MGMT pyrosequencing-based cut-off methylation level and clinical outcome in patients with glioblastoma multiforme

'The Reports of My Death Are Greatly Exaggerated'-Evaluating the Effect of Necrosis on MGMT Promoter Methylation Testing in High-Grade Glioma

(1) Background: MGMT (O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase) promoter methylation remains an important predictive biomarker in high-grade gliomas (HGGs). The influence of necrosis on the fidelity of MGMT promoter (MGMTp) hypermethylation testing is currently unknown. Therefore, our study aims to evaluate the effect of varying degrees of necrosis on MGMTp status, as determined by pyrosequencing, in a series of primary and recurrent HGGs; (2) Methods: Within each case, the most viable blocks (assigned as 'true' MGMTp status) and the most necrotic block were determined by histopathology review. MGMTp status was determined by pyrosequencing. Comparisons of MGMTp status were made between the most viable and most necrotic blocks. (3) Results: 163 samples from 64 patients with HGGs were analyzed. MGMTp status was maintained in 84.6% of primary and 78.3% of recurrent HGGs between the most viable and necrotic blocks. A threshold of ≥60% tumor cellularity was established at which MGMTp status was unaltered, irrespective of the degree of necrosis. (4) Conclusions: MGMTp methylation status, as determined by pyrosequencing, does not appear to be influenced by necrosis in the majority of cases at a cellularity of at least 60%. Further investigation into the role of intratumoral heterogeneity on MGMTp status will increase our understanding of this predictive marker.

Full kinetic modeling analysis of [18F]fluorocholine Positron Emission Tomography (PET) at initial diagnosis of high-grade glioma

PURPOSE

The main objective was to characterize the tracer uptake kinetics of [18F]fluoromethylcholine ([18F]F-CHO) in high-grade gliomas (HGG) through a full PET kinetic modeling approach. Secondarily, we aimed to explore the relationship between the PET uptake measures and the HGG molecular features.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-four patients with a suspected diagnosis of HGG were prospectively included. They underwent a dynamic brain [18F]F-CHO-PET/CT, from which a tumoral time-activity curve was extracted. The plasma input function was obtained through arterial blood sampling with metabolite correction. These data were fitted to 1- and 2-tissue-compartment models, the best of which was selected through the Akaike information criterion. We assessed the correlation between the kinetic parameters and the conventional static PET metrics (SUVmax, SUVmean and tumor-to-background ratio TBR). We explored the association between the [18F]F-CHO-PET quantitative parameters and relevant molecular biomarkers in HGG.

RESULTS

Tumoral time-activity curves in all patients showed a rapid rise of [18F]F-CHO uptake followed by a plateau-like shape. Best fits were obtained with near-irreversible 2-tissue-compartment models. The perfusion-transport constant K1 and the net influx rate Ki showed strong correlation with SUVmax (r = 0.808-0.861), SUVmean (r = 0.794-0.851) and TBR (r = 0.643-0.784), p < 0.002. HGG was confirmed in 21 patients, of which those with methylation of the O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter showed higher mean Ki (p = 0.020), K1 (p = 0.025) and TBR (p = 0.001) than the unmethylated ones.

CONCLUSION

[18F]F-CHO uptake kinetics in HGG is best explained by a 2-tissue-compartment model. The conventional static [18F]F-CHO-PET measures have been validated against the perfusion-transport constant (K1) and the net influx rate (Ki) derived from kinetic modeling. A relationship between [18F]F-CHO uptake rate and MGMT methylation is suggested but needs further confirmation.

Pyrosequencing Analysis of O-6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase Methylation at Different Cut-Offs of Positivity Associated with Treatment Response and Disease-Specific Survival in Isocitrate Dehydrogenase-Wildtype Grade 4 Glioblastoma

The O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene is a critical guardian of genomic integrity. MGMT methylation in diffuse gliomas serves as an important determinant of patients' prognostic outcomes, more specifically in glioblastomas (GBMs). In GBMs, the absence of MGMT methylation, known as MGMT promoter unmethylation, often translates into a more challenging clinical scenario, tending to present resistance to chemotherapy and a worse prognosis. A pyrosequencing (PSQ) technique was used to analyze MGMT methylation status at different cut-offs (5%, 9%, and 11%) in a sample of 78 patients diagnosed with IDH-wildtype grade 4 GBM. A retrospective analysis was provided to collect clinicopathological and prognostic data. A statistical analysis was used to establish an association between methylation status and treatment response (TR) and disease-specific survival (DSS). The patients with methylated MGMT status experienced progressive disease rates of 84.6%, 80%, and 78.4% at the respective cut-offs of 5%, 9%, and 11%. The number was considerably higher when considering unmethylated patients, as all patients (100%), regardless of the cut-off, presented progressive disease. Regarding disease-specific survival (DSS), the Hazard Ratio (HR) was HR = 0.74 (0.45-1.24; p = 0.251); HR = 0.82 (0.51-1.33; p = 0.425); and HR = 0.79 (0.49-1.29; p = 0.350), respectively. Our study concludes that there is an association between MGMT unmethylation and worse TR and DSS. The 9% cut-off demonstrated a greater potential for patient survival as a function of time, which may shed light on the future need for standardization of MGMT methylation positivity parameters in PSQ.

