Third- and further-line therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients: an overview

Safety and efficacy of anlotinib hydrochloride capsules in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicenter, real-world study

Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of anlotinib hydrochloride capsules in stage III-IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: NSCLC patients received anlotinib monotherapy or combination therapy. The primary end point was adverse reactions during anlotinib treatment and the secondary end point was progression-free survival. Results: During anlotinib treatement, 41.85% (167/399) of patients experienced adverse reactions, and the monotherapy group had a lower incidence than the combination group (36.89 vs 49.68%; p = 0.012). The median progression-free survival of patients in the monotherapy group was significantly lower than that in the combination group (5 vs 6 months; p = 0.0119). Conclusion: Compared with anlotinib monotherapy, combination therapy resulted in longer PFS and a higher incidence of adverse reactions in patients with NSCLC.

Intravascular Treatment Techniques for Locoregional Therapies of Lung Tumors

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer incidence has greatly increased over the past century. Moreover, the lung is the most common site of metastatic involvement. Despite improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of lung malignancies, patient prognosis is still unsatisfactory. Locoregional chemotherapeutic techniques for the treatment of lung malignancies are the current focus of research. The aim of this review article is to present different locoregional intravascular techniques and their treatment principles and to assess the pros and cons of each of them as a palliative and neoadjuvant treatment method in the treatment of lung malignancy.

METHOD

The different methods for the treatment of malignant lung lesions such as isolated lung perfusion (ILP), selective pulmonary artery perfusion (SPAP), transpulmonary chemoembolization (TPCE), bronchial artery infusion (BAI), bronchioarterial chemoembolization (BACE), and intraarteriel chemoperfusion (IACP) are evaluated comparatively.

RESULTS

Locoregional intravascular chemotherapy procedures are proving to be promising treatment options in the management of malignant lung tumors. In order to achieve optimal results, the locoregional technique should be used to achieve the highest possible uptake of the chemotherapeutic agent into the target tissue with rapid systemic clearance.

CONCLUSION

Among the various treatment options for lung malignancies, TPCE is the best evaluated treatment concept. However, further studies are necessary to define the optimal treatment concept with the best clinical outcomes.

KEY POINTS

· There are various intravascular chemotherapy methods for the treatment of lung malignancies.. · Transpulmonary chemoembolization (TPCE) is currently the most extensively evaluated treatment method for lung malignancies.. · Thermoablation after neoadjuvant chemoperfusion is a promising therapy for treating lung malignancies..

CITATION FORMAT

· Vogl TJ, Mekkawy A, Thabet DB. Intravascular Treatment Techniques for Locoregional Therapies of Lung Tumors. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2023; 195: 579 - 585.

Anlotinib for refractory advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To assess the efficacy and toxicity of anlotinib for the treatment of refractory advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

We systematically searched databases for randomized controlled trials on anlotinib treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC published until November 6, 2020. Articles were assessed and data were extracted independently by two investigators. Further, we analyzed hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS, respectively). In addition, we analyzed risk ratio (RR) for overall response and disease control rates (ORR and DCR, respectively) and the odds ratio (OR) for the main adverse events (AEs) using RevMan 5.3 software.

Results

This analysis included 594 patients from three clinical studies. The pooled HRs for PFS and OS were 0.27 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.22–0.33, P < 0.001) and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.56–0.83, P < 0.001), respectively, indicating that anlotinib administration significantly improved PFS and OS in patients with advanced NSCLC. The pooled RRs for ORR and DCR were 11.62 (95% CI: 2.75–49.14, P < 0.001) and 2.30 (95% CI: 1.91–2.77, P < 0.001), respectively, indicating that anlotinib administration in patients with advanced NSCLC improved ORR and DCR. The pooled OR for AEs of grade 3 or higher was 2.94 (95% CI: 1.99–4.35, P < 0.001), indicating that AEs of grade 3 or higher were more prevalent in the anlotinib group than in the placebo group.

Conclusion

Anlotinib, an effective choice of third- or later line therapy for patients with refractory advanced NSCLC, provides clinical benefits in terms of PFS, OS, ORR, and DCR. AEs associated with anlotinib were tolerable.

