Treatment of severe infections due to metallo-β-lactamases-producing Gram-negative bacteria

Use of Cefiderocol in Adult Patients: Descriptive Analysis from a Prospective, Multicenter, Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Cefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin showing activity against various carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB). No data currently exist about real-world use of cefiderocol in terms of types of therapy (e.g., empirical or targeted, monotherapy or combined regimens), indications, and patient characteristics.

METHODS

In this multicenter, prospective study, we aimed at describing the use of cefiderocol in terms of types of therapy, indications, and patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Cefiderocol was administered as empirical and targeted therapy in 27.5% (55/200) and 72.5% (145/200) of cases, respectively. Overall, it was administered as monotherapy in 101/200 cases (50.5%) and as part of a combined regimen for CR-GNB infections in the remaining 99/200 cases (49.5%). In multivariable analysis, previous isolation of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii odds ratio (OR) 2.56, with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.01-6.46, p = 0.047] and previous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (OR 8.73, 95% CI 1.05-72.54, p = 0.045) were associated with administration of cefiderocol as part of a combined regimen, whereas chronic kidney disease was associated with cefiderocol monotherapy (OR 0.38 for combined regimen, 95% CI 0.16-0.91, p = 0.029). Cumulative 30-day mortality was 19.8%, 45.0%, 20.7%, and 22.7% in patients receiving targeted cefiderocol for infections by Enterobacterales, A. baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and any metallo-β-lactamase producers, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Cefiderocol is mainly used for targeted treatment, although empirical therapies account for more than 25% of prescriptions, thus requiring dedicated standardization and guidance. The almost equal distribution of cefiderocol monotherapy and cefiderocol-based combination therapies underlines the need for further study to ascertain possible differences in efficacy between the two approaches.

Novel resistance ICEs carrying the blaFIM-1 metallo-β-lactamase gene from an ST235 Pseudomonas aeruginosa sublineage

FIM-1 is an acquired metallo-β-lactamase identified in a multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (index strain FI-14/157) of clinical origin isolated in 2007 in Florence, Italy. Here we report on a second case of infection by FIM-1-positive P. aeruginosa (FI-17645), which occurred in 2020 in the same hospital. Both FIM-1-positive strains exhibited resistance to all anti-Pseudomonas antibiotics except colistin and cefiderocol. Comparative genomic characterization revealed that the two FIM-positive strains were closely related [core genome difference, 16 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)], suggesting a local circulation of similar strains. In the FI-14/157 index strain, the blaFIM-1 gene was associated with an ISCR19-like element that likely contributed to its capture downstream an integron platform inserted aboard a Tn21-like transposon, named Tn7703.1, which was associated with a large integrative and conjugative element (ICE) named ICE7705.1, integrated into an att site located within the 3'-end of tRNAGly CCC gene of the P. aeruginosa chromosome. In strain FI-17645, blaFIM-1 was associated with a closely related ICE, named ICE7705.2, integrated in the same chromosomal site. Similar ICE platforms, lacking the blaFIM-1-containing region, were detected in other ST235 P. aeruginosa strains from different geographic areas, suggesting a common ancestry and underscoring the role of these elements in the dissemination of resistance genes in P. aeruginosa. Sequence database mining revealed two draft P. aeruginosa genomes, one from Italy and one from the USA (both isolated in 2012), including a contig with blaFIM-1, suggesting that this resistance gene could have a broader distribution than originally anticipated.

Antimicrobial surveillance: A 20-year history of the SMART approach to addressing global antimicrobial resistance into the future

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major global public health threat, particularly affecting patients in resource-poor settings. Comprehensive surveillance programmes are essential to reducing the high mortality and morbidity associated with AMR and are integral to informing treatment decisions and guidelines, appraising the effectiveness of intervention strategies, and directing development of new antibacterial agents. Various surveillance programmes exist worldwide, including those administered by government bodies or funded by the pharmaceutical industry. One of the largest and longest running industry-sponsored AMR surveillance programme is the Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART), which recently completed its 20th year. The SMART database has grown to almost 500 000 isolates from over 200 sites in more than 60 countries, encompassing all major geographic regions and including many sites in low- and middle-income countries. The SMART surveillance programme has evolved in scope over time, including additional antibacterial agents, pathogens and infection sites, in line with changing epidemiology and medical need. Surveillance data from SMART and similar programmes have been used successfully to detect emerging resistance threats and AMR patterns in specific countries and regions, thus informing national and local clinical treatment guidelines. The SMART database can be accessed readily by physicians and researchers globally, which may be especially valuable to those from countries with limited healthcare resources, where surveillance and resistance data are rarely collected. Continued participation from as many sites as possible worldwide and maintenance of adequate funding are critical factors to fully realising the potential of large-scale AMR surveillance programmes into the future.

