1
|
Chen Y, Martin P, Inoue LYT, Basu A, Carlson JJ. Tackling Challenges in Assessing the Economic Value of Tumor-Agnostic Therapies: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pembrolizumab as a Case Study. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2024; 27:926-935. [PMID: 38548177 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Assessing the value of tumor-agnostic drugs (TAD) is challenging given the potential variability in treatment effects, trials with small sample sizes, different standards of care (SoC), and lack of comparative data from single-arm basket trials. Our study developed and applied novel methods to assess the value of pembrolizumab compared with SoC to inform coverage decisions. METHODS We developed a partitioned survival model to evaluate the cost-utility of pembrolizumab for previously treated patients with 8 advanced or metastatic microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient cancers from a US commercial payer perspective. Efficacy of pembrolizumab was based on data from trials directly or with adjustment using Bayesian hierarchical models. Eight chemotherapy-based external control arms were constructed from the TriNetX electronic health record databases. Tumor-specific health-state utility values were applied. All costs were adjusted to 2022 US dollars. RESULTS At a lifetime horizon, pembrolizumab was associated with increased effectiveness compared with chemotherapies in colorectal (quality-adjusted life years [QALYs]: +0.64, life years [LYs]: +0.64), endometrial (QALYs: +3.79, LYs: +5.47), and small intestine cancers (QALYs: +1.73, LYs: +2.48), but not for patients with metastatic gastric, cholangiocarcinoma, pancreatic, ovarian, and brain cancers. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios varied substantially across tumor types. Pembrolizumab was found to be cost-effective in treating colorectal and endometrial cancers (incremental cost-effectiveness ratios: $121 967 and $139 257, respectively), and not cost-effective for other assessed cancers at a $150 000 willingness-to-pay/QALY threshold, compared with SoC chemotherapies. CONCLUSIONS The cost-effectiveness of TADs can vary by cancers. Using analytic tools such as external controls and Bayesian hierarchical models can tackle several challenges in assessing the value of TADs and uncertainties from basket trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yilin Chen
- Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Peter Martin
- Kaiser Permanente Health Plan of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Lurdes Y T Inoue
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Anirban Basu
- Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Josh J Carlson
- Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kimmick G, Pilehvari A, You W, Bonilla G, Anderson R. First- vs second-line CDK 4/6 inhibitor use for patients with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth-factor receptor-2 negative, metastatic breast cancer in the real world setting. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024:10.1007/s10549-024-07415-6. [PMID: 38922546 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07415-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2024] [Accepted: 06/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) with endocrine therapy (ET) in the first- versus second-line setting for treatment of hormone receptor positive (HR+), HER2 negative, metastatic breast cancer (MBC) using real-world evidence. METHODS Patients with HR+, HER2 negative MBC, diagnosed between 2/3/2015 and 11/2/2021 and having ≥ 3 months follow-up were identified from the nationwide electronic health record-derived Flatiron Health de-identified database. Treatment cohorts included: (1) first-line ET with a CDK 4/6i (1st-line CDK4/6i) versus (2) first-line ET alone followed by second-line ET with a CDK4/6i (2nd-line CDK4/6i). Differences in baseline characteristics were tested using chi-square tests and two-sample t-tests. Time to third-line therapy, time to start of chemotherapy, and overall survival were compared using Kaplan-Maier method. RESULTS The analysis included 2771 patients (2170 1st-line CDK4/6i and 601 2nd-line CDK4/6i). Patients receiving 1st-line CDK4/6i were younger (75% vs 68% < 75 years old, p = 0.0001), less likely uninsured or not having insurance status documented (10% vs. 13%, p = 0.04), of better performance status (50% vs 43% with ECOG 0, p = 0.03), and more likely to have de novo MBC (36% vs. 24%, p < 0.001). Time to third-line therapy (49 vs 22 months, p < 0.001) and time to chemotherapy (68 vs 41 months, p < 0.001) were longer in those receiving first-line CDK4/6i. Overall survival (54 vs 49 months, p = 0.33) was similar between groups. CONCLUSION Use of CDK4/6i with first-, vs second-, line ET was associated with longer time to receipt of 3rd-line therapy and longer time to receipt of chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gretchen Kimmick
- Duke University Medical Center/Duke Cancer Institute, DUMC Box 3204, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
| | - Asal Pilehvari
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
- University of Virginia Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Wen You
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
