Survey of current practices from the International Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Consortium (ISBRTC) for head and neck cancers

Incidence of Carotid Blowout Syndrome in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer after Radiation Therapy: A Cohort Study

Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is a rare yet life-threatening complication that occurs after radiation therapy (RT). This study aimed to determine the incidence of CBS in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) undergoing contemporary RT and to explore potential discrepancies in the risk of CBS between nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) and non-NPC patients. A total of 1084 patients with HNC who underwent RT between 2013 and 2023 were included in the study. All patients were under regular follow-ups at the radio-oncology department, and underwent annual contrast-enhanced computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging for cancer recurrence surveillance. Experienced neuroradiologists and vascular neurologists reviewed the recruited patients' images. Patients were further referred to the neurology department for radiation vasculopathy evaluation. The primary outcome of this study was CBS. Patients were categorized into NPC and non-NPC groups and survival analysis was employed to compare the CBS risk between the two groups. A review of the literature on CBS incidence was also conducted. Among the enrolled patients, the incidence of CBS in the HNC, NPC, and non-NPC groups was 0.8%, 0.9%, and 0.7%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant difference between the NPC and non-NPC groups (p = 0.34). Combining the findings for our cohort with those of previous studies revealed that the cumulative incidence of CBS in patients with HNC is 5% (95% CI = 3-7%) after both surgery and RT, 4% (95% CI = 2-6%) after surgery alone, and 5% (95% CI = 3-7%) after RT alone. Our findings indicate a low incidence of CBS in patients with HNC undergoing contemporary RT. Patients with NPC may have a CBS risk close to that of non-NPC patients. However, the low incidence of CBS could be a potentially cause of selection bias and underestimation bias.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy as a Curative Treatment for De Novo Mucosal Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Feasible Alternative Option for Fragile Patients with Small Lesion: A Systematic Review

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is characterized by a high dose per fraction, well-defined small targets, superior dose conformity, and a steep off-target dose gradient. A literature search was conducted to examine the experience with SBRT as a curative treatment for newly diagnosed mucosal carcinoma of the head and neck (MCHN). Four retrospective case series and one prospective phase I clinical trial published between 2012 and 2020 described 124 patients. SBRT was mainly performed in older patients with different tumor sites. The median size of the planning target volumes ranged from 5.3 to 41 cm3. Different approaches were used to create margins. In two studies, limited elective nodal irradiation was performed. The equivalent doses used were 60-83.33 Gy delivered in five fractions. Considerable heterogeneity was observed in the radiation dose specification. The incidence of grade ≥3 late toxicity was 0-8.3%, with local and regional control ranging from 73% to 100%. Improved or stable quality of life after SBRT was reported in two studies. Curative-intent SBRT for de novo MCHN appears to be an effective and relatively safe treatment for small tumor targets, preferably without concomitant elective tissue irradiation. Standardization of SBRT practice and well-designed prospective clinical trials are needed to better define the role of SBRT in this setting.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for treating primary head and neck cancer and locoregional recurrence: A comprehensive review of the literature

Introduction

Although stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has advance to standard-of-care for many different indications like lung and liver malignancies, it still remains in its infancy for treating head and neck cancer. Nevertheless there is a growing body of experience and evidence, which is summarized in this review Methods A thorough search of the literature was performed and critically reviewed both for SABR as a primary treatment as well as for treating locoregionally recurrent disease in a pre-irradiated field.

Results

There exist only few prospective data published so far for treating head and neck cancer with SABR. In the primary situation especially implementing SABR as a boost after definitive radiotherapy or a single-modality for locally limited, small glottic cancer appear promising. On the other hand, SABR can be a useful modality for treating local recurrence in a pre-irradiated field. However, caution is needed in the case of proximity to a pre-irradiated carotid artery or other serial organs at risk. Usually only limited gross volumes are treated with 3-6 fractions every other day and a cumulative dose of 24-44 Gy in dedicated radiosurgery platforms or modern linacs with the possibility of online image-guidance and adequate immobilsation.