Nintedanib plus docetaxel after progression on immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: insights from VARGADO, a prospective study in patients with lung adenocarcinoma

Aim: To assess outcomes in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma non-small-cell lung cancer who received nintedanib plus docetaxel after progression on prior chemotherapy followed by immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. Patients & methods: VARGADO is a prospective, noninterventional study. We describe initial data from a cohort of 22 patients who received nintedanib plus docetaxel after chemotherapy and ICI therapy. Results: Median progression-free survival with nintedanib plus docetaxel was 5.5 months (95% CI: 1.9–8.7 months). The objective response rate was 7/12 (58%) and the disease control rate was 10/12 (83%). Data for overall survival rate 12 months after the start of treatment (primary end point) are not yet mature and are not reported. Of 22 patients, 73% experienced drug-related adverse events; adverse events led to treatment discontinuation in 32% of patients. Conclusion: These data highlight the potential clinical benefit of nintedanib plus docetaxel in patients who failed prior ICI therapy.

Trial registration number: NCT02392455

Basket Trials for Intractable Cancer

Currently, genomic characterization has become standard of care for tumor types such as non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer, melanoma, and colorectal cancer. A deep understanding of genomic alterations in different tumor types would help identify potentially actionable genomic changes which occur across a wide variety of tumor types. A basket trial is a new type of clinical trial for which eligibility is based on the presence of a specific genomic alteration, irrespective of histology. Basket trials are phase II screening trials for the off-label use of a targeted drug in patients with the same genomic alterations for which it was approved. Intractable cancer refers to a type or condition of cancer which is unresponsive or resistant to treatment; intractable cancers may be classified into five subtypes as follows: hard-to-treat condition of common advanced cancer after multiple-line therapy, rare cancer in which no standard of care has been recommended, advanced cancer in which standard of care does not work well, cancer accompanied with organ dysfunction, and cancers in older or younger cancer patients. Previous studies have demonstrated that in basket trials, genomic-guided therapy yields clinical benefits in intractable cancer, thereby providing novel insights into the optimal clinical management of such cancers. In this review, we describe a novel way to classify intractable cancer, and summarize the current knowledge on such cancers. We additionally provide information on the role of basket trials in intractable cancer.

Combination of PD-1 blockade and RetroNectin®-activated cytokine-induced killer in preheavily treated non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective study

Aim: To analyze the efficacy of PD-1 blockade combined with RetroNectin®-activated cytokine-induced killer (R-CIK) cells in preheavily treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with advanced NSCLC who received PD-1 blockade combined with R-CIK cells whose treatments failed at least two regimens. Results: The median number of previous treatment regimens was three (range: 2–7). Partial remission was achieved in two patients, stable disease in four patients and one patient experienced progressive disease. The median time-to-progression was 4.8 months. Conclusion: PD-1 blockade combined with R-CIK cells is safe and effective in patients with advanced NSCLC who have failed at least two treatment regimens.

Oral vinorelbine-based concomitant chemoradiotherapy in unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy administered concomitantly to thoracic radiotherapy is the treatment recommended by the European guidelines for fit patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Cisplatin may be combined with etoposide, vinorelbine or other vinca alkaloids, which act also as radiation sensitizers. Initially administered intravenously, vinorelbine is also available as oral formulation and is the only orally available microtubule-targeting agent. In addition, the oral formulation avoids the risk of extravasation and phlebitis. Areas covered: A literature search has been performed for articles reporting phase II-III trials aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of oral vinorelbine-based chemoradiotherapy in unresectable locally advanced NSCLC. Expert commentary: In a series of trials with various protocols published from 2008 to 2018, mostly phase II studies, oral vinorelbine demonstrated a significant activity in concomitant chemoradiotherapy for unresectable locally advanced NSCLC typically as part of combination schedules with cisplatin. Main toxicities were hematologic (neutropenia and anemia); non-hematological toxicities included esophagitis and gastro-duodenal adverse events. Large prospective phase III trials are needed to confirm the role of vinorelbine-based chemotherapy associated to thoracic radiotherapy in unresectable stage III NSCLC and more particularly trials with metronomic oral vinorelbine.

