A combination of methylation and protein markers is capable of detecting gastric cancer detection by combined markers

A study of the clinical significance of mSEPT9 in monitoring recurrence and prognosis in patients with surgically treated colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To explore the medical significance of methylated septin9 (mSEPT9) in monitoring recurrence and prognostic assessment in individuals with surgically treated colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

To investigate the role of Septin9 in colorectal cancer, we utilized the TIMER2.0 database to analyze its differential expression between tumor tissues and adjacent normal tissues. Colorectal cancer RNA-seq data from the TCGA database was downloaded and curated. The clinical relevance of mSEPT9 in colorectal cancer was explored by examining the correlation between Septin9 methylation levels and clinical characteristics using UALCAN and MethSurv software. Peripheral blood samples were obtained from 130 CRC subjects who underwent surgery for the detection of mSEPT9 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) expression, along with collection of clinicopathological data such as age, gender, tumor site, TNM stage, and tumor differentiation. Patients were followed up for at least 3 years post-surgery until the death or final follow-up dates (31/12/2022). Additionally, peripheral blood samples were collected from 30 colorectal cancer surgery patients for mSEPT9 detection before and 7 days after surgery.

RESULTS

Through bioinformatic database analysis, we identified higher expression levels of SEPT9 mRNA in most tumor tissues compared to normal tissues. Similarly, both paired and unpaired CRC tissues exhibited elevated expression of Septin9 when compared to normal tissues. Following GO and KEGG analysis of Septin9 target genes, we discovered their significant associations with ncRNA metabolic processes, ribonucleoprotein complex biogenesis, spliceosomes, and viral carcinogenesis. Furthermore, the overexpression of mSeptin9 was observed in CRC tissues, and it demonstrated a correlation with colon cancer staging and histologic classification. In our clinical sample study, The positive rate of mSEPT9 in CRC patients 7 days after surgery was 43.44% lower than that of preoperative. The differences in TNM stage, tumor differentiation degree, and preoperative CEA expression level between the preoperative mSEPT9 positive and negative groups of CRC were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were shorter in the preoperative mSEPT9-positive group, meaning preoperative mSEPT9 status was a risk factor for CRC recurrence and prognosis (P < 0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC value of preoperative mSEPT9 and CEA levels for predicting postoperative recurrence in CRC patients were 88% vs. 72%, 56.19% vs. 55.24%, and 0.721 vs. 0.636 respectively, well the AUC value of the combined prediction of postoperative recurrence was 0.758.

CONCLUSION

The detection of mSEPT9 combined with CEA in preoperative plasma helps predict recurrence in colorectal cancer patients.

Circulating miRNA and circulating tumor DNA application as liquid biopsy markers in gastric cancer

Liquid biopsy has been investigated as a novel method to overcome the numerous challenges in gastric cancer (GC) management. This non-invasive, feasible, and easy-to-repeat method has been shown to be cost-effective and capable of increasing diagnostic sensitivity and prognostic assessment. Additionally, it is potentially accurate to aid decision-making and personalized treatment planning. MicroRNA (miRNA) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) markers can enhance GC management in various aspects, including diagnosis (mainly earlier diagnosis and the ability to perform population-based screening), prognosis (more precise stratification of prognosis), and treatment (including more accurate prediction of treatment response and earlier detection of resistance to the treatment). Concerning the treatment-related application, miRNAs' mimics and antagonists (by using two main strategies of restoring tumor suppressor miRNAs and inhibiting oncogene miRNAs) have been shown to be effective therapeutic agents. However, these need to be further validated in clinical trials. Furthermore, novel delivery systems, such as lipid-based vectors, polymeric-based vectors, and exosome-based delivery, have been developed to enhance the performance of these agents. Moreover, this paper explores the current detection and measuring methods for these markers. These approaches are categorized into direct methods (e.g., Chem-NAT, HTG EdgeSeq, and Multiplex Circulating Fireplex) and indirect methods (e.g., Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), qPCR, microarray, and NGS) for miRNA detection. For ctDNA measurement, main core technologies like NGS, digital PCR, real-time PCR, and mass spectrometry are suggested.

The signature of cancer methylation markers in maternal plasma: Factors influencing the development and application of cancer liquid biopsy assay

BACKGROUND

DNA methylation is highly correlated with cancer and embryo development, and plasma-based methylation markers have been widely used for cancer early detection. However, whether the commonly used cancer methylation markers cause "false positives" in the plasma of pregnant women has not been comprehensively evaluated.