Conclusions

SABR is an innovative, effective and promising treatment modality for small targets, especially in near proximity to organs at risk or in a pre-irradiated region. Prospective trials are further needed for this technique to become standard-of care.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for distant metastases to the head and neck

PURPOSE

To report clinical outcomes for patients with metastatic disease to the head and neck (HN) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients treated with SBRT to HN sites from 2012 to 2020 was conducted. Treatment indications included the following: oligometastases, oligoprogression, and control a dominant area of progression (DAP). Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate local control (LC), regional control (RC), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Univariable (UVA) and multivariable analyses (MVA) were performed. Grade 3-4 acute and late toxicities were reported by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients (58 lesions) were analysed with a median follow-up of 16 months. Primary sites included lung (25.0%), kidney (19.6%), breast (19.6%) and other (35.8%). SBRT indications were as follows: oligometastases (42.9%), oligoprogression (19.6%) and local control of a dominant area of progression (37.5%). Most patients received SBRT to a single neck node (n = 47, 81.0%). Median SBRT dose was 40 Gy (range 25-50 Gy) in five fractions, with a median biologically effective dose (BED10) of 72 Gy (range 37.5-100 Gy). One- and 2-year LC and RC rates were 97.6% and 72.7% as well as 100% and 86.7%, respectively. Median OS was 19.2 months (95% [CI] 14.8-69.4), and median PFS was 7.4 months (95% [CI] 5.2-11.9). The 1-year OS and PFS rates for oligometastases, oligoprogression and DAP were 95.8%, 63.6% and 38.1% (p = 0.0039) as well as 56.5%, 27.3% and 19.1% (p = 0.0004), respectively. On MVA, treatment indication and histology were predictive for OS, while indication and prior systemic therapy were predictive for PFS. Cumulative late grade 3 + toxicity rate was 11.3%, without grade 5 events.

CONCLUSION

The use of SBRT for metastatic disease to the HN provided excellent LC rates with low rates of regional failure and an acceptable toxicity profile, highlighting its utility in these patients. Patients with oligometastatic disease had better OS and PFS than others.

The Evolving Role of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer: Where Do We Stand?

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a precise and conformal radiation therapy (RT) that aims to deliver a high dose of radiation to the tumor whilst sparing surrounding normal tissue, making it an attractive option for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients who are not suitable for the traditional long course of RT with comprehensive RT target volume. Definitive SBRT for HNC has been investigated in different settings, including early stage glottis cancer, and as an alternative to brachytherapy boost after external beam RT. It is also used as a primary treatment option for elderly or medically unfit patients. More recently, an SBRT combination with immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting for HNC showed promising results. Salvage or adjuvant SBRT for HNC can be used in appropriately selected cases. Future studies are warranted to determine the optimum dose and fractionation schedules in any of these indications.

An Overview of Head and Neck Tumor Reirradiation: What Has Been Achieved So Far?

The recurrence rate of head and neck cancers (HNCs) after initial treatment may reach 70%, and poor prognosis is reported in most cases. Curative options for recurrent HNCs mainly depend on the treatment history and the recurrent tumor localization. Reirradiation for HNCs is effective and has been included in most guidelines. However, the option remains clinically challenging due to high incidence of severe toxicity, especially in cases of quick infield recurrence. Recent technical advances in radiation therapy (RT) provide the means for upgrade in reirradiation protocols. While the majority of hospitals stay focused on conventional and widely accessible modulated RTs, the particle therapy options emerge as tolerable and providing further treatment opportunities for recurrent HNCs. Still, the progress is impeded by high heterogeneity of the data and the lack of large-scale prospective studies. This review aimed to summarize the outcomes of reirradiation for HNCs in the clinical perspective.

The immunogenic radiation and new players in immunotherapy and targeted therapy for head and neck cancer

