Long-term secondary prevention programs after cardiac rehabilitation for the reduction of future cardiovascular events: focus on regular physical activity

Effects of Cardiac Telerehabilitation During COVID-19 on Cardiorespiratory Capacities in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic led to the closure of most cardiac therapy centers. One of the solutions was to adapt the existing cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program in an institute to a remote approach offered by home-based telerehabilitation. The aim of this study was to measure the cardiorespiratory effects of telerehabilitation compared to conventional center-based CR.

Methods

Patients were assigned to two 3-week CR programs: telerehabilitation and conventional center-based CR. The telerehabilitation group wore a connected watch to monitor heart rate (HR) and gave their perception of effort according to a modified Borg scale. The exercise training (four sessions/week) consisted of 1-h aerobic endurance and strength training session at the target HR zone determined by results based on cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) and perception of effort, respectively. The exercise protocol was the same for conventional CR participants except the duration of session that lasted 2 h instead of one. The week before and after the training program, peak oxygen uptake (VO₂ peak), oxygen uptake at first ventilatory threshold (VO₂ at VT₁), peak workload, percent of predicted maximum HR, and the absolute differences in HR and systolic blood pressure between maximum and recovery at 1 and 3 min were measured using a CPET. A two-way ANOVA with one repeated measure and one independent factor was performed.

Results

Fifty-four patients (mean age: 61.5 ± 8.6 years, 10 women) equally split in the two groups were included in this experiment. A significant increase was observed in both groups on VO₂ peak (telerehabilitation: 8.1 ± 7.8% vs. conventional: 10.1 ± 9.7%, p < 0.001), VO₂ at VT₁ (telerehabilitation: 8.8 ± 4.4% vs. conventional: 7.3 ± 19.0%, p = 0.02) and peak workload (telerehabilitation: 16.6 ± 18.9% vs. conventional: 17.2 ± 7.0%, p < 0.001) after the 3-week telerehabilitation and conventional CR, respectively. No significant difference was noticed between both groups.

Conclusion

A 3-week exercise program improved patients’ cardiorespiratory fitness. Telerehabilitation was as effective and represents a safe alternative CR program during the COVID-19 period. In the future, this approach could facilitate the continuity of care for patients unable to participate in center-based CR.

Symptoms of depression are associated with physical inactivity but not modified by gender or the presence of a cardiovascular disease; a cross-sectional study

Background

Depressive symptomatology may act as a barrier to enhance physical activity. This phenomenon is predominantly found in patients with an established cardiovascular disease (CVD) and in female patients. This cross-sectional study investigated (1) the association between symptoms of depression and physical inactivity, and (2) whether this association is different between primary and secondary prevention patients, and between men and women.

Methods

The study design concerns a secondary analysis of baseline data from a randomized clinical trial, including primary and secondary prevention patients (n = 2184; mean age 71.6 ± 8.94), from 34 general practitioner panels. The Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity questionnaire (RAPA) was used to measure patient reported activity levels. Symptoms of depression were determined using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Multilevel linear regression analysis was used to explore the association between symptoms of depression and physical activity while adjusting for confounders. Gender and whether or not having a CVD were considered as potential effect modifiers for the association between symptoms of depression and inactivity.

Results

Symptoms of depression were associated with lower levels of physical activity. This association was neither different for men and women nor for primary and secondary prevention patients.

Conclusion

In primary care patients’ symptoms of depression were associated with physical inactivity. This association was not modified by gender or the presence of a CVD. Future research should focus on lifestyle interventions aiming at the increase of physical activity levels, while emphasizing on improving symptoms of depression in men, women, and patients both with and without a history of CVD.

Influence of short-term cardiac rehabilitation on oxidative stress in men after myocardial infarction depends upon smoking status

PURPOSE

Oxidative stress is an important nonclassical risk factor for myocardial infarction (MI), and thus, it seems extremely important to recognize factors that effectively reduce it. The aim of our study was to explore possible influences of short-term cardiac rehabilitation (CR) of only 2 weeks in duration on oxidative stress in men after MI.

METHODS

Male patients (N = 21; aged 41-88 years, median 56 years), 6 to 8 weeks after acute MI, were included in our observational study using a pretest/posttest design. We investigated markers of oxidative stress and antioxidant enzymes before and after CR of only 2 weeks in duration and influence of smoking status on these differences.

RESULTS

We found significant decrease in isoprostanes in urine in nonsmokers (n = 9) (P = .036) but not in smokers (n = 12) (not significant) during CR. After CR, nonsmokers had lower isoprostanes in urine (P = .039), lower non-transferrin-bound iron (P = .020), and higher erythrocyte catalase (P = .023) than smokers. Of classical risk factors, only low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was lower in nonsmokers before (P = .041) and after CR (P = .015) than in smokers. No other significant differences were seen at the beginning or at the end of CR.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, the results of our study indicate for the first time that short-term CR of only 2 weeks in duration already has a positive effect on reduction of oxidative stress in the body. However, this positive effect is seen only in nonsmokers and not in smokers.