1
|
Rassy E, Benvenuti C, Akla S, Di Meglio A, Martin E, Havas J, Rieutord A, Combarel D, Fasse L, Scotté F, Guéroult Accolas L, Jacob G, Bergougnoux A, Delaloge S, Vaz-Luis I, Pistilli B. Breast cancer survivors' opinion on personalizing endocrine therapy and developing informative tools. NPJ Breast Cancer 2024; 10:48. [PMID: 38886406 PMCID: PMC11183231 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-024-00655-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 06/01/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Understanding breast cancer survivors' perspectives is critical to personalizing endocrine therapy (ET) in the adjuvant setting. A nationwide survey among breast cancer survivors was proposed in France, in collaboration with patient advocacy organizations, to assess their perspectives on personalizing ET and developing dedicated informative tools. This survey explored patients' preferences regarding ET intake schedule, formulation, presentation (color, taste, shape, size, design, and packaging), combination with agents targeting ET-related adverse events, and a mobile application to support them during ET. Of the 1103 individuals who started the survey, 939 (85.1%) were eligible for enrollment and completed the survey. The majority of the participants considered that a personalized ET should take into consideration the intake schedule (n = 974, 90.7%) and swallowable tablet formulation (n = 606, 64.5%), without a preference for ET presentation (n = 619; 65.9%). The majority of the participants expressed a willingness to participate in a potential clinical trial evaluating the combination of ET with agents targeting ET-related adverse events at the start of ET (n = 752, 80.1%) or in the case of major ET-related adverse events (n = 778, 82.8%). The primary considerations were to have an uncompromised ET efficacy and a guaranteed reduction of adverse events. Last, a dedicated mobile application was considered helpful by 665 participants (70.8%). Informative tools should focus on the recommendations for dealing with adverse events (n = 593, 63.2%), the impact on the patient's daily life (n = 515, 54.9%), benefits (n = 504, 53.7%), and adverse events (n = 494, 52.6%) of ET. This survey paves the way for multimodal strategies that can include a personalized ET (e.g., ET in combination with agents targeting ET-related adverse events) and dedicated mobile applications to ultimately improve adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elie Rassy
- Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Chiara Benvenuti
- Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Medical Oncology Department, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Sarra Akla
- Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Antonio Di Meglio
- Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Survivorship Program, INSERM Unit U981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Elise Martin
- Survivorship Program, INSERM Unit U981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Julie Havas
- Survivorship Program, INSERM Unit U981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - David Combarel
- Department of Pharmacology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Léonor Fasse
- Interdisciplinary Patient Pathway Division, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Florian Scotté
- Interdisciplinary Patient Pathway Division, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Ines Vaz-Luis
- Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Survivorship Program, INSERM Unit U981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Interdisciplinary Patient Pathway Division, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Okroša AD, Silovski T, Plavetić ND, Silovski H, Kovačić A, Mucalo I. Beliefs about medicines' association with endocrine therapy adherence in early breast cancer survivors in Croatia. ACTA PHARMACEUTICA (ZAGREB, CROATIA) 2023; 73:673-689. [PMID: 38147479 DOI: 10.2478/acph-2023-0043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
This observational, cross-sectional study conducted at the University Hospital Centre Zagreb (UHC Zagreb) aimed to explore patients' beliefs about adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) as well as their association with non-adherence and sociodemographic and clinical factors. Out of 420 early breast cancer (BC) patients included in the study, 79.5 % perceived AET necessary and important for their health, as measured by the Belief About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ), with the mean necessity score (20.4 ± 3.68) significantly higher than the mean concerns score (13 ± 4.81) (p < 0.001). Based on the Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5), 44.4 % (n = 182) of the participants were non-adherers, out of which 63.2 % (n = 115) were unintentional and 36.8 % (n = 67) intentional non-adherers. Significantly higher concern beliefs were found among patients that were younger (p < 0.001), employed (p < 0.001), intentionally non-adherent to AET (p = 0.006), had a lower body-mass index (p = 0.005) and a higher level of education (p < 0.001), were premenopausal at the time of diagnosis (p < 0.001), taking tamoxifen treatment (p = 0.05) and receiving ovarian suppression (p < 0.001). Younger patients should be recognized as being at risk of non-adherence as they hold greater concern beliefs about medicines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Dugonjić Okroša
- 1Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices of Croatia, Zagreb Croatia
| | - Tajana Silovski
- 2Department of Oncology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
- 3University of Zagreb, Medical School Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Natalija Dedić Plavetić
- 2Department of Oncology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
- 3University of Zagreb, Medical School Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Hrvoje Silovski
- 3University of Zagreb, Medical School Zagreb, Croatia
- 4Department of Surgery, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Ana Kovačić
- 5University of Zagreb Faculty of Food Technology and Biotechnology, Zagreb Croatia
| | - Iva Mucalo
- 6University of Zagreb Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Zagreb Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pezzolato M, Marzorati C, Lanzoni L, Monzani D, Masiero MA, Pietrobon R, Pravettoni G. "Interventions to increase adherence to oral therapies in breast cancer patients: A systematic review based on the behavior change technique taxonomy". Psychooncology 2023; 32:1481-1502. [PMID: 37571974 DOI: 10.1002/pon.6203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE High rates of non-adherence to oral medications in breast cancer (BC) patients have been reported. Here we provide an up-to-date systematic review of the interventions aimed at increasing adherence to oral medication in BC patients, with a particular focus on the content of the interventions. METHODS PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Ovid databases and reference lists of relevant studies were searched through October 2022. Studies which (1) described an intervention aimed at increasing adherence to oral anticancer medication, (2) included (or planned to include) at least one sub-group of BC patients, (3) were written in English, and (4) with full-text available were included. The contents of the interventions were coded using the Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy. Quality assessment was conducted using Downs and Black scale. RESULTS Thirty-six studies met the inclusion criteria and involved a total sample of 28,528 BC patients. Interventions were mainly delivered with eHealth devices (n = 21) and most of them used mobile app. Other studies used in-person modalities (e.g., CBT, relaxation technique) or written materials (e.g., psycho-educational booklet). The behavior change techniques most frequently implemented were "problem solving," "social support," "information about health consequences," and "prompts/cues". Quality assessment revealed that the higher risk of bias refers to the selection process. CONCLUSIONS The use of reminders, monitoring patients' medication-taking behaviors and giving feedback were the most frequently implemented techniques in those interventions that resulted significant. If these preliminary observations were to be confirmed by future comparative studies, they should be taken into account when developing new interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimo Pezzolato