Antibiotic Therapy Strategies for Treating Gram-Negative Severe Infections in the Critically Ill: A Narrative Review

INTRODUCTION

Not enough data exist to inform the optimal duration and type of antimicrobial therapy against GN infections in critically ill patients.

METHODS

Narrative review based on a literature search through PubMed and Cochrane using the following keywords: "multi-drug resistant (MDR)", "extensively drug resistant (XDR)", "pan-drug-resistant (PDR)", "difficult-to-treat (DTR) Gram-negative infection," "antibiotic duration therapy", "antibiotic combination therapy" "antibiotic monotherapy" "Gram-negative bacteremia", "Gram-negative pneumonia", and "Gram-negative intra-abdominal infection".

RESULTS

Current literature data suggest adopting longer (≥10-14 days) courses of synergistic combination therapy due to the high global prevalence of ESBL-producing (45-50%), MDR (35%), XDR (15-20%), PDR (5.9-6.2%), and carbapenemases (CP)/metallo-β-lactamases (MBL)-producing (12.5-20%) Gram-negative (GN) microorganisms (i.e., Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumanii). On the other hand, shorter courses (≤5-7 days) of monotherapy should be limited to treating infections caused by GN with higher (≥3 antibiotic classes) antibiotic susceptibility. A general approach should be based on (i) third or further generation cephalosporins ± quinolones/aminoglycosides in the case of MDR-GN; (ii) carbapenems ± fosfomycin/aminoglycosides for extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs); and (iii) the association of old drugs with new expanded-spectrum β-lactamase inhibitors for XDR, PDR, and CP microorganisms. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in combination with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), bactericidal vs. bacteriostatic antibiotics, and the presence of resistance risk predictors (linked to patient, antibiotic, and microorganism) should represent variables affecting the antimicrobial strategies for treating GN infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the strategies of therapy described in the results, clinicians must remember that all treatment decisions are dynamic, requiring frequent reassessments depending on both the clinical and microbiological responses of the patient.

Treatment options for infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: a guide to good clinical practice

The rapid emergence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections necessitates the development of new treatments or the repurposing of available antibiotics. Here, treatment options for treatment of these infections, recent guidelines and evidence are reviewed. Studies that included treatment options for infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (Enterobacterales and nonfermenters), as well as extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing and carbapenem-resistant bacteria, were considered. Potential agents for the treatment of these infections, considering type of microorganism, mechanism of resistant, source and severity of infection as well as pharmacotherapy considerations, are summarized.

Impact of Persistent Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteremia on Clinical Outcome and Mortality

The clinical aspects of persistent bacteremia (PB) caused by gram-negative rods (GNRs) in terms of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and PB clearance status are unclear. This secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort study investigated differences in PB caused by Enterobacterales and glucose non-fermentative GNRs (NF-GNRs) based on AMR and PB clearance. We retrospectively surveyed medical records at Tohoku University Hospital. Patients for whom blood cultures were performed between January 2012 and December 2021 were recruited. PB cases were grouped based on AMR and PB clearance; the characteristics of PB due to each bacterial pathogen were examined. The main outcome variable was mortality. The late (30-90-day) mortality rate was significantly higher in the multidrug-resistant (MDR) group than in the non-MDR group for Enterobacterales. However, no significant difference was noted in mortality rates between NF-GNRs with and without AMR. Mortality rates tended to be higher in the non-PB-clearance group than in the clearance group for both Enterobacterales and NF-GNRs. Since the mortality rate was higher in the MDR group in the case of Enterobacterales PB, more careful management is necessary for this condition. Follow-up blood cultures and confirming the clearance of PB are useful for improving the survival rate.

In vitro activity of aztreonam in combination with newly developed β-lactamase inhibitors against MDR Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa producing metallo-β-lactamases

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the in vitro activity of aztreonam in combination with novel β-lactamase inhibitors, namely avibactam, nacubactam, taniborbactam and zidebactam, against MDR MBL-producing Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates.