METHODS

We conducted a case-control study from February 2021 to March 2023, which included 138 pregnant women and 44 control women. Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was isolated and bisulfite-converted, and then the methylation levels of eight methylated markers related to gastrointestinal cancer (SEPT9, SDC2, C9orf50, KCNQ5, CLIP4, TFPI2, ELMO1 and ZNF582) and three markers related to lung cancer (SHOX2, RASSF1A and PTGER4) were analyzed.

RESULTS

When comparing the plasma of pregnant women to that of control women, SEPT9, CLIP4, ZNF582, SHOX2, RASSF1A and PTGER showed significantly higher levels of methylation (p < 0.05). These positive signals originate from the placenta/fetus rather than the mother. We found no discernible difference in DNA methylation levels between fetal cfDNA fractions of < 10 % and ≥ 10 % in pregnant women (p > 0.05), while CLIP4 and PTGER4 showed high methylation levels in the assisted fertilization group compared to the natural fertilization group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that cancer and fetus/placenta exhibit similar DNA methylation patterns, and some gastrointestinal cancer and lung cancer-related methylation markers also show positives in maternal plasma. This is an important consideration in the design and application of plasma-based cancer liquid biopsy assays.

DNA methylation drives a new path in gastric cancer early detection: Current impact and prospects

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common and deadly cancers worldwide. Early detection offers the best chance for curative treatment and reducing its mortality. However, the optimal population-based early screening for GC remains unmet. Aberrant DNA methylation occurs in the early stage of GC, exhibiting cancer-specific genetic and epigenetic changes, and can be detected in the media such as blood, gastric juice, and feces, constituting a valuable biomarker for cancer early detection. Furthermore, DNA methylation is a stable epigenetic alteration, and many innovative methods have been developed to quantify it rapidly and accurately. Nonetheless, large-scale clinical validation of DNA methylation serving as tumor biomarkers is still lacking, precluding their implementation in clinical practice. In conclusion, after a critical analysis of the recent existing literature, we summarized the evolving roles of DNA methylation during GC occurrence, expounded the newly discovered noninvasive DNA methylation biomarkers for early detection of GC, and discussed its challenges and prospects in clinical applications.

Comprehensive Multiomics Analyses Establish the Optimal Prognostic Model for Resectable Gastric Cancer : Prognosis Prediction for Resectable GC

BACKGROUND

Prognostic models based on multiomics data may provide better predictive capability than those established at the single-omics level. Here we aimed to establish a prognostic model for resectable gastric cancer (GC) with multiomics information involving mutational, copy number, transcriptional, methylation, and clinicopathological alterations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The mutational, copy number, transcriptional, methylation data of 268, 265, 226, and 252 patients with stages I-III GC were downloaded from the TCGA database, respectively. Alterations from all omics were characterized, and prognostic models were established at the individual omics level and optimized at the multiomics level. All models were validated with a cohort of 99 patients with stages I-III GC.

RESULTS

TTN, TP53, and MUC16 were among the genes with the highest mutational frequency, while UBR5, ZFHX4, PREX2, and ARID1A exhibited the most prominent copy number variations (CNVs). Upregulated COL10A1, CST1, and HOXC10 and downregulated GAST represented the biggest transcriptional alterations. Aberrant methylation of some well-known genes was revealed, including CLDN18, NDRG4, and SDC2. Many alterations were found to predict the patient prognosis by univariate analysis, while four mutant genes, two CNVs, five transcriptionally altered genes, and seven aberrantly methylated genes were identified as independent risk factors in multivariate analysis. Prognostic models at the single-omics level were established with these alterations, and optimized combination of selected alterations with clinicopathological factors was used to establish a final multiomics model. All single-omics models and the final multiomics model were validated by an independent cohort. The optimal area under the curve (AUC) was 0.73, 0.71, 0.71, and 0.85 for mutational, CNV, transcriptional, and methylation models, respectively. The final multiomics model significantly increased the AUC to 0.92 (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Multiomics model exhibited significantly better capability in predicting the prognosis of resectable GC than single-omics models.

A sensitive and robust plasma-based DNA methylation panel for early detection of target gastrointestinal cancers

BACKGROUND

Target gastrointestinal cancers (GICs), encompassing esophageal cancer (EC), gastric cancer (GC), and colorectal cancer (CRC), originate within a single readily accessible luminal organ system and are diagnosable using endoscopy. However, endoscopy is an invasive procedure with low compliance and no plasma-based DNA methylation assay for the early detection of GICs.