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Marzorati
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Lucilla Lanzoni
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Monzani
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Marianna Agnese Masiero
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Gabriella Pravettoni
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bright EE, Finkelstein LB, Nealis MS, Genung SR, Wrigley J, Gu HCJ, Schmiege SJ, Arch JJ. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Interventions to Promote Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Adherence Among Breast Cancer Survivors. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:4548-4561. [PMID: 37531593 PMCID: PMC10553065 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) adherence among breast cancer survivors is often suboptimal, leading to higher cancer recurrence and mortality. Intervention studies to promote AET adherence have burgeoned, more than doubling in number since this literature was last reviewed. The current aim is to provide an up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to enhance AET adherence and to identify strengths and limitations of existing interventions to inform future research and clinical care. METHODS Systematic searches were conducted in three electronic databases. Studies were included in the systematic review if they examined an intervention for promoting AET adherence among breast cancer survivors. Studies were further included in the meta-analyses if they examined a measure of AET adherence (defined as compliance or persistence beyond initiation) and reported (or provided upon request) sufficient information to calculate an effect size. RESULTS Of 5,045 unique records, 33 unique studies representing 375,951 women met inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Interventions that educated patients about how to manage side effects generally failed to improve AET adherence, whereas policy changes that lowered AET costs consistently improved adherence. Medication reminders, communication, and psychological/coping strategies showed varied efficacy. Of the 33 studies that met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review, 25 studies representing 367,873 women met inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed statistically significant effects of the adherence interventions overall relative to study-specified control conditions (number of studies [k] = 25; odds ratio, 1.412; 95% CI, 1.183 to 1.682; P = .0001). Subgroup analyses showed that there were no statistically significant differences in effect sizes by study design (randomized controlled trial v other), publication year, directionality of the intervention (unidirectional v bidirectional contact), or intervention type. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this is the first known meta-analysis to demonstrate a significant effect for interventions to promote AET adherence. The systematic review revealed that lowering medication costs and a subgroup of psychosocial and reminder interventions showed the most promise, informing future research, policy, and clinical directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma E. Bright
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO
| | - Lauren B. Finkelstein
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO
| | - Madeline S. Nealis
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO
| | - Sarah R. Genung
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO
| | - Jordan Wrigley
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO
| | - Heng Chao J. Gu
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO
| | - Sarah J. Schmiege
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health at the Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO
| | - Joanna J. Arch
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO
- Cancer Prevention and Control, University of Colorado Cancer Center, School of Medicine, the Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yang S, Park SW, Bae SJ, Ahn SG, Jeong J, Park K. Investigation of Factors Affecting Adherence to Adjuvant Hormone Therapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients: A Comprehensive Systematic Review. J Breast Cancer 2023; 26:309-333. [PMID: 37272247 PMCID: PMC10475712 DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2023.26.e22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 02/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Adherence and persistence to adjuvant hormone therapy (AHT) are seldom maintained among early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (BC) survivors, despite the significant clinical benefits of long-term AHT. As the factors influencing adherence to AHT remain unclear, this study aimed to comprehensively identify such factors and classify them into specific dimensions. METHODS PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL were searched for qualified articles. The search mainly focused on three components: early-stage (0-III) BC, oral AHT administration, and adherence to AHT, with keywords derived from MeSH and entry terms. The factors identified were then classified into six categories based on a modified WHO multidimensional model. RESULTS Overall, 146 studies were included; the median sample size was 651 (range, 31-40,009), and the mean age of the population was 61.5 years (standard deviation, 8.3 years). Patient- and therapy-related factors were the most frequently investigated factors. Necessity/concern beliefs and self-efficacy among patient-related factors were consistently related to better adherence than depression. Although drug side effects and medication use cannot be modified easily, a refined prescription strategy for the initiation and switching of AHT is likely to increase adherence levels. CONCLUSION An effective psychological program that encourages positive views and beliefs about medication and management strategies for each therapy may be necessary to improve adherence to AHT. Social support and a sense of belonging can be enhanced through community participation and social media for better adherence to AHT. Patient-centered communication and appropriate recommendations by physicians may be attributable to better adherence outcomes. Findings from systematically organized factors that influence adherence to AHT may contribute to the establishment of intervention strategies to benefit patients with early-stage BC to achieve optimal health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seongwoo Yang
- HERINGS, The Institute of Advanced Clinical & Biomedical Research, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong Won Park
- HERINGS, The Institute of Advanced Clinical & Biomedical Research, Seoul, Korea
| | - Soong June Bae
- Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine/Institute for Breast Cancer Precision Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Gwe Ahn
- Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine/Institute for Breast Cancer Precision Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joon Jeong
- Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine/Institute for Breast Cancer Precision Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyounghoon Park
