Optimal aspirin dose in acute coronary syndromes: an emerging consensus

A real-world data analysis of acetylsalicylic acid in FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database

BACKGROUND

Acetylsalicylic acid (Aspirin), one of the oldest medicines, is widely used in various clinical fields. However, numerous adverse events (AEs) have been reported. In this study, we aimed to investigate adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of aspirin using real-worlddata from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

METHODS

We assessed the disproportionality of aspirin-related AEs by calculating measures such as reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagationneural network (BCPNN), and Gamma-Poisson Shrinker (GPS).

RESULTS

Out of 7,510,564 casereports in the FAERS database, 18644 reports of aspirin as the 'primary suspected (PS)' AEs were recorded. Disproportionality analyses identified 493 aspirin-related preferred terms (PTs) across 25 organ systems. Notably, unexpected significant AEs such as pallor (p=5.66E-33), dependence (p=6.45E-67), and compartment syndrome (p=1.95E-28) were observed, which were not mentioned in the drug's instructions.

CONCLUSION

Our findings align with clinical observations, highlighting potential new and unexpected ADR signals associated with aspirin. Further prospective clinical studies are necessary to confirm and elucidate the relationship between aspirin and these ADRs. This study offers a fresh and unique perspective for studying drug-AEs.

Aspirin Hypersensitivity in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. What Should We be Doing?

Aspirin plays a pivotal role in the management of patients with Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) with well-recognised benefits of reducing recurrent myocardial infarction and minimising the risk of stent thrombosis for those undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI). Dual antiplatelet therapy is mandated for patients undergoing PCI and typically consists of aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor antagonist. Aspirin hypersensitivity poses a significant clinical dilemma, as the safety and efficacy of oral antiplatelet combinations that exclude aspirin have not been validated. Although, genuine hypersensitivity to aspirin is encountered infrequently, it can be challenging when managing patients with concomitant CAD given the paucity of safe and effective alternatives. Aspirin desensitization is a potential and safe option but may not always be practical. This review aims to highlight the challenges of aspirin hypersensitivity in patients undergoing PCI and propose a treatment algorithm to address this issue in clinical practice.

Effect on mortality of different routes of administration and loading dose of aspirin in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty

BACKGROUND

Aspirin is the cornerstone of the anti-platelet therapy during the acute phase of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and it can be administrated orally or intravenously. The oral loading dose of aspirin is well characterized, whereas there are little data on the optimal intravenous (IV) loading dose.

AIM

To confirm if the mortality of patients treated with a loading dose of IV aspirin was comparable to that of patients treated with the most usual aspirin per os.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed the overall mortality during hospitalization and at 1 year follow-up among 756 consecutive patients with STEMI. Four hundred seventy-eight (63.2%) patients received per os and 278 (36.8%) IV aspirin. We divided the 278 patients of the IV aspirin group into two subgroups, based on the median value of the dose of aspirin used as a load.

RESULTS

The per os aspirin group took 234 ± 138 mg of aspirin per os at the first medical contact; the IV low-dose group 194 ± 87 mg, and the IV high-dose group 483 ± 194 mg of IV aspirin. No differences were observed in mortality rate after 1-year of follow-up. In-hospital mortality resulted significantly higher (9.3%) in the IV high-dose group respect to the IV low-dose one (5.0%) and per os aspirin group (6.0%) (P < 0.01 for both).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective study, high dose IV aspirin loading in STEMI increased intra-hospital mortality. Further study is necessary to define the optimal dose of intravenous aspirin in STEMI.

Efficacy and Safety of Available Protocols for Aspirin Hypersensitivity for Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Survey and Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The most suitable approach for patients with aspirin hypersensitivity undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention remains to be assessed.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Pubmed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane were systematically searched for papers describing protocols about aspirin hypersensitivity in the percutaneous coronary intervention setting. Discharge from hospital with aspirin was the primary end point, whereas rates of adverse reactions being a secondary outcome. An online international survey was performed to critically analyze rates of aspirin hypersensitivity and its medical and interventional management. Eleven studies with 283 patients were included. An endovenous desensitization protocol was performed on one of them, with high efficacy rate (98%) and a low adverse reaction rate when compared with oral administration. No significant differences were reported among the oral protocols in terms of efficacy (less versus more fractionated [95.8% {95.4%-96.2%} versus 95.9% {95.2-96.5%}]), whereas higher incidence of rash and angioedema were reported for protocols with <6 doses escalation (2.6% [1.1%-4.1%] versus 2.6% [1.9%-3.2%]). In the survey, we collected answer from 86 physician of the 100 interviewed. Fifty-six percent of them managed aspirin hypersensitivity changing the therapeutic regimen (eg, clopidogrel monotherapy and indobufen). Despite the previous safety data, desensitization protocols were adopted by only 42% of surveyed cardiologist.

CONCLUSIONS

Available protocols for aspirin hypersensitivity are effective and safe, representing a feasible approach for patients needing dual antiplatelet therapy.

P2Y12 antagonists in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: latest evidence and optimal use

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), which includes the combination of aspirin and a P2Y12 platelet receptor inhibitor, is a well-established antiplatelet regimen in the treatment of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). Three P2Y12 inhibitor options (clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor) are currently available, all having different efficacy and safety profiles along with contrasting contraindications, special warnings and precautions for use. This review compares and contrasts the unique P2Y12 antagonists in the NSTE-ACS setting, covering the latest evidence and their optimal use.