Evaluating the effect of multivalvular disease on mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Mitral complex geometric changes aggravate mitral stenosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) often coexists with mitral valve stenosis (MS). MS aggravation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is common, and its etiology is multifactorial. We hypothesized that geometric changes in the mitral complex (mitral valvular and annular deformities) are adjunctive factors aggravating MS after TAVR, particularly in older adults with a smaller left ventricle (LV). This study aimed to evaluate the mitral complex geometric changes before and after TAVR and to assess the important predictors of MS aggravation after TAVR. This retrospective study enrolled consecutive adult patients who underwent TAVR and surgical AVR (SAVR) for severe AS. The mitral valve area (MVA), the angle between the anterior mitral valve leaflet (AMVL) and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), AMVL length, mitral annular diameter, presence of mitral annular calcification, and LV size were evaluated using transthoracic echocardiography. This study included 258 patients who underwent TAVR and SAVR. MVA index decreased from 2.3 ± 0.6 cm² to 1.9 ± 0.5 cm² in the TAVR group. The angle between the AMVL and LVOT was 56.3 ± 9.7° preoperatively and increased to 67.3 ± 11.5° after TAVR. In multivariate analysis, the most important predictive factors of MS aggravation after TAVR were a smaller mitral annular diameter, restricted AMVL mobility, and implantation depth (odds ratio: 4.5, 5.3,3.0; 95% confidence interval: 1.6-14, 1.9-17, 1.0-8.9; and p = 0.005, p = 0.001, p = 0.042, respectively). The reduction in MVA after TAVR was related to the restriction of AMVL opening, depth of implantation and narrowing of the mitral annulus.

Mixed aortic valve disease: association with paravalvular leak and reduced survival after transcatheter aortic valve replacement

AIMS

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) revolutionized the therapy of severe aortic stenosis (AS) with rising numbers. Mixed aortic valve disease (MAVD) treated by TAVR is gaining more interest, as those patients represent a more complex cohort as compared with isolated AS. However, concerning long-term outcome for this cohort only, limited data are available. The aim of the study is to assess the prevalence of MAVD in TAVR patients, investigate its association with paravalvular regurgitation (PVR), and analyse its impact on long-term mortality after TAVR.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a registry-based cohort study using the Vienna TAVR registry, enrolling patients who underwent TAVR at Medical University of Vienna between January 2007 and May 2020 with available transthoracic echocardiography before and after TAVR (n = 880). Data analysis included PVR incidence and long-term survival outcomes. A total of 647 (73.52%) out of 880 patients had ≥ mild aortic regurgitation next to severe AS. MAVD was associated with PVR compared with isolated AS with an odds ratio of 2.06, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.51-2.81 (P = <0.001). More than mild PVR after TAVR (n = 168 out of 880: 19.09%) was related to higher mortality compared with the absence of PVR with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.33, 95% CI: 1.05- 1.67 (P = 0.016). MAVD patients developing ≥ mild PVR after TAVR were also associated with higher mortality compared with the absence of PVR with an HR of 1.30 and 95% CI: 1.04-1.62 (P = 0.022).

CONCLUSION

MAVD is prevalent among TAVR patients and presents unique challenges, with increased PVR risk and worse outcomes compared with isolated AS. Long-term survival for MAVD patients, not limited to those developing PVR post-TAVR, is compromised. Earlier intervention before the occurrence of structural myocardial damage or surgical valve replacement might be a potential workaround to improve outcomes.

Clinical impact of baseline mitral regurgitation on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis

Objective

The clinical impact of baseline mitral regurgitation (MR) on the outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is not clear. This study sought to assess the clinical impact of baseline MR on outcomes after TAVR.

Methods

The study was a retrospective analysis. Data was from 120 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing TAVR at our center from June 2018 and July 2020. Clinical outcomes were assessed at 30-day, 1- and 2-year follow-up.

Results

The median follow-up was 736.0 (interquartile range, 666.0-965.0) days. Overall survival in patients with nonsignificant and significant baseline MR was not significantly different, while patients from the improved MR group after TAVR demonstrated a significantly higher survival than unchanged or worsened MR group during 2-year follow-up. NYHA functional class had generally improved at 1 year, with only 8.3 % of patients with nonsignificant MR and 17.5 % of patients with significant MR in class III or IV. Patients with improved MR at 1 year after TAVR had a significantly higher LVEF, smaller LVEDD and LVESD than those with unchanged or worsened MR. Among the significant baseline MR group, 70.4 % and 80.0 % of patients had improved to nonsignificant MR at 30-day and 1-year follow-up after TAVR, respectively.

Conclusions

Significant baseline MR was not associated with the increased risk of all-cause mortality 2 years after TAVR. Significant baseline MR was improved in most patients at 1 year after TAVR. Patients with unchanged or worsened MR had an increased all-cause mortality.

Is Concomitant Mitral Stenosis Associated With Worse Outcomes in Patients Who Underwent TAVR? Insights from a National Database

Concomitant mitral stenosis (MS) is present in 10% to 15% of all patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Our aim is to assess outcomes of TAVR in patients with MS using a national database. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was used to identify patients who underwent TAVR from 2015 to 2020. We created 2 groups, patients with and those without MS. We then compared baseline characteristics, demographics, and in-hospital outcomes of the groups. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, acute respiratory failure, and pacemaker placement. Secondary outcomes were length of stay and in-hospital costs. Our study indicates that patients with MS had greater incidence of acute respiratory failure (8.8% vs 4.89%, p = 0.001), complete heart block (13.54% vs 9.36%, p = 0.01), and permanent pacemaker placement (8.03% vs 6.03%, p = 0.05). In-hospital mortality was greater in the MS group; however, it was not statistically significant (1.32% vs 1.53%, p = 0.679).