Identifying the optimal cutoff point for MGMT promoter methylation status in glioblastoma

Revisiting Temozolomide's role in solid tumors: Old is gold?

Temozolomide is an imidazotetrazine with a long history in oncology especially for the high grade malignant glioma and metastatic melanoma. However, last year's new indications for its use are added. Its optimum pharmacodynamic profile, its ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier, the existence of methylation of MGMT in solid tumors which enhances its efficacy, the identification of new agents that can overcome temozolomide's resistance, the promising role of temozolomide in turning immune cold tumors to hot ones, are leading to expand its use in other solid tumors, giving oncologists an additional tool for the treatment of advanced and aggressive neoplasms.

Analysis of gliomas DNA methylation: Assessment of pre-analytical variables

Precision oncology is driven by molecular biomarkers. For glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), the most common malignant adult primary brain tumor, O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase ( MGMT ) gene DNA promoter methylation is an important prognostic and treatment clinical biomarker. Time consuming pre-analytical steps such as biospecimen storage before fixing, sampling, and processing are major sources of errors and batch effects, that are further confounded by intra-tumor heterogeneity of MGMT promoter methylation. To assess the effect of pre-analytical variables on GBM DNA methylation, tissue storage/sampling (CryoGrid), sample preparation multi-sonicator (PIXUL) and 5-methylcytosine (5mC) DNA immunoprecipitation (Matrix MeDIP-qPCR/seq) platforms were used. MGMT promoter CpG methylation was examined in 173 surgical samples from 90 individuals, 50 of these were used for intra-tumor heterogeneity studies. MGMT promoter methylation levels in paired frozen and formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) samples were very close, confirming suitability of FFPE for MGMT promoter methylation analysis in clinical settings. Matrix MeDIP-qPCR yielded similar results to methylation specific PCR (MS-PCR). Warm ex-vivo ischemia (37°C up to 4hrs) and 3 cycles of repeated sample thawing and freezing did not alter 5mC levels at MGMT promoter, exon and upstream enhancer regions, demonstrating the resistance of DNA methylation to the most common variations in sample processing conditions that might be encountered in research and clinical settings. 20-30% of specimens exhibited intratumor heterogeneity in the MGMT DNA promoter methylation. Collectively these data demonstrate that variations in sample fixation, ischemia duration and temperature, and DNA methylation assay technique do not have significant impact on assessment of MGMT promoter methylation status. However, intratumor methylation heterogeneity underscores the need for histologic verification and value of multiple biopsies at different GBM geographic tumor sites in assessment of MGMT promoter methylation. Matrix-MeDIP-seq analysis revealed that MGMT promoter methylation status clustered with other differentially methylated genomic loci (e.g. HOXA and lncRNAs), that are likewise resilient to variation in above post-resection pre-analytical conditions. These MGMT -associated global DNA methylation patterns offer new opportunities to validate more granular data-based epigenetic GBM clinical biomarkers where the CryoGrid-PIXUL-Matrix toolbox could prove to be useful.

Advances in Diagnostic Tools and Therapeutic Approaches for Gliomas: A Comprehensive Review

Gliomas, a prevalent category of primary malignant brain tumors, pose formidable clinical challenges due to their invasive nature and limited treatment options. The current therapeutic landscape for gliomas is constrained by a "one-size-fits-all" paradigm, significantly restricting treatment efficacy. Despite the implementation of multimodal therapeutic strategies, survival rates remain disheartening. The conventional treatment approach, involving surgical resection, radiation, and chemotherapy, grapples with substantial limitations, particularly in addressing the invasive nature of gliomas. Conventional diagnostic tools, including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET), play pivotal roles in outlining tumor characteristics. However, they face limitations, such as poor biological specificity and challenges in distinguishing active tumor regions. The ongoing development of diagnostic tools and therapeutic approaches represents a multifaceted and promising frontier in the battle against this challenging brain tumor. The aim of this comprehensive review is to address recent advances in diagnostic tools and therapeutic approaches for gliomas. These innovations aim to minimize invasiveness while enabling the precise, multimodal targeting of localized gliomas. Researchers are actively developing new diagnostic tools, such as colorimetric techniques, electrochemical biosensors, optical coherence tomography, reflectometric interference spectroscopy, surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy, and optical biosensors. These tools aim to regulate tumor progression and develop precise treatment methods for gliomas. Recent technological advancements, coupled with bioelectronic sensors, open avenues for new therapeutic modalities, minimizing invasiveness and enabling multimodal targeting with unprecedented precision. The next generation of multimodal therapeutic strategies holds potential for precision medicine, aiding the early detection and effective management of solid brain tumors. These innovations offer promise in adopting precision medicine methodologies, enabling early disease detection, and improving solid brain tumor management. This review comprehensively recognizes the critical role of pioneering therapeutic interventions, holding significant potential to revolutionize brain tumor therapeutics.