METHODS

MIC values of aztreonam, aztreonam/β-lactam inhibitor but also cefiderocol as comparator were determined for 64 and 39 clinical Enterobacterales or P. aeruginosa isolates, respectively, producing representative MBLs, i.e. derivatives of NDM (n = 64), VIM (n = 32), IMP (n = 8) and SPM (n = 2). MICs were also determined for Escherichia coli TOP10 and P. aeruginosa PAO1 harbouring recombinant plasmids producing the different β-lactamases under isogenic backgrounds (n = 22 and n = 11, respectively). Fifty percent inhibitory concentrations were additionally determined for the abovementioned β-lactamase inhibitors using β-lactamase crude extracts.

RESULTS

The susceptibility rate for aztreonam was 17.1% among MBL-producing Enterobacterales, while it was very high with aztreonam/zidebactam (98.4%), and to a lower extent with aztreonam/nacubactam (84.4%) and aztreonam/taniborbactam (75%), compared with aztreonam/avibactam (70.3%) and cefiderocol (39.1%). Among MBL-producing P. aeruginosa isolates, the susceptibility rates were 53.8% with aztreonam, 66.7% with aztreonam/nacubactam and aztreonam/taniborbactam combinations, and 69.2% with aztreonam/avibactam, aztreonam/zidebactam and cefiderocol.

CONCLUSIONS

Altogether, these results showed that combinations including aztreonam and novel β-lactamase inhibitors, such as zidebactam, nacubactam or taniborbactam, have a very significant in vitro activity against MDR MBL-producing Enterobacterales clinical isolates, the aztreonam/zidebactam combination being the best option. On the other hand, aztreonam/zidebactam is equivalent to aztreonam/avibactam and cefiderocol among MBL-producing P. aeruginosa isolates.

Empirical antibiotic therapy for difficult-to-treat Gram-negative infections: when, how, and how long?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss empirical therapy for severe infections due to Gram-negative bacteria with difficult-to-treat resistance (GNB-DTR) in current clinical practice, focusing in particular on the positioning of novel therapeutic agents and rapid diagnostic tests.

RECENT FINDINGS

The current era of novel agents active against GNB-DTR and showing differential activity against specific determinants of resistance is an unprecedented scenario, in which the clinical reasoning leading to the choice of the empirical therapy for treating severe GNB-DTR infections is becoming more complex, but it also allows for enhanced treatment precision.

SUMMARY

Novel agents should be used in line with antimicrobial stewardship principles, aimed at reducing selective pressure for antimicrobial resistance. However, this does not mean that they should not be used. Indeed, excesses in restrictive uses may be unethical by precluding access to the most effective and less toxic treatments for patients with severe GNB-DTR infections. Given these premises (the 'how'), empirical treatment with novel agents should be considered in all patients with risk factors for GNB-DTR and severe clinical presentation of acute infection (the 'when'). Furthermore, empirical novel agents should preferably be continued only for a few hours, until de-escalation, modification, or confirmation (as targeted therapy) is made possible by the results of rapid diagnostic tests (the 'how long').

Nosocomial outbreak by NDM-1-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae highly resistant to cefiderocol, Florence, Italy, August 2021 to June 2022

A nosocomial outbreak by cefiderocol (FDC)-resistant NDM-1-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (NDM-Kp) occurred in a large tertiary care hospital from August 2021-June 2022 in Florence, Italy, an area where NDM-Kp strains have become endemic. Retrospective analysis of NDM-Kp from cases observed in January 2021-June 2022 revealed that 21/52 were FDC-resistant. The outbreak was mostly sustained by clonal expansion of a mutant with inactivated cirA siderophore receptor gene, which exhibited high-level resistance to FDC (MIC ≥ 32 mg/L) and spread independently of FDC exposure.

