Prognostic value of peripheral naive CD8+ T cells in oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

Pre-treatment peripheral blood immunophenotyping and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in operable breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Tumor immune infiltration and peripheral blood immune signatures have prognostic and predictive value in breast cancer. Whether distinct peripheral blood immune phenotypes are associated with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains understudied.

METHODS

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 126 breast cancer patients enrolled in a prospective clinical trial (NCT02022202) were analyzed using Cytometry by time-of-flight with a panel of 29 immune cell surface protein markers. Kruskal-Wallis tests or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to evaluate differences in immune cell subpopulations according to breast cancer subtype and response to NAC.

RESULTS

There were 122 evaluable samples: 47 (38.5%) from patients with hormone receptor-positive, 39 (32%) triple-negative (TNBC), and 36 (29.5%) HER2-positive breast cancer. The relative abundances of pre-treatment peripheral blood T, B, myeloid, NK, and unclassified cells did not differ according to breast cancer subtype. In TNBC, higher pre-treatment myeloid cells were associated with lower pathologic complete response (pCR) rates. In hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, lower pre-treatment CD8 + naïve and CD4 + effector memory cells re-expressing CD45RA (TEMRA) T cells were associated with more extensive residual disease after NAC. In HER2 + breast cancer, the peripheral blood immune phenotype did not differ according to NAC response.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-treatment peripheral blood immune cell populations (myeloid in TNBC; CD8 + naïve T cells and CD4 + TEMRA cells in luminal breast cancer) were associated with response to NAC in early-stage TNBC and hormone receptor-positive breast cancers, but not in HER2 + breast cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02022202 . Registered 20 December 2013.

Multiomic Characterization Reveals a Distinct Molecular Landscape in Young-Onset Pancreatic Cancer

PURPOSE

Using a real-world database with matched genomic-transcriptomic molecular data, we sought to characterize the distinct molecular correlates underlying clinical differences between patients with young-onset pancreatic cancer (YOPC; younger than 50 years) and patients with average-onset pancreatic cancer (AOPC; 70 years and older).

METHODS

We analyzed matched whole-transcriptome and DNA sequencing data from 2,430 patient samples (YOPC, n = 292; AOPC, n = 2,138) from the Caris Life Sciences database (Phoenix, AZ). Immune deconvolution was performed using the quanTIseq pipeline. Overall survival (OS) data were obtained from insurance claims (n = 4,928); Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated for age- and molecularly defined cohorts. Significance was determined as FDR-corrected P values (Q) < .05.

RESULTS

Patients with YOPC had higher proportions of mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite instability-high, BRCA2-mutant, and PALB2-mutant tumors compared with patients with AOPC, but fewer SMAD4-, RNF43-, CDKN2A-, and SF3B1-mutant tumors. Notably, patients with YOPC demonstrated significantly lower incidence of KRAS mutations compared with patients with AOPC (81.3% v 90.9%; Q = .004). In the KRAS wild-type subset (n = 227), YOPC tumors demonstrated fewer TP53 mutations and were more likely driven by NRG1 and MET fusions, whereas BRAF fusions were exclusively observed in patients with AOPC. Immune deconvolution revealed significant enrichment of natural killer cells, CD8+ T cells, monocytes, and M2 macrophages in patients with YOPC relative to patients with AOPC, which corresponded with lower rates of HLA-DPA1 homozygosity. There was an association with improved OS in patients with YOPC compared with patients with AOPC with KRAS wild-type tumors (median, 16.2 [YOPC-KRASWT] v 10.6 [AOPC-KRASWT] months; P = .008) but not KRAS-mutant tumors (P = .084).

CONCLUSION

In this large, real-world multiomic characterization of age-stratified molecular differences in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, YOPC is associated with a distinct molecular landscape that has prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Focal therapy for primary tumor and metastases in de novo or recurrent oligometastatic prostate cancer: current standing and future perspectives

PURPOSE

Focal therapy (FT) is gaining increasing acceptance in the management of localized prostate cancer particularly due to its favorable safety. Preliminary evidence suggests advantageous utilization of local treatment in the field of oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC). Since data on the utilization of FT in OMPC are scarce, we sought to summarize available evidence.

METHODS

For this narrative comprehensive review, we employed PubMed®, Web of Science™, Embase®, Scopus®, and clinicaltrial.gov databases and Google web search engine to seek peer-reviewed articles, published abstracts from international congresses, and ongoing trials in the English language using the terms "prostate cancer", "oligometastatic", "hormone-sensitive", "focal therapy", "focal treatment", "cryotherapy", "ablation", "cancer" as well as "metastasis-directed therapy. We focused on relevant publications on FT utilized in OMPC targeting the primary or metastatic sites as well as completed and ongoing clinical trials.

RESULTS

Growing evidence points to distinct differences in the biologic behavior and molecular signaling processes of OMPC as compared to polymetastatic disease (PMPC). No established biomarkers are available to accurately identify OMPC yet, while several candidates are currently under investigation. The evolution of molecular imaging is set to aid in selecting patients benefitting most from local management. Differences between OMPC and PMPC should be considered when designing the optimal therapeutic strategy. While efficacy data for FT in comparison to standard care in OMPC are scarce, longer progression-free survival and time to castration resistance have been demonstrated for bone metastatic prostate cancer with the primary tumor treated by cryosurgery followed by androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) compared to ADT alone.

CONCLUSION

Ongoing research efforts are eagerly awaited to better characterize OMPC and establish customized strategies for patients with this condition.

Exponential Slope from Absolute Lymphocyte Counts during Radio-Chemotherapy Can Predict an Aggressive Course of Cervical Cancer

This study aimed to investigate whether the exponential slope α from absolute lymphocyte counts during concurrent radio−chemotherapy (CRT) is associated with aggressive and non-aggressive courses of cervical cancer. We analyzed 362 patients with stage IB−IVB cervical cancer treated with CRT in two groups: 323 patients without mRNA data (cohort 1) and 39 with mRNA data (cohort 2) from plasma exosomes. We calculated the α of each patient; 69 patients who died of cancer in cohort 1 were divided into 44 who died within 30 months (aggressive group), and 25 who died after more than 30 months (non-aggressive group). The median follow-up periods of cohorts 1 and 2 were 63 and 28 months, respectively. The log2 fold change (log2FC) between read counts of mRNAs before treatment and after the second week of CRT was calculated. Multivariate analyses from cohort 1 showed that neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥ 2.43 and α < 0.08 were statistically significant predictors of disease-specific survival (DSS) in the aggressive group (DSS-A), whereas α ≥ 0.08 was the only significant predictor of DSS in the non-aggressive group (DSS-NA). The 2.5-year DSS-A and 8-year DSS-NA rates of patients with α ≥ 0.08 and α < 0.08 were 86.7% and 73%, and 78.5% and 94.8% in the high-NLR group, respectively. In cohort 2, patients with both NLR < 2.7 and α ≥ 0.07 had a higher 2.5-year DSS rate than did those with either NLR ≥ 2.72 or α < 0.07. E2F8 and STX6 significantly correlated with ɑ and survival. The 2.5-year DSS rates in patients with E2F8 + STX6 (log2FC) < 0.2429 and ≥0.2429 were 100% and 77.2%, respectively. The exponential slope α can potentially distinguish between aggressive and non-aggressive courses in cervical cancer patients.