Immunotherapy combinations for the treatment of patients with solid tumors

Dual-targeting vaccine of FGL1/CAIX exhibits potent anti-tumor activity by activating DC-mediated multi-functional CD8 T cell immunity

Tumor DNA vaccine as an effective therapeutic approach can induce systemic immunity against malignant tumors, but its therapeutic effect is still not satisfactory in advanced renal cancer. Herein, a novel DNA vaccine containing dual antigens of fibrinogen-like protein 1 (FGL1) and carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) was developed and intramuscularly delivered by PLGA/PEI nanoparticles for renal cancer therapy. Compared with PLGA/PEI-pCAIX immunization, PLGA/PEI-pFGL1/pCAIX co-immunization significantly inhibited the subcutaneous tumor growth and promoted the differentiation and maturation of CD11c⁺ DCs and CD11c⁺CD11b⁺ DCs subset. Likewise, the increased capabilities of CD8 T cell proliferation, CTL responses, and multi-functional CD8⁺ T cell immune responses were observed in PLGA/PEI-pFGL1/pCAIX vaccine group. Interestingly, depletion of CD8⁺ T cells by using CD8 mAb resulted in a loss of anti-tumor function of PLGA/PEI-pFGL1/pCAIX vaccine, suggesting that the anti-tumor activity of the vaccine was dependent on CD8⁺ T cell immune responses. Furthermore, PLGA/PEI-pFGL1/pCAIX co-immunization also suppressed the lung metastasis of tumor mice by enhancing the multi-functional CD8⁺ T cell responses. Therefore, these results indicate that PLGA/PEI-pFGL1/pCAIX vaccine could provide an effective protective effect for renal cancer by enhanced DC-mediated multi-functional CD8⁺ T cell immune responses. This vaccine strategy offers a potential approach for solid or metastatic tumor treatment.

Nanotechnology-enhanced immunotherapy for metastatic cancer

A vast majority of cancer deaths occur as a result of metastasis. Unfortunately, effective treatments for metastases are currently lacking due to the difficulty of selectively targeting these small, delocalized tumors distributed across a variety of organs. However, nanotechnology holds tremendous promise for improving immunotherapeutic outcomes in patients with metastatic cancer. In contrast to conventional cancer immunotherapies, rationally designed nanomaterials can trigger specific tumoricidal effects, thereby improving immune cell access to major sites of metastasis such as bone, lungs, and lymph nodes, optimizing antigen presentation, and inducing a persistent immune response. This paper reviews the cutting-edge trends in nano-immunoengineering for metastatic cancers with an emphasis on different nano-immunotherapeutic strategies. Specifically, it discusses directly reversing the immunological status of the primary tumor, harnessing the potential of peripheral immune cells, preventing the formation of a pre-metastatic niche, and inhibiting the tumor recurrence through postoperative immunotherapy. Finally, we describe the challenges facing the integration of nanoscale immunomodulators and provide a forward-looking perspective on the innovative nanotechnology-based tools that may ultimately prove effective at eradicating metastatic diseases.

Angiogenesis, programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and immune microenvironment association in laryngeal carcinoma

In the specific field of laryngeal carcinoma (LSCC), evidence about the interaction between angiogenetic pathway and immune microenvironment has not yet been explored. Given the potential relevance of such an interaction for prognostic and therapeutic purposes, the main aim of this exploratory study was to investigate the existence of a correlation between angiogenesis (quantified through CD31 expression), programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, and immune microenvironment. A secondary aim was to verify whether considering a combination of angiogenesis and immune microenvironment variables might improve prognostic accuracy compared to the traditional clinical-pathological prognostic tools. CD31-assessed micro-vessel density (MVD), PD-L1 in terms of combined positive score (CPS), and tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were assessed on 45 consecutive cases of LSCC. Cox proportional hazards model revealed increasing CD31-assessed MVD values, PD-L1 CPS <1, and TILs count rate <30%, as predictive of reduced disease free survival (DFS). Multivariate analysis found that MVD (p<0.0001) and TILs (p=0.0420) retained their significant independent prognostic value. Spearman's correlation model disclosed a significant negative correlation between CD31-assessed MVD values and PD-L1 CPS (p=0.0040). PD-L1 CPS and TILs count rate were positively correlated (p<0.0001). DFS was significantly lower in the CD31-assessed MVD >7, PD-L1 CPS <1, TILs <30% group than in the MVD ≤7, PD-L1 CPS ≥1, TILs ≥30% group (p=0.0001). These data preliminarily support an integrated interpretation of the prognostic role or angiogenesis and immune microenvironment markers in LSCC. This is of potential clinical relevance suggesting a synergistic effect of the combination of anti-angiogenic drugs with programmed death-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors in advanced LSCC.

Anti-Angiogenic Therapy: Current Challenges and Future Perspectives

Anti-angiogenic therapy is an old method to fight cancer that aims to abolish the nutrient and oxygen supply to the tumor cells through the decrease of the vascular network and the avoidance of new blood vessels formation. Most of the anti-angiogenic agents approved for cancer treatment rely on targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) actions, as VEGF signaling is considered the main angiogenesis promotor. In addition to the control of angiogenesis, these drugs can potentiate immune therapy as VEGF also exhibits immunosuppressive functions. Despite the mechanistic rational that strongly supports the benefit of drugs to stop cancer progression, they revealed to be insufficient in most cases. We hypothesize that the rehabilitation of old drugs that interfere with mechanisms of angiogenesis related to tumor microenvironment might represent a promising strategy. In this review, we deepened research on the molecular mechanisms underlying anti-angiogenic strategies and their failure and went further into the alternative mechanisms that impact angiogenesis. We concluded that the combinatory targeting of alternative effectors of angiogenic pathways might be a putative solution for anti-angiogenic therapies.