In Vitro Potency and Spectrum of the Novel Polymyxin MRX-8 Tested against Clinical Isolates of Gram-Negative Bacteria

The polymyxins display excellent in vitro antimicrobial activity against most Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii isolates, but their clinical utility has been limited because of class-specific toxicity problems. Therefore, new polymyxin analogs with improved safety properties are needed to combat serious infections caused by resistant Gram-negative pathogens. MRX-8 is a novel polymyxin B analog that displays reduced toxicity in in vitro and animal assays and is currently being evaluated in a phase 1 clinical trial. In this nonclinical study, the in vitro potency and spectrum of MRX-8 and comparators were evaluated against a large set of Gram-negative clinical isolates collected in the United States in 2017 to 2020. MRX-8, colistin, and polymyxin B exhibited nearly identical antimicrobial activities against the Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii isolate sets. MRX-8 MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ values were 0.12 and 0.25 mg/L, respectively, for the set of Enterobacterales isolates not intrinsically resistant to colistin and 0.5 and 1 mg/L, respectively, against both the A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa isolate sets. All three polymyxin-class compounds retained activity against meropenem-resistant and multidrug-resistant isolate subsets but were inactive against isolates displaying acquired or intrinsic resistance to polymyxins. These results support the continued development of MRX-8 to treat serious Gram-negative infections.

New antibiotics for the treatment of nonfermenting Gram-negative bacteria

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the current literature on novel agents for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant nonfermenting Gram-negative bacteria (NF-GNB) infections.

RECENT FINDINGS

Some novel agents have recently become available that are expected to replace classical polymyxins as the first-line options for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant NF-GNB infections.

SUMMARY

In this narrative review, we provide a brief overview of the differential activity of various recently approved agents against NF-GNB most encountered in the daily clinical practice, as well as the results from phase-3 randomized clinical trials and large postapproval observational studies, with special focus on NF-GNB. Since resistance to novel agents has already been reported, the use of novel agents needs to be optimized, based on their differential activity (not only in terms of targeted bacteria, but also of resistance determinants), the local microbiological epidemiology, and the most updated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data. Large real-life experiences remain of crucial importance for further refining the optimal treatment of NF-GNB infections in the daily clinical practice.

Role of new antibiotics in extended-spectrum β-lactamase-, AmpC- infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL)- and ampicillinase class C (AmpC)-producing Enterobacterales represent one of the major public threats of the current era. As a consequence, during the last decades there have been great efforts to develop new therapeutic agents against these microorganisms. The aim of this review is to summarize the clinical features associated with novel antibiotics with activity against ESBL- and AmpC-producing isolates.

RECENT FINDINGS

There a number of therapeutic agents with activity against ESBL and AmpC than have been introduced and approved over the past few years. Ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam are both carbapenem sparing agents that appear interesting alternatives for treatment of serious Gram-negative infections. Other new β-lactams/ β-lactamase inhibitors (e.g. cefepime-enmetazobactam; ceftaroline fosamil-avibactam; aztreonam-avibactam and cefepime-zidebactam) as well as eravacycline, omadacycline, and plazomicin are also promising agents for treatment of ESBL- and AmpC- infections, but further clinical data are needed to establish their efficacy in comparison to carbapenems. The role of carbapenems/ β-lactamase inhibitors remains to be clarified.

SUMMARY

New therapeutic agents against ESBL- and AmpC-producing Enterobacterales have distinctive specificities and limitations that require further investigations. Future randomized clinical trials are required to define the best strategy for their use in patients with serious infections due to ESBL- and/or AmpC- infections.

Safety evaluation of current therapies for high-risk severely ill patients with carbapenem-resistant infections

INTRODUCTION

Infections due to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) are increasingly frequent events, which are associated with a high mortality rate. Traditionally, combination regimens including high doses of "old antibiotics" such as polymyxins, tigecycline, and aminoglycosides have been used to treat these infections, but they were often associated with low efficacy and high excess of side effects and toxicity, especially nephrotoxicity. Along with the development of new compounds, the last decade has seen substantial improvements in the management of CR infections.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we aimed to discuss the safety characteristics and tolerability of different new options for treatment of CR infections.

EXPERT OPINION

The availability of new drugs showing a potent in vitro activity against CR-GNB represents a unique opportunity to face the threat of resistance, while potentially reducing toxicity. A thorough understanding of the safety profile from clinical trials may guide the use of these new drugs in critically ill patients at high risk for the development of adverse events. Future data coming from real-life studies for drugs targeting CR infections are crucial to confirm the safety profile observed in pivotal trials.