- HERINGS, The Institute of Advanced Clinical & Biomedical Research, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kuhn EP, Pirruccello J, Boothe JT, Li Z, Tosteson TD, Stahl JE, Schwartz GN, Chamberlin MD. Preventing metastatic recurrence in low-risk ER/PR + breast cancer patients-a retrospective clinical study exploring the evolving challenge of persistence with adjuvant endocrine therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 198:31-41. [PMID: 36592233 PMCID: PMC9883310 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06849-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In the genomic era, more women with low-risk breast cancer will forego chemotherapy and rely on adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) to prevent metastatic recurrence. However, some of these patients will unfortunately relapse. We sought to understand this outcome. Preliminary work suggested that early discontinuation of AET, also known as non-persistence, may play an important role. A retrospective analysis exploring factors related to our breast cancer patients' non-persistence with AET was performed. METHODS Women who underwent Oncotype-DX® testing between 2011 and 2014 with minimum 5 years follow-up were included. 'Low risk' was defined as Oncotype score < 26. Outcomes of recurrence and persistence were determined by chart review. Patient, tumor and treatment factors were collected, and persistent versus non-persistent groups compared using multivariable ANOVA and Fisher Chi square exact test. RESULTS We identified six cases of distant recurrence among low-risk patients with a median follow-up of 7.7 years. Among them, five of six patients (83%) were non-persistent with AET. The non-persistence rate in our cohort regardless of recurrence was 57/228 (25%). Non-persistent patients reported more severe side effects compared with persistent patients (p = 0.002) and were more likely to be offered a switch in endocrine therapy, rather than symptom-relief (p = 0.006). In contrast, persistent patients were 10.3 times more likely to have been offered symptom-alleviating medications compared with non-persistent patients (p < 0.001). A subset analysis revealed that patients who persisted with therapy had a higher Oncotype-DX® score than patients who discontinued early (p = 0.028). CONCLUSION Metastatic recurrence in low-risk breast cancer patients may be primarily due to non-persistence with endocrine therapy. Further work is needed to optimize care for patients who struggle with side effects. To our knowledge, these are the first published data suggesting that Oncotype-DX® score may influence persistence with AET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elaine P Kuhn
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
| | - Jonathan Pirruccello
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - James T Boothe
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Zhongze Li
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Tor D Tosteson
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - James E Stahl
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Gary N Schwartz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Mary D Chamberlin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
En‐nasery ‐ de Heer S, Tromp VNMF, Westerman MJ, Konings I, Beckeringh JJ, Boons CLM, Timmers L, Hugtenburg JG. Patient experiences and views on pharmaceutical care during adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer: A qualitative study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2022; 31:e13749. [PMID: 36300863 PMCID: PMC9786726 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Revised: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The use of adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) after primary treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer reduces the risk of recurrence and mortality. However, non-adherence is still common. Limited consideration has been given to how users deal with AET and the role of pharmaceutical care. Therefore, this study aims to obtain insight into the needs and wishes of women using AET regarding pharmaceutical care and eHealth. METHODS This is a qualitative explorative study comprising semi-structured interviews (n = 16) and a focus group (n = 5) among women who use or used AET after primary early-stage breast cancer (EBC) treatment using a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS Three themes emerged from the interviews and focus group: (1) experiences with AET use, (2) experiences with provided information and (3) needs and wishes regarding pharmaceutical care. Most women were highly motivated to use AET and indicated to have received useful information on AET. However, many expressed a strong need for more elaborate tailored and timely provided information on AET. They acknowledged the accessibility of pharmacists but reported that currently, pharmacists are hardly involved in AET care. Several women considered eHealth useful to obtain counselling and reliable information. CONCLUSION Women need more comprehensive information and follow-up in primary setting after initial cancer treatments. A more elaborate role for the pharmacy and eHealth/mHealth, especially with regard to counselling on side effects and side effect management, could potentially improve pharmaceutical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selma En‐nasery ‐ de Heer
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and PharmacyAmsterdam UMC, Location VUmcAmsterdamThe Netherlands,Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteAmsterdam UMC, Location VUmcAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Vashti N. M. F. Tromp
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and PharmacyAmsterdam UMC, Location VUmcAmsterdamThe Netherlands,Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteAmsterdam UMC, Location VUmcAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Marjan J. Westerman
- Department of Epidemiology and Data ScienceAmsterdam UMC, Location VUmcAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Inge Konings
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center AmsterdamAmsterdam UMC, Location VUmcAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | - Christel L. M. Boons
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and PharmacyAmsterdam UMC, Location VUmcAmsterdamThe Netherlands,Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteAmsterdam UMC, Location VUmcAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Lonneke Timmers
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and PharmacyAmsterdam UMC, Location VUmcAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Jacqueline G. Hugtenburg
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and PharmacyAmsterdam UMC, Location VUmcAmsterdamThe Netherlands,Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteAmsterdam UMC, Location VUmcAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Green SMC, French DP, Graham CD, Hall LH, Rousseau N, Foy R, Clark J, Parbutt C, Raine E, Gardner B, Velikova G, Moore SJL, Buxton J, Smith SG. Supporting adjuvant endocrine therapy adherence in women with breast cancer: the development of a complex behavioural intervention using Intervention Mapping guided by the Multiphase Optimisation Strategy. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:1081. [PMID: 36002831 PMCID: PMC9404670 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08243-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) reduces the risk of breast cancer recurrence and mortality. However, up to three-quarters of women with breast cancer do not take AET as prescribed. Existing interventions to support adherence to AET have largely been unsuccessful, and have not focused on the most salient barriers to adherence. This paper describes the process of developing four theory-based intervention components to support adherence to AET. Our aim is to provide an exemplar of intervention development using Intervention Mapping (IM) with guidance from the Multiphase Optimisation Strategy (MOST). METHODS Iterative development followed the six-stage IM framework with stakeholder involvement. Stage 1 involved a literature review of barriers to adherence and existing interventions, which informed the intervention objectives outlined in Stage 2. Stage 3 identified relevant theoretical considerations and practical strategies for supporting adherence. Stage 4 used information from Stages 1-3 to develop the intervention components. Stages 1-4 informed a conceptual model for the intervention package. Stages 5 and 6 detailed implementation considerations and evaluation plans for the intervention package, respectively. RESULTS The final intervention package comprised four individual intervention components: Short Message Service to encourage habitual behaviours surrounding medication taking; an information leaflet to target unhelpful beliefs about AET; remotely delivered Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-based guided self-help to reduce psychological distress; and a website to support self-management of AET side-effects. Considerations for implementation within the NHS, including cost, timing and mode of delivery were outlined, with explanation as to how using MOST can aid this. We detail our plans for the final stage of IM which involve feasibility testing. This involved planning an external exploratory pilot trial using a 24-1 fractional factorial design, and a process evaluation to assess acceptability and fidelity of intervention components. CONCLUSIONS We have described a systematic and logical approach for developing a theoretically informed intervention package to support medication adherence in women with breast cancer using AET. Further research to optimise the intervention package, guided by MOST, has the potential to lead to more effective, efficient and scalable interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie M. C. Green
