Postmastectomy radiation therapy for breast cancer patients with one to three positive lymph nodes: a propensity score matching analysis

A comparison of carbon ion radiotherapy and transarterial chemoembolization treatment outcomes for single hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching study

BACKGROUND

We compared clinical outcomes of carbon ion radiotherapy and transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

Data of 477 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who had undergone carbon ion radiotherapy or transarterial chemoembolization between April 2007 and September 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Treatment naïve patients with single HCC, who underwent carbon ion radiotherapy or transarterial chemoembolization as a primary treatment were included. Clinical outcomes of the treatments were compared after utilizing propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Of 124 patients who received carbon ion radiotherapy and 353 patients who received transarterial chemoembolization, 31 and 23 patients met our inclusion criteria, respectively. After utilizing propensity score matching, 17 matched pairs of patients from each treatment group were analyzed. The median follow-up durations after carbon ion radiotherapy and transarterial chemoembolization were 43 and 32 months, respectively. The 3-year overall survival, local control, and progression-free survival rates in the carbon ion radiotherapy versus transarterial chemoembolization groups were 88% versus 58% (p < 0.05), 80% versus 26% (p < 0.01), and 51% versus 15% (p < 0.05), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Carbon ion radiotherapy showed more favorable clinical outcomes than did transarterial chemoembolization for patients with single hepatocellular carcinoma after matching patient characteristics utilizing propensity score matching. Further studies with larger patient numbers are required to confirm our results.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN000036455 : date of registration 22 March 2019, retrospectively registered.

Characteristics and survival difference of clinical tumor size 0 extensive-stage small cell lung cancer with different metastasis pattern

Background

Few studies were focused on the characteristics and survival prognosis of clinical tumor size 0 (cT0) extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients with distant metastasis.

Methods

The proper patients were screened based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2013. Chi-square test was used to analyze the characteristics of cT0 stage. The risk factors on cT0 stage were analyzed by Logistic regression model. The survival difference was compared by the Log rank test. The prognostic factors on survival were analyzed by univariate and multivariate Cox regression model.

Results

Only 1.2% of patients were diagnosed at cT0 stage. Clinical nodal status 0 (cN0) stage, no bone metastasis and no lung metastasis were all risk factors on cT0 stage. The patients at cT0 stage had better cancer specific survival (CSS) benefit (P=0.011). The cT0 stage was also an independent prognostic factor on CSS (P=0.018).

Conclusions

The patients at cT0 stage was a different subgroup compared with the patients at cT1-4 stage for ES-SCLC patients with distant metastasis.

How many ELNs are optimal for breast cancer patients with more than three PLNs who underwent MRM? A large population-based study

Background

Few studies have focused on the optimal threshold of examed lymph nodes (ELNs) for breast cancer patients with more than three positive lymph nodes after modified radical mastectomy.

Materials and methods

The X-tile and the minimum P-value models were applied to determine the optimal threshold. Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to analyze the cancer-specific survival and perform subgroup analysis.

Results

The results showed that 12 ELNs was the optimal threshold for these patients, and the patients with >12 ELNs had a better cancer-specific survival benefit compared with the patients with <12 ELNs (P<0.001).

Conclusion

The number 12 can be selected as the optimal threshold of ELNs for breast cancer patients with >3 positive lymph nodes after modified radical mastectomy.

The appropriate number of ELNs for lymph node negative breast cancer patients underwent MRM: a population-based study

Whether number of examed lymph nodes (ELNs) would bring survival benefit for patients with negative lymph nodes after modified radical mastectomy (MRM) is uncertain. In our study, using the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2009, we screened the appropriate patients with negative lymph nodes underwent MRM. The Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to determine the effect of number of ELNs on cancer specific survival (CSS). The results showed that the number of ELNs was not an independent prognostic factor on CSS (P = 0.940). Then the X-tile mode was used to determine the appropriate threshold for ELNs count. The results showed that 9 was the appropriate cut-off point. Next, the log-rank χ² test was used to analyze the CSS based on different subgroup variables. The results showed that some subgroup variables including age < 50/ ≥ 50, grade I/III, AJCC T1/T2, ER positive/negative and PR positive/negative ,demonstrated significant CSS benefits among the patients with the number of ELNs ≤ 9 (all, P < 0.05). However, three subgroup variables including grade II, AJCC T3 and AJCC T4, the patients with the number of ELNs ≤ 9 did not bring significant CSS benefits (all, P > 0.1). In conclusion, our study demonstrated that the number of ELNs was not an independent prognostic factor on CSS, and 9 can be selected as the appropriate cut-off point of ELNs for patients with negative lymph nodes who underwent MRM.