Although treatment modalities for head and neck cancer have evolved considerably over the past decades, survival rates have plateaued. The treatment options remained limited to definitive surgery, surgery followed by fractionated radiotherapy with optional chemotherapy, and a definitive combination of fractionated radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Lately, immunotherapy has been introduced as the fourth modality of treatment, mainly administered as a single checkpoint inhibitor for recurrent or metastatic disease. While other regimens and combinations of immunotherapy and targeted therapy are being tested in clinical trials, adapting the appropriate regimens to patients and predicting their outcomes have yet to reach the clinical setting. Radiotherapy is mainly regarded as a means to target cancer cells while minimizing the unwanted peripheral effect. Radiotherapy regimens and fractionation are designed to serve this purpose, while the systemic effect of radiation on the immune response is rarely considered a factor while designing treatment. To bridge this gap, this review will highlight the effect of radiotherapy on the tumor microenvironment locally, and the immune response systemically. We will review the methodology to identify potential targets for therapy in the tumor microenvironment and the scientific basis for combining targeted therapy and radiotherapy. We will describe a current experience in preclinical models to test these combinations and propose how challenges in this realm may be faced. We will review new players in targeted therapy and their utilization to drive immunogenic response against head and neck cancer. We will outline the factors contributing to head and neck cancer heterogeneity and their effect on the response to radiotherapy. We will review in-silico methods to decipher intertumoral and intratumoral heterogeneity and how these algorithms can predict treatment outcomes. We propose that (a) the sequence of surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy should be designed not only to annul cancer directly, but to prime the immune response. (b) Fractionation of radiotherapy and the extent of the irradiated field should facilitate systemic immunity to develop. (c) New players in targeted therapy should be evaluated in translational studies toward clinical trials. (d) Head and neck cancer treatment should be personalized according to patients and tumor-specific factors.

Reirradiation of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: a pragmatic approach, part II: radiation technique and fractionations

INTRODUCTION

Reirradiation (reRT) of local recurrent/second primary tumors of the head and neck represents a potential curative treatment for patients not candidate to a salvage surgery. Aim of the present study is to summarize literature data on modern radiation techniques and fractionations used in this setting of patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A narrative review of the literature was conducted on three topics: (1) target volume delineation (2) reRT dose and techniques and (3) ongoing studies. Patients treated with postoperative reRT and palliative intent were not considered for the current analysis.

RESULTS

Recommendations on the target volume contouring have been reported. 3D-Conformal Radiotherapy, Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy, Stereotactic body Radiotherapy Intraoperative Radiotherapy, Brachytherapy and Charged Particles have been analyzed in terms of indication and fractionation in the field of reRT. Ongoing studies on the topic have been reported for IMRT and Charged Particles. Moreover, according to literature data a stepwise approach has been proposed aiming to provide a useful tool to select patients candidate to a curative reRT in daily clinical practice. Two clinical cases were also provided for its application.

CONCLUSION

Different radiation techniques and fractionations can be used for a second course of radiotherapy in patients with recurrent/second primary tumor of head and neck region. Tumor characteristics as well as radiobiological considerations should be take into account to define the best reRT approach.

A phase 2 study of stereotactic body radiation therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SHINE): a single arm clinical trial protocol

BACKGROUND

Cancers of the head and neck region are often characterized by locally advanced, non-metastatic disease. Standard treatments for advanced cervico-facial cancers of the skin or primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) include combinations of surgery, radiation and chemotherapy, which are associated with high rates of acute toxicity and complications. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been shown to be a promising modality of treatment for this patient population in retrospective studies; to our knowledge, there are no prospective clinical studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of SBRT in these patients.

METHODS

This phase 2, single institution, single arm study aims to evaluate response rates to SBRT in older age patients with locally advanced HNSCC for whom primary surgery is not recommended or performed. The intervention is SBRT 45 Gy in 5 fractions given every 3-4 days. Toxicity, quality of life and patient outcomes will be recorded regularly up to 24 months after completion of SBRT.

DISCUSSION

For this patient population, SBRT may offer a shorter and more effective treatment than the current standard of care palliative regimens. If the study demonstrates that SBRT is safe and effective, then this may lead to randomized studies comparing conventional radiotherapy to SBRT for selected head and neck cancer patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04435938 .  Date registered: June 17, 2020.

Retreatment of Recurrent or Second Primary Head and Neck Cancer After Prior Radiation: Executive Summary of the American Radium Society® (ARS) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC): Expert Panel on Radiation Oncology - Head and Neck Cancer

BACKGROUND

Re-treatment of recurrent or second primary head and neck cancers occurring in a previously irradiated field is complex. Few guidelines exist to support practice.

METHODS

We performed an updated literature search of peer-reviewed journals in a systematic fashion. Search terms, key questions, and associated clinical case variants were formed by panel consensus. The literature search informed the committee during a blinded vote on the appropriateness of treatment options via the modified Delphi method.

