Real-world data on treatment outcomes in EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer patients receiving osimertinib in second or further lines

Prognostic Factors in Japanese EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive lung cancer has improved significantly since the advent of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). We aimed to investigate the relationship between patient characteristics, EGFR genotype, therapeutic agents, and the prognosis of the patients with EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed 198 Japanese patients with unresectable EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer who were treated with EGFR-TKIs at Toho University Sakura Medical Center from April 2006 to December 2021. Factors associated with overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards analysis.

RESULTS

Patients who received osimertinib had a significantly longer OS than did those not receiving it (median OS, 36.2 versus 20.7 months; p < 0.001).There were significant differences in OS between patients with EGFR mutation who received osimertinib as first-line treatment, T790M-positive patients who received osimertinib as second- or later-line treatment, and those who did not receive it (median OS, 28.2 versus 40.2 versus 20.7 months; p = 0.003). However, in T790M-negative patients, no significant difference in OS was noted between those who did and did not receive osimertinib as post-treatment (median OS, 28.0 versus 40.0 months; p = 0.619). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that osimertinib treatment was associated with longer OS (hazard ratio, 0.480; 95% confidence interval, 0.326-0.707; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The patients who were T790M-positive in the first-line treatment with first or second-generation EGFR-TKIs and were given osimertinib as the second or later line treatment had a better prognosis than the patients who were T790M-negative in the first-line treatment with first or second-generation EGFR-TKIs and could not receive osimertinib.

Real-world data on efficacy and safety of osimertinib in non-small cell lung cancer patients with EGFR T790M mutation detected by first and repeat rebiopsy

BACKGROUND

Osimertinib could effectively target epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M resistance mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), indicating that rebiopsy may be particularly important. However, the clinical benefit of repeat rebiopsy in T790M-negative patients with NSCLC detected by the first rebiopsy is still unclear, and data on the efficacy and safety of osimertinib in patients with NSCLC who are T790M-positive patients on a repeat rebiopsy remain rare.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected the clinical data of advanced NSCLC patients with common EGFR mutation who were treated with 1/2-generation (1/2G) EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in first-line therapy in our center from January 2018 to December 2020. The detection rate of T790M by first and repeat rebiopsy was recorded, and we also analyzed the efficacy and safety of osimertinib for T790M-positive patients.

RESULTS

Among 190 common EGFR-mutant patients who received 1/2G EGFR-TKIs with advanced NSCLC in the first-line treatment, 141 patients developed progressive disease. In total, 110 of 141 accepted the first rebiopsy, with a T790M prevalence of 50.9% (56/110). In total, 43 T790M-positive patients who received osimertinib were included in first rebiopsy group. Of 54 T790M-negative patients detected by the first rebiopsy, 28 underwent repeated rebiopsy in subsequent clinical treatment, and 10 (35.7%) T790M-positive cases were confirmed. In total, eight T790M-positive patients treated with osimertinib were included in repeat rebiopsy group. Overall, 66 (60%) of 110 patients acquired a T790M mutation. In patients with the T790M mutation discovered by the first and repeat rebiopsy, osimertinib resulted in median progression-free survival of 7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.3-8.7) and 6 (95% CI: 4.7-7.3) months, respectively (p = .656). The median overall survival since osimertinib initiation for T790M-positive patients at first rebiopsy was 20 (95% CI: 15.1-24.9) months and 19 (95% CI: 16.9-21.1) months, for those at repeated rebiopsy (p = .888). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were similar in the two groups (25.6% vs. 12.5%, p = .616). There was no treatment-related death in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat rebiopsy can increase the T790M mutation positivity rate. Osimertinib showed similar efficacy and safety in T790M-positive patients whether detected by the first or repeat rebiopsy.

Real-World Evidence of EGFR Targeted Therapy in NSCLC- A Brief Report of Decade Long Single Center Experience

The significance of EGFR targeted therapy in the lung adenocarcinoma is paramount. Several controlled clinical trials have reported considerable survival of EGFR mutation positive patients on receiving the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). However, the real-world evidence of benefits of EGFR TKI would be further useful to understand how the designated therapeutic regimen benefits the patients. In this study, we report a decade long real-world evidence of EGFR molecular testing in lung cancer at Tata Memorial Hospital (Mumbai, India). Laboratory and hospital records containing basic demographic details, clinical characteristics, treatment regimen, survival outcome were collected retrospectively. Statistical association and survival analysis were performed using the R programming. The cohort includes 9,053 lung cancer patients tested for EGFR mutations during 2011 to 2019. Baseline T790M and compound mutations were the only mutations observed co-occurring while all other EGFR mutations were mutually exclusive. Furthermore, the baseline T790M were also observed to be associated with TTF1 positivity, smoking and local metastasis. Overall survival of the patients harboring co-occurring compound mutations was significantly lesser than the other EGFR positive patients. Overall, our study suggests that EGFR TKI may provide real-world benefit to the lung cancer patients harboring mutually exclusive EGFR mutations. On the other hand, further systematic study is essential to develop better therapeutic regimen for co-occurring baseline EGFR T790M and other compound mutations.

Overview of approaches to estimate real-world disease progression in lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Randomized clinical trials of novel treatments for solid tumors normally measure disease progression using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. However, novel, scalable approaches to estimate disease progression using real-world data are needed to advance cancer outcomes research. The purpose of this narrative review is to summarize examples from the existing literature on approaches to estimate real-world disease progression and their relative strengths and limitations, using lung cancer as a case study.

METHODS

A narrative literature review was conducted in PubMed to identify articles that used approaches to estimate real-world disease progression in lung cancer patients. Data abstracted included data source, approach used to estimate real-world progression, and comparison to a selected gold standard (if applicable).

RESULTS

A total of 40 articles were identified from 2008 to 2022. Five approaches to estimate real-world disease progression were identified including manual abstraction of medical records, natural language processing of clinical notes and/or radiology reports, treatment-based algorithms, changes in tumor volume, and delta radiomics-based approaches. The accuracy of these progression approaches were assessed using different methods, including correlations between real-world endpoints and overall survival for manual abstraction (Spearman rank ρ = 0.61-0.84) and area under the curve for natural language processing approaches (area under the curve = 0.86-0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

Real-world disease progression has been measured in several observational studies of lung cancer. However, comparing the accuracy of methods across studies is challenging, in part, because of the lack of a gold standard and the different methods used to evaluate accuracy. Concerted efforts are needed to define a gold standard and quality metrics for real-world data.

Incidence of Bone Metastases and Skeletal-Related Events in Patients With EGFR-Mutated NSCLC Treated With Osimertinib

Introduction

Bone metastases are frequent in patients with EGFR-mutated (EGFR+) NSCLC. Skeletal-related events (SREs) are common in these patients; however, no data on SRE in osimertinib-treated patients are reported. We investigated the development of bone metastases and SREs in patients with EGFR+ NSCLC treated with osimertinib.

Methods

This is a retrospective multicenter cohort study that included patients with metastatic EGFR+ NSCLC who were treated with osimertinib between February 2016 and September 2021. Demographics, bone metastases-related outcomes, SREs, treatment efficacy, and overall survival (OS) were collected.

Results

In total, 250 patients treated with osimertinib (43% first line) were included. Of the patients, 51% had bone metastases at initiation of osimertinib. Furthermore, 16% of the patients with bone metastases used bone-targeted agents. Median follow-up from initiation of osimertinib was 23.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.9-26.9 mo). During osimertinib treatment, 10% developed new bone metastases or bone progression. Of the patients with bone metastases, 39% had more than or equal to one SREs: 28% developed first SRE before osimertinib treatment, 1% after, and 11% during. Median OS post-bone metastasis was 30.8 months (95% CI: 21.9-39.7). Median OS after first SRE was 31.1 months (95% CI: 15.8-46.5).

Conclusions

Bone metastases and SREs are frequent before and during treatment with osimertinib in EGFR+ NSCLC. Because of these findings and the long OS post-bone metastases, we advocate prescription of bone-targeted agents in these patients and recommend adding bone-specific end points in clinical trials.