- University of Virginia Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Gloribel Bonilla
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
- University of Virginia Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Roger Anderson
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
- University of Virginia Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Swaminathan A, Ren AL, Wu JY, Bhargava-Shah A, Lopez I, Srivastava U, Alexopoulos V, Pizzitola R, Bui B, Alkhani L, Lee S, Mohit N, Seo N, Macedo N, Cheng W, Wang W, Tran E, Thomas R, Gevaert O. Extraction of Unstructured Electronic Health Records to Evaluate Glioblastoma Treatment Patterns. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2024; 8:e2300091. [PMID: 38857465 DOI: 10.1200/cci.23.00091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Data on lines of therapy (LOTs) for cancer treatment are important for clinical oncology research, but LOTs are not explicitly recorded in electronic health records (EHRs). We present an efficient approach for clinical data abstraction and a flexible algorithm to derive LOTs from EHR-based medication data on patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). METHODS Nonclinicians were trained to abstract the diagnosis of GBM from EHRs, and their accuracy was compared with abstraction performed by clinicians. The resulting data were used to build a cohort of patients with confirmed GBM diagnosis. An algorithm was developed to derive LOTs using structured medication data, accounting for the addition and discontinuation of therapies and drug class. Descriptive statistics were calculated and time-to-next-treatment (TTNT) analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Treating clinicians as the gold standard, nonclinicians abstracted GBM diagnosis with a sensitivity of 0.98, specificity 1.00, positive predictive value 1.00, and negative predictive value 0.90, suggesting that nonclinician abstraction of GBM diagnosis was comparable with clinician abstraction. Of 693 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of GBM, 246 patients contained structured information about the types of medications received. Of them, 165 (67.1%) received a first-line therapy (1L) of temozolomide, and the median TTNT from the start of 1L was 179 days. CONCLUSION We described a workflow for extracting diagnosis of GBM and LOT from EHR data that combines nonclinician abstraction with algorithmic processing, demonstrating comparable accuracy with clinician abstraction and highlighting the potential for scalable and efficient EHR-based oncology research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Janet Y Wu
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | | | - Ivan Lopez
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Ujwal Srivastava
- Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | | | | | - Brandon Bui
- Department of Human Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Layth Alkhani
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Susan Lee
- Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
- Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Nathan Mohit
- Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Noel Seo
- Department of Sociology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Nicholas Macedo
- Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Winson Cheng
- Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
- Department of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - William Wang
- Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Edward Tran
- Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Reena Thomas
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Olivier Gevaert
- Department of Medicine, Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research (BMIR), Stanford, CA
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research (BMIR), Stanford, CA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Falchetto L, Bender B, Erhard I, Zeiner KN, Stratmann JA, Koll FJ, Wagner S, Reiser M, Gasimli K, Stehle A, Voss M, Ballo O, Vehreschild JJ, Maier D. Concepts of lines of therapy in cancer treatment: findings from an expert interview-based study. BMC Res Notes 2024; 17:137. [PMID: 38750530 PMCID: PMC11094945 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-024-06789-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The concept of lines of therapy (LOT) in cancer treatment is often considered for decision making in tumor boards and clinical management, but lacks a common definition across medical specialties. The complexity and heterogeneity of malignancies and treatment modalities contribute to an inconsistent understanding of LOT among physicians. This study assesses the heterogeneity of understandings of the LOT concept, its major dimensions, and criteria from the perspective of physicians of different specialties with an oncological focus in Germany. Semi-structured expert interviews with nine physicians were conducted and evaluated using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS Most interviewees agreed that there is no single definition for LOT and found it difficult to explicate their understanding. A majority of experts stated that they had already encountered misunderstandings with colleagues regarding LOT and that they had problems with deciphering LOT from the medical records of their patients. Disagreement emerged about the roles of the following within the LOT concept: maintenance therapy, treatment intention, different therapy modalities, changing pharmaceutical agents, and therapy breaks. Respondents predominantly considered the same criteria as decisive for the definition of LOT as for a change in LOT (e.g., the occurrence of a progression event or tumor recurrence).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Falchetto
