Anaplastic gliomas: end-of-life care recommendations

Why is advance care planning underused in oncology settings? A systematic overview of reviews to identify the benefits, barriers, enablers, and interventions to improve uptake

Background

Advance care planning (ACP) centres on supporting people to define and discuss their individual goals and preferences for future medical care, and to record and review these as appropriate. Despite recommendations from guidelines, rates of documentation for people with cancer are considerably low.

Aim

To systematically clarify and consolidate the evidence base of ACP in cancer care by exploring how it is defined; identifying benefits, and known barriers and enablers across patient, clinical and healthcare services levels; as well as interventions that improve advance care planning and are their effectiveness.

Methods

A systematic overview of reviews was conducted and was prospectively registered on PROSPERO. PubMed, Medline, PsycInfo, CINAHL, and EMBASE were searched for review related to ACP in cancer. Content analysis and narrative synthesis were used for data analysis. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was used to code barriers and enablers of ACP as well as the implied barriers targeted by each of the interventions.

Results

Eighteen reviews met the inclusion criteria. Definitions were inconsistent across reviews that defined ACP (n=16). Proposed benefits identified in 15/18 reviews were rarely empirically supported. Interventions reported in seven reviews tended to target the patient, even though more barriers were associated with healthcare providers (n=40 versus n=60, respectively).

Conclusion

To improve ACP uptake in oncology settings; the definition should include key categories that clarify the utility and benefits. Interventions need to target healthcare providers and empirically identified barriers to be most effective in improving uptake.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?, identifier CRD42021288825.

Would they do it again? Final treatment decisions in malignant brain tumour patients—a caregiver’s perspective

Purpose

Overall survival of malignant brain tumour patients has significantly been increased over the last years. However, therapy remains palliative, and side effects should be balanced. Once terminal phase is entered, both patients and caregivers may find it hard to accept, and further therapies are demanded. But little is known about this highly sensitive period. Therefore, we analysed the last therapy decisions from the family caregiver’s perspective. Would they support their beloved ones in the same way or would they now recommend a different therapy decision?

Methods

Caregivers of deceased malignant brain tumour patients, treated at our neurooncological centre between 2011 and 2017, were included. We designed a questionnaire to analyse the impact of the last therapy decision (resection, chemotherapy, radiotherapy), focusing on probable repeat of the choice taken and general therapy satisfaction. Independent variables, for example “satisfaction with therapy”, were analysed using linear regression analysis, the coefficient of determination R2 and the standardized regression coefficient β. The binary logistic regression analyses were taken to illustrate relationships with the dichotomously scaled outcome parameter “re-choice of therapy”. Odds ratio analyses were used to determine the strength of a relationship between two characteristics.

Results

Data from 102 caregivers (life partners (70.6%)) were analysed retrospectively. Each 40% of patients died in a hospice or at home (20% in a hospital). In 67.6% the last therapy was chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy (16.7%) and surgery (15.7%). A positive evaluation of the last therapy was significantly correlated to re-choosing of respective therapy (chemo-/radiotherapy: p = 0.000) and satisfaction with informed consent (p = 0.000). Satisfaction regarding interpersonal contact was significantly correlated to satisfaction with resection (p = 0.000) and chemotherapy (p = 0.000 27 caregivers (28.7%) felt overburdened with this situation).

Conclusion

This analysis demonstrates a significant correlation between a positive relation of patient/caregiver/physician and the subjective perception of the latest therapy. It underlines the central role of caregivers, who should be involved in therapy discussions. Neurooncologists should be specially trained in communication and psycho-oncology.

Seizures, Edema, Thrombosis, and Hemorrhages: An Update Review on the Medical Management of Gliomas

Patients affected with gliomas develop a complex set of clinical manifestations that deeply impact on quality of life and overall survival. Brain tumor-related epilepsy is frequently the first manifestation of gliomas or may occur during the course of disease; the underlying mechanisms have not been fully explained and depend on both patient and tumor factors. Novel treatment options derive from the growing use of third-generation antiepileptic drugs. Vasogenic edema and elevated intracranial pressure cause a considerable burden of symptoms, especially in high-grade glioma, requiring an adequate use of corticosteroids. Patients with gliomas present with an elevated risk of tumor-associated venous thromboembolism whose prophylaxis and treatment are challenging, considering also the availability of new oral anticoagulant drugs. Moreover, intracerebral hemorrhages can complicate the course of the illness both due to tumor-specific characteristics, patient comorbidities, and side effects of antithrombotic and antitumoral therapies. This paper aims to review recent advances in these clinical issues, discussing the medical management of gliomas through an updated literature review.