RESULTS

The final number of citations retained for review was 274. These informed five key questions, which focused on patient selection, adjuvant re-irradiation, definitive re-irradiation, stereotactic body radiation (SBRT), and re-irradiation to treat non-squamous cancer. Results of the consensus voting are presented along with discussion of the most current evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

This provides updated evidence-based recommendations and guidelines for the re-treatment of recurrent or second primary cancer of the head and neck.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for head and neck skin cancer

AIM

To report outcomes of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for head and neck skin cancer (HNSC) patients treated at a high-volume center.

MATERIALS

A retrospective review of HNSC SBRT patients from 2012 to 2019 was conducted. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate local control (LC), locoregional control (LRC) outside of SBRT field, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and late toxicity (LT). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Grade 3-4 acute and late toxicities were reported by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0.

RESULTS

One hundred and six medically unfit HNSC patients (112 lesions) were included. Median follow-up was 8 months. Median patient age at diagnosis was 86 years (range: 56-102 years). The majority of patients had advanced disease (overall stage III-IV [n = 90, 85%]) with median gross tumor volumes (GTV) of 31 cm³ (range: 17-56 cm³). Treated sites were: primary (n = 51), nodal (n = 47) or primary plus nodal (n = 8). SBRT doses ranged from 32-50 Gy delivered twice weekly in 4-6 fractions to the gross tumor volume (GTV). One and 2-year LC rates were 78% (69-88) and 67% (53-82), respectively. One-year LRC outside of SBRT field, OS, PFS and LT rates were 72% (62-84), 53% (43-65), 52% (40-62), and 7% (2-17), respectively. Thirty-three patients (31%) developed acute grade ≥ 3 treatment-related toxicity, most commonly dermatitis (n = 31). Nine patients (8%) experienced late grade ≥ 3 toxicity, including 7 grade 3 fibrosis, 1 grade 3 bone radionecrosis and 1 grade 4 skin ulceration. No treatment-related deaths (grade 5) were observed.

CONCLUSION

SBRT provides durable disease control with acceptable toxicity for medically unfit high-risk HNSC patients unable to undergo standard of care curative treatment approaches.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for primary non-metastatic head and neck cancer: When less is enough

The advantage of highly conformal dose distribution and steep dose gradient has resulted in rapidly increasing use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in multiple cancer sites. Also there has been a surge in the use of SBRT in head neck cancer over the last decade. It is predominantly exploited in retreatment setting for recurrent and second primary head neck cancer as well as in metastatic setting. The literature on SBRT in primary non-metastatic head neck cancer is sparse and evolving. In the current review, available literature was critically analyzed focusing on the potential applications of SBRT in primary untreated non-metastatic head neck cancer. SBRT boost following external beam radiotherapy is temping as a method of dose escalation. Special attention was paid to the application of SBRT as a sole modality of treatment. The shorter treatment schedule makes it an attractive option for treatment in primary head neck cancer especially in elderly, co-morbid and medically unfits patients. Future investigation is needed to establish SBRT as an additional armamentarium in the radiotherapeutic management of head and neck cancers.

Initial Data Pooling for Radiation Dose-Volume Tolerance for Carotid Artery Blowout and Other Bleeding Events in Hypofractionated Head and Neck Retreatments

PURPOSE

Dose-volume data for injury to carotid artery and other major vessels in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)/SABR head and neck reirradiation were reviewed, modeled, and summarized.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A PubMed search of the English-language literature (stereotactic and carotid and radiation) in April 2018 found 238 major vessel maximum point doses in 6 articles that were pooled for logistic modeling. Two subsequent studies with dose-volume major vessel data were modeled separately for comparison. Attempts were made to separate carotid blowout syndrome from other bleeding events (BE) in the analysis, but we acknowledge that all except 1 data set has some element of BE interspersed.