Association of MGMT Promoter and Enhancer Methylation with Genetic Variants, Clinical Parameters, and Demographic Characteristics in Glioblastoma

The response of glioblastoma (GBM) patients to the alkylating agent temozolomide (TMZ) vitally depends on the expression level of the repair protein O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT). Since MGMT is strongly regulated by promoter methylation, the methylation status of the MGMT promoter has emerged as a prognostic and predictive biomarker for GBM patients. By determining the methylation levels of the four enhancers located within or close to the MGMT gene, we recently found that enhancer methylation contributes to MGMT regulation. In this study, we investigated if methylation of the four enhancers is associated with SNP rs16906252, TERT promoter mutations C228T and C250T, TERT SNP rs2853669, proliferation index Ki-67, overall survival (OS), age, and sex of the patients. In general, associations with genetic variants, clinical parameters, and demographic characteristics were caused by a complex interplay of multiple CpGs in the MGMT promoter and of multiple CpGs in enhancer regions. The observed associations for intragenic enhancer 4, located in intron 2 of MGMT, differed from associations observed for the three intergenic enhancers. Some findings were restricted to subgroups of samples with either methylated or unmethylated MGMT promoters, underpinning the relevance of the MGMT promoter status in GBMs.

Variant allelic frequencies of driver mutations can identify gliomas with potentially false-negative MGMT promoter methylation results

MGMT promoter methylation testing is required for prognosis and predicting temozolomide response in gliomas. Accurate results depend on sufficient tumor cellularity, but histologic estimates of cellularity are subjective. We sought to determine whether driver mutation variant allelic frequency (VAF) could serve as a more objective metric for cellularity and identify possible false-negative MGMT samples. Among 691 adult-type diffuse gliomas, MGMT promoter methylation was assessed by pyrosequencing (N = 445) or DNA methylation array (N = 246); VAFs of TERT and IDH driver mutations were assessed by next generation sequencing. MGMT results were analyzed in relation to VAF. By pyrosequencing, 56% of all gliomas with driver mutation VAF ≥ 0.325 had MGMT promoter methylation, versus only 37% with VAF < 0.325 (p < 0.0001). The mean MGMT promoter pyrosequencing score was 19.3% for samples with VAF VAF ≥ 0.325, versus 12.7% for samples with VAF < 0.325 (p < 0.0001). Optimal VAF cutoffs differed among glioma subtypes (IDH wildtype glioblastoma: 0.12-0.18, IDH mutant astrocytoma: ~0.33, IDH mutant and 1p/19q co-deleted oligodendroglioma: 0.3-0.4). Methylation array was more sensitive for MGMT promoter methylation at lower VAFs than pyrosequencing. Microscopic examination tended to overestimate tumor cellularity when VAF was low. Re-testing low-VAF cases with methylation array and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) confirmed that a subset of them had originally been false-negative. We conclude that driver mutation VAF is a useful quality assurance metric when evaluating MGMT promoter methylation tests, as it can help identify possible false-negative cases.

Immuno markers in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients underwent Stupp protocol after neurosurgery: a retrospective series

PURPOSE

The aims of our retrospective study investigated the role of immune system in glioblastoma (GBM), which is the most aggressive primary brain tumor in adults characterized by a poor prognosis. The recurrence rate remains high, probably due to "immune-desert" tumor microenvironment (TME) making GBM hidden from the anti-tumoral immune clearance. Considering this, we aimed to create a panel of prognostic markers from blood and tumor tissue correlating with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

METHODS

Firstly, we analyzed the inflammatory markers NLR and PLR as the ratio of the absolute neutrophil count and absolute platelet count by the absolute lymphocyte count respectively, collected at different time points in the peripheral blood of 95 patients. Furthermore, in 31 patients of the same cohort, we analyzed the formalin-fixed paraffin embedded samples to further compare the impact of circulating and inflammatory markers within the TME.

RESULTS

Patients aged < 60 years and with methylated MGMT showed better OS. While, pre-chemotherapy Systemic Inflammatory Index (SII) < 480 was related to a better OS and PFS, we observed that only CD68+macrophage and CD66b+neutrophils expressed in vascular/perivascular area (V) showed a statistically significant prognostic role in median OS and PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, we underscored a role of SII as predictive value of response to STUPP protocol. Regarding the TME-related markers, we suggested to take into consideration for future studies with new immunotherapy combinations, each component relating to expression of immune infiltrating subsets.

Quantitative analysis of MGMT promoter methylation status changes by pyrosequencing in recurrent glioblastoma

MGMT promoter methylation status can change in response to several factors, treatment with alkylating therapy being the mechanism more commonly cited in the literature. Some authors have attempted to quantify these alterations, with inconsistent results. This study aims to determine changes in MGMT promoter methylation status by pyrosequencing, which quantitatively yields results, in a cohort of patients reoperated for recurrent glioblastoma and having previously completed the Stupp protocol. Methylation status of the MGMT promoter gene of a total of 24 pairs of glioblastoma preselected tumor samples was retrospectively analyzed using pyrosequencing and depicted as percentages or categories (hypermethylated, intermediate methylation, unmethylated). Matched samples were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and log-rank test was used to establish a correlation with survival data. The median value of MGMT promoter methylation status declined after adjuvant treatment from 20.35% to 14.25% (p = 0.346). A significant correlation between methylation in primary samples and overall survival (p = 0.05) and progression-free survival (p = 0.024) was found. Intermediate methylation status at recurrence was linked to greater survival after progression, without reaching statistical significance (post-progression survival [PPS]) (p = 0.217). Although treatment with alkylating chemotherapy was a common feature in all patients of our cohort, switching in both directions was observed when MGMT promoter methylation status was analyzed as a continuous variable. These data suggest that the dynamics of epigenetics may be very complex and not entirely explained by clonal selection influenced by temozolomide.