A descriptive analysis of end-of-life discussions for high-grade glioma patients

Background

End-of-life discussions (EOLDs) in patients with high-grade glioma (HGG) have not been well described. Therefore, this study examined the appropriateness of timing and the extent of patient involvement in EOLDs and their impact on HGG patients.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 105 bereaved families of HGG patients at a university hospital in Japan between July and August 2019. Fisher's exact test and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used to assess the association between patient participation in EOLDs and their outcomes.

Results

In total, 77 questionnaires were returned (response rate 73%), of which 20 respondents replied with refusal documents. Overall, 31/57 (54%) participated in EOLDs at least once in acute hospital settings, and a significant difference was observed between participating and nonparticipating groups in communicating the patient's wishes for EOL care to the family (48% vs 8%, P = .001). Moreover, >80% of respondents indicated that the initiation of EOLDs during the early diagnosis period with patients and families was appropriate. Most EOLDs were provided by neurosurgeons (96%), and other health care providers rarely participated. Additionally, patient goals and priorities were discussed in only 28% of the EOLDs. Patient participation in EOLDs was not associated with the quality of EOL care and a good death.

Conclusions

Although participation in EOLDs is relatively challenging for HGG patients, this study showed that participation in EOLDs may enable patients to express their wishes regarding EOL care. It is important to initiate EOLDs early on through an interdisciplinary team approach while respecting patient goals and priorities.

Palliative care in glioma management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The concept of palliative care is becoming increasingly important in the management of glioma patients. However, the right time for implementation, as well as the individual degree of integration of palliative care aspects, are still a matter of debate. This review updates recent evidence of palliative care in glioma and raises questions for future developments.

RECENT FINDINGS

According to the disease-specific aspects of palliative care in glioma management, there is an increasing need for a specialized 'neurooncological' palliative care approach.The implementation of palliative care for glioma patients and caregivers avoids unnecessary hospitalization and reduces health-related costs. Moreover, palliative care may be offered in different settings (inpatient/outpatient) according to local health structures, but definitely improves the QOL of glioma patients and their caregivers.

SUMMARY

There are considerable differences between countries with respect to palliative care in glioma. Major aspects of good-quality care throughout the countries are optimized symptom control, support for patients and proxies by an interdisciplinary team and to provide realistic information to patients and caregivers. The availability of neurooncological palliative teams and multidisciplinary support programs increases well being of glioma patients and caregivers as well as releases pressure on healthcare systems.

End-of-Life Care for Patients with Glioma

OBJECTIVE

To describe best practices and guidelines in symptom management at the end of life for adults with malignant glioma.

DATA SOURCES

Journal articles, evidence-based reviews, textbooks, and clinical guidelines.

CONCLUSION

Symptom management is an essential element of end-of-life care that aims to preserve dignity and quality of life for patients with glioma and their family caregivers.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Advance care planning using a holistic approach to the patient's symptoms experience and goals of care are necessary to develop, implement, and evaluate outcomes of an evidence-based plan of care tailored for each patient and family.

End-of-Life Care in High-Grade Glioma Patients. The Palliative and Supportive Perspective

High-grade gliomas (HGGs) are the most frequently diagnosed primary brain tumors. Even though it has been demonstrated that combined surgical therapy, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy improve survival, HGGs still harbor a very poor prognosis and limited overall survival. Differently from other types of primary neoplasm, HGG manifests also as a neurological disease. According to this, palliative care of HGG patients represents a peculiar challenge for healthcare providers and caregivers since it has to be directed to both general and neurological cancer symptoms. In this way, the end-of-life (EOL) phase of HGG patients appears to be like a journey through medical issues, progressive neurological deterioration, and psychological, social, and affective concerns. EOL is intended as the time prior to death when symptoms increase and antitumoral therapy is no longer effective. In this phase, palliative care is intended as an integrated support aimed to reduce the symptoms burden and improve the Quality Of Life (QOL). Palliative care is represented by medical, physical, psychological, spiritual, and social interventions which are primarily aimed to sustain patients’ functions during the disease time, while maintaining an acceptable quality of life and ensuring a dignified death. Since HGGs represent also a family concern, due to the profound emotional and relational issues that the progression of the disease poses, palliative care may also relieve the distress of the caregivers and increase the satisfaction of patients’ relatives. We present the results of a literature review addressed to enlighten and classify the best medical, psychological, rehabilitative, and social interventions that are addressed both to patients and to their caregivers, which are currently adopted as palliative care during the EOL phase of HGG patients in order to orientate the best medical practice in HGG management.