Letter to the editor: economic analysis lacks external validity to support universal syndromic testing for suspected meningitis/encephalitis

The clinical impact of multiplex PCR panel diagnostics in paediatric meningitis/ encephalitis: a bicenter cohort study

PURPOSE

In infections of the Central Nervous System (iCNS), rapid identification of causing pathogens is crucial for survival and to avoid long-term sequelae. Targeted therapy may reduce side effects and development of antibiotic resistance. New molecular-based syndromic tests such as the "meningitis/encephalitis panel" (MEP) allow accelerated pathogen identification from cerebrospinal fluid. We conducted a clinical study to evaluate the MEP's efficacy in paediatric patients.

METHODS

Cohort study in a unique clinical setting by comparing the outcome data of two neighbouring Children's Hospitals in Germany which are comparable in size, catchment area and equipment but differ regarding availability of the MEP: study centre 1 (SC1): yes; SC2: no. The study population included 213 paediatric patients with a suspected iCNS (SC1: 106; SC2: 107), with comparable age, CRP at admission and frequency of intensive care. The primary outcome was total use of antibiotics.

RESULTS

Total antibiotic use per patient was numerically lower in SC1 than in SC2 (SC1: median 2.83 days; SC2 3.67 days; p = 0.671). Multiple linear regression analysis did not show a relevant association between MEP-availability and total antibiotic use (ß = 0.1, 95% confidence interval [-1.46; +1.67], p = 0.897). In the subcohort with suspected meningoencephalitis (SC1: 18, SC2: 17), duration of acyclovir treatment was shorter in SC1 than in SC2 (median 1.3 days vs. 2.7 days, descriptive p = 0.0397).

CONCLUSIONS

The add-on use of the MEP in paediatric patients with suspected iCNS was associated with a non-significant reduction in total antibiotic use, and with a reduced exposure to acyclovir in treated patients.

Clinical and Financial Impact of a Diagnostic Stewardship Program for Children with Suspected Central Nervous System Infection

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the optimal implementation and clinical and financial impacts of the FilmArray Meningitis Encephalitis Panel (MEP) multiplex polymerase chain reaction testing of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in children with suspected central nervous system infection.

STUDY DESIGN

A pre-post quasiexperimental cohort study to investigate the impact of implementing MEP using a rapid CSF diagnostic stewardship program was conducted at Children's Hospital Colorado (CHCO). MEP was implemented with electronic medical record indication selection to guide testing to children meeting approved use criteria: infants <2 months, immunocompromised, encephalitis, and ≥5 white blood cells/μL of CSF. Positive results were communicated with antimicrobial stewardship real-time decision support. All cases with CSF obtained by lumbar puncture sent to the CHCO microbiology laboratory meeting any of the 4 aforementioned criteria were included with preimplementation controls (2015-2016) compared with postimplementation cases (2017-2018). Primary outcome was time-to-optimal antimicrobials compared using log-rank test with Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Time-to-optimal antimicrobials decreased from 28 hours among 1124 preimplementation controls to 18 hours (P < .0001) among 1127 postimplementation cases (72% with MEP testing conducted). Postimplementation, time-to-positive CSF results was faster (4.8 vs 9.6 hours, P < .0001), intravenous antimicrobial duration was shorter (24 vs 36 hours, P = .004), with infectious neurologic diagnoses more frequently identified (15% vs 10%, P = .03). There were no differences in time-to-effective antimicrobials, hospital admissions, antimicrobial starts, or length of stay. Costs of microbiologic testing increased, but total hospital costs were unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of MEP with a rapid central nervous system diagnostic stewardship program improved antimicrobial use with faster results shortening empiric therapy. Routine MEP testing for high-yield indications enables antimicrobial optimization with unchanged overall costs.

Impact of cerebrospinal fluid syndromic testing in the management of children with suspected central nervous system infection

The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of the use of BioFire® FilmArray® meningitis/encephalitis(FA-ME) panel which enables rapid automated CSF testing for 14 common viral, bacterial, and yeast pathogens that cause CNS infections, in the management of children with suspected CNS infection. A prospective cohort study was performed on children admitted to a tertiary pediatric hospital, over a period of 1 year, with possible CNS infection and CSF pleocytosis (> 15 cells/mm³). Children were randomized 1:1, either to use FA-ME or separate molecular CSF microbiological tests according to usual pediatric practice in the hospital. Length of hospital stay, duration of antimicrobials, and total cost of hospitalization were compared between groups. A total of 142 children were included in the study (71 cases). A pathogen was detected in 37/71(52.1%) children with the use of FA-ME and in 16/71(22.5%) in the control group (P value < 0.001). In aseptic meningitis cases a virus was detected in 27/61(44.2%) and in 11/66(16.7%) controls (P value < 0.001). Median (IQR) length of stay in cases and controls with aseptic meningitis was 5(4-8) and 8(6-10) days, respectively (P value < 0. 001). The median (IQR) duration of antimicrobials in cases and controls was 4(2-5.7) and 7(5-10) days, respectively (P value < 0.001). The hospitalization cost was calculated in cases and controls 1042€ (932-1372) and 1522€ (1302-1742), respectively (P value < 0.001). The use of FA-ME was able to reduce significantly the use of antimicrobials, the hospitalization days, and the total cost comparing to the control group in children with suspected CNS infection.

Appropriate Use and Future Directions of Molecular Diagnostic Testing

Purpose of Review

Major technologic advances in two main areas of molecular infectious disease diagnostics have resulted in accelerated adoption or ordering, outpacing implementation, and clinical utility studies. Physicians must understand the limitations to and appropriate utilization of these technologies in order to provide cost-effective and well-informed care for their patients.

Recent Findings

Rapid molecular testing and, to a lesser degree, clinical metagenomics are now being routinely used in clinical practice. While these tests allow for a breadth of interrogation not possible with conventional microbiology, they pose new challenges for diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship programs. This review will summarize the most recent literature on these two categories of technologic advances and discuss the few studies that have looked at utilization and stewardship approaches. This review also highlights the future directions for both of these technologies.

Summary

The appropriate utilization of rapid molecular testing and clinical metagenomics has not been well established. More studies are needed to assess their prospective impacts on patient management and antimicrobial stewardship efforts as the future state of infectious disease diagnostics will see continued expansion of these technologic advances.