- Institute for Digital Medicine and Clinical Data Science, Goethe University Frankfurt, Faculty of Medicine, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Bernd Bender
- Institute for Digital Medicine and Clinical Data Science, Goethe University Frankfurt, Faculty of Medicine, Frankfurt, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Frankfurt/Mainz and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Ian Erhard
- Institute for Digital Medicine and Clinical Data Science, Goethe University Frankfurt, Faculty of Medicine, Frankfurt, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Frankfurt/Mainz and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kim N Zeiner
- Department for Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Jan A Stratmann
- Medical Department 2 (Hematology/Oncology), Center for Internal Medicine, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Florestan J Koll
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Sebastian Wagner
- Medical Department 2 (Hematology/Oncology), Center for Internal Medicine, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Marcel Reiser
- PIOH Praxis Internistischer Onkologie und Hämatologie, Cologne, Germany
| | - Khayal Gasimli
- Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Angelika Stehle
- Department for Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Martin Voss
- Department Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Olivier Ballo
- Medical Department 2 (Hematology/Oncology), Center for Internal Medicine, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Jörg Janne Vehreschild
- Institute for Digital Medicine and Clinical Data Science, Goethe University Frankfurt, Faculty of Medicine, Frankfurt, Germany
- Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF) partner site Bonn Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Daniel Maier
- Institute for Digital Medicine and Clinical Data Science, Goethe University Frankfurt, Faculty of Medicine, Frankfurt, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Frankfurt/Mainz and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Antonarakis ES, Zhang N, Saha J, Nevalaita L, Ikonen T, Tsai LJ, Garratt C, Fizazi K. Prevalence and Spectrum of AR Ligand-Binding Domain Mutations Detected in Circulating-Tumor DNA Across Disease States in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. JCO Precis Oncol 2024; 8:e2300330. [PMID: 38781544 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is typically treated with agents directly or indirectly targeting the androgen receptor (AR) pathway. However, such treatment is limited by resistance mechanisms, including the development of activating mutations in the AR ligand-binding domain (AR-LBD). METHODS This study evaluated a database of over 15,000 patients with advanced prostate cancer (PC) undergoing comprehensive circulating-tumor DNA analysis (Guardant360, Redwood City, CA) between 2014 and 2021, with associated clinical information from administrative claims (GuardantINFORM database). RESULTS Of 15,705 patients with PC included, 54% had mCRPC at the time of their blood draw. Of those, 49% had previous treatment with an AR pathway inhibitor (ARPi). AR-LBD mutation prevalence was 15% in patients with mCRPC who were untreated with a next-generation ARPi, 22% in those after one line of ARPi therapy, and 24% in those after two lines of ARPi treatment. Next-generation ARPi treatment yielded an increase in AR L702H and T878A/S mutations after abiraterone, and an increase in AR L702H and F877L mutations after enzalutamide. AR-LBD+ patients demonstrated unique biology, including increased concurrent mutations in the cell-cycle, wingless-related integration site, homologous recombination repair, and phospho-inositide 3-kinase pathways (all P < .0005), and greater low-level (copy number <10) AR amplifications (P = .0041). AR-LBD+ patients exhibited worse overall survival (OS) relative to a matched cohort of AR-LBD- patients (50.1 v 60.7 months, unadjusted log-rank P = .013). CONCLUSION This large database analysis demonstrates that AR-LBD mutation prevalence increases after next-generation ARPi use. AR-LBD+ tumors demonstrate unique biology (more oncogenic pathway mutations and low-level AR amplification) and reduced OS. These findings inform the development of novel therapies designed to circumvent AR-mediated therapeutic resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Karim Fizazi
- Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rong Y, Bentley JP, Bhattacharya K, Yang Y, Chang Y, Earl S, Ramachandran S. Incidence and risk factors of immune-related adverse events induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors among older adults with non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e6879. [PMID: 38164655 PMCID: PMC10807682 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 12/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment has been linked to a variety of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which can affect any organ system. The incidence and risk factors of irAEs have not been adequately evaluated among older adults with NSCLC. METHODS A cohort study was conducted using 1999-2019 SEER-Medicare data among beneficiaries aged ≥65 years with a diagnosis of NSCLC who received nivolumab, pembrolizumab, or atezolizumab. Incident irAEs were identified post-ICI initiation. Demographic, cancer-related characteristics, and clinical history risk factors of irAEs were evaluated with competing events considered. RESULTS A total of 8175 older NSCLC patients were included (with 46.8% experiencing irAEs). Pneumonitis (16.5%), hypothyroidism (10.5%), arrhythmia (11.18%), and acute kidney injury (AKI) (5.8%) were the most common irAEs. The median time to first irAE was 82 days (IQR: 29-182 days). The earliest onset of irAE occurrence was for hematologic irAEs, while the latest were gastrointestinal, dermatologic, and musculoskeletal irAEs. Fine-Gray regression modeling revealed significantly greater hazards of irAE occurrence in patients who received pembrolizumab at index, did not have CNS metastases, had a history of autoimmune disorder, and had chemotherapy in combination with ICI. Race, socioeconomic status, previous radiation therapy, and comorbidity burden were found to be associated with the occurrence of certain type of irAEs. CONCLUSION A significant proportion of older patients with NSCLC develop an irAE after receiving ICI treatment. Factors related to cancer and treatment as well as demographics contribute to the increased risk of irAEs. Close monitoring and prediction of irAE among older patients receiving ICI is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiran Rong
- Department of Pharmacy AdministrationUniversity of MississippiUniversityMississippiUSA
| | - John P. Bentley
- Department of Pharmacy AdministrationUniversity of MississippiUniversityMississippiUSA
- Center for Pharmaceutical Marketing and ManagementCenter for Pharmaceutical Marketing and ManagementUniversity of MississippiUniversityMississippiUSA
| | - Kaustuv Bhattacharya
- Department of Pharmacy AdministrationUniversity of MississippiUniversityMississippiUSA
- Center for Pharmaceutical Marketing and ManagementCenter for Pharmaceutical Marketing and ManagementUniversity of MississippiUniversityMississippiUSA
| | - Yi Yang
- Department of Pharmacy AdministrationUniversity of MississippiUniversityMississippiUSA
| | - Yunhee Chang
- Department of Nutrition and Hospitality ManagementUniversity of MississippiUniversityMississippiUSA
| | - Sally Earl
- Department of Pharmacy PracticeUniversity of MississippiUniversityMississippiUSA
| | - Sujith Ramachandran
- Department of Pharmacy AdministrationUniversity of MississippiUniversityMississippiUSA
- Center for Pharmaceutical Marketing and ManagementCenter for Pharmaceutical Marketing and ManagementUniversity of MississippiUniversityMississippiUSA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Siu DHW, Lin FPY, Cho D, Lord SJ, Heller GZ, Simes RJ, Lee CK. Framework for the Use of External Controls to Evaluate Treatment Outcomes in Precision Oncology Trials. JCO Precis Oncol 2024; 8:e2300317. [PMID: 38190581 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 09/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Advances in genomics have enabled anticancer therapies to be tailored to target specific genomic alterations. Single-arm trials (SATs), including those incorporated within umbrella, basket, and platform trials, are widely adopted when it is not feasible to conduct randomized controlled trials in rare biomarker-defined subpopulations. External controls (ECs), defined as control arm data derived outside the clinical trial, have gained renewed interest as a strategy to supplement evidence generated from SATs to allow comparative analysis. There are increasing examples demonstrating the application of EC in precision oncology trials. The prospective application of EC in conducting comparative studies is associated with distinct methodological challenges, the specific considerations for EC use in biomarker-defined subpopulations have not been adequately discussed, and a formal framework is yet to be established. In this review, we present a framework for conducting a prospective comparative analysis using EC. Key steps are (1) defining the purpose of using EC to address the study question, (2) determining if the external data are fit for purpose, (3) developing a transparent study protocol and a statistical analysis plan, and (iv) interpreting results and drawing conclusions on the basis of a prespecified hypothesis. We specify the considerations required for the biomarker-defined subpopulations, which include (1) specifying the comparator and biomarker status of the comparator group, (2) defining lines of treatment, (3) assessment of the biomarker testing panels used, and (4) assessment of cohort stratification in tumor-agnostic studies. We further discuss novel clinical trial designs and statistical techniques leveraging EC to propose future directions to advance evidence generation and facilitate drug development in precision oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derrick H W Siu
