Late post-treatment radiographic changes 3 years following chemoradiation for glioma: the importance of histopathology

Undetected pseudoprogressions in the CeTeG/NOA-09 trial: hints from postprogression survival and MRI analyses

PURPOSE

In the randomized CeTeG/NOA-09 trial, lomustine/temozolomide (CCNU/TMZ) was superior to TMZ therapy regarding overall survival (OS) in MGMT promotor-methylated glioblastoma. Progression-free survival (PFS) and pseudoprogression rates (about 10%) were similar in both arms. Further evaluating this discrepancy, we analyzed patterns of postprogression survival (PPS) and MRI features at first progression according to modified RANO criteria (mRANO).

METHODS

We classified the patients of the CeTeG/NOA-09 trial according to long vs. short PPS employing a cut-off of 18 months and compared baseline characteristics and survival times. In patients with available MRIs and confirmed progression, the increase in T1-enhancing, FLAIR hyperintense lesion volume and the change in ADC mean value of contrast-enhancing tumor upon progression were determined.

RESULTS

Patients with long PPS in the CCNU/TMZ arm had a particularly short PFS (5.6 months). PFS in this subgroup was shorter than in the long PPS subgroup of the TMZ arm (11.1 months, p = 0.01). At mRANO-defined progression, patients of the CCNU/TMZ long PPS subgroup had a significantly higher increase of mean ADC values (p = 0.015) and a tendency to a stronger volumetric increase in T1-enhancement (p = 0.22) as compared to long PPS patients of the TMZ arm.

CONCLUSION

The combination of survival and MRI analyses identified a subgroup of CCNU/TMZ-treated patients with features that sets them apart from other patients in the trial: short first PFS despite long PPS and significant increase in mean ADC values upon mRANO-defined progression. The observed pattern is compatible with the features commonly observed in pseudoprogression suggesting mRANO-undetected pseudoprogressions in the CCNU/TMZ arm of CeTeG/NOA-09.

Dynamic Susceptibility Perfusion Imaging for Differentiating Progressive Disease from Pseudoprogression in Diffuse Glioma Molecular Subtypes

Rationale and Objectives: Advanced adjuvant therapy of diffuse gliomas can result in equivocal findings in follow-up imaging. We aimed to assess the additional value of dynamic susceptibility perfusion imaging in the differentiation of progressive disease (PD) from pseudoprogression (PsP) in different molecular glioma subtypes. Materials and Methods: 89 patients with treated diffuse glioma with different molecular subtypes (IDH wild type (Astro-IDH^wt), IDH mutant astrocytomas (Astro-IDH^mut) and oligodendrogliomas), and tumor-suspect lesions on post-treatment follow-up imaging were classified into two outcome groups (PD or PsP) retrospectively by histopathology or clinical follow-up. The relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) was assessed in the tumor-suspect FLAIR and contrast-enhancing (CE) lesions. We analyzed how a multilevel classification using a molecular subtype, the presence of a CE lesion, and two rCBV histogram parameters performed for PD prediction compared with a decision tree model (DTM) using additional rCBV parameters. Results: The PD rate was 69% in the whole cohort, 86% in Astro-IDH^wt, 52% in Astro-IDH^mut, and 55% in oligodendrogliomas. In the presence of a CE lesion, the PD rate was higher with 82%, 94%, 59%, and 88%, respectively; if there was no CE lesion, however, the PD rate was only 44%, 60%, 40%, and 33%, respectively. The additional use of the rCBV parameters in the DTM yielded a prediction accuracy for PD of 99%, 100%, 93%, and 95%, respectively. Conclusion: Utilizing combined information about the molecular tumor type, the presence or absence of CE lesions and rCBV parameters increases PD prediction accuracy in diffuse glioma.

The consistency of neuropathological diagnoses in patients undergoing surgery for suspected recurrence of glioblastoma

Purpose

Clinical factors and neuro-imaging in patients with glioblastoma who appear to progress following standard chemoradiation are unable to reliably distinguish tumor progression from pseudo-progression. As a result, surgery is commonly recommended to establish a final diagnosis. However, studies evaluating the pathologists’ agreement on pathologic diagnoses in this setting have not been previously evaluated.

Methods

A hypothetical clinical history coupled with images of histological sections from 13 patients with glioblastoma who underwent diagnostic surgery for suspected early recurrence were sent to 101 pathologists from 50 NCI-designated Cancer Centers. Pathologists were asked to provide a final diagnosis (active tumor, treatment effect, or unable to classify) and to report on percent active tumor, treatment effect, and degree of cellularity and degree of mitotic activity.

Results

Forty-eight pathologists (48%) from 30 centers responded. In three cases > 75% of pathologists diagnosed active tumor. In two cases > 75% diagnosed treatment effect. However, in the remaining eight cases the disparity in diagnoses was striking (maximum agreement on final diagnosis ranged from 36 to 68%). Overall, only marginal agreement was observed in the overall assessment of disease status [kappa score 0.228 (95% CI 0.22–0.24)].

Conclusions

Confidence in any clinical diagnostic assay requires that very similar results are obtained from identical specimens evaluated by sophisticated clinicians and institutions. The findings of this study illustrate that the diagnostic agreement between different cases of repeat resection for suspected recurrent glioblastoma can be variable. This raises concerns as pathological diagnoses are critical in directing standard and experimental care in this setting.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s11060-018-03037-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.