Alterations in pain responsiveness and serum biomarkers in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy: an age- and gender-matched controlled pilot study

Cattle Bile Arisaema Aqueous Extracts Protect Against Febrile Seizures in Rats Through Regulating Neurotransmitters and Suppressing Neuroinflammation

Cattle bile Arisaema (CBA) is a traditional medicine used for the treatment of febrile seizures (FS) for thousands of years in China. However, its application is greatly limited due to cost reasons, and pig bile Arisaema (PBA) is the main commercial product instead. Additionally, the underlying mechanism of CBA for the treatment of FS still remains unknown. In this study, we investigated the anti-convulsant effect and potential mechanism of the CBA aqueous extract for the first time through a hot-water bath-induced FS rat model. Our results showed that pre-treatment with CBA dramatically lowered the incidence rate and generation times and prolonged the latency of FS. In addition, CBA effectively ameliorated neuronal damage and regulated neurotransmitter disorder induced by FS in the rat hippocampus. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, western blotting, immunohistochemical, and qRT-PCR results exhibited that CBA suppressed the expression of GFAP, TLR4, NF-κB, HMGB1, NLRP3, TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 and consequently inhibited the neuroinflammation induced by FS. Interestingly, although the CBA and PBA aqueous extracts possessed the same trend on the changes caused by FS, the improvement of FS by CBA is markedly better than that by PBA. These findings indicate that CBA exerts a protective effect on febrile seizures through regulating neurotransmitter disorder and suppressing neuroinflammation.

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor in patients with epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Epilepsy affects almost 1% of people and is characterized by sudden seizures. To date, no reliable biomarker has been found to diagnose or predict the outcomes of epilepsy. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels have recently been shown to differ between patients with certain neurologic disorders and normal population, and it is unknown whether this is the case for epilepsy. In this study, we mainly aim to answer this question.

METHODS

We searched three databases for studies comparing BDNF levels between patients with epilepsy and controls. Quality assessment of included studies was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and statistical analyses were carried out in STATA software version 16.

RESULTS

Final analyses included 10 studies involving 403 patients with epilepsy. BDNF levels were statistically similar between patients and controls (standardized mean difference (SMD) = - 0.30, 95% CI = - 1.32 to 0.71, p = 0.56). When categorized by epilepsy subtype, patients with partial epilepsy showed lower BDNF measures than controls (95% CI = - 1.42 to - 0.32, p < 0.01), while the difference was not significant in patients with generalized epilepsy (95% CI = - 2.81 to 1.65, p = 0.61). Subgroup analyses indicated that BDNF was lower in patients than controls when age or sex matching was not present. Patient samples acquired in the morning also showed significantly lower BDNF levels than controls, unlike afternoon samples. Meta-regression identified no predictor for the difference in BDNF levels.

CONCLUSION

Generally, patients with epilepsy had BDNF levels similar to general population, although patients with partial epilepsy showed lower BDNF levels. Taking into account the sub-group analyses, further studies with higher qualities are required to evaluate the role and utility of BDNF in epilepsy.