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| | - David P. French
- grid.5379.80000000121662407Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Christopher D. Graham
- grid.4777.30000 0004 0374 7521Department of Psychology, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Louise H. Hall
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| | - Nikki Rousseau
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Robbie Foy
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| | - Jane Clark
- grid.443984.60000 0000 8813 7132St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Catherine Parbutt
- grid.443984.60000 0000 8813 7132St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Erin Raine
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| | - Benjamin Gardner
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Galina Velikova
- grid.443984.60000 0000 8813 7132Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, University of Leeds, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UK ,grid.443984.60000 0000 8813 7132Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Sally J. L. Moore
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| | - Jacqueline Buxton
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| | | | - Samuel G. Smith
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dang TH, Forkan ARM, Wickramasinghe N, Jayaraman PP, Alexander M, Burbury K, Schofield P. Investigation of Intervention Solutions to Enhance Adherence to Oral Anticancer Medicines in Adults: Overview of Reviews. JMIR Cancer 2022; 8:e34833. [PMID: 35475978 PMCID: PMC9096640 DOI: 10.2196/34833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 02/26/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adherence to anticancer medicines is critical for the success of cancer treatments; however, nonadherence remains challenging, and there is limited evidence of interventions to improve adherence to medicines in patients with cancer. OBJECTIVE This overview of reviews aimed to identify and summarize available reviews of interventions to improve adherence to oral anticancer medicines in adult cancer survivors. METHODS A comprehensive search of 7 electronic databases was conducted by 2 reviewers who independently conducted the study selection, quality assessment using the A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2, and data extraction. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 checklist was adapted to report the results. RESULTS A total of 29 reviews were included in the narrative synthesis. The overall quality of the systematic reviews was low. The 4 main strategies to promote adherence were focused on education, reminders, behavior and monitoring, and multicomponent approaches. Digital technology-based interventions were reported in most reviews (27/29, 93%). A few interventions applied theories (10/29, 34%), design frameworks (2/29, 7%), or engaged stakeholders (1/29, 3%) in the development processes. The effectiveness of interventions was inconsistent between and within reviews. However, interventions using multiple strategies to promote adherence were more likely to be effective than single-strategy interventions (12/29, 41% reviews). Unidirectional communication (7/29, 24% reviews) and technology alone (11/29, 38% reviews) were not sufficient to demonstrate improvement in adherence outcomes. Nurses and pharmacists played a critical role in promoting patient adherence to oral cancer therapies, especially with the support of digital technologies (7/29, 24% reviews). CONCLUSIONS Multicomponent interventions are potentially effective in promoting patient adherence to oral anticancer medicines. The seamless integration of digital solutions with direct clinical contacts is likely to be effective in promoting adherence. Future research for developing comprehensive digital adherence interventions should be evidence-based, theory-based, and rigorously evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thu Ha Dang
- Department of Psychology, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Digital Health Cooperative Research Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - Abdur Rahim Mohammad Forkan
- Digital Innovation Lab, School of Science, Computing and Engineering Technologies, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nilmini Wickramasinghe
- Department Health and Bio Statistics, School of Health Sciences and Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
- Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Prem Prakash Jayaraman
- Digital Innovation Lab, School of Science, Computing and Engineering Technologies, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Marliese Alexander
- Pharmacy Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kate Burbury
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Digital and Healthcare Innovation, Peter McCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Psychology, and Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Inotai A, Ágh T, Maris R, Erdősi D, Kovács S, Kaló Z, Senkus E. Systematic review of real-world studies evaluating the impact of medication non-adherence to endocrine therapies on hard clinical endpoints in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 2021; 100:102264. [PMID: 34388473 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Revised: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer, one of the most common malignancies, is associated with significant economic and health burden both at the patient and societal level. Although medication non-adherence to endocrine breast cancer therapies is common, so far only limited systematic evidence has been available on its quantitative consequences, as previous systematic reviews focused mainly on factors contributing to medication non-adherence. The objective of this review was to explore the implications of medication non-adherence to endocrine therapies on hard clinical outcomes in breast cancer based on real-world studies. A systematic literature review was conducted on PubMed; empirical evidence on hard clinical endpoints (i.e., survival, disease-free survival, metastasis and recurrence) were extracted from uni- or multivariate statistical analyses from retrospective or prospective cohort studies. Of the 2,360 identified records, 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. Two studies identified significant positive association between medication non-adherence and the risk of distant metastasis, three articles between medication non-adherence and the recurrence of breast cancer, two studies between medication non-adherence- and non-persistence and of worse disease-free survival and eight articles between medication non-adherence and mortality. There was only one study where the positive association between medication adherence and survival did not apply to all subgroups. The strong evidence on the negative health consequences of non-adherence to breast cancer treatments indicates the need for the regular monitoring of medication adherence. Furthermore, explicit inclusion of adherence enhancing interventions into health policy agenda would be warranted to improve medication adherence also at a system level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- András Inotai
- Semmelweis University, Center for Health Technology Assessment, Budapest, Hungary; Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary.
| | - Tamás Ágh
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary.
| | | | - Dalma Erdősi
- Semmelweis University, Center for Health Technology Assessment, Budapest, Hungary; University of Pécs, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacoeconomics, Pécs, Hungary.
| | - Sándor Kovács
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary; University of Pécs, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacoeconomics, Pécs, Hungary.
| | - Zoltán Kaló
- Semmelweis University, Center for Health Technology Assessment, Budapest, Hungary; Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary.
