Use of intracardiac echocardiography during atrial fibrillation ablation to avoid complications

A case report of atrial septal puncture "mistakenly" penetrated the aorta during left bypass radiofrequency ablation

INTRODUCTION

Transseptal punctures (TSPs) are widely used in left atrium and left ventricle surgery. Accidental puncture of the puncture needle into the aorta is a rare complication that is rarely reported but has serious consequences. The appropriate management of this complication remains unclear.

PATIENT CONCERNS

This report describes a case of a male with the chief complaint: paroxysmal palpitation for 1 year, aggravated for 1 month.

DIAGNOSIS

The electrophysiological diagnosis was atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia caused by left-side bypass.

INTERVENTIONS

Radiofrequency ablation of the heart was a necessary treatment and a TSP operation was needed, in which a puncture was mistakenly believed to have entered the aorta, a series of measures were taken urgently. Although the surgical procedure in this case was a false alarm, we still initiated a series of emergency plans. Emergency measures to address the complications were effectively implemented, and the emergency measures were promptly terminated after it was clear that complications had been misjudged.

OUTCOMES

At last, it was confirmed that the angiogram was a pulmonary artery image, not an aorta image. Then the atrial septal puncture operation was successfully completed, and under the guidance of the Carto system, the ablation was successfully completed. Postoperative fluoroscopy showed no complications, such as pericardial effusion. After 2 years of follow-up, there was no reoccurrence of tachycardia, and there were no complications. It is crucial that emergency procedures are terminated in a timely manner after a clear miscarriage of performance. Although accidental puncture into the aorta is urgent and serious, performing a blockage or even thoracotomy in an emergency if complications are not clearly confirmed can cause further damage to the patient and would be a definitively wrong strategy.

CONCLUSION

Strict and standardized TSP operations can avoid complications. Correct judgment of the authenticity of complications is crucial, and remedial measures that may cause further damage should not be blindly adopted. The retention of the aortic guide wire can provide convenient access for further differential diagnosis and remedial treatment.

Relationship between anatomical characteristics of pulmonary veins and atrial fibrillation recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The aim of the current study was to investigate the potential relationship between anatomical characteristics of pulmonary veins (PVs) and atrial fibrillation recurrence (AFR) following radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA), specifically focusing on PV diameter and cross-sectional orifices index (CSOA). The analysis was based on a comprehensive review of currently available literature, providing valuable insights for the prevention and treatment of AFR.

Methods

Data was collected from five databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane, spanning the period from 2004 to October 2022. The search strategy utilized Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms related to PV diameter, PV size, PV anatomy, and AFR. Indicators of PV diameter and CSOA from the included studies were collected and analyzed, with Weight mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) representing continuous variables.

Results

The meta-analysis included six studies. The results revealed that patients with AFR had a significant larger mean PV diameter compared to those without AFR (MD 0.33; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.66; P = 0.04; I2 = 33.80%). In a meta-analysis of two studies involving a total of 715 participants, we compared the diameters of the left superior pulmonary vein (LSPV), left inferior pulmonary vein (LIPV), right superior pulmonary vein (RSPV), right inferior pulmonary vein (RIPV) between patients with AFR and patients without AFR. The results showed that there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in any of the four data items (all P > 0.05). Additionally, the pooled estimate revealed that LSPV-CSOA, LIPV-COSA, RSPV-COSA, and RIPV-CSOA were greater in the AFR group compared to the non-AFR group, but the differences were not statistically significant (all P > 0.05).

Conclusion

We found evidence supporting the notion that the PV diameter of patients who experienced AFR after RFCA was significantly larger than that of patients without AFR. The findings suggested that the PV diameter could serve as a potential predictor of the risk of AFR following RFCA.

DIFFERENCES IN OUTCOMES AMONG PATIENTS WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION UNDERGOING CATHETER ABLATION WITH VERSUS WITHOUT INTRACARDIAC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY

Background

Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) use can lead to early detection of periprocedural complications and may improve patient outcomes by providing real‐time visualization of catheter location and the treatment area during cardiac ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF).

Objective

Examine complications and 12‐month healthcare use among patients with AF undergoing CA with versus without ICE use during the procedure in a real‐world setting.

Methods

The 2015–2020 IBM MarketScan® Database was used to identify non‐elderly adults (age 18–64 years) undergoing CA for AF. Patients were classified into ICE/non‐ICE groups based on the presence or absence of ICE procedure codes. Patients in each group were matched on study covariates using propensity scores. Peri‐procedural complications, 12‐month cardiovascular (CV) or AF‐related inpatient admission, repeat CA, and cardioversion were compared using a Cox proportional hazard model.