METHODS

Nine potential DNA methylation markers were identified and evaluated in tissue (n=60) and plasma (n=155) cohorts to select the most suitable markers. A training cohort (n=244) and a validation cohort (n=199), including GICs patients, benign tumors, gastrointestinal polyps, and controls, were enrolled to develop and validate a DNA methylation panel. An independent prospective cohort (n=158) was used to validate the panel's performance and compare it with blood protein tumor markers.

RESULTS

Six out of nine candidate methylation markers with excellent discrimination abilities in both tissue and plasma cohorts were selected for the DNA methylation panel. The panel demonstrated high AUC values of 0.937 (EC), 0.968 (GC), and 0.987 (CRC) in training cohort, and achieved AUC values of 0.921 (EC), 0.921 (GC), and 0.959 (CRC) in validation cohort. Notably, it achieved impressive AUC values of 0.971 and 0.843 for identifying stage I GICs in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. In the prospective cohort, the six-marker panel showed comparable AUC values to CEA, AFP, and CA19-9 (0.935, 0.769, 0.663, and 0.668, respectively).

CONCLUSION

This study successfully developed and validated a novel, robust, sensitive, and specific plasma-based DNA methylation panel, offering a promising strategy for the early detection of GICs.

Septin9 DNA methylation as a promising biomarker for cervical cancer

Aberrant Septin9 methylation in cervical cancer has been rarely studied. We aimed to identify its diagnostic value in cervical cancer using cervical scrapings, and its predictive potential in plasma for pelvic nodal metastasis of cervical cancer. The statuses of methylated Septin9 in fresh cervical lesions and cervical scrapings were first evaluated by using quantitative methylation-specific PCR. Subsequently, the relationship between Septin9 methylation in 113 plasma samples and pelvic nodal metastasis of cervical cancer was evaluated. Methylated Septin9 was detected in all cancerous tissues, but not in cervicitis. The degrees of Septin9 methylation increased with growing severity of cervical lesions in cervical scrapings. The sensitivity of methylated Septin9 was lower than that of cytology, while it yielded a high specificity and area under the curve in detecting high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or cervical cancer; and when Septin9 methylation combined with HPV16/18 genotyping, the sensitivity would increase from 70.42% to 82.39%. Plasma-based Septin9 methylation had a high discriminatory power in predicting pelvic nodal metastasis of cervical cancer, with an optimal specificity of 81.48%. In conclusion, we demonstrated methylated Septin9 to be an innovative diagnostic biomarker for cervical cancer and its non-invasive predictive potential in plasma for pelvic nodal metastasis of cervical cancer.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? The occurrence of cervical cancer is related to Septin9 methylation. In fresh specimens and cervical scrapings, we found the degrees of methylated Septin9 increased with growing severity of cervical lesions. Compared with HPV16/18 genotyping and cytological detection, Septin9 methylation had a better specificity and AUC in detecting ≥ HSIL. Furthermore, plasma-based Septin9 methylation also had a high specificity for pelvic lymphatic metastasis prediction.What the results of this study add? Methylation analysis of Septin9 indicated a similar sensitivity, specificity and AUC in detecting ≥ HSIL, relative to HPV16/18 genotyping. Compared with cytological method, Septin9 methylation also yielded a higher specificity and AUC in detecting ≥ HSIL. And we also found plasma-based Septin9 methylation had a high discriminatory power in predicting pelvic nodal metastasis of cervical cancer, with an optimal specificity of 81.48%; additionally an increasing sensitivity from 50% to nearly 80% was found when combined with SCCAg.What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between Septin9 methylation and cervical cancer, and to explore the value of methylated Septin9 in the detection of cervical (pre)cancerous lesions. Moreover, we would explore plasma-based ctDNA biomarkers for pelvic lymphatic metastasis prediction of cervical cancer, to improve non-invasive predictive accuracy of pelvic nodal metastasis and reduce the complications caused by pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Methylomics and cancer: the current state of methylation profiling and marker development for clinical care

