1
|
Marchesi F, Terrenato I, Papa E, Tomassi M, Falcucci P, Gumenyuk S, Palombi F, Pisani F, Renzi D, Romano A, Spadea A, Regazzo G, Rizzo MG, De Rienzo M, Ripellino C, Sgromo S, Viggiani C, Ponte E, Kayal R, Cordone I, Foddai ML, Mengarelli A. Efficacy and safety of biosimilar Peg-filgrastim after autologous stem cell transplant in myeloma and lymphoma patients: a comparative study with biosimilar Filgrastim, Lenograstim, and originator Peg-filgrastim. Ann Hematol 2024; 103:947-956. [PMID: 38189833 PMCID: PMC10867069 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-023-05604-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
Data about biosimilar Peg-filgrastim (bioPEG) in autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) are still scarce. The aim of this study has been to assess efficacy and safety of bioPEG among lymphoma and myeloma patients undergoing ASCT, comparing these data with historical controls receiving other G-CSFs. Furthermore, an economic evaluation has been included to estimate the savings by using bioPEG. This is a prospective cohort study comparing lymphoma and myeloma patients undergoing ASCT and receiving bioPEG (n = 73) with three historical consecutive cohorts collected retrospectively who received other G-CSFs (Lenograstim - Leno - n = 101, biosimilar Filgrastim - bioFIL n = 392, and originator Peg-filgrastim - oriPEG n = 60). We observed a significantly shorter time to neutrophils and platelet engraftment (p < 0.001) in patients treated with bioPEG and oriPEG. Moreover, patients who received bioPEG showed a shorter hospitalization time (p < 0.001) and a lower transfusion need (p < 0.001). We did not observe any significant difference in terms of transplant-related mortality, mucositis, and diarrhea among the four groups. No serious adverse events were associated with bioPEG. Similar data were obtained after running a stratified analysis for lymphomas and myeloma separately conducted by using a propensity score matching. The average total cost per patient of bioPEG was € 18218.9 compared to € 23707.8, € 20677.3 and € 19754.9 of Leno, oriPEG, and bioFIL, respectively. In conclusion, bioPEG seems to be as effective as the originator and more effective than short-acting G-CSFs in terms of post-transplant engraftment in myeloma and lymphoma patients undergoing ASCT. Moreover, bioPEG was cost-effective when compared with the other G-CSFs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Marchesi
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 55, 00144, Rome, Italy.
| | - Irene Terrenato
- Department of Research, Advanced Diagnostics and Technological Innovation, Clinical Trial Center, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Elena Papa
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 55, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Martina Tomassi
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 55, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Falcucci
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 55, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Svitlana Gumenyuk
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 55, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Palombi
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 55, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Pisani
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 55, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniela Renzi
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 55, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Atelda Romano
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 55, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Spadea
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 55, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Regazzo
- Department of Research, Advanced Diagnostics and Technological Innovation, Genomic and Epigenetic Unit, Translational Research Area, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Giulia Rizzo
- Department of Research, Advanced Diagnostics and Technological Innovation, Genomic and Epigenetic Unit, Translational Research Area, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Mafalda De Rienzo
- Immuno-Transfusional Medicine Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Simona Sgromo
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 55, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Caterina Viggiani
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 55, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Eleonora Ponte
- Leukapheresis and Cellular Therapy Unit, S. Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Ramy Kayal
- Radiology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Iole Cordone
- Clinical Pathology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Laura Foddai
- Immuno-Transfusional Medicine Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Mengarelli
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 55, 00144, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|