Results

1371 patients were identified in each study cohort (ICE and non‐ICE) after propensity matching. Patients who had CA with ICE had a significantly lower rate of complications than those without (2.9% vs. 5.8%; p < .001). The risk of complications was 50% lower with ICE use (hazard ratio [HR] 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34–0.72). For assessment of 12‐month healthcare utilization, 1250 patients were identified in each cohort after propensity matching. ICE use was associated with a 36% lower risk of 12‐month repeat ablation (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.49–0.83). No differences in CV‐ or AF‐related inpatient admission and cardioversion were observed.

Conclusion

Among patients with AF, the use of ICE during an ablation procedure was associated with lower incidence of complications and repeat ablation.

Transseptal Access to the Left Atrium: Tips and Tricks to Keep it Safe Derived from Single Operator Experience and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Transseptal puncture (TSP) remains a demanding procedural step in accessing the left atrium with inherent risks and safety concerns, mostly related to cardiac tamponade.

OBJECTIVE

Based on our own experience with 249 TSP procedures and in-depth literature review, we present our results and offer several tips and tricks that may render TSP successful and safe.

METHODS

This prospective study comprised 249 consecutive patients (146 men), aged 41.6±17.4 years, undergoing TSP by a single operator for ablation of a variety of arrhythmias, mostly related to left accessory pathways (n=145) or left atrial tachycardias (n=33) and more recently, atrial fibrillation (n=70). TSP was guided by fluoroscopy alone in all patients without the use of echocardiography imaging. In addition, an extensive literature review of TSP-related topics was carried out in PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar.

RESULTS

Among 249 patients, 33 patients were children or young adolescents (aged 7-18 years); 14 patients were undergoing a repeat procedure. Patients with a manifest accessory pathway were the youngest (mean age 33.7±15.9) and patients with atrial fibrillation the oldest (mean age 56.0±10.8 years). A successful TSP was accomplished in 247 patients (99.2%). Two (0.8%) procedures were complicated by cardiac tamponade managed successfully with pericardiocentesis or surgical drainage. Review of the literature revealed no systematic reviews and meta-analyses of TSP studies; however, several patient series have documented that fluoroscopy-guided TSP, with various modifications in the technique employed in the present series, have been effective in 95-100% of the cases with a complication rate ranging from 0.0% to 6.7%, albeit with a mortality rate of 0.018%- 0.2%. Echo imaging techniques were employed in cases with difficult TSP.

CONCLUSION

Employing a standardized protocol with use of fluoroscopy alone minimized serious complications to 0.8% (2 patients) among 249 consecutive patients undergoing TSP for ablation of a variety of cardiac arrhythmias. Based on this single-operator experience and review of the literature, a list of practical tips and tricks is provided for a successful and safe procedure, reserving the more expensive and patient inconveniencing echo-imaging techniques for difficult or failed cases.

Impact of the pulmonary vein orifice area assessed using intracardiac echocardiography on the outcome of radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

PURPOSE

The purposes of this study were to investigate pulmonary vein cross-sectional orifice area (PV-CSOA) using intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) and to determine its association with atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA).

METHODS

We studied 77 patients undergoing initial RFCA for AF (55 paroxysmal and 22 persistent AF patients, mean age 61 ± 12 years, 59 men). The PV-CSOA was measured in each patient and expressed as an index divided by the body surface area-left superior (LSPV-CSOA), left inferior (LIPV-CSOA), right superior (RSPV-CSOA), and right inferior (RIPV-CSOA).

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 21 ± 14 months, 61 patients maintained sinus rhythm (non-recurrence group) and AF recurred in 16 patients (recurrence group). The LSPV-CSOA index was significantly greater in the recurrence group compared with the non-recurrence group (146 ± 41 vs. 126 ± 30 mm²/m², p = 0.04). A Cox regression multivariate analysis revealed that the LSPV-CSOA was the independent predictor of AF recurrence (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.04, p = 0.01). The LSPV-CSOA cutoff value of 154 mm²/m² predicts AF recurrence with 50% positive predictive value and 89% negative predictive value.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests that ICE can be used as an alternative imaging tools for assessing the PV-CSOA during RFCA and that the LSPV-CSOA index was a useful independent predictor of AF recurrence after RFCA.