Epigenetic modifications have long been recognized as an essential level in transcriptional regulation linking behavior and environmental conditions or stimuli with biological processes and disease development. Among them, methylation is the most abundant of these reversible epigenetic marks, predominantly occurring on DNA, RNA, and histones. Methylation modification is intimately involved in regulating gene transcription and cell differentiation, while aberrant methylation status has been linked with cancer development in several malignancies. Early detection and precise restoration of dysregulated methylation form the basis for several epigenetics-based therapeutic strategies. In this review, we summarize the current basic understanding of the regulation and mechanisms responsible for methylation modification and cover several cutting-edge research techniques for detecting methylation across the genome and transcriptome. We then explore recent advances in clinical diagnostic applications of methylation markers of various cancers and address the current state and future prospects of methylation modifications in therapies for different diseases, especially comparing pharmacological methylase/demethylase inhibitors with the CRISPRoff/on methylation editing systems. This review thus provides a resource for understanding the emerging role of epigenetic methylation in cancer, the use of methylation-based biomarkers in cancer detection, and novel methylation-targeted drugs.

An overview of DNA methylation markers for early detection of gastric cancer: current status, challenges, and prospects

Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignancies, with a low 5-year survival rate. However, if diagnosed at an early stage, it can be cured by endoscopic treatment and has a good prognosis. While gastrointestinal X-ray and upper endoscopy are used as national GC screening methods in some GC high-risk countries, such as Japan and Korea, their radiation exposure, invasiveness, and high cost suggest that they are not the optimal tools for early detection of GC in many countries. Therefore, a cost-effective, and highly accurate method for GC early detection is urgently needed in clinical settings. DNA methylation plays a key role in cancer progression and metastasis and has been demonstrated as a promising marker for cancer early detection. Aims and methods: This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current status of DNA methylation markers associated with GC, the assays developed for GC early detection, challenges in methylation marker discovery and application, and the future prospects of utilizing methylation markers for early detection of GC. Through our analysis, we found that the currently reported DNA methylation markers related to GC are mainly in the early discovery stage. Most of them have only been evaluated in tissue samples. The majority of non-invasive assays developed based on blood lack standardized sampling protocols, pre-analytical procedures, and multicenter validation, and they exhibit insufficient sensitivity for early-stage GC detection. Meanwhile, the reported GC DNA methylation markers are generally considered pan-cancer markers. Conclusion: Therefore, future endeavors should focus on identifying additional methylation markers specific to GC and establishing non-invasive diagnostic assays that rely on these markers. These assays should undergo multicenter, large-scale prospective validation in diverse populations.

Novel biomarkers for early detection of gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Less than half of GC cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage due to its lack of early symptoms. GC is a heterogeneous disease associated with a number of genetic and somatic mutations. Early detection and effective monitoring of tumor progression are essential for reducing GC disease burden and mortality. The current widespread use of semi-invasive endoscopic methods and radiologic approaches has increased the number of treatable cancers: However, these approaches are invasive, costly, and time-consuming. Thus, novel molecular noninvasive tests that detect GC alterations seem to be more sensitive and specific compared to the current methods. Recent technological advances have enabled the detection of blood-based biomarkers that could be used as diagnostic indicators and for monitoring postsurgical minimal residual disease. These biomarkers include circulating DNA, RNA, extracellular vesicles, and proteins, and their clinical applications are currently being investigated. The identification of ideal diagnostic markers for GC that have high sensitivity and specificity would improve survival rates and contribute to the advancement of precision medicine. This review provides an overview of current topics regarding the novel, recently developed diagnostic markers for GC.

Zinc Finger Proteins in the War on Gastric Cancer: Molecular Mechanism and Clinical Potential

According to the 2020 global cancer data released by the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) International, gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide, with yearly increasing incidence and the second-highest fatality rate in malignancies. Despite the contemporary ambiguous molecular mechanisms in GC pathogenesis, numerous in-depth studies have demonstrated that zinc finger proteins (ZFPs) are essential for the development and progression of GC. ZFPs are a class of transcription factors with finger-like domains that bind to Zn²⁺ extensively and participate in gene replication, cell differentiation and tumor development. In this review, we briefly outline the roles, molecular mechanisms and the latest advances in ZFPs in GC, including eight principal aspects, such as cell proliferation, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), invasion and metastasis, inflammation and immune infiltration, apoptosis, cell cycle, DNA methylation, cancer stem cells (CSCs) and drug resistance. Intriguingly, the myeloid zinc finger 1 (MZF1) possesses reversely dual roles in GC by promoting tumor proliferation or impeding cancer progression via apoptosis. Therefore, a thorough understanding of the molecular mechanism of ZFPs on GC progression will pave the solid way for screening the potentially effective diagnostic indicators, prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets of GC.