Association between MGMT Enhancer Methylation and MGMT Promoter Methylation, MGMT Protein Expression, and Overall Survival in Glioblastoma

The repair protein O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) is regulated epigenetically, mainly by the methylation of the MGMT promoter. MGMT promoter methylation status has emerged as a prognostic and predictive biomarker for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). However, a strong negative correlation between MGMT promoter methylation and MGMT protein expression cannot be applied as a rule for all GBM patients. In order to investigate if the DNA methylation status of MGMT enhancers is associated with MGMT promoter methylation, MGMT expression, and the overall survival (OS) of GBM patients, we established assays based on high-resolution melting analysis and pyrosequencing for one intragenic and three intergenic MGMT enhancers. For CpGs in an enhancer located 560 kb upstream of the MGMT promoter, we found a significant negative correlation between the methylation status and MGMT protein levels of GBM samples expressing MGMT. The methylation status of CpGs in the intragenic enhancer (hs696) was strongly negatively correlated with MGMT promoter methylation and was significantly higher in MGMT-expressing GBM samples than in MGMT-non-expressing GBM samples. Moreover, low methylation of CpGs 01-03 and CpGs 09-13 was associated with the longer OS of the GBM patients. Our findings indicate an association between MGMT enhancer methylation and MGMT promoter methylation, MGMT protein expression, and/or OS.

MGMT Promoter Methylation: Prognostication beyond Treatment Response

MGMT promoter methylation is related to the increased sensitivity of tumour tissue to chemotherapy with temozolomide (TMZ) and thus to improved patient survival. However, it is unclear how the extent of MGMT promoter methylation affects outcomes. In our study, a single-centre retrospective study, we explore the impact of MGMT promoter methylation in patients with glioblastoma who were operated upon with 5-ALA. Demographic, clinical and histology data, and survival rates were assessed. A total of 69 patients formed the study group (mean age 53.75 ± 15.51 years old). Positive 5-ALA fluorescence was noted in 79.41%. A higher percentage of MGMT promoter methylation was related to lower preoperative tumour volume (p = 0.003), a lower likelihood of 5-ALA positive fluorescence (p = 0.041) and a larger extent of resection EoR (p = 0.041). A higher MGMT promoter methylation rate was also related to improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.008 and p = 0.006, respectively), even when adjusted for the extent of resection (p = 0.034 and p = 0.042, respectively). A higher number of adjuvant chemotherapy cycles was also related to longer PFS and OS (p = 0.049 and p = 0.030, respectively). Therefore, this study suggests MGMT promoter methylation should be considered as a continuous variable. It is a prognostic factor that goes beyond sensitivity to chemotherapy treatment, as a higher percentage of methylation is related not only to increased EoR and increased PFS and OS, but also to lower tumour volume at presentation and a lower likelihood of 5-ALA fluorescence intraoperatively.

Epigenetic alterations in glioblastomas: Diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic relevance

Glioblastoma, the most common and heterogeneous tumor affecting brain parenchyma, is dismally characterized by a very poor prognosis. Thus, the search of new, more effective treatments is a vital need. Here, we will review the druggable epigenetic features of glioblastomas that are, indeed, currently explored in preclinical studies and in clinical trials for the development of more effective, personalized treatments. In detail, we will review the studies that have led to the identification of epigenetic signatures, IDH mutations, MGMT gene methylation, histone modification alterations, H3K27 mutations and epitranscriptome landscapes of glioblastomas, in each case discussing the corresponding targeted therapies and their potential efficacy. Finally, we will emphasize how recent technological improvements permit to routinely investigate many glioblastoma epigenetic biomarkers in clinical practice, further enforcing the hope that personalized drugs, targeting specific epigenetic features, could be in future a therapeutic option for selected patients.

MGMT Promoter Methylation as a Prognostic Factor in Primary Glioblastoma: A Single-Institution Observational Study

Glioblastoma is the most malignant central nervous system tumor, which represents 50% of all glial tumors. The understanding of glioma genesis, prognostic evaluation, and treatment planning has been significantly enhanced by the discovery of molecular genetic biomarkers. This study aimed to evaluate survival in patients with primary glioblastoma concerning O6-methylguanine–DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation and other clinical factors. The study included 41 newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients treated from 2011 to 2014 in the 10th Military Research Hospital and Polyclinic, Poland. All patients underwent surgical resection followed by radiation and chemotherapy with alkylating agents. The MGMT promoter methylation was evaluated in all patients, and 43% were found to be methylated. In 26 and 15 cases, gross total resection and subtotal resection were conducted, respectively. Patients with a methylated MGMT promoter had a median survival of 504 days, while those without methylation had a median survival of 329 days. The group that was examined had a median age of 53. In a patient group younger than 53 years, those with methylation had significantly longer overall survival (639 days), compared to 433.5 days for patients without methylation. The most prolonged survival (551 days) was in patients with MGMT promoter methylation after gross total resection. The value of MGMT promoter methylation as a predictive biomarker is widely acknowledged. However, its prognostic significance remains unclear. Our findings proved that MGMT promoter methylation is also an essential positive prognostic biomarker.

Definition of the Prognostic Role of MGMT Promoter Methylation Value by Pyrosequencing in Newly Diagnosed IDH Wild-Type Glioblastoma Patients Treated with Radiochemotherapy: A Large Multicenter Study

Background. O6-methylguanine (O6-MeG)-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation status is a predictive factor for alkylating treatment efficacy in glioblastoma patients, but its prognostic role is still unclear. We performed a large, multicenter study to evaluate the association between MGMT methylation value and survival. Methods. We evaluated glioblastoma patients with an assessment of MGMT methylation status by pyrosequencing from nine Italian centers. The inclusion criteria were histological diagnosis of IDH wild-type glioblastoma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) ≤2, and radio-chemotherapy treatment with temozolomide. The relationship between OS and MGMT was investigated with a time-dependent Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve and Cox regression models. Results. In total, 591 newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients were analyzed. The median OS was 16.2 months. The ROC analysis suggested a cut-off of 15% for MGMT methylation. The 2-year Overall Survival (OS) was 18.3% and 51.8% for MGMT methylation <15% and ≥15% (p < 0.0001). In the multivariable analysis, MGMT methylation <15% was associated with impaired survival (p < 0.00001). However, we also found a non-linear association between MGMT methylation and OS (p = 0.002): median OS was 14.8 months for MGMT in 0−4%, 18.9 months for MGMT in 4−40%, and 29.9 months for MGMT in 40−100%. Conclusions. Our findings suggested a non-linear relationship between OS and MGMT promoter methylation, which implies a varying magnitude of prognostic effect across values of MGMT promoter methylation by pyrosequencing in newly diagnosed IDH wild-type glioblastoma patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.

The correlation between promoter hypermethylation of VDR, CLDN, and CasR genes and recurrent stone formation

Objectives

Recurrent Kidney stone formation is a main medical problem imposing a significant burden on both healthcare and the economy worldwide. Environmental and genetic factors have been linked to a bigger risk of kidney stone formation. We aim to assess the role of methylation on recurrent stone formation in three target genes.

Methods

We aimed to check the association between promoter hypermethylation vitamin D receptor (VDR), calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR), and claudin 14 (CLDN14) genes in recurrent kidney stones. We enrolled 30 consecutive recurrent kidney stone formers (age 18–60 years) (cases) and 30 age and gender-matched controls.3. To identify promoter methylation, two target regions from each candidate gene were bisulfited after blood collection and DNA extraction. Methylation quantification was done through methylation-specific high resolution melting (MS-HRM).

Results

The mean age of the patients and controls (mean ± SD) was 49.58 ± 14.23 years and BMI 36.12 ± 2.72. The methylation status in all six target regions was meaningfully different between the stone-former group and controls when methylation was considered in three clusters of unmethylated, methylated, and hypermethylated. A higher effect in VDR and CLDN was observed compare to CasR (p-value < 0.001, and < 0.005 versus p-value < 0.256).

Conclusions

Methylation as an important epigenetic mechanism should be considered more in recurrent stone formations. Promoter hypermethylation of VRD and CLDN genes may have an essential role in recurrent kidney stones formations.

CN-3 increases TMZ sensitivity and induces ROS-dependent apoptosis and autophagy in TMZ-resistance glioblastoma

Many glioma patients develop resistance to temozolomide (TMZ) treatment, resulting in reduced efficacy and survival rates. TMZ-resistant cell lines SHG44R and U87R, which highly express O₆ -methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) and P-gp, were established. CN-3, a new asterosaponin, showed cytotoxic effects on TMZ-resistant cells in a dose- and time-dependent manner via reactive oxygen species (ROS)-mediated apoptosis and autophagy. Transmission electron microscopy and monodansylcadaverine (MDC) staining showed turgidity of the mitochondria and autophagosomes in CN-3-treated SHG44R and U87R cells. The autophagy inhibitor 3-methyladenine was used to confirm the important role of autophagy in CN-3 cytotoxicity in TMZ-resistant cells. The ROS scavenger N-acetyl- l-cysteine (NAC) attenuated the levels of ROS induced by CN-3 and, therefore, rescued the CN-3 cytotoxic effect on the viability of SHG44R and U87R cells by Cell Counting Kit-8 assays and JuLI-Stage videos. MDC staining also confirmed that NAC rescued an autophagosome increase in CN-3-treated SHG44R and U87R cells. Western blotting revealed that CN-3 increased Bax, cleaved-caspase 3, cytochrome C, PARP-1, LC3-Ⅱ, and Beclin1, and decreased P-AKT, Bcl-2, and p62. Further rescue experiments revealed that CN-3 induced apoptosis and autophagy through ROS-mediated cytochrome C, cleaved-caspase 3, Bcl-2, P-AKT, PARP-1, and LC3-Ⅱ. In addition, CN-3 promoted SHG44R and U87R cells sensitive to TMZ by reducing the expression of P-gp, MGMT, and nuclear factor kappa B p65, and it had a synergistic cytotoxic effect with TMZ. Moreover, CN-3 disrupted the natural cycle arrest and inhibited the migration of SHG44R and U87R cells by promoting cyclin E1 and D1, and by decreasing P21, P27, N-cadherin, β-catenin, transforming growth factor beta 1, and Smad2.

Distinguishing Pseudoprogression From True Early Progression in Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Wild-Type Glioblastoma by Interrogating Clinical, Radiological, and Molecular Features

Background: Pseudoprogression (PsP) mimics true early progression (TeP) in conventional imaging, which poses a diagnostic challenge in glioblastoma (GBM) patients who undergo standard concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT). This study aimed to investigate whether perioperative markers could distinguish and predict PsP from TeP in de novo isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type GBM patients.

Methods: New or progressive gadolinium-enhancing lesions that emerged within 12 weeks after CCRT were defined as early progression. Lesions that remained stable or spontaneously regressed were classified as PsP, otherwise persistently enlarged as TeP. Clinical, radiological, and molecular information were collected for further analysis. Patients in the early progression subgroup were divided into derivation and validation sets (7:3, according to operation date).

Results: Among 234 consecutive cases enrolled in this retrospective study, the incidences of PsP, TeP, and neither patterns of progression (nP) were 26.1% (61/234), 37.6% (88/234), and 36.3% (85/234), respectively. In the early progression subgroup, univariate analysis demonstrated female (OR: 2.161, P = 0.026), gross total removal (GTR) of the tumor (OR: 6.571, P < 001), located in the frontal lobe (OR: 2.561, P = 0.008), non-subventricular zone (SVZ) infringement (OR: 10.937, P < 0.001), and methylated O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter (mMGMTp) (OR: 9.737, P < 0.001) were correlated with PsP, while GTR, non-SVZ infringement, and mMGMTp were further validated in multivariate analysis. Integrating quantitative MGMTp methylation levels from pyrosequencing, GTR, and non-SVZ infringement showed the best discriminative ability in the random forest model for derivation and validation set (AUC: 0.937, 0.911, respectively). Furthermore, a nomogram could effectively evaluate the importance of those markers in developing PsP (C-index: 0.916) and had a well-fitted calibration curve.