Significance of O6-methyl guanine methyltransferase promoter methylation in high grade glioma patients: optimal cutoff point, CpG locus, and genetic assay

PURPOSE

To evaluate O6-methyl guanine methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status in high grade glioma patients and to identify the best cutoff point as well as the most predictive CpG loci for patients survival.

METHOD

Consecutive high grade glioma patients treated with surgical gross total resection followed by concomitant radiochemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy were included in this retrospective observational study. Methylation status of MGMT promoter CpG island of resected tumor tissue were evaluated using next generation sequencing assay. The outcomes were grouped as CpG 70-78, CpG 79-83, CpG 84-87, CpG 70-87, and whole promoter. Quantitative analyses were dichotomized as methylated or unmethylated based on the cutoff points set to %10, and methylation was further graded as <%10 unmethylated, %10-30 low-methylated, and %30-100 high-methylated.

RESULTS

Total of 95 patients with the mean age of 51.50 ± 12.36 years were included in the study. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were 14.53 ± 1.92 (95% CI 10.77-18.30) and 10.90 ± 2.05 (95% CI 6.89-14.92) months, respectively. MGMT promoter was methylated in 38.2% of cases and high-methylated in 10.5% of cases. Methylation status of MGMT promoter was recognized as a very powerful predictor of OS and PFS. In particular, high-methylation of CpG 79-83 and CpG 84-87 islands at promoter region were strongly associated with better survival outcomes (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our outcomes support the prognostic value of MGMT promoter methylation in patients with high grade glioma. Sequencing of whole promoter CpG islands demonstrated that methylation of particular CpG sites might predict clinical outcomes more precisely.

Molecular Biomarkers and Recent Liquid Biopsy Testing Progress: A Review of the Application of Biosensors for the Diagnosis of Gliomas

Gliomas are the most common primary central nervous system tumors, with a high mortality rate. Early and accurate diagnosis of gliomas is critical for successful treatment. Biosensors are significant in the detection of molecular biomarkers because they are simple to use, portable, and capable of real-time analysis. This review discusses several important molecular biomarkers as well as various biosensors designed for glioma diagnosis, such as electrochemical biosensors and optical biosensors. We present our perspectives on the existing challenges and hope that this review can promote the improvement of biosensors.

MGMT Promoter Methylation: Prognostication beyond Treatment Response

MGMT promoter methylation is related to the increased sensitivity of tumour tissue to chemotherapy with temozolomide (TMZ) and thus to improved patient survival. However, it is unclear how the extent of MGMT promoter methylation affects outcomes. In our study, a single-centre retrospective study, we explore the impact of MGMT promoter methylation in patients with glioblastoma who were operated upon with 5-ALA. Demographic, clinical and histology data, and survival rates were assessed. A total of 69 patients formed the study group (mean age 53.75 ± 15.51 years old). Positive 5-ALA fluorescence was noted in 79.41%. A higher percentage of MGMT promoter methylation was related to lower preoperative tumour volume (p = 0.003), a lower likelihood of 5-ALA positive fluorescence (p = 0.041) and a larger extent of resection EoR (p = 0.041). A higher MGMT promoter methylation rate was also related to improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.008 and p = 0.006, respectively), even when adjusted for the extent of resection (p = 0.034 and p = 0.042, respectively). A higher number of adjuvant chemotherapy cycles was also related to longer PFS and OS (p = 0.049 and p = 0.030, respectively). Therefore, this study suggests MGMT promoter methylation should be considered as a continuous variable. It is a prognostic factor that goes beyond sensitivity to chemotherapy treatment, as a higher percentage of methylation is related not only to increased EoR and increased PFS and OS, but also to lower tumour volume at presentation and a lower likelihood of 5-ALA fluorescence intraoperatively.

Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) increase the effectiveness of temozolomide and lomustine in glioblastoma cell lines

PURPOSE

Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are electric fields that disrupt cellular processes critical for cancer cell viability and tumor progression, ultimately leading to cell death. TTFields therapy is approved for treatment of newly-diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) concurrent with maintenance temozolomide (TMZ). Recently, the benefit of TMZ in combination with lomustine (CCNU) was demonstrated in patients with O⁶-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation. The addition of adjuvant TTFields to TMZ plus CCNU further improved patient outcomes, leading to a CE mark for this regimen. The current in vitro study aimed to elucidate the mechanism underlying the benefit of this treatment protocol.