Vinflunine for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Vinflunine belongs to the class of vinca alkaloids and acts by disrupting the microtubule dynamics during cell cycle; this agent is currently available for previously treated advanced transitional cell carcinoma in Europe. The aim of this invited review is to evaluate the potential role of vinflunine for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Areas covered: The potential role of vinflunine in NSCLC is discussed on the basis of the available data, including full papers and meeting abstracts. Relevant preclinical studies describing the pharmacological properties of vinflunine are also included. The review also summarizes clinical studies, including phase I trials involving NSCLC among other tumors as well as phase II/III trials specifically addressing this malignancy. Additionally, the safety profile and the current regulatory status of vinflunine is discussed. Expert opinion: Vinflunine is active as single agent and as part of platinum-based combinations in NSCLC. It results non-inferior to docetaxel in a randomized phase III trial including previously treated NSCLC patients; additionally, its safety profile is generally considered manageable. Ultimately, further studies are needed to confirm the role of vinflunine in NSCLC, in consideration of the evolving evidence regarding targeted therapies and immune check-point inhibitors.

Pemetrexed plus dendritic cells as third-line therapy for metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

This study was conducted to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of pemetrexed plus dendritic cells (DCs) when administered as third-line treatment for metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). All patients in the study group had previously failed first-line treatment with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin-based regimens, as well as second-line treatment with taxane-based regimens. A total of 31 patients were treated with pemetrexed (500 mg/m²) plus DCs on day 1, every 3 weeks. DCs were given for one cycle of 21 days. Thirty patients were evaluated for their response. No patient had a complete response, three patients (10.0%) had a partial response, ten patients (33.3%) had stable disease, and 17 patients (56.7%) had progressive disease. The overall response rate was 10.0%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 2.9 months (95% CI, 2.7–3.2), and the median overall survival (OS) time was 7.1 months (95% CI, 6.4–7.9). The median PFS and OS times among patients with high and low levels of miR-143 expression in their blood serum were significantly different: median PFS times =3.2 months (95% CI, 2.9–3.4) and 2.7 months (95% CI, 2.4–3.0), respectively (P=0.017), and median OS times =7.8 months (95% CI, 6.8–8.9) and 6.3 months (95% CI, 5.3–7.3), respectively (P=0.036). No patient experienced Grade 4 toxicity. Combined third-line treatment with pemetrexed and DCs was marginally effective and well tolerated in patients with advanced ESCC. Serum miR-143 levels are a potential biomarker for predicting the efficacy of pemetrexed plus DCs in the treatment of ESCC.

DNA Repair Genes ERCC1 and BRCA1 Expression in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Chemotherapy Drug Resistance

Background

Surgery combined with chemotherapy is an important therapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, chemotherapy drug resistance seriously hinders the curative effect. Studies show that DNA repair genes ERCC1 and BRCA1 are associated with NSCLC chemotherapy, but their expression and mechanism in NSCLC chemotherapy drug-resistant cells has not been elucidated.

Material/Methods

NSCLC cell line A549 and drug resistance cell line A549/DDP were cultured. Real-time PCR and Western blot analyses were used to detect ERCC1 and BRCA1 mRNA expression. A549/DDP cells were randomly divided into 3 groups: the control group; the siRNA-negative control group (scramble group); and the siRNA ERCC1 and BRCA1siRNA transfection group. Real-time PCR and Western blot analyses were used to determine ERCC1 and BRCA1 mRNA and protein expression. MTT was used to detect cell proliferation activity. Caspase 3 activity was tested by use of a kit. Western blot analysis was performed to detect PI3K, AKT, phosphorylated PI3K, and phosphorylated AKT protein expression.

Results

ERCC1 and BRCA1 were overexpressed in A549/DDP compared with A549 (P<0.05). ERCC1 and BRCA1siRNA transfection can significantly reduce ERCC1 and BRCA1 mRNA and protein expression (P<0.05). Downregulating ERCC1 and BRCA1 expression obviously inhibited cell proliferation and increased caspase 3 activity (P<0.05). Downregulating ERCC1 and BRCA1 significantly decreased PI3K and AKT phosphorylation levels (P<0.05).

Conclusions

ERCC1 and BRCA1 were overexpressed in NSCLC drug