Conclusion: Integrating those clinical, radiological, and molecular features provided a novel and robust method to distinguish PsP from TeP, which was crucial for subsequent clinical decision making, clinical trial enrollment, and prognostic assessment. By in-depth interrogation of perioperative markers, clinicians could distinguish PsP from TeP independent from advanced imaging.

Prognostic value of test(s) for O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation for predicting overall survival in people with glioblastoma treated with temozolomide

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma is an aggressive form of brain cancer. Approximately five in 100 people with glioblastoma survive for five years past diagnosis. Glioblastomas that have a particular modification to their DNA (called methylation) in a particular region (the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter) respond better to treatment with chemotherapy using a drug called temozolomide.

OBJECTIVES

To determine which method for assessing MGMT methylation status best predicts overall survival in people diagnosed with glioblastoma who are treated with temozolomide.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, BIOSIS, Web of Science Conference Proceedings Citation Index to December 2018, and examined reference lists. For economic evaluation studies, we additionally searched NHS Economic Evaluation Database (EED) up to December 2014.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Eligible studies were longitudinal (cohort) studies of adults with diagnosed glioblastoma treated with temozolomide with/without radiotherapy/surgery. Studies had to have related MGMT status in tumour tissue (assessed by one or more method) with overall survival and presented results as hazard ratios or with sufficient information (e.g. Kaplan-Meier curves) for us to estimate hazard ratios. We focused mainly on studies comparing two or more methods, and listed brief details of articles that examined a single method of measuring MGMT promoter methylation. We also sought economic evaluations conducted alongside trials, modelling studies and cost analysis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently undertook all steps of the identification and data extraction process for multiple-method studies. We assessed risk of bias and applicability using our own modified and extended version of the QUality In Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. We compared different techniques, exact promoter regions (5'-cytosine-phosphate-guanine-3' (CpG) sites) and thresholds for interpretation within studies by examining hazard ratios. We performed meta-analyses for comparisons of the three most commonly examined methods (immunohistochemistry (IHC), methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) and pyrosequencing (PSQ)), with ratios of hazard ratios (RHR), using an imputed value of the correlation between results based on the same individuals.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 32 independent cohorts involving 3474 people that compared two or more methods. We found evidence that MSP (CpG sites 76 to 80 and 84 to 87) is more prognostic than IHC for MGMT protein at varying thresholds (RHR 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01 to 1.71). We also found evidence that PSQ is more prognostic than IHC for MGMT protein at various thresholds (RHR 1.36, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.84). The data suggest that PSQ (mainly at CpG sites 74 to 78, using various thresholds) is slightly more prognostic than MSP at sites 76 to 80 and 84 to 87 (RHR 1.14, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.48). Many variants of PSQ have been compared, although we did not see any strong and consistent messages from the results. Targeting multiple CpG sites is likely to be more prognostic than targeting just one. In addition, we identified and summarised 190 articles describing a single method for measuring MGMT promoter methylation status.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

PSQ and MSP appear more prognostic for overall survival than IHC. Strong evidence is not available to draw conclusions with confidence about the best CpG sites or thresholds for quantitative methods. MSP has been studied mainly for CpG sites 76 to 80 and 84 to 87 and PSQ at CpG sites ranging from 72 to 95. A threshold of 9% for CpG sites 74 to 78 performed better than higher thresholds of 28% or 29% in two of three good-quality studies making such comparisons.

Final Results of the Prospective Biomarker Trial PETra: [11C]-MET-Accumulation in Postoperative PET/MRI Predicts Outcome after Radiochemotherapy in Glioblastoma

PURPOSE

This prospective trial investigates the association of time to recurrence (TTR) in glioblastoma with [¹¹C]methionine (MET) tracer uptake before postoperative radiochemotherapy (RCT) aiming to guide radiotherapy boost regions.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Between 2013 and 2016, 102 patients with glioblastoma were recruited. RCT was performed with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide to a total dose of 60 Gy. Tumor residues in postresection PET and MRI were together defined as gross tumor volumes for radiotherapy treatment planning. [¹¹C]methionine (MET)-PET/MRI was performed before RCT and at each follow-up.

RESULTS

The primary hypothesis of a longer TTR for patients without increased tracer accumulation in postoperative MET-PET was confirmed in 89 patients. With 18.9 months (95% confidence interval, 9.3-28.5 months), median TTR was significantly (P < 0.001) longer for patients without (n = 29, 32.6%) as compared with 6.3 months (3.6-8.9) for patients with MET accumulation (n = 60, 67.4%) in pre-RCT PET. Although MRI often did not detect all PET-positive regions, an unfavorable impact of residual tumor in postsurgical MRI (n = 38, 42.7%) on TTR was observed [4.6 (4.2-5.1) vs. 15.5 months (6.0-24.9), P < 0.001]. Significant multivariable predictors for TTR were MRI positivity, PET-positive volume, and O⁶-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) hypermethylation.

CONCLUSIONS

Postsurgical amino acid PET has prognostic value for TTR after RCT in glioblastoma. Because of the added value of the metabolic beyond the pure structural information, it should complement MRI in radiotherapy planning if available with reasonable effort, at least in the context of maximal therapy. Furthermore, the spatial correlation of regions of recurrence with PET-positive volumes could provide a bioimaging basis for further trials, for example, testing local radiation dose escalation.