RESULTS

Prior radiation therapy (RT) dose was not uniformly reported per patient in the studies included, but a course on the order of conventionally fractionated 70 Gy was considered for the purposes of the analysis (with an approximately ≥6-month estimated interval between prior and subsequent treatment in most cases). Factors likely associated with reduced risk of BE include nonconsecutive daily treatment, lower extent of circumferential tumor involvement around the vessel, and no surgical manipulation before or after SBRT.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial data pooling for reirradiation involving the carotid artery resulted in 3 preliminary models compared in this Hypofractionated Treatment Effects in the Clinic (HyTEC) report. More recent experiences with alternating fractionation schedules and additional risk-reduction strategies are also presented. Complications data for the most critical structures such as spinal cord and carotid artery are so limited that they cannot be viewed as strong conclusions of probability of risk, but rather, as a general guideline for consideration. There is a great need for better reporting standards as noted in the High Dose per Fraction, Hypofractionated Treatment Effects in the Clinic introductory paper.

Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for De Novo Head and Neck Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for de novo (previously untreated) head and neck cancers (HNCs) is increasingly being used in medically unfit patients. A systematic review of SBRT was conducted for previously untreated HNCs.

Methods and Materials

Medline (PubMed), excerpta medica database, and Cochrane Library databases were queried from inception until July 2020. Comparative outcome data were extracted where available up to 5 years. Results from random-effect models were presented in forest plots, with between-study heterogeneity evaluated by I² statistics and Q-tests.

Results

Nine studies met inclusion criteria, representing 157 patients. Local control rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were as follows: 90.7% (95% confidence interval, 80.6%-95.6%), 81.8% (67.2%-90.7%), and 73.5% (40.4%-90.5%), respectively. Overall survival at 1, 2, and 3 years was 75.9% (75.1%-76.6%), 61.1% (60.3%-61.9%), and 50.0% (48.8%-51.4%), respectively. Late grade 3 to 4 toxicity rate was 3.3% (0.2%-10.2%), and late grade 5 toxicity rate was 0.1% (0.0%-1.0%).

Conclusions

SBRT for de novo HNC is safe and effective in providing locoregional control, with acceptable toxicities in most subsites. This finding warrants broader validation to guide its scope.

Carotid blowout syndrome after reirradiation for head and neck malignancies: a comprehensive systematic review for a pragmatic multidisciplinary approach

AIM

To provide a literature review on risk factors and strategies to prevent acute carotid blowout (CBO) syndrome in patients who underwent reirradiation (reRT) for recurrent head and neck (HN) malignancies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Inclusion criteria were: 1) CBO following reRT in the HN region, 2) description on patient-, tumor- or treatment-related risk factors, 3) clinical or radiological signs of threatened or impending CBO, and 4) CBO prevention strategies.

RESULTS

Thirty-five studies were selected for the analysis from five hundred seventy-seven records. Results provided indications on clinical, radiological and dosimetric parameters possibly associated with higher risk of CBO. Endovascular procedures (artery occlusion and stenting) to prevent acute massive hemorrhage in high risk patients were discussed.

CONCLUSION

Literature data are still scarce with a low level of evidence. Nevertheless, the present work provides a comprehensive review useful for clinicians as a multidisciplinary pragmatic tool in their clinical practice.

Long-term outcomes and safety after reirradiation in locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma in a non-endemic area

PURPOSE

To determine outcomes and toxicities after reirradiation for locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rNPC) and to apply a prognostic index in a non-endemic region.

METHODS

We retrospectively reported progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related toxicities in patients treated with curative intent for locally rNPC. We applied the prognostic model for OS and grade 5 radiotherapy (RT)-related toxicities published by Li et al. and evaluated its prognostic accuracy by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

Between 2005 and 2018, 33 patients were treated for rNPC in our institution. Median follow-up was 60 months. The mean time to local recurrence was 75 months. Six (18%) patients had a persistent grade 3 toxicity from a previous RT course. The median re-RT dose was 66 Gy. After re-RT, 13 patients had local failure and 3 patients had metastatic recurrence. Median PFS was 18 months with a 5-year PFS rate of 29%. Median OS was 35 months with a 5-year OS rate of 37%. Grade 3 or higher toxicities rate was 74%. There were 21% grade 5 toxicities. The median time to a grade 5 toxicity was less than 6 months following re-RT. The prognostic nomogram was not predictive for OS or grade 5 toxicities.

CONCLUSION

Reirradiation of rNPC is an effective treatment but is associated with a high rate of life-threatening toxicity. Stratification of patients based on their risk of developing severe toxicity is needed to select patients who will most likely benefit from re-RT.