METHODS

Human GBM cell lines with different MGMT promoter methylation statuses were treated with TTFields, TMZ, and CCNU, and effectiveness was tested by cell count, apoptosis, colony formation, and DNA damage measurements. Expression levels of relevant DNA-repair proteins were examined by western blot analysis.

RESULTS

TTFields concomitant with TMZ displayed an additive effect, irrespective of MGMT expression levels. TTFields concomitant with CCNU or with CCNU plus TMZ was additive in MGMT-expressing cells and synergistic in MGMT-non-expressing cells. TTFields downregulated the FA-BRCA pathway and increased DNA damage induced by the chemotherapy combination.

CONCLUSIONS

The results support the clinical benefit demonstrated for TTFields concomitant with TMZ plus CCNU. Since the FA-BRCA pathway is required for repair of DNA cross-links induced by CCNU in the absence of MGMT, the synergy demonstrated in MGMT promoter methylated cells when TTFields and CCNU were co-applied may be attributed to the BRCAness state induced by TTFields.

Methylation Profiling in Diffuse Gliomas: Diagnostic Value and Considerations

Diffuse gliomas cause significant morbidity across all age groups, despite decades of intensive research efforts. Here, we review the differences in diffuse gliomas in adults and children, as well as the World Health Organisation (WHO) 2021 classification of these tumours. We explain how DNA methylation-based classification works and list the methylation-based tumour types and subclasses for adult and paediatric diffuse gliomas. The benefits and utility of methylation-based classification in diffuse gliomas demonstrated to date are described. This entails the identification of novel tumour types/subclasses, patient stratification and targeted treatment/clinical management, and alterations in the clinical diagnosis in favour of the methylation-based over the histopathological diagnosis. Finally, we address several considerations regarding the use of DNA methylation profiling as a diagnostic tool, e.g., the threshold of the classifier, the calibrated score, tumour cell content and intratumour heterogeneity.

Quantitative Analysis of the MGMT Methylation Status of Glioblastomas in Light of the 2021 WHO Classification

Background: Glioblastomas with methylation of the promoter region of the O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene exhibit increased sensitivity to alkylating chemotherapy. Quantitative assessment of the MGMT promoter methylation status might provide additional prognostic information. The aim of our study was to determine a quantitative methylation threshold for better survival among patients with glioblastomas. Methods: We included consecutive patients ≥18 years treated at our department between 11/2010 and 08/2018 for a glioblastoma, IDH wildtype, undergoing quantitative MGMT promoter methylation analysis. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Results: A total of 321 patients were included. Median overall survival was 12.6 months. Kaplan−Meier and adjusted Cox regression analysis showed better survival for the groups with 16−30%, 31−60%, and 61−100% methylation. In contrast, survival in the group with 1−15% methylation was similar to those with unmethylated promoter regions. A secondary analysis confirmed this threshold. Conclusions: Better survival is observed in patients with glioblastomas with ≥16% methylation of the MGMT promoter region than with <16% methylation. Survival with tumors with 1−15% methylation is similar to with unmethylated tumors. Above 16% methylation, we found no additional benefit with increasing methylation.

Definition of the Prognostic Role of MGMT Promoter Methylation Value by Pyrosequencing in Newly Diagnosed IDH Wild-Type Glioblastoma Patients Treated with Radiochemotherapy: A Large Multicenter Study

Background. O6-methylguanine (O6-MeG)-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation status is a predictive factor for alkylating treatment efficacy in glioblastoma patients, but its prognostic role is still unclear. We performed a large, multicenter study to evaluate the association between MGMT methylation value and survival. Methods. We evaluated glioblastoma patients with an assessment of MGMT methylation status by pyrosequencing from nine Italian centers. The inclusion criteria were histological diagnosis of IDH wild-type glioblastoma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) ≤2, and radio-chemotherapy treatment with temozolomide. The relationship between OS and MGMT was investigated with a time-dependent Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve and Cox regression models. Results. In total, 591 newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients were analyzed. The median OS was 16.2 months. The ROC analysis suggested a cut-off of 15% for MGMT methylation. The 2-year Overall Survival (OS) was 18.3% and 51.8% for MGMT methylation <15% and ≥15% (p < 0.0001). In the multivariable analysis, MGMT methylation <15% was associated with impaired survival (p < 0.00001). However, we also found a non-linear association between MGMT methylation and OS (p = 0.002): median OS was 14.8 months for MGMT in 0−4%, 18.9 months for MGMT in 4−40%, and 29.9 months for MGMT in 40−100%. Conclusions. Our findings suggested a non-linear relationship between OS and MGMT promoter methylation, which implies a varying magnitude of prognostic effect across values of MGMT promoter methylation by pyrosequencing in newly diagnosed IDH wild-type glioblastoma patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.