| | - Elżbieta Senkus
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lin M, Hackenyos D, Savidge N, Weidner RA, Murphy-Banks R, Fleckner T, Parsons SK, Rodday AM. Enhancing patients' understanding of and adherence to oral anticancer medication: Results of a longitudinal pilot intervention. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2020; 27:1409-1421. [PMID: 32996363 DOI: 10.1177/1078155220960800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oral anticancer medications (OAM) make administration more convenient for patients, but shifts the responsibility of care from clinical providers to the patients themselves. Following an institutional pilot study showing inadequate understanding and adherence among vulnerable patients taking OAM, a longitudinal intervention was developed using an oncology specialty pharmacist and medication navigators to enhance OAM understanding and adherence. METHODS Patients initiating OAM were approached for four formalized teaching and check-in sessions, supplemented with medication information sheets and individualized calendars. At each session, participants were assessed on their OAM understanding and adherence using teach-back and validated measures. A study evaluation elicited feedback from participants on the usefulness of the intervention. RESULTS Of 80 eligible patients, 58 (72.5%) received formal OAM teaching from the specialty pharmacist. Of those, 54 (93.1%) enrolled in the study with 39 (72%) completing the intervention for final analysis. At study completion, all participants adequately understood OAM taking, but 41.0% had inadequate understanding of OAM handling. Throughout the study, participants reported issues that were addressed by the intervention team (28.2% to 31.6%) as well as those requiring additional assistance from the treatment team (26.3% to 38.5%), Most participants found the intervention to be very beneficial (initial evaluation, 86.5%; final evaluation, 76.9%). CONCLUSIONS This pilot intervention addressed gaps identified by our institutional assessment through formalized OAM teaching and follow-up. Improved understanding of taking and handling OAM through this subsequent study illustrated the enhanced effect of a multidisciplinary and multicomponent intervention to better educate and support patients on OAM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Tara Fleckner
- Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Boston, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hershman DL, Unger JM, Hillyer GC, Moseley A, Arnold KB, Dakhil SR, Esparaz BT, Kuan MC, Graham ML, Lackowski DM, Edenfield WJ, Dayao ZR, Henry NL, Gralow JR, Ramsey SD, Neugut AI. Randomized Trial of Text Messaging to Reduce Early Discontinuation of Adjuvant Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy in Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: SWOG S1105. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:2122-2129. [PMID: 32369401 PMCID: PMC7325363 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.02699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Nonadherence to aromatase inhibitors (AIs) for breast cancer is common and increases the risk of recurrence. Text messaging increases adherence to medications for chronic conditions. METHODS We conducted a randomized clinical trial of text messaging (TM) versus no text messaging (No-TM) at 40 sites in the United States. Eligible patients were postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer taking an AI for > 30 days with a planned duration of ≥ 36 months. Test messages were sent twice a week over 36 months. Content themes focused on overcoming barriers to medication adherence and included cues to action, statements related to medication efficacy, and reinforcements of the recommendation to take AIs. Both groups were assessed every 3 months. The primary outcome was time to adherence failure (AF), where AF was defined as urine AI metabolite assay results satisfying one of the following: < 10 ng/mL, undetectable, or no submitted specimen. A stratified log-rank test was conducted. Multiple sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS In total, 724 patients were registered between May 2012 and September 2013, among whom,702 patients (348 in the text-messaging arm and 354 in the no-text-messaging arm) were eligible at baseline. Observed adherence at 36 months was 55.5% for TM and 55.4% for No-TM. The primary analysis showed no difference in time to AF by arm (3-year AF: 81.9% TM v 85.6% No-TM; HR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.76 to 1.05]; P = .18). Multiple time to AF sensitivity analyses showed similar nonsignificant results. Three-year self-reported time to AF (10.4% v 10.3%; HR, 1.16 [95% CI, 0.69 to 1.98]; P = .57) and site-reported time to AF (21.9% v 18.9%; HR, 1.31 [95% CI, 0.86 to 2.01]; P = .21) also did not differ by arm. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this was the first large, long-term, randomized trial of an intervention directed at improving AI adherence. We found high rates of AI AF. Twice-weekly text reminders did not improve adherence to AIs. Improving long-term adherence will likely require personalized and sustained behavioral interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joseph M. Unger
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, WA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Anna Moseley
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, WA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Kathryn B. Arnold
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, WA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | - Ming C. Kuan
- Kaiser Permanente NCORP/Kaiser Permanente NCAL, San Leandro, CA
| | - Mark L. Graham
- Southeast COR NCORP/Waverly Hematology/Oncology, Cary, NC
| | - Douglas M. Lackowski
- Northwest NCORP/Central Interstate Medical Office Department Hematology/Oncology, Portland, OR
| | | | - Zoneddy R. Dayao
- New Mexico Minority Underserved NCORP/University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM
| | | | - Julie R. Gralow
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance/University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mamguem Kamga A, Di Martino C, Anota A, Paget-Bailly S, Coutant C, Arveux P, Desmoulins I, Dabakuyo-Yonli TS. Impact of routine assessment of health-related quality of life coupled with therapeutic information on compliance with endocrine therapy in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2020; 21:527. [PMID: 32546198 PMCID: PMC7296931 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04397-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2019] [Accepted: 05/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Despite its proven efficacy in reducing recurrence and improving survival, adherence to endocrine therapy (ET) is suboptimal in women with breast cancer (BC). Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in BC has been widely studied and many positive effects have been highlighted. Recently, a link between HRQoL and compliance with ET has been suggested, which would suggest a potential role for HRQoL assessment in improving compliance with ET. With the advent of digital technologies, electronic collection of HRQoL on a tablet is now possible. Thus, we hypothesize that systematic HRQoL assessment (using a tablet, prior to each consultation, with presentation of scores to clinicians) coupled with therapeutic information could have an impact on 12-month compliance with ET in patients with non-metastatic BC. Methods In this study, we will include 342 women with non-metastatic hormone receptor–positive BC with an indication for treatment with ET. Patients will be randomly assigned 1:1 by minimization and stratified by age, stage, type of ET prescribed, and presence of comorbidities (or not) in two arms. The intervention will consist of numerical HRQoL assessment using the CHES (Computer-based Health Evaluation System) software before each consultation (with delivery of scores to clinicians) coupled with therapeutic information. Therapeutic information will consist of three workshops related to understanding the prescription, nutrition, and fatigue. A reminder letter will be sent to patients every month. Patients in the control group will follow standard care. HRQoL will be assessed using a classic “paper-pencil” collection at baseline in both arms to ensure comparability between arms and at 12 months. The primary endpoint is 12-month compliance with ET. Patient satisfaction with care and the clinicians’ perception of the usefulness of routine HRQoL assessment will also be assessed. Discussion This study will allow clinicians to identify and better understand the areas in which patients who receive ET have difficulties and thus it will assist clinicians with patient management. Systematic evaluation of HRQoL could provide an additional endpoint for measuring patients’ health status and treatment-related symptoms, including ET. If the results of this study are positive, this intervention could be proposed as an integral part of daily clinical practice in patients who receive ET. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.govNCT04176809. Registered Nov. 25, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariane Mamguem Kamga