Using Preclinical Data to Design Combination Clinical Trials of Radiation Therapy and Immunotherapy

Immunotherapies are rapidly entering the clinic as approved treatments for diverse cancer pathologies. Radiation therapy is an integral partner in cancer therapy, commonly as part of complicated multimodality approaches that optimize patient outcomes. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that the success of radiation therapy in tumor control is due in part to immune mechanisms, and that outcomes following radiation therapy can be improved through combination with a range of immunotherapies. However, preclinical models of cancer are very different from patient tumors, and the way these preclinical tumors are treated is often very different from standard of care treatment of patients. This review examines the preclinical and clinical data for the role of the immune system in radiation therapy outcomes, and how to integrate preclinical findings into clinical trials, using ongoing studies as examples.

Highlights on the Management of Oligometastatic Disease

Purpose: The understanding of oligometastatic disease (OMD) is rapidly evolving and with this comes the ability to utilize a number of modalities that excel in the localized control of disease. It has been identified that there are no clear guidelines based on high-level evidence to standardized approaches toward the management of OMD. These highlights have been developed to provide a road map for all health-care professionals who are involved in the management of OMD to support standardized patient care. Methods: The Saudi Lung Cancer Guidelines Committee is a part of the Saudi Lung Cancer Association which, in turn, is part of the Saudi Thoracic Society. Considering that lung cancer constitutes a major proportion of OMD prevalence, the committee took the initiative to develop national highlights to support the management of OMD within Saudi Arabia. The committee members are national clinical leaders who collaborated with international expertise to establish these highlights to serve as a general clinical pathway in the management of OMD. Results: Standardization of the indications to diagnose oligometastases and patient selection criteria including ineligibility criteria for treatment are the basis of the highlights. Treatment approaches including surgical and the variety of radiotherapeutical options are discussed in relation to specific oligometastatic sites. Acceptable measurements for response to treatment and the future for the treatment of OMD conclude the development of the highlights. Conclusion: These are the first national highlights addressing this important disease in oncology. The implementation of these highlights as guidelines requires a robust multidisciplinary team and access to specific technology and expertise. These highlights are based on the most recent findings within the literature but will require repeated review and updating due to this rapidly evolving field in disease management.

Contact lens-type ocular in vivo dosimeter for radiotherapy

PURPOSE

This study aimed to (a) develop a contact lens-type ocular in vivo dosimeter (CLOD) that can be worn directly on the eye and (b) assess its dosimetric characteristics and biological stability for radiation therapy.

METHODS

The molder of a soft contact lens was directly used to create the dosimeter, which included a radiation-sensitive component - an active layer similar to a radiochromic film - to measure the delivered dose. A flatbed scanner with a reflection mode was used to measure the change in optical density due to irradiation. The sensitivity, energy, dose rate, and angular dependence were tested, and the uncertainty in determining the dose was calculated using error propagation analysis. Sequential biological stability tests, specifically, cytotoxicity and ocular irritation tests, were conducted to ensure the safe application of the CLOD to patients.

RESULTS

The dosimeter demonstrated high sensitivity in the low dose region, and the sensitivity linearly decreased with the dose. The responses obtained for the 10 and 15 MV photon beams were 1.7% and 1.9% higher compared to the 6 MV photon beam. A strong dose rate dependence was not obtained for the CLOD. Angular dependence was observed from 90° to 180° with a difference in response from 1% to 2%. The total uncertainty in error propagation analysis decreased as a function of the dose in the red channel. For a dose range of 0 to 50 cGy, the total uncertainties for 5, 10, and 50 cGy were 14.2%, 8.9%, and 5%, respectively. Quantitative evaluation using the MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) method presented no cytotoxicity. Further, no corneal opacity, iris reaction, or conjunctival inflammation was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The CLOD is the first dosimeter that can be worn close to the eye. The results of cytotoxicity and irritation tests indicate that it is a stable medical device. The evaluation of dose characteristics in open field conditions shows that the CLOD can be applied to an in vivo dosimeter in radiotherapy.