Low MGMT digital expression is associated with a better outcome of IDH1 wildtype glioblastomas treated with temozolomide

INTRODUCTION

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the deadliest primary brain tumor. The standard treatment consists of surgery, radiotherapy, and temozolomide (TMZ). TMZ response is heterogeneous, and MGMT promoter (MGMTp) methylation has been the major predictive biomarker. We aimed to describe the clinical and molecular data of GBMs treated with TMZ, compare MGMT methylation with MGMT expression, and further associate with patient's outcome.

METHODS

We evaluate 112 FFPE adult GBM cases. IDH1 and ATRX expression was analyzed by immunohistochemistry, hotspot TERT promoter (TERTp) mutations were evaluated by Sanger or pyrosequencing, and MGMTp methylation was assessed by pyrosequencing and MGMT mRNA expression using the nCounter® Vantage 3D™ DNA damage and repair panel.

RESULTS

Of the 112 GBMs, 96 were IDH1^WT, and 16 were IDH1^MUT. Positive ATRX expression was found in 91.6% (88/96) of IDH^WT and 43.7% (7/16) of IDH^MUT. TERTp mutations were detected in 70.4% (50/71) of IDH^WT. MGMTp methylation was found in 55.5% (35/63) of IDH^WT and 84.6% (11/13) of IDH^MUT, and as expected, MGMTp methylation was significantly associated with a better response to TMZ. MGMT expression was inversely correlated with MGMTp methylation levels (- 0.506, p < 0.0001), and MGMT low expression were significantly associated with better patient survival. It was also observed that integrating MGMTp methylation and expression, significantly improved the prognostication value.

CONCLUSIONS

MGMT mRNA levels evaluated by digital expression were associated with the outcome of TMZ-treated GBM patients. The combination of MGMT methylation and mRNA expression may provide a more accurate prediction of TMZ response in GBM patients.

Congress of neurological surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines update on the role of emerging developments in the management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma

TARGET POPULATION

These recommendations apply to adult patients with newly diagnosed or suspected glioblastoma.

IMAGING

Question What imaging modalities are in development that may be able to provide improvements in diagnosis, and therapeutic guidance for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastoma?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: It is suggested that techniques utilizing magnetic resonance imaging for diffusion weighted imaging, and to measure cerebral blood and magnetic spectroscopic resonance imaging of N-acetyl aspartate, choline and the choline to N-acetyl aspartate index to assist in diagnosis and treatment planning in patients with newly diagnosed or suspected glioblastoma.

SURGERY

Question What new surgical techniques can be used to provide improved tumor definition and resectability to yield better tumor control and prognosis for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastoma?

RECOMMENDATIONS

Level II: The use of 5-aminolevulinic acid is recommended to improve extent of tumor resection in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Level II: The use of 5-aminolevulinic acid is recommended to improve median survival and 2 year survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients with clinical characteristics suggesting poor prognosis. Level III: It is suggested that, when available, patients be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials assessing the value of diffusion tensor imaging in improving the safety of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma undergoing surgery.

NEUROPATHOLOGY

Question What new pathology techniques and measurement of biomarkers in tumor tissue can be used to provide improved diagnostic ability, and determination of therapeutic responsiveness and prognosis for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas?

RECOMMENDATIONS

Level II: Assessment of tumor MGMT promoter methylation status is recommended as a significant predictor of a longer progression free survival and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed with glioblastoma. Level II: Measurement of tumor expression of neuron-glia-2, neurofilament protein, glutamine synthetase and phosphorylated STAT3 is recommended as a predictor of overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed with glioblastoma. Level III: Assessment of tumor IDH1 mutation status is suggested as a predictor of longer progression free survival and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed with glioblastoma. Level III: Evaluation of tumor expression of Phosphorylated Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase protein, EGFR protein, and Insulin-like Growth Factor-Binding Protein-3 is suggested as a predictor of overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed with glioblastoma.

RADIATION

Question What radiation therapy techniques are in development that may be used to provide improved tumor control and prognosis for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastomas?

RECOMMENDATIONS

Level III: It is suggested that patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma undergo pretreatment radio-labeled amino acid tracer positron emission tomography to assess areas at risk for tumor recurrence to assist in radiation treatment planning. Level III: It is suggested that, when available, patients be with newly diagnosed glioblastomas be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials of radiation dose escalation, altered fractionation, or new radiation delivery techniques.

CHEMOTHERAPY

Question What emerging chemotherapeutic agents or techniques are available to provide better tumor control and prognosis for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: As no emerging chemotherapeutic agents or techniques were identified in this review that improved tumor control and prognosis it is suggested that, when available, patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials of chemotherapy.

MOLECULAR AND TARGETED THERAPY

Question What new targeted therapy agents are available to provide better tumor control and prognosis for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastomas?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: As no new molecular and targeted therapies have clearly provided better tumor control and prognosis it is suggested that, when available, patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials of molecular and targeted therapies IMMUNOTHERAPY: Question What emerging immunotherapeutic agents or techniques are available to provide better tumor control and prognosis for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: As no immunotherapeutic agents have clearly provided better tumor control and prognosis it is suggested that, when available, patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials of immunologically-based therapies.

NOVEL THERAPIES

Question What novel therapies or techniques are in development to provide better tumor control and prognosis for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastomas?