- Epidemiology and Quality of Life Research Unit, INSERM U1231, Georges Francois Leclerc Centre - UNICANCER, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, Dijon Cedex, 21000, France
| | - Cyril Di Martino
- Georges François Leclerc Centre - UNICANCER, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, Dijon, 21000, France
| | - Amelie Anota
- Methodological and Quality of Life Unit in Oncology, University Hospital Of Besançon, 3 Boulevard Alexandre Fleming, Besançon, 25000, France.,INSERM, EFS BFC, UMR1098, Interaction Hôte-Greffon-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire ET Génique, University Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 32 Avenue de l'Observatoire, Besançon, 25000, France.,National Quality of Life and Cancer Platform, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, Dijon, 21000, France
| | - Sophie Paget-Bailly
- Methodological and Quality of Life Unit in Oncology, University Hospital Of Besançon, 3 Boulevard Alexandre Fleming, Besançon, 25000, France.,INSERM, EFS BFC, UMR1098, Interaction Hôte-Greffon-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire ET Génique, University Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 32 Avenue de l'Observatoire, Besançon, 25000, France
| | - Charles Coutant
- Surgery Department, Georges François Leclerc Centre - UNICANCER, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, Dijon, 21000, France.,Burgundy Franche-Comté University, 7 Boulevard Jeanne d'Arc, Dijon, 21000, France
| | - Patrick Arveux
- Epidemiology and Quality of Life Research Unit, INSERM U1231, Georges Francois Leclerc Centre - UNICANCER, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, Dijon Cedex, 21000, France.,Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), INSERM U1018, University Paris-Sud, UVSQ Gustave Roussy, 12 Avenue Paul Vaillant Couturier, Villejuif, 94800, France
| | - Isabelle Desmoulins
- Medical Oncology Unit, Centre Georges-François Leclerc Centre - UNICANCER, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, Dijon, 21000, France
| | - Tienhan Sandrine Dabakuyo-Yonli
- Epidemiology and Quality of Life Research Unit, INSERM U1231, Georges Francois Leclerc Centre - UNICANCER, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, Dijon Cedex, 21000, France. .,National Quality of Life and Cancer Platform, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, Dijon, 21000, France.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rosenberg SM, Petrie KJ, Stanton AL, Ngo L, Finnerty E, Partridge AH. Interventions to Enhance Adherence to Oral Antineoplastic Agents: A Scoping Review. J Natl Cancer Inst 2020; 112:443-465. [PMID: 31899790 PMCID: PMC7225676 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djz244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2019] [Revised: 11/11/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As new targeted oral antineoplastic therapies have emerged in recent years, the development of effective strategies that promote optimal adherence to cancer medication regimens has become an important priority. METHODS We conducted a scoping literature review to search for English language articles published through July 15, 2019, to identify studies that reported the testing and/or evaluation of interventions to improve adherence to oral antineoplastic agents. RESULTS A total of 56 articles were selected for review. Of the studies evaluated, 14 were randomized trials. All interventions except two targeted adult patients. Thirty-three studies enrolled fewer than 100 patients. Most interventions were education- and counseling-based and centered on provision of information about the drug and strategies to manage side effects. Only eight studies used an mHealth tool and/or text messages to target nonadherence. Among studies with a comparison sample, fewer than one-half (44.7%) reported statistically significant improvements in adherence or persistence associated with the intervention; however, some pharmacist-directed programs, particularly those that integrated monitoring or routine follow-up with a provider, did demonstrate efficacy. CONCLUSION Although the development of adherence-promoting interventions for oral antineoplastic therapies has increased recently, few have been rigorously tested. The nascent literature suggests those that are pharmacist directed and use regular monitoring show promise, though additional prospective studies are needed. Study methodology, population selection, and potential challenges that may be encountered in the implementation and dissemination phases should be considered when developing new interventions to address nonadherence to oral antineoplastic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Keith J Petrie
- Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Annette L Stanton
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry/Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lan Ngo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Emma Finnerty
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ann H Partridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Development of a community pharmacy-based intervention to enhance adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy among breast cancer survivors guided by the Intervention Mapping approach. Res Social Adm Pharm 2020; 16:1724-1736. [PMID: 32205070 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2019] [Revised: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 02/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) is prescribed for 5 or 10 years to women with non-metastatic breast cancer to reduce recurrence and mortality risks. However, AET adherence is suboptimal for many women. The few interventions specifically designed to enhance AET adherence and evaluated to date have provided inconclusive results. None of these interventions was offered in the community pharmacy setting. OBJECTIVE To describe the development of the PAcHA program, a community pharmacy-based intervention aiming to enhance AET adherence. METHODS The development of the intervention was guided by the six-step Intervention Mapping approach: needs assessment (Step 1); development of objectives matrices (Step 2); selection of theory-based intervention methods and practical applications (Step 3); development of the intervention program (Step 4); development of the adoption and implementation plan (Step 5); and evaluation plan (Step 6). Researchers, pharmacists and women prescribed AET were consulted at key steps. RESULTS The logic model was developed based on women's needs identified through a literature review and a qualitative study (Step 1). Optimal use of treatment for each woman with a new AET prescription was considered the behavioral outcome of the intervention. A woman is expected to: acquire knowledge about AET; make an informed decision about AET initiation and persistence; respect administration modalities and cope with side effects (Step 2). Motivational interviewing principles serve to guide the pharmacist intervention (Step 3). The intervention is brief and tailored to AET initiation and follow-up visits. Standardized intervention tools are available as support for pharmacists in their counseling (Step 4). An implementation plan was established, and web-based training was designed to train the pharmacists (Step 5). A cluster-randomized controlled trial was designed to evaluate the intervention (Step 6). CONCLUSION The systematic approach used for developing the intervention may increase its potential for being efficiently implemented and effective.