Modern radiotherapy for head and neck cancer

Radiation therapy (RT) plays a key role in curative-intent treatments for head and neck cancers. Its use is indicated as a sole therapy in early stage tumors or in combination with surgery or concurrent chemotherapy in advanced stages. Recent technologic advances have resulted in both improved oncologic results and expansion of the indications for RT in clinical practice. Despite this, RT administered to the head and neck region is still burdened by a high rate of acute and late side effects. Moreover, about 50% of patients with high-risk disease experience loco-regional recurrence within 3 years of follow-up. Therefore, in recent decades, efforts have been dedicated to optimize the cost/benefit ratio of RT in this subset of patients. The aim of the present review was to highlight modern concepts of RT for head and neck cancers considering both the technological advances that have been achieved and recent knowledge that has informed the biological interaction between radiation and both tumor and healthy tissues.

Long-term outcomes following stereotactic body radiotherapy boost for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

Background/purpose: To determine the efficacy and toxicity profile of a stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) boost as a first line treatment in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study in 195 consecutive OPSCC patients with T1-small T3 disease, treated at Erasmus MC between 2009 and 2016 with a SBRT (3 × 5.5 Gy) boost after 46 Gy IMRT. Primary endpoints were disease-specific survival (DSS) and Grade ≥3 toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria). The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model were applied to determine rates and risk factors. Results: The median follow-up was 4.3 years. Treatment compliance was high (100%). Rates of 5-year DSS and late grade ≥3 toxicity were 85% and 28%, respectively. Five-year overall survival was 67%. The most frequently observed toxicities were mucosal ulceration or soft tissue necrosis (n = 30, 5 year 18%), dysphagia or weight loss (n = 18, 5 year 12%) and osteoradionecrosis (n = 11, 5 year 9%). Current smoker status (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.9, p = .001) and Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2 (HR = 1.9, p = .03) were was associated with increased toxicity risk. Tooth extraction prior to RT was associated with increased osteoradionecrosis risk (HR = 6.4, p = .006). Conclusion: We reported on outcomes in the largest patient series to date treated with a hypofractionated boost for OPSCC. Efficacy was good with survival rates comparable to conventionally fractionated (chemo)radiotherapy. Grade ≥3 toxicity profiles showed high rates of soft tissue necrosis and osteoradionecrosis. Strategies to mitigate severe toxicity risks are under investigation to improve the tolerability of the SBRT boost.

A snapshot of medical physics practice patterns

A large number of surveys have been sent to the medical physics community addressing many clinical topics for which the medical physicist is, or may be, responsible. Each survey provides an insight into clinical practice relevant to the medical physics community. The goal of this study was to create a summary of these surveys giving a snapshot of clinical practice patterns. Surveys used in this study were created using SurveyMonkey and distributed between February 6, 2013 and January 2, 2018 via the MEDPHYS and MEDDOS listserv groups. The format of the surveys included questions that were multiple choice and free response. Surveys were included in this analysis if they met the following criteria: more than 20 responses, relevant to radiation therapy physics practice, not single‐vendor specific, and formatted as multiple‐choice questions (i.e., not exclusively free‐text responses). Although the results of free response questions were not explicitly reported, they were carefully reviewed, and the responses were considered in the discussion of each topic. Two‐hundred and fifty‐two surveys were available, of which 139 passed the inclusion criteria. The mean number of questions per survey was 4. The mean number of respondents per survey was 63. Summaries were made for the following topics: simulation, treatment planning, electron treatments, linac commissioning and quality assurance, setup and treatment verification, IMRT and VMAT treatments, SRS/SBRT, breast treatments, prostate treatments, brachytherapy, TBI, facial lesion treatments, clinical workflow, and after‐hours/emergent treatments. We have provided a coherent overview of medical physics practice according to surveys conducted over the last 5 yr, which will be instructive for medical physicists.

Salvage Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Locally Recurrent Previously Irradiated Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Analysis from the RSSearch® Registry

Objectives

To report on overall survival (OS), local control (LC), dose-outcome relationships, and related toxicities following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for locally recurrent, previously irradiated squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (rSCCHN).

Methods

We queried the prospectively-maintained RSSearch® Registry for patients with rSCCHN treated with five-fraction SBRT from January 2008 to November 2016. Patients with non-squamous cell histology, missing registry data regarding prior irradiation, those treated with less than five fractions of SBRT, and those treated with SBRT in primary or boost settings were excluded. LC and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with comparisons between groups completed using log-rank t-tests and multivariable Cox regression. Logistic regression analyses were used to examine factors predictive of toxicity.