RECOMMENDATIONS

Level II: The use of tumor-treating fields is recommended for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma who have undergone surgical debulking and completed concurrent chemoradiation without progression of disease at the time of tumor-treating field therapy initiation. Level II: It is suggested that, when available, enrollment in properly designed studies of vector containing herpes simplex thymidine kinase gene and prodrug therapies be considered in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

MGMT promoter methylation analysis for allocating combined CCNU/TMZ chemotherapy: Lessons learned from the CeTeG/NOA-09 trial

The CeTeG/NOA-09 trial showed a survival benefit for combined CCNU/TMZ therapy in MGMT-promoter-methylated glioblastoma patients (quantitative methylation-specific PCR [qMSP] ratio > 2). Here, we report on the prognostic value of the MGMT promoter methylation ratio determined by qMSP and evaluate the concordance of MGMT methylation results obtained by qMSP, pyrosequencing (PSQ) or DNA methylation arrays (MGMT-STP27). A potential association of qMSP ratio with survival was analyzed in the CeTeG/NOA-09 trial population (n = 129; log-rank tests, Cox regression analyses). The concordance of MGMT methylation assays (qMSP, PSQ and MGMT-STP27) was evaluated in 76 screened patients. Patients with tumors of qMSP ratio > 4 showed superior survival compared to those with ratios 2-4 (P = .0251, log-rank test). In multivariate analysis, the qMSP ratio was not prognostic across the study cohort (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.72-1.08). With different cutoffs for qMSP ratio (4, 9, 12 or 25), the CCNU/TMZ benefit tended to be larger in subgroups with lower ratios (eg, for cutoff 9: HR 0.32 for lower subgroup, 0.73 for higher subgroup). The concordance rates with qMSP were 94.4% (PSQ) and 90.2% (MGMT-STP27). Discordant results were restricted to tumors with qMSP ratios ≤4 and PSQ mean methylation rate ≤25%. Despite a shorter survival in MGMT-promoter-methylated patients with lower methylation according to qMSP, these patients had a benefit from combined CCNU/TMZ therapy, which even tended to be stronger than in patients with higher methylation rates. With acceptable concordance rates, decisions on CCNU/TMZ therapy may also be based on PSQ or MGMT-STP27.

Glioblastoma treatment guidelines: Consensus by the Spanish Society of Neurosurgery Tumor Section

INTRODUCTION

Glioblastoma (GBM) treatment starts in most patients with surgery, either resection surgery or biopsy, to reach a histology diagnose. Multidisciplinar team, including specialists in brain tumors diagnose and treatment, must make an individualize assessment to get the maximum benefit of the available treatments.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Experts in each GBM treatment field have briefly described it based in their experience and the reviewed of the literature.

RESULTS

Each area has been summarized and the consensus of the brain tumor group has been included at the end.

CONCLUSIONS

GBM are aggressive tumors with a dismal prognosis, however accurate treatments can improve overall survival and quality of life. Neurosurgeons must know treatment options, indications and risks to participate actively in the decision making and to offer the best surgical treatment in every case.

Posttreatment Effect of MGMT Methylation Level on Glioblastoma Survival

The DNA repair protein O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) removes temozolomide-induced alkylation, thereby preventing DNA damage and cytotoxicity. We investigated the prognostic effect of different MGMT methylation levels on overall and progression-free survival in 327 patients with primary glioblastoma undergoing standard treatment. We obtained MGMT methylation level in 4 CpG sites using pyrosequencing. The association between MGMT methylation level and survival was investigated using Cox proportional hazards model and an extension to detect time-varying effects. We found an association between MGMT methylation level and overall survival (OS) from around 9 months after the diagnosis, with no association between MGMT methylation level and OS before that. For patients surviving at least 9 months even small increases in MGMT methylation level are significantly beneficial (HR = 0.97, 95% CI [0.96, 0.98]). The predictive ability of MGMT methylation level on OS from 9 months after diagnosis has a Harrel's C of 66%. We conclude that the MGMT methylation level is strongly associated with survival only for patients surviving beyond 9 months with considerable effects for levels much lower than previously reported. Prognostic evaluation of cut-points of MGMT methylation levels and of CpG island site selection should take the time-varying effect on overall survival into account.

Predicting MGMT Promoter Methylation of Glioblastoma from Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion: A Radiomic Approach

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study aims to investigate whether radiomic quantitative image features (IFs) from perfusion dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging (DSC-MRI) retain sufficient strength to predict O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation (MGMT_pm) in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GB) patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the perfusion DSC-MRI of 59 patients with GB. Patients were classified into three groups: (1) unmethylated if MGMT_pm ≤ 9% (UM); (2) intermediate-methylated if MGMT_pm ranged between 10% and 29% (IM); (3) methylated if MGMT_pm ≥ 30% (M). A total of 92 quantitative IFs were obtained from relative cerebral blood volume and relative cerebral blood flow maps. The Mann-Whitney U-test was applied to assess whether there were statistical differences in IFs between patient groups. Those IFs showing significant difference between two patient groups were termed relevant IFs (rIFs). rIFs were uploaded to a machine learning model to predict the MGMT_pm.

RESULTS

No rIFs were found between UM and IM groups. Fourteen rIFs were found among UM-M, IM-M, and (UM + IM)-M groups. We built a multilayer perceptron deep learning model that classified patients as belonging to UM + IM and M group. The model performed well with 75% sensitivity, 85% specificity, and an area under the receiver-operating curve of .84.

CONCLUSION

rIFs from perfusion DSC-MRI are potential biomarkers in GBs with a ≥30% MGMT_pm. Otherwise, unmethylated and intermediate-methylated GBs lack of rIFs. Five of 14 rIFs show sufficient strength to build an accurate prediction model of MGMT_pm.

Significance and Prognostic Value of The Coagulation Profile in Patients with Glioblastoma: Implications for Personalized Therapy

BACKGROUND

Coagulation is an important aspect of the vascular microenvironment in which brain tumors evolve. Patients with tumor often show aberrant coagulation and fibrinolysis activation. In particular, glioblastoma (GBM), the most aggressive primary brain tumor, is associated with a state of hypercoagulability, and venous thromboembolism is a common complication of this cancer and its treatment. Our study aims to investigate the clinical and prognostic significance of routine laboratory tests to assess the coagulative state of patients with brain tumors, to identify potential new prognostic factors and targets for personalized therapy.

METHODS

Blood samples were collected from patients with GBM (n = 58) and patients with meningioma (MNG, n = 22), before any treatment. The parameters analyzed were prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), D dimer (DD), fibrinogen, von Willebrand factor (VWF), leukocyte count, and hemoglobin levels.

RESULTS

Plasma levels of PT and aPTT were significantly reduced in GBMs compared with MNGs (P < 0.05), whereas DD, VWF:Ag levels, and leukocyte count were significantly higher in GBMs than in MNGs (P < 0.01). Furthermore, we observed that patients with GBM with reduced PT and aPTT and high levels of DD and VWF, defined as hypercoagulable patients, showed reduced overall survival (P < 0.05) compared with nonhypercoagulable patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data support the assumption that patients with GBM show a plasma hypercoagulable profile and that coagulation profile is related to adverse outcome in patients with GBM. If confirmed, hypercoagulability could play an important role as a prognostic factor of the disease and in the decision of an antithrombotic prophylaxis.

Methylation status of KLF4 and HS3ST2 genes as predictors of endometrial cancer and hyperplastic endometrial lesions

Endometrial carcinoma is one of the most common tumours in developed countries. In addition to the active role of genetic factors, epigenetic changes also have an important effect. The present study analysed the methylation status of kruppel like factor 4 (KLF4) and heparan sulfate‑glucosamine 3‑sulfotransferase 2 (HS3ST2) genes in three endometrial tissue types for carcinoma prediction. The sample comprised 91 women with histologically‑confirmed endometrial carcinoma (64.16±9.64 years old), 36 women with hyperplasia (53.39±9.64 years old) and 45 with no signs or symptoms of malignancy (48.53±11.11 years old). The CpG dinucleotide methylation levels were examined by quantitative pyrosequencing, and the discrimination accuracy of the model was calculated using the Random Forest classification algorithm of the area under the ROC curve (AUC). The mean values of KLF4 and HS3ST2 methylation indices were 23.83±11.39 and 8.52±2.57 in the control samples; 30.40±8.52 and 33.76±20.66 in hyperplasia and 34.72±10.79 and 34.49±18.39 in the cancerous tissues. Multinomial logistic regression indicated that the HS3ST2 CpG1 methylation status is a predictor of hyperplasia (P<0.05) and that the KLF4 CpG2 dinucleotide can predict carcinoma formation (P<0.001). The AUC value of 0.95 indicates high discrimination accuracy of the CpG nucleotides methylation status model between the controls and the two other diagnoses. The results of the present study establish the likelihood that aberrations in KLF4 and HS3ST2 gene methylation levels are important in the development of endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma, with hyperplasia an intermediate step between healthy and tumour tissues.

Defining a prognostic score based on O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase cut-off methylation level determined by pyrosequencing in patients with glioblastoma multiforme

PURPOSE

Epigenetic variations in the O6-methylguanine-methyltransferase gene had been widely associated with a favorable impact on survival in patients affected by glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Aim of this study is to explore a scoring system based on the gene promoter methylation in order to predict patients' prognosis.

METHODS

A series of 128 patients with GBM was retrospectively analyzed. A training set and a validations set were then generated. The methylation level of CpGi from 74 to 83 was determined by pyrosequencing. In accordance to previous literature, each island was assigned with 1 point if the corresponding methylation level was higher than 9%. The sum consisted in a score that went from 0 (all CpGi < 9%) to 10 (all CpGi ≥ 9%). A threshold capable to detect a favorable outcome (overall survival, OS > 24 months) was identified by ROC analysis.

RESULTS

Median OS and follow-up were 14 and 32.6 months respectively. Among the total population, 35% of the pts had a score of 0, while 29% had a score of 10. A score ≥ 6 was associated with a favorable prognosis also when corrected for age (> 70 vs. ≤ 70 years) and ECOG performance status (0-1 vs. 2-3). Similar results were observed also in terms of PFS. Results were consistent in the training and in the validation set.

CONCLUSIONS

The present manuscript explored a novel scoring system capable to take into consideration the methylation status of each single CpGi, capable to better predict prognosis in GBM patients.

Natural products: a hope for glioblastoma patients

Glioblastoma (GBM) is one of the most aggressive malignant tumors with an overall dismal survival averaging one year despite multimodality therapeutic interventions including surgery, radiotherapy and concomitant and adjuvant chemotherapy. Few drugs are FDA approved for GBM, and the addition of temozolomide (TMZ) to standard therapy increases the median survival by only 2.5 months. Targeted therapy appeared promising in in vitro monolayer cultures, but disappointed in preclinical and clinical trials, partly due to the poor penetration of drugs through the blood brain barrier (BBB). Cancer stem cells (CSCs) have intrinsic resistance to initial chemoradiation therapy (CRT) and acquire further resistance via deregulation of many signaling pathways. Due to the failure of classical chemotherapies and targeted drugs, research efforts focusing on the use of less toxic agents have increased. Interestingly, multiple natural compounds have shown antitumor and apoptotic effects in TMZ resistant and p53 mutant GBM cell lines and also displayed synergistic effects with TMZ. In this review, we have summarized the current literature on natural products or product analogs used to modulate the BBB permeability, induce cell death, eradicate CSCs and sensitize GBM to CRT.