- National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Frank P Y Lin
- National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Kinghorn Centre for Clinical Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Doah Cho
- National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Sarah J Lord
- National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Gillian Z Heller
- National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Mathematics and Statistics, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW, Australia
| | - R John Simes
- National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Chee Khoon Lee
- National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Cancer Care Centre, St George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Barzi A, Lin F, Song J, Lam C, Nie X, Noman A, Kwong WJ. Real-World Treatment Patterns and Economic Burden Following First-Line Trastuzumab in Patients with Metastatic Gastric Cancer in the USA. Drugs Real World Outcomes 2023; 10:395-404. [PMID: 37540381 PMCID: PMC10491560 DOI: 10.1007/s40801-023-00378-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy is the standard first-line (1L) treatment for HER2+ metastatic gastric cancer (mGC) in the USA. OBJECTIVE This study characterizes the real-world treatment patterns, healthcare resource use (HRU), and costs in patients with HER2+ mGC post-1L trastuzumab before approval of fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki. PATIENTS AND METHODS This retrospective study used the IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus Database (October 2014-September 2019) to identify adults with HER2+ mGC who discontinued trastuzumab-based regimens in 1L. Patient characteristics, second-line (2L) treatment patterns, and treatment duration were summarized. HRU and costs before and after discontinuation of 1L trastuzumab-based regimens as well as during 2L treatment were described. RESULTS Of the 190 HER2+mGC patients who discontinued 1L trastuzumab-based regimens, 136 (71.58%) initiated 2L treatments. Trastuzumab-based regimens were the most common in 2L (50.74%), followed by ramucirumab + paclitaxel (19.85%). The median time to 2L discontinuation was 2.37 months. During a mean follow-up of 9.8 months, mean per-patient-per-month (PPPM) healthcare costs post-1L trastuzumab-based regimens were higher in patients receiving 2L treatment than those without subsequent treatment (US$25,178 vs. US$14,812). The mean PPPM cost during 2L treatment was US$30,838, primarily driven by outpatient infusion costs (US$22,262). CONCLUSIONS The short duration of 2L treatment observed in this study is consistent with a lack of effective treatments post-1L trastuzumab prior to 2020. Re-use of trastuzumab treatment was common despite its limited efficacy and high treatment cost. The findings highlight the unmet medical needs and substantial burden faced by patients with HER2 +mGC previously treated with trastuzumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Afsaneh Barzi
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Feng Lin
- Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., 211 Mt Airy Road, Basking Ridge, NJ 08920 USA
| | | | - Clara Lam
- AstraZeneca PLC, Gaithersburg, MD USA
| | - Xiaoyu Nie
- Analysis Group, Inc., Los Angeles, CA USA
| | | | - Winghan J. Kwong
- Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., 211 Mt Airy Road, Basking Ridge, NJ 08920 USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Incidence of second primary malignancies in relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients in England. Leuk Res 2023; 127:107042. [PMID: 36812661 DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2023.107042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatments for relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) may be associated with an increased risk of second primary malignancies (SPMs). Currently available SPM incidence benchmarks are unreliable due to small sample sizes. METHODS The Cancer Analysis System (CAS), a population-level cancer database in England, was used to identify patients with incident B-cell NHL diagnosed during 2013-2018 with evidence of r/r disease. Incidence rates (IRs) of SPMs after r/r disease diagnosis were calculated per 1000 person-years (PYs) and stratified by age, sex, and SPM type. RESULTS We identified 9444 patients with r/r B-cell NHL disease. Of those who were eligible for SPM analysis, nearly 6.0% (470/7807) developed at least one SPM after r/r disease diagnosis (IR: 44.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 40.9-48.9). Of note, 205 (2.6%) had a non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) SPM. IR of SPMs was the highest for patients with r/r chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic leukemia (80.0) and lowest for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (30.9). Patients with DLBCL had the shortest overall survival after r/r disease diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS This real-world data study suggests that the IR of SPM among patients with r/r B-cell NHL is 44.7 per 1000 PY and that most SPMs diagnosed after r/r disease diagnosis are NMSCs, establishing a basis for the comparison of safety outcomes for new treatments being developed for r/r B-cell NHL.
Collapse
|
10
|
Mehta R, Liepa AM, Zheng S, Chatterjee A. Real-World Molecular Biomarker Testing Patterns and Results for Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancers in the United States. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:1869-1881. [PMID: 36826106 PMCID: PMC9955769 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30020145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The decision to treat advanced gastroesophageal cancers (GECs) with targeted therapy and immunotherapy is based on key biomarker expression (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), microsatellite instability (MSI), and/or mismatch repair (MMR)). Real-world data on testing, results, and treatment patterns are limited. This retrospective observational study used a nationwide electronic health record-derived de-identified database of patients from the United States. The analysis included adult patients with advanced GECs who initiated systemic treatment between 2017 and 2020. Biomarker testing patterns, timing, assays, tissue collection site, results, and treatment sequences were assessed. Of 1142 eligible patients, adenocarcinoma was the most prevalent histology (83% of patients). Overall, 571 (50%) patients were tested for PD-L1, 582 (51%) were tested for MMR/MSI, and 857 (75%) were tested for HER2. Between 2017 and 2020, the PD-L1 testing rate increased from 39% to 58%, and the MMR/MSI testing rate increased from 41% to 58%; the median time from initial diagnosis to first test decreased for both biomarkers. Programmed cell death receptor-1 inhibitor use was observed among patients with positive PD-L1 or MMR-deficient/MSI-High results. These results supplement data reported in key clinical trials and may inform decision-making as treatment options for advanced GECs evolve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rutika Mehta
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-813-745-1277
| | | | - Shen Zheng
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA
- TechData Service Company, King of Prussia, PA 19406, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fisher VA, Comment LA. Multi-state survival models with treatment effects and biomarkers: Simulations for study design assessment. Cancer Epidemiol 2022; 81:102272. [PMID: 36219984 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2022.102272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Revised: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Comparative effectiveness studies of cancer therapeutics in observational data face confounding by patterns of clinical treatment over time. The validity of survival analysis in longitudinal health records depends on study design choices including index date definition and model specification for covariate adjustment. METHODS Overall survival in cancer is a multi-state transition process with mortality and treatment switching as competing risks. Parametric Weibull regression quantifies proportionality of hazards across lines of therapy in real-world cohorts of 12 solid tumor types. Study design assessments compare alternative analytic models in simulations with realistic disproportionality. The multi-state simulation framework is adaptable to alternative treatment effect profiles and exposure patterns. RESULTS Event-specific hazards of treatment-switching and death are not proportional across lines of therapy in 12 solid tumor types. Study designs that include all eligible lines of therapy per subject showed lower bias and variance than designs that select one line per subject. Confounding by line number was effectively mitigated across a range of simulation scenarios by Cox proportional hazards models with stratified baseline hazards and inverse probability of treatment weighting. CONCLUSION Quantitative study design assessment can inform the planning of observational research in clinical oncology by demonstrating the potential impact of model misspecification. Use of empirical parameter estimates in simulation designs adapts analytic recommendations to the clinical population of interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virginia A Fisher
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., 150 Second Street, Cambridge, MA 02141, USA.
| | - Leah A Comment
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., 150 Second Street, Cambridge, MA 02141, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hess LM, Zhu YE, Fang Y, Liepa AM. Health care resource utilization and treatment variability in the care of patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal or gastric cancer. J Med Econ 2021; 24:930-938. [PMID: 34289799 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2021.1958607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
AIMS This study was designed to describe health care resource utilization (HCRU) of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) or gastric cancer to test the hypothesis that greater treatment variability would be associated with increased HCRU. METHODS A retrospective observational study using Marketscan claims data was conducted. Eligible patients had a first diagnosis of metastatic CRC or gastric cancer between 2004 and 2015 and must have received systemic anti-cancer therapy after diagnosis. Treatment variability was measured using the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI). HHI scores were stratified by quartile. HCRU variables were evaluated throughout the follow-up period and described by 6-month periods. Chi-square test was used for categorical variables and ANOVA for continuous variables. RESULTS A total of 55,403 CRC and 9,073 gastric cancer patients were eligible. First-line HHI scores ranged from 0.1304-0.2778 for CRC and 0.0383-0.1778 for gastric cancer by state of residence. Statistically significant differences by HHI quartiles for HCRU in CRC included hospitalizations (p = 0.0003), ER visits (p < 0.0001), ER visits leading to hospitalization (p < 0.0001), and supportive care (all agents studied, p < 0.01). For gastric cancer, significant differences by HHI quartile were observed for ER visits (p = 0.002) and selected supportive care (G-CSF, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, bisphosphonates, nutritional support, and antiemetics, each p < 0.05). No consistent increasing or decreasing trends were observed across the quartiles for either cohort. LIMITATIONS Large sample sizes could lead to statistical significance without being clinically meaningful. High treatment heterogeneity in the gastric cancer cohort and lack of a homogeneous quartile for comparisons limited the ability to evaluate HCRU by different levels of treatment variability. CONCLUSIONS Statistically significant relationships were observed between treatment variability as measured by HHI and increased HCRU, but no consistent directional trends in HCRU variables were observed. Therefore, this study failed to reject the null hypothesis of equivalent HCRU by level of treatment variability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa M Hess
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | - Yun Fang
- Syneos Health, Inc, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|