Epigenome sequencing comes of age in development, differentiation and disease mechanism research

The fate is not always written in the genes: epigenomics in epidemiologic studies

Cost-effective, high-throughput epigenomic technologies have begun to emerge, rapidly replacing the candidate gene approach to molecular epidemiology and offering a comprehensive strategy for the study of epigenetics in human subjects. Epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) provide new opportunities for advancing our understanding of epigenetic changes associated with complex disease states. However, such analyses are complicated by the dynamic nature of DNA methylation. In contrast to genomic studies, where genotype is essentially constant across somatic cells, EWAS present a new set of challenges, largely due to differential DNA methylation across distinct cell types, particularly for studies involving heterogeneous tissue sources, and changes in the epigenetic profile that occur over time. This review describes potential applications of EWAS from the viewpoint of the molecular epidemiologist, along with special considerations and pitfalls involved in the design of such studies.

DNA methylation in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-obligate precursor lesion of invasive carcinoma of the breast. Current prognostic markers based on histopathological examination are unable to accurately predict which DCIS cases will progress to invasive carcinoma or recur after surgical excision. Epigenetic changes have been shown to be a significant driver of tumorigenesis, and DNA methylation of specific gene promoters provides predictive and prognostic markers in many types of cancer, including invasive breast cancer. In general, the spectrum of genes that are methylated in DCIS strongly resembles that seen in invasive ductal carcinoma. The identification of specific prognostic markers in DCIS remains elusive and awaits additional work investigating a large panel of methylatable genes by using sensitive and reproducible technologies. This review critically appraises the role of methylation in DCIS and its use as a biomarker.

Molecular-based classification of acute myeloid leukemia and its role in directing rational therapy: personalized medicine for profoundly promiscuous proliferations

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is not a single pathologic entity but represents a heterogeneous group of malignancies. This heterogeneity is exemplified by the variable clinical outcomes that are observed in patients with AML, and it is largely the result of diverse mutations within the leukemic cells. These mutations range from relatively large genetic alterations, such as gains, losses, and translocations of chromosomes, to single nucleotide changes. Detection of many of these mutations is required for accurate diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of patients with AML. As such, many testing modalities have been developed and are currently employed in clinical laboratories to ascertain mutational status at prognostically and therapeutically critical loci. The assays include those that specifically identify large chromosomal alterations, such as conventional metaphase analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization, and methods that are geared more toward analysis of small mutations, such as PCR with allele-specific oligonucleotide primers. Furthermore, newer tests, including array analysis and next-generation sequencing, which can simultaneously probe numerous molecular aberrancies within tumor cells, are likely to become commonplace in AML diagnostics. Each testing method clearly has advantages and disadvantages, an understanding of which should influence the choice of test in various clinical circumstances. To aid such understanding, this review discusses both genetic mutations in AML and the clinical tests-including their pros and cons-that may be used to probe these abnormalities. Additionally, we highlight the significance of genetic testing by describing cases in which results of genetic testing significantly influence clinical management of patients with AML.

Personalized medicine - where do we stand? Pouring some water into wine: a realistic perspective

Abstract

Reviewing the past and the present status of personalized medicine, the hope and promise from several years ago was critically compared to what is really achieved to tailor the drug treatment according to the patient’s individuality. The basis for consideration is what we know about the variant of the disease the patient is suffering from, and about the mechanisms influencing the plasma concentration-time profile, such as activity of metabolizing enzymes and transporters. In cancer treatment, drugs are currently selected regarding molecular properties of the cancer tissue, eg, expressing receptors such as HER2 receptor. Currently diagnostic tests are available allowing to detect somatic cell mutations that can be used to guide drug selection. Unfortunately, tumor heterogeneity and developing resistance by further mutations may limit the success of the therapy determined by molecular diagnostics. The present status can be described that in drug kinetics we know the influencing factors and we understand the mechanisms. However, only in a few cases the genetic background is the main determinant of kinetic variability, and environmental and other factors have an additional important role. Therefore, much more has to be done before we can translate the accumulating knowledge into a benefit for the patient. Only then, we can speak about personalized medicine.