Decreased cortical spreading depolarizations in neurosurgical patients being given ketamine

Ketamine in Acute Brain Injury: Current Opinion Following Cerebral Circulation and Electrical Activity

The use of ketamine in patients with TBI has often been argued due to its possible deleterious effects on cerebral circulation and perfusion. Early studies suggested that ketamine could increase intracranial pressure, decreasing cerebral perfusion pressure and thereby reducing oxygen supply to the damaged cerebral cortex. Some recent studies have refuted these conclusions relating to the role of ketamine, especially in patients with TBI, showing that ketamine should be the first-choice drug in this type of patient at induction. Our narrative review collects evidence on ketamine’s use in patients with TBI. Databases were examined for studies in which ketamine had been used in acute traumatic brain injury (TBI). The outcomes considered in this narrative review were: mortality of patients with TBI; impact on intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure; blood pressure and heart rate values; depolarization rate; and preserved neurological functions. 11 recent studies passed inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in this review. Despite all the benefits reported in the literature, the use of ketamine in patients with brain injury still appears to be limited. A slight increase in intracranial pressure was found in only two studies, while two smaller studies showed a reduction in intracranial pressure after ketamine administration. There was no evidence of harm from the ketamine’s use in patients with TBI.

Spreading Depolarization After Chronic Subdural Hematoma Evacuation: Associated Clinical Risk Factors and Influence on Clinical Outcome

BACKGROUND

Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a common neurosurgical condition responsible for excess morbidity, particularly in the geriatric population. Recovery after evacuation is complicated by fluctuating neurological deficits in a high proportion of patients. We previously demonstrated that spreading depolarizations (SDs) may be responsible for some of these events. In this study, we aim to determine candidate risk factors for probable SD and assess the influence of probable SD on outcome.

METHODS

We used two cohorts who underwent surgery for cSDH. The first cohort (n = 40) had electrocorticographic monitoring to detect SD. In the second cohort (n = 345), we retrospectively identified subjects with suspected SD based on the presence of transient neurological symptoms not explained by structural etiology or ictal activity on electroencephalography. We extracted standard demographic and outcome variables for comparisons and modeling.

RESULTS

Of 345 subjects, 80 (23%) were identified in the retrospective cohort as having probable SD. Potential risk factors included history of hypertension, worse clinical presentation on the Glasgow Coma Scale, and lower Hounsfield unit density and volume of the preoperative subdural hematoma. Probable SD was associated with multiple worse-outcome measures, including length of stay and clinical outcomes, but not increased mortality. On a multivariable analysis, probable SD was independently associated with worse outcome, determined by the Glasgow Outcome Scale score at the first clinic follow-up (odds ratio 1.793, 95% confidence interval 1.022-3.146) and longer hospital length of stay (odds ratio 7.952, 95% confidence interval 4.062-15.563).

CONCLUSIONS

Unexplained neurological deficits after surgery for cSDH occur in nearly a quarter of patients and may be explained by SD. We identified several potential candidate risk factors. Patients with probable SD have worse outcomes, independent of other baseline risk factors. Further data with gold standard monitoring are needed to evaluate for possible predictors of SD to target therapies to a high-risk population.

Ketamine as an Anesthetic for Patients with Acute Brain Injury: A Systematic Review

For years, the use of ketamine as an anesthetic to patients suffering from acute brain injury has been debated because of its possible deleterious effects on the cerebral circulation and thus on the cerebral perfusion. Early studies suggested that ketamine could increase the intracranial pressure thus lowering the cerebral perfusion and hence reduce the oxygen supply to the injured brain. However, more recent studies are less conclusive and might even indicate that patients with acute brain injury could benefit from ketamine sedation. This systematic review summarizes the evidence regarding the use of ketamine in patients suffering from traumatic brain injury. Databases were searched for studies using ketamine in acute brain injury. Outcomes of interest were mortality, intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, blood pressure, heart rate, spreading depolarizations, and neurological function. In total 11 studies were included. The overall level of evidence concerning the use of ketamine in brain injury is low. Only two studies found a small increase in intracranial pressure, while two small studies found decreased levels of intracranial pressure following ketamine administration. We found no evidence of harm during ketamine use in patients suffering from acute brain injury.