Collapse
|
16
|
Paladino AJ, Anderson JN, Krukowski RA, Waters T, Kocak M, Graff C, Blue R, Jones TN, Buzaglo J, Vidal G, Schwartzberg L, Graetz I. THRIVE study protocol: a randomized controlled trial evaluating a web-based app and tailored messages to improve adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy among women with breast cancer. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:977. [PMID: 31856812 PMCID: PMC6924011 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4588-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2019] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Long-term use of adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) among women with early-stage, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer significantly reduces the risk of hospitalizations, cancer recurrence, and mortality. AET is associated with adverse symptoms that often result in poor adherence. A web-enabled app offers a novel way to communicate and manage symptoms for women on AET. In a region with significant racial disparities in breast cancer outcomes, our study tests the impact of a web-enabled app that collects and transmits patient-reported symptoms to healthcare teams to facilitate timely and responsive symptom management on medication adherence. Methods In this randomized controlled trial, we randomize 300 patients initiating AET to one of three arms: 1) an “App” group (n = 100) that receives weekly reminders to use the THRIVE study app; 2) an “App+Feedback” group (n = 100) that receives weekly reminders and tailored feedback based on their use of the app; or 3) a “Usual Care” group (n = 100) that receives usual care only. Participants are stratified by race: 50% White and 50% Black. The duration of the intervention is six months following enrollment, and outcomes are assessed at 12-months. The primary outcome is adherence, which is captured using an electronic monitoring pillbox. Secondary outcomes include symptom burden, quality of life, self-efficacy for managing symptoms, and healthcare costs. We also evaluate the impact of the intervention on racial disparities in adherence. Data are derived from three sources: electronic health record data to capture treatment changes, healthcare utilization, and health outcomes; self-report survey data related to adherence, symptom burden, and quality of life; and an electronic medication monitoring device that captures adherence. Discussion A successful web-enabled intervention could be disseminated across systems, conditions, and populations. By evaluating the impact of this intervention on a comprehensive set of measures, including AET adherence, patient outcomes, and costs, our study will provide valuable and actionable results for providers, policy makers, and insurers who strive to achieve the “Triple Aim” – reduce costs while improving health outcomes and the patient care experience. Trial registration NCT03592771. Prospectively registered on July 19, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Paladino
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, USA.,The West Cancer Center & Research Institute, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Janeane N Anderson
- College of Nursing, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 920 Madison Avenue, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Rebecca A Krukowski
- Department of Preventive Medicine, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of Medicine, 66 N Pauline St, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Teresa Waters
- Department of Health Management and Policy, The University of Kentucky, College of Public Health, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Mehmet Kocak
- Department of Preventive Medicine, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of Medicine, 66 N Pauline St, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Carolyn Graff
- College of Nursing, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 920 Madison Avenue, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Ryan Blue
- College of Nursing, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 920 Madison Avenue, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Tameka N Jones
- The West Cancer Center & Research Institute, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Joanne Buzaglo
- Department of Patient Reported Outcomes, Vector Oncology, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Gregory Vidal
- The West Cancer Center & Research Institute, Memphis, TN, USA
| | | | - Ilana Graetz
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, USA. .,Department of Preventive Medicine, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of Medicine, 66 N Pauline St, Memphis, TN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Finitsis DJ, Vose BA, Mahalak JG, Salner AL. Interventions to promote adherence to endocrine therapy among breast cancer survivors: A meta‐analysis. Psychooncology 2018; 28:255-263. [PMID: 30511789 DOI: 10.1002/pon.4959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2018] [Revised: 10/26/2018] [Accepted: 11/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David J. Finitsis
- Hartford HealthCare Cancer InstituteHartford Hospital Hartford Connecticut
- Department of PsychiatryYale University School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut
| | - Brittany A. Vose
- Hartford HealthCare Cancer InstituteHartford Hospital Hartford Connecticut
| | - Justin G. Mahalak
- Hartford HealthCare Cancer InstituteHartford Hospital Hartford Connecticut
| | - Andrew L. Salner
- Hartford HealthCare Cancer InstituteHartford Hospital Hartford Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Heiney SP, Parker PD, Felder TM, Adams SA, Omofuma OO, Hulett JM. A systematic review of interventions to improve adherence to endocrine therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018. [PMID: 30387003 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-5012-7.] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Adherence to endocrine therapy for hormone positive breast cancer is a significant problem, especially in minority populations. Further, endocrine therapy reduces recurrence and thus mortality. However, little data are available on interventions to improve adherence. The authors conducted a systematic review to examine the impact of interventions, strategies, or approaches aimed to improve endocrine therapy adherence among women with breast cancer. A secondary aim was to determine if interventions had any cultural modifications. METHODS Two of the authors examined articles published between 2006 and 2017 from a wide variety of databases using Covidence systematic review platform. RESULTS In total, 16 eligible studies met criteria for review including 4 randomized controlled trials, 4 retrospective studies, and 8 with various observational designs. Eligible studies used a broad range of definitions for adherence and measured adherence by self-report, medical records, claims data, and combinations of these. All used 80% medication possession ratio as a standard for adherence. Patient information/education was the most frequent intervention strategy but did not demonstrate a significant effect except in one study. Significant results were noted when education was combined with communication strategies. CONCLUSIONS Researchers need a standard definition for adherence and a reliable measure that is feasible to use in a variety of studies. While education may be a necessary component of an intervention, when used alone, it is not a sufficient approach to change behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sue P Heiney
- College of Nursing, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, 1601 Greene St, Columbia, 29208, SC, USA.
| | | | - Tisha M Felder
- College of Nursing, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA
| | - Swann Arp Adams
- College of Nursing, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA
| | - Omonefe O Omofuma
- Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Heiney SP, Parker PD, Felder TM, Adams SA, Omofuma OO, Hulett JM. A systematic review of interventions to improve adherence to endocrine therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 173:499-510. [PMID: 30387003 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-5012-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2018] [Accepted: 10/15/2018] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Adherence to endocrine therapy for hormone positive breast cancer is a significant problem, especially in minority populations. Further, endocrine therapy reduces recurrence and thus mortality. However, little data are available on interventions to improve adherence. The authors conducted a systematic review to examine the impact of interventions, strategies, or approaches aimed to improve endocrine therapy adherence among women with breast cancer. A secondary aim was to determine if interventions had any cultural modifications. METHODS Two of the authors examined articles published between 2006 and 2017 from a wide variety of databases using Covidence systematic review platform. RESULTS In total, 16 eligible studies met criteria for review including 4 randomized controlled trials, 4 retrospective studies, and 8 with various observational designs. Eligible studies used a broad range of definitions for adherence and measured adherence by self-report, medical records, claims data, and combinations of these. All used 80% medication possession ratio as a standard for adherence. Patient information/education was the most frequent intervention strategy but did not demonstrate a significant effect except in one study. Significant results were noted when education was combined with communication strategies. CONCLUSIONS Researchers need a standard definition for adherence and a reliable measure that is feasible to use in a variety of studies. While education may be a necessary component of an intervention, when used alone, it is not a sufficient approach to change behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sue P Heiney
- College of Nursing, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, 1601 Greene St, Columbia, 29208, SC, USA.
| | | | - Tisha M Felder
- College of Nursing, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA
| | - Swann Arp Adams
- College of Nursing, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA
| | - Omonefe O Omofuma
- Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Women's Beliefs on Early Adherence to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Breast Cancer: A Theory-Based Qualitative Study to Guide the Development of Community Pharmacist Interventions. PHARMACY 2018; 6:pharmacy6020053. [PMID: 29890738 PMCID: PMC6024955 DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy6020053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2018] [Revised: 06/02/2018] [Accepted: 06/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) taken for a minimum of five years reduces the recurrence and mortality risks among women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer. However, adherence to AET is suboptimal. To guide the development of theory-based interventions to enhance AET adherence, we conducted a study to explore beliefs regarding early adherence to AET. This qualitative study was guided by the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). We conducted focus groups and individual interviews among women prescribed AET in the last two years (n = 43). The topic guide explored attitudinal (perceived advantages and disadvantages), normative (perception of approval or disapproval), and control beliefs (barriers and facilitating factors) towards adhering to AET. Thematic analysis was conducted. Most women had a positive attitude towards AET regardless of their medication-taking behavior. The principal perceived advantage was protection against a recurrence while the principal inconvenience was side effects. Almost everyone approved of the woman taking her medication. The women mentioned facilitating factors to encourage medication-taking behaviors and cope with side effects. For adherent women, having trouble establishing a routine was their main barrier to taking medication. For non-adherent women, it was side effects affecting their quality of life. These findings could inform the development of community pharmacy-based adherence interventions.
