Update on management of vertebral column tumors

Management of metastatic bone disease of melanoma

One of the most aggressive tumors arising from the skin, mucosa, and uvea is malignant melanoma, which easily metastasizes. Bone tissue is one of the most typical locations for distant metastasis, and around 5%-20% of patients eventually acquired skeletal metastases. For decades, the incidence of bone metastases was higher, bringing greater burden on the family, society, and healthcare system owing to the progress of targeted therapy and immunotherapy, which prolonging the survival time substantially. Moreover, bone metastases result in skeletal-related events, which influence the quality of life, obviously. Appropriate intervention is therefore crucial. To obtain the optimum cost-effectiveness, existing treatment algorithm must be integrated, which is still controversial. We have aimed to throw light on current views concerning the formation, biological and clinical features, and treatment protocol of melanoma bone metastases to guide the decision-making process.

Anterior spinal separation surgery to allow for stereotactic body radiotherapy: a novel approach permitting radical oncological treatment of oligometastatic disease

The treatment of spinal cancers has rapidly evolved in the past decade. Often the treatment for spinal metastases required highly morbid surgeries and with palliative outcomes. However, a paradigm shift in surgical oncology has allowed spinal metastases treatment to have curative results. In the state of oligometastatic disease (OMD), the accompaniment of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) as a primary modality or adjuvant treatment to surgery has been shown to excellent survival outcomes, lower morbidities and better pain management. This case report illustrates a novel approach to the treatment of spinal OMD utilizing anterior spinal separation surgery with a custom carbon fibre vertebral body replacement cage followed by postoperative SBRT with excellent radio-oncological outcomes over 30-month follow-up.

Diagnostic Accuracy of CT for Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression

Background: Early diagnosis of metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) is vital to expedite therapy and prevent paralysis. Staging CT is performed routinely in cancer patients and presents an opportunity for earlier diagnosis. Methods: This retrospective study included 123 CT scans from 101 patients who underwent spine MRI within 30 days, excluding 549 CT scans from 216 patients due to CT performed post-MRI, non-contrast CT, or a gap greater than 30 days between modalities. Reference standard MESCC gradings on CT were provided in consensus via two spine radiologists (11 and 7 years of experience) analyzing the MRI scans. CT scans were labeled using the original reports and by three radiologists (3, 13, and 14 years of experience) using dedicated CT windowing. Results: For normal/none versus low/high-grade MESCC per CT scan, all radiologists demonstrated almost perfect agreement with kappa values ranging from 0.866 (95% CI 0.787–0.945) to 0.947 (95% CI 0.899–0.995), compared to slight agreement for the reports (kappa = 0.095, 95%CI −0.098–0.287). Radiologists also showed high sensitivities ranging from 91.51 (95% CI 84.49–96.04) to 98.11 (95% CI 93.35–99.77), compared to 44.34 (95% CI 34.69–54.31) for the reports. Conclusion: Dedicated radiologist review for MESCC on CT showed high interobserver agreement and sensitivity compared to the current standard of care.

Hybrid Therapy Versus Total En Bloc Spondyectomy in the Treatment of Solitary Radioresistant Spinal Metastases: A Single-center, Retrospective Study

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the treatment efficacy of hybrid therapy (HT) with that of total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) in patients with solitary radioresistant high-grade epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC) spinal metastases.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Both HT and TES can yield good results for solitary radioresistant metastatic spinal tumors with high-grade ESCC. However, there is still a lack of comparative studies on the treatment efficacy of these 2 methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with the above-mentioned tumors between January 2012 and May 2019. A total of 157 patients underwent surgery, 64 of whom received HT and 93 were treated with TES. Propensity score matching (1:1 ratio) allowed the generation of best-matched pairs for the 2 categories. Local control rates and survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

All patients had a minimum 2-year follow-up. The longest follow-up period was 88 months. The survival rates and local progression-free survival rates after HT were comparable with those after TES at 1 year (84.6% vs. 83.1% and 90.2% vs. 90%, respectively), 2 years (60.8% vs. 64.3% and 64.1% vs. 62.1%, respectively), and 5 years (18.8% vs. 24.1% and 24.4% vs. 28.4%, respectively). There were no significant differences in pain control, improvement in neurological status, spine stabilization restoration, incidence of perioperative complications, and improvement in quality of life between the groups. However, HT showed more advantages than TES in that it had a shorter operative time and lower intraoperative blood loss.

CONCLUSIONS

HT can obtain satisfactory results comparable to TES for solitary radioresistant metastatic spinal tumors with high-grade ESCC. In addition, HT has a shorter operative time and fewer perioperative complications than TES. HT may be a promising treatment for solitary radioresistant metastatic spinal tumors with high-grade ESCC.

Hybrid Therapy for Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression: Technique for Separation Surgery and Spine Radiosurgery

BACKGROUND

Despite major advances in radiation and systemic treatments, surgery remains a critical step in the multidisciplinary treatment of metastatic spinal cord tumors.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the indications, rationale, and technique of "hybrid therapy" (separation surgery and concomitant spine stereotactic radiosurgery [SRS]) along with practical nuances.

METHODS

Separation surgery describes a posterolateral approach for circumferential epidural decompression and stabilization. The goal is to decompress the spinal cord, stabilize the spine, and create adequate separation between the neural elements and the tumor for SRS to achieve durable tumor control.