Results

Forty-five rSCCHN patients treated with SBRT delivered in five fractions at 12 radiotherapy centers were identified. Prescription doses ≥ 40 Gy were associated with higher one-year rates of OS, LC, and a higher likelihood of experiencing toxicities. Acute and late toxicity rates were low (22.2% and 15.6%, respectively) and were all Grade 1-2 with only one late Grade 3 esophagitis.

Conclusion

Salvage SBRT for rSCCHN resulted in outcomes comparable to prior single-institutional reports in a multi-institutional cohort across clinical settings with low toxicity, thus supporting more widespread adoption of SBRT with recommended doses ≥ 40 Gy.

Prognostic Model for Stratification of Radioresistant Nasopharynx Carcinoma to Curative Salvage Radiotherapy

Purpose

To investigate for a prognostic index (PI) to personalize recommendations for salvage intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (lrNPC).

Methods

Patients with lrNPC from two academic institutions (Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center [SYSUCC-A; n = 251 (training cohort)] and National Cancer Centre Singapore [NCCS; n = 114] and SYSUCC-B [n = 193 (validation cohorts)]) underwent salvage treatment with IMRT from 2001 to 2015. Primary and secondary clinical end points were overall survival (OS) and grade 5 toxicity-free rate (G5-TFR), respectively. Covariate inclusion to the PIs was qualified by a multivariable two-sided P < .05. Discrimination and calibration of the PIs were assessed.

Results

The primary PI comprised covariates that were adversely associated with OS in the training cohort (gross tumor volumerecurrence hazard ratio [HR], 1.01/mL increase [ P < .001], agerecurrence HR, 1.02/year increase [ P = .008]; repeat IMRT equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions [EQD2] ≥ 68 Gy HR, 1.42 [ P = .03]; prior radiotherapy-induced grade ≥ 3 toxicities HR, 1.90 [ P = .001]; recurrent tumor [rT]-category 3 to 4 HR, 1.96 [ P = .005]), in ascending order of weight. Discrimination of the PI for OS was comparable between training and both validation cohorts (Harrell’s C = 0.71 [SYSUCC-A], 0.72 [NCCS], and 0.69 [SYSUCC-B]); discretization by using a fixed PI score cutoff of 252 determined from the training data set yielded low- and high-risk subgroups with disparate OS in the validation cohorts (NCCS HR, 3.09 [95% CI, 1.95 to 4.89]; SYSUCC-B HR, 3.80 [95% CI, 2.55 to 5.66]). Our five-factor PI predicted OS and G5-TFR (predicted v observed 36-month OS and G5-TFR, 22% v 15% and 38% v 44% for high-risk NCCS and 26% v 31% and 45% v 46% for high-risk SYSUCC-B).

Conclusion

We present a validated PI for robust clinical stratification of radioresistant NPC. Low-risk patients represent ideal candidates for curative repeat IMRT, whereas novel clinical trials are needed in the unfavorable high-risk subgroup.

Head and Neck Tumor Control Probability: Radiation Dose-Volume Effects in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Locally Recurrent Previously-Irradiated Head and Neck Cancer: Report of the AAPM Working Group

PURPOSE

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a viable reirradiation strategy for locally recurrent previously-irradiated head and neck cancer. Doses in the literature have varied, which challenges clinical application of SBRT as well as clinical trial design.

MATERIAL & METHODS

A working group was formed through the American Association of Physicists in Medicine to study tumor control probabilities for SBRT in head and neck cancer. We herein present a systematic review of the available literature addressing the dose/volume data for tumor control probability with SBRT in patients with locally recurrent previously-irradiated head and neck cancer. Dose-response models are generated that present tumor control probability as a function of dose.

RESULTS

Data from more than 300 cases in 8 publications suggest that there is a dose-response relationship, with superior local control and possibly improved overall survival for doses of 35 to 45 Gy (in 5 fractions) compared with <30 Gy.

CONCLUSION

Stereotactic body radiation therapy doses equivalent to 5-fraction doses of 40 to 50 Gy are suggested for retreatment.