Collapse
|
21
|
Interventions to improve endocrine therapy adherence in breast cancer survivors: what is the evidence? J Cancer Surviv 2018; 12:348-356. [PMID: 29396760 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-017-0674-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2017] [Accepted: 12/29/2017] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Endocrine therapy reduces the risk of breast cancer recurrences and mortality in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer survivors. However, non-adherence to treatment remains a significant problem. The aim of this study was to review current literature and ongoing trials to identify interventions employed to improve adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) in breast cancer survivors. METHODS We searched PubMed and the National Library of Medicine registry of clinical trials using the terms "breast cancer" and "adherence" or "compliance" and "intervention" and "medication" or "endocrine therapy" or "hormone therapy" to identify published studies as well as ongoing clinical trials. RESULTS Three hundred and sixty-three studies were identified; five studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies enrolled postmenopausal women diagnosed with early stage HR+ breast cancer. Providing educational materials was the most common intervention implemented to improve adherence to one or more aromatase inhibitors. None of the studies found a significant improvement in adherence with the intervention evaluated. Twelve clinical trials investigating various interventions, mostly based on technology, to improve AET adherence were also identified. CONCLUSIONS Improving adherence to AET in HR+ breast cancer survivors is an urgent medical need. While newer clinical trials are overcoming some of the limitations seen with published studies, tailored interventions led by clinicians need further investigation. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Our study highlights the unmet clinical need to develop and test feasible interventions to improve AET adherence in HR+ breast cancer survivors to extend their long-term survival.
Collapse
|
22
|
Salgado TM, Davis EJ, Farris KB, Fawaz S, Batra P, Henry NL. Identifying socio-demographic and clinical characteristics associated with medication beliefs about aromatase inhibitors among postmenopausal women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 163:311-319. [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4177-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2017] [Accepted: 02/25/2017] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
|
23
|
Brier MJ, Chambless DL, Gross R, Chen J, Mao JJ. Perceived barriers to treatment predict adherence to aromatase inhibitors among breast cancer survivors. Cancer 2017. [PMID: 27570979 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30318.] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although poor adherence to hormonal therapies such as aromatase inhibitors (AIs) is widely documented, to the authors' knowledge less is known regarding whether health beliefs predict treatment nonadherence. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the relationship between health beliefs (perceived susceptibility to breast cancer, perceived benefits of AI treatment, and perceived barriers to AI treatment) and adherence to AIs. METHODS Postmenopausal women with early-stage, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer who were currently receiving treatment with an AI completed the 3-factor Health Beliefs and Medication Adherence in Breast Cancer scale and questionnaires concerning their demographics and symptoms. Adherence data (treatment gaps and premature discontinuation) were abstracted from participants' medical charts. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the relationship between health beliefs and adherence. RESULTS Among 437 participants, 93 (21.3%) were nonadherent. Those who perceived greater barriers to their AI treatment were more likely to demonstrate AI nonadherence behaviors by the end of their treatment period compared with those who reported fewer barriers to AI therapy (adjusted odds ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-2.86 [P = .04]). In contrast, perceived susceptibility to cancer recurrence and perceived benefits of AIs did not appear to predict AI adherence. Minority individuals were found to have lower perceived susceptibility to breast cancer recurrence and higher perceived barriers to AI treatment (P<.05 for both). CONCLUSIONS Greater perceived barriers appeared to predict nonadherence to AIs. Interventions addressing women's negative beliefs regarding the challenges of AI treatment are needed to help optimize adherence in survivors of breast cancer. Cancer 2017;169-176. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moriah J Brier
- Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Dianne L Chambless
- Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Robert Gross
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Philadelphia Veterans Administration Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jinbo Chen
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jun J Mao
- Integrative Medicine Service, The Bendheim Integrative Medicine Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Brier MJ, Chambless DL, Gross R, Chen J, Mao JJ. Perceived barriers to treatment predict adherence to aromatase inhibitors among breast cancer survivors. Cancer 2016; 123:169-176. [PMID: 27570979 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2016] [Revised: 07/22/2016] [Accepted: 08/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although poor adherence to hormonal therapies such as aromatase inhibitors (AIs) is widely documented, to the authors' knowledge less is known regarding whether health beliefs predict treatment nonadherence. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the relationship between health beliefs (perceived susceptibility to breast cancer, perceived benefits of AI treatment, and perceived barriers to AI treatment) and adherence to AIs. METHODS Postmenopausal women with early-stage, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer who were currently receiving treatment with an AI completed the 3-factor Health Beliefs and Medication Adherence in Breast Cancer scale and questionnaires concerning their demographics and symptoms. Adherence data (treatment gaps and premature discontinuation) were abstracted from participants' medical charts. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the relationship between health beliefs and adherence. RESULTS Among 437 participants, 93 (21.3%) were nonadherent. Those who perceived greater barriers to their AI treatment were more likely to demonstrate AI nonadherence behaviors by the end of their treatment period compared with those who reported fewer barriers to AI therapy (adjusted odds ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-2.86 [P = .04]). In contrast, perceived susceptibility to cancer recurrence and perceived benefits of AIs did not appear to predict AI adherence. Minority individuals were found to have lower perceived susceptibility to breast cancer recurrence and higher perceived barriers to AI treatment (P<.05 for both). CONCLUSIONS Greater perceived barriers appeared to predict nonadherence to AIs. Interventions addressing women's negative beliefs regarding the challenges of AI treatment are needed to help optimize adherence in survivors of breast cancer. Cancer 2017;169-176. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moriah J Brier
- Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Dianne L Chambless
- Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Robert Gross
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Philadelphia Veterans Administration Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jinbo Chen
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jun J Mao
- Integrative Medicine Service, The Bendheim Integrative Medicine Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|