RESULTS

A transpedicular route to achieve ventrolateral access and limited resection of the tumorous vertebral body is carried out. In the setting of high-grade cord compression, caution must be taken when performing the tumor decompression. "Separation" of the ventral epidural tumor component anteriorly creates space for concomitant SRS while a simple laminectomy would not adequately achieve this goal. Dissection of the posterior longitudinal ligament allows maximal ventral decompression. Gross total tumor resection is not crucial for durable tumor control using the "hybrid therapy" model. Thus, attempts at ventral tumor resection may unnecessarily increase operative morbidity. Cement augmentation of the construct or vertebral body may improve construct stability. CT myelogram is the preferred exam for postoperative SRS planning. Radiosurgical planning constitutes a multidisciplinary effort and guidelines for contouring in the postoperative setting have recently become available.

CONCLUSION

Separation surgery is an effective, well-tolerated, and reproducible surgery. It provides safe margins for concomitant SRS. Combined, this "Hybrid Therapy" allows durable local control, maintenance of spinal stability, and palliation of symptoms, while minimizing operative morbidity.

State of the Art Treatment of Spinal Metastatic Disease

Treatment paradigms for patients with spine metastases have evolved significantly over the past decade. Incorporating stereotactic radiosurgery into these paradigms has been particularly transformative, offering precise delivery of tumoricidal radiation doses with sparing of adjacent tissues. Evidence supports the safety and efficacy of radiosurgery as it currently offers durable local tumor control with low complication rates even for tumors previously considered radioresistant to conventional radiation. The role for surgical intervention remains consistent, but a trend has been observed toward less aggressive, often minimally invasive, techniques. Using modern technologies and improved instrumentation, surgical outcomes continue to improve with reduced morbidity. Additionally, targeted agents such as biologics and checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer care, improving both local control and patient survivals. These advances have brought forth a need for new prognostication tools and a more critical review of long-term outcomes. The complex nature of current treatment schemes necessitates a multidisciplinary approach including surgeons, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, interventionalists, and pain specialists. This review recapitulates the current state-of-the-art, evidence-based data on the treatment of spinal metastases, integrating these data into a decision framework, NOMS, which integrates the 4 sentinel decision points in metastatic spine tumors: Neurologic, Oncologic, Mechanical stability, and Systemic disease and medical co-morbidities.

Composite PEEK/Carbon fiber implants can increase the effectiveness of radiotherapy in the management of spine tumors

BACKGROUND

Combination of surgery and radiotherapy in the treatment of primary spine tumour can be indicated in some cases where a satisfactory oncological margin cannot be achieved. The presence of metal hardware has always limited post-operative radiotherapy due to the scattering effects of ionizing radiation or particles. The use of a fixation system (including rods and screw) fully made in PEEK embedded Carbon fiber (CFR-PEEK) could make easier and more effective the post-operative radiotherapy as it is radiolucent and does not interfere with ionizing radiation and accelerated particles.

METHODS

An ambispective study was performed on the first 22 consecutive primary tumor patients, who underwent spinal surgery including a composite CFR-PEEK fixation system. Oncologic surgery was palliative decompression and fixation in 3 cases; tumor excision in 15; en bloc resection in 4. The incidence of complications (intra- and postoperative), local control (LC) and local recurrence (LR), and changes in neurological status were considered.

RESULTS

Only one intraoperative screw breakage occurred and one case of loosening of sacral screws were found at 12 months in one patient. No rod breakage, neither any screw/rod disconnection was found. Post-operative RT has been performed in 19 patients. The overall number of progression of the tumour or LR was 7. The actuarial rate of LR or progression of the tumour, calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method, was 17.6% at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The CFR-PEEK fixation system is comparable to standard titanium system in term of intraoperative complications, stability at weight bearing and at functional recovery. Thanks to radiolucency CFR-PEEK stabilization devices are more suitable in patients eligible for RT: the absence of image artifacts together with significantly less dose perturbation improve the treatment accuracy. Moreover the radiolucency is useful in the follow-up of patients thus allowing early detection of LR.

Cost Variation Within Spinal Fusion Payment Groups

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective, large administrative database.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate cost variation within current spinal fusion diagnosis-related groups (DRGs).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Medicare reimbursement to hospitals for spinal fusion surgery is provided as a fixed payment for each admission based on DRG. This assumes that patients can be grouped into homogenous units of resource use such that a single payment will cover the costs of hospitalization for most patients within a given DRG. However, major differences in costs exist for different methods of spinal fusion surgery. A previous study in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) showed that variation within DRGs can lead to differences between hospital costs and Medicare reimbursement, resulting in predictable financial losses to hospitals and hindering access to care for some patients. No study to our knowledge has investigated cost variation within current spinal fusion DRGs.

METHODS

Direct hospital costs were obtained from the 2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) for patients in spinal fusion DRGs 453-460 and TJA DRGs 466-470. Our primary outcome was the coefficient of variation (CV), defined as the ratio of the standard deviation (SD) to the mean (CV = SD/mean × 100), for all costs within a given DRG. CVs were compared to an established TJA benchmark for within-DRG cost variation.

RESULTS

CVs for costs within spinal fusion DRGs ranged from 44.16 to 52.6 and were significantly higher than the CV of 38.2 found in the TJA benchmark group (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

As in TJA, the cost variation observed within spinal fusion DRGs in this study may be leading to differences between costs and reimbursement that places undue financial burden on some hospitals and potentially compromises access to care for some patients. Future studies should seek to identify drivers of cost variation to determine whether changes can be made to further homogenize current payment groups and ensure equal access for all patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.