Diagnostic value of plasma RNF180 gene methylation for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

A systematic evaluation of the diagnostic value of Ring finger protein 180 (RNF180) gene methylation as a novel tumor marker for gastric cancer (GC) is required to improve the early diagnosis of gastric cancer patients.

Methods

Computer searches of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, CBM, WanFang Data, National Research Register, Cclinical Controlled Trials, Opengrey and VIP databases were conducted from the database's inception to September 1, 2022. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted information, and assessed the risk of bias in studies that were included. The meta-analysis was carried out using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 16.0 software.

Results

A total of 9 studies with a total of 1531 subjects were included. A random-effects meta-analysis revealed that the combined sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of plasma RNF180 gene methylation for the diagnosis of GC were: 0.54 [95% CI (0.45, 0.62)], 0.80 [95% CI (0.72, 0.87)], 2.73 [95% CI (2.09, 3.57)], 0.58 [95% CI (0.51, 0.65)], 4.74 [95% CI (3.59, 6.62)], respectively.

Conclusion

The detection of RNF180 gene methylation in plasma has a high diagnostic value for GC and is expected to be a potential biomarker for the diagnosis of gastric cancer, according to current evidence.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=370903, identifier CRD42022370903.

A Novel Plasma-Based Methylation Panel for Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Early Detection

BACKGROUND

Upper gastrointestinal cancer (UGC) is an important cause of cancer death in China, with low five-year survival rates due to the majority of UGC patients being diagnosed at an advanced stage. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop cost-effective, reliable and non-invasive methods for the early detection of UGC.

METHODS

A novel plasma-based methylation panel combining simultaneous detection of three methylated biomarkers (ELMO1, ZNF582 and TFPI2) and an internal control gene were developed and used to examine plasma samples from 186 UGC patients and 190 control subjects.

RESULTS

The results indicated excellent PCR amplification efficiency and reproducibility of ELMO1, ZNF582 and TFPI2 in the range of 10-100,000 copies per PCR reaction of fully methylated genomic DNA. The methylation levels of ELMO1, ZNF582 and TFPI2 were significantly higher in UGC samples than those in control subjects. The sensitivities of ELMO1, ZNF582 and TFPI2 alone for UGC detection were 32.3%, 61.3% and 30.6%, respectively; when three markers were combined, the sensitivity was improved to 71.0%, with a specificity of 90.0%, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.870 (95% CI: 0.832-0.902).

CONCLUSION

Methylated ELMO1, ZNF582 and TFPI2 were specific for UGC and the three-methylated gene panel provided an alternative non-invasive choice for UGC early detection.

A Pilot Study of Blood-Based Methylation Markers Associated With Pancreatic Cancer

Over the past several decades in the United States, incidence of pancreatic cancer (PCa) has increased, with the 5-year survival rate remaining extremely low at 10.8%. Typically, PCa is diagnosed at an advanced stage, with the consequence that there is more tumor heterogeneity and increased probability that more cells are resistant to treatments. Risk factors for PCa can serve as a way to select a high-risk population and develop biomarkers to improve early detection and treatment. We focus on blood-based methylation as an approach to identify a marker set that can be obtained in a minimally invasive way (through peripheral blood) and could be applied to a high-risk subpopulation [those with recent onset type 2 diabetes (DM)]. Blood samples were collected from 30 patients, 15 had been diagnosed with PCa and 15 had been diagnosed with recent onset DM. HumanMethylationEPIC Beadchip (Illumina, CA, United States) was used to quantify methylation of approximately 850,000 methylation sites across the genome and to analyze methylation markers associated with PCa or DM or both. Exploratory analysis conducted to propose importance of top CpG (5'-C-phosphate-G-3') methylation site associated genes and visualized using boxplots. A methylation-based age predictor was also investigated for ability to distinguish disease groups from controls. No methylation markers were observed to be significantly associated with PCa or new onset diabetes compared with control the respective control groups. In our exploratory analysis, one methylation marker, CpG04969764, found in the Laminin Subunit Alpha 5 (LAMA5) gene region was observed in both PCa and DM Top 100 methylation marker sets. Modification of LAMA5 methylation or LAMA5 gene function may be a way to distinguish those recent DM cases with and without PCa, however, additional studies with larger sample sizes and different study types (e.g., cohort) will be needed to test this hypothesis.