Management of Infections Caused by Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative Pathogens: Recent Advances and Future Directions

During the last decades, the isolation of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative (MDR-GN) bacteria has dramatically increased worldwide and has been associated with significant delays in the administration of adequate antibiotic treatment, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality rates. Given specific challenges to effective therapy with old antibiotics, there is the need to establish adequate clinical and therapeutic recommendations for antibiotic treatment of MDR-GN pathogens. Herein, we will review risk factors for harbouring infections due to MDR-GN bacteria, proposing an algorithm for the choice of empirical treatment when a MDR-GN pathogen is suspected. In addition, we will report our recommendations regarding the first- and second-line treatment options for hospitalized patients with serious infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamases producing Enterobacterales, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa and MDR Acinetobacter baumannii. Recommendations have been specially focused, for each pathogen, on bloodstream infections, nosocomial pneumonia, and urinary tract infections.

Polymyxin resistance in Enterobacterales: overview and epidemiology in the Americas

The worldwide spread of carbapenem- and polymyxin-resistant Enterobacterales represents an urgent public-health threat. However, for most countries in the Americas, the available data are limited, although Latin America has been suggested as a silent spreading reservoir for isolates carrying plasmid-mediated polymyxin resistance mechanisms. This work provides an overall update on polymyxin and polymyxin resistance and focuses on uses, availability and susceptibility testing. Moreover, a comprehensive review of the current polymyxin resistance epidemiology in the Americas is provided. We found that reports in the English and Spanish literature show widespread carbapenemase-producing and colistin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in the Americas determined by the clonal expansion of the pandemic clone ST258 and mgrB-mediated colistin resistance. In addition, widespread IncI2 and IncX4 plasmids carrying mcr-1 in Escherichia coli come mainly from human sources; however, plasmid-mediated colistin resistance in the Americas is underreported in the veterinary sector. These findings demonstrate the urgent need for the implementation of polymyxin resistance surveillance in Enterobacterales as well as appropriate regulatory measures for antimicrobial use in veterinary medicine.

The Revival of Aztreonam in Combination with Avibactam against Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Gram-Negatives: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies and Clinical Cases

Infections caused by metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas are increasingly reported worldwide and are usually associated with high mortality rates (>30%). Neither standard therapy nor consensus for the management of these infections exist. Aztreonam, an old β-lactam antibiotic, is not hydrolyzed by MBLs. However, since many MBL-producing strains co-produce enzymes that could hydrolyze aztreonam (e.g., AmpC, ESBL), a robust β-lactamase inhibitor such as avibactam could be given as a partner drug. We performed a systematic review including 35 in vitro and 18 in vivo studies on the combination aztreonam + avibactam for infections sustained by MBL-producing Gram-negatives. In vitro data on 2209 Gram-negatives were available, showing the high antimicrobial activity of aztreonam (MIC ≤ 4 mg/L when combined with avibactam) in 80% of MBL-producing Enterobacterales, 85% of Stenotrophomonas and 6% of MBL-producing Pseudomonas. Clinical data were available for 94 patients: 83% of them had bloodstream infections. Clinical resolution within 30 days was reported in 80% of infected patients. Analyzing only patients with bloodstream infections (64 patients), death occurred in 19% of patients treated with aztreonam + ceftazidime/avibactam. The combination aztreonam + avibactam appears to be a promising option against MBL-producing bacteria (especially Enterobacterales, much less for Pseudomonas) while waiting for new antimicrobials.

Carbapenemase producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: implication on future therapeutic strategies

Introduction: The emergence of carbapenemase resistant Gram-negative is designated as an 'urgent' priority of public health. Carbapenemase producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (CPKP) is linked with significant mortality. Conventionally used antibiotics (polymyxins, tigecycline, aminoglycosides, etc.) are associated with poor efficacy and toxicity profiles are quite worrisome.Areas covered: This article reviews mechanism of resistance and evidence regarding novel treatments of infections caused by CPKP, focusing mainly on currently approved new therapies and implications on future therapeutic strategies. A review of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLI) recently approved and in clinical development as well as cefiderocol, eravacycline and apramycin are discussed.Expert opinion: Newly approved and forthcoming antimicrobial agents are promising to combat infections caused by CPKP. Ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam are novel agents with favorable outcome and associated with improved mortality in KPC-producing K. pneumoniae infections. However, are inactive against metallo-β-lactamases (MBL). Novel BLI in later stage of development, i.e. aztreonam-avibactam, cefepime-zidebactam, cefepime-taniborbactam, and meropenem-nacubactam as well as cefiderocol are active in vitro against both KPC and MBL. Potential expectations of future therapeutic strategies are improved potency against CPKP, more tolerable safety profile, and capability of overcoming current resistance mechanism of multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae.