Effects of lymphadenectomy among women with stage IA endometrial cancer: a SEER database analysis

Recent management of endometrial cancer: a narrative review of the literature

Endometrial cancer is a common female gynecological neoplasia and its incidence rate has increased in the past years. Due to its predominant symptoms, most women will present uterine bleeding. It is usually diagnosed at an early stage and surgery has an important role in the treatment plan. The prognosis and quality of life of these patients can be quite favorable, if proper treatment is offered by surgeons. Traditionally, more invasive approaches and procedures were offered to these patients, but recent data suggest that more conservative and minimal invasive choices can be adopted in the treatment algorithm. Minimal invasive surgery, such as laparoscopy and robotic surgery, should be considered as an acceptable alternative, compared to laparotomy with less comorbidities and similar oncological and survival outcomes. Furthermore, sentinel lymph node biopsy has emerged in the surgical staging of endometrial cancer, in order to replace comprehensive lymphadenectomy. It is associated with less intra- and postoperative complications, while preliminary data show no difference in survival rates. However, sentinel lymph node biopsy should be offered within a strict algorithm, to avoid residual metastatic disease. The aim of this review is to analyze all the available data for the application of minimal invasive surgery in early endometrial cancer and especially the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Endometrial Cancer: A Comprehensive Review

Endometrial cancer (EC) is known as a common gynecological malignancy. The incidence rate is on the increase annually. Lymph node status plays a crucial role in evaluating the prognosis and selecting adjuvant therapy. Currently, the patients with high-risk (not comply with any of the following: (1) well-differentiated or moderately differentiated, pathological grade G1 or G2; (2) myometrial invasion< 1/2; (3) tumor diameter < 2 cm are commonly recommended for a systematic lymphadenectomy (LAD). However, conventional LAD shows high complication incidence and uncertain survival benefits. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) refers to the first lymph node that is passed by the lymphatic metastasis of the primary malignant tumor through the regional lymphatic drainage pathway and can indicate the involvement of lymph nodes across the drainage area. Mounting evidence has demonstrated a high detection rate (DR), sensitivity, and negative predictive value (NPV) in patients with early-stage lower risk EC using sentinel lymph node mapping (SLNM) with pathologic ultra-staging. Meanwhile, SLNM did not compromise the patient’s progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with low operative complications. However, the application of SLNM in early-stage high-risk EC patients remains controversial. As revealed by the recent studies, SLNM may also be feasible, effective, and safe in high-risk patients. This review aims at making a systematic description of the progress made in the application of SLNM in the treatment of EC and the relevant controversies, including the application of SLNM in high-risk patients.

Systematic lymphadenectomy in early stage endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND

The positive effect of systematic lymphadenectomy on survival of patients with endometrial cancer is a topic of ongoing debate.

METHODS

We aimed to investigate whether systemic lymphadenectomy is beneficial for patients with early endometrial cancer. For this purpose, we analyzed a population-based registry with of 2392 women with endometrioid endometrial cancer, stage I and II at intermediate and high risk of recurrence. The primary outcome measure was overall survival.

RESULTS

After exclusions, 868 women were eligible for analysis. Of those, 511 and 357 were categorized as intermediate (pT1A G3 and pT1B G1-2) and high risk (pT1B G3 and pT2 G1-3) early stage endometrial cancer, respectively. Lymphadenectomy was performed in 527 (60.7%) of the cases. Patients in the lymphadenectomy group were significantly younger, presented with more tumors of intermediate or undifferentiated grade and exhibited significantly lower co-morbidity rates and Eastern Cooperative of Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status. Median follow-up was 6.7 years. Recurrence-free survival was not improved by lymphadenectomy in the intermediate and high-risk group of patients. During the follow-up period, 111 (12.8%) women had disease recurrence and 302 (34.8%) died. Systematic lymphadenectomy was associated with significant improvement of overall survival in the pT1A G3 and pT1B G3 patient subgroups. Notably, adjustment for patient age and ECOG status abolished the improvement of overall survival by systematic lymphadenectomy in all groups. Thus, lymphadenectomy did not improve recurrence-free survival in the intermediate risk or the high-risk group of patients CONCLUSIONS: Systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy did not improve the survival of patients with early stage I and II endometrioid endometrial cancer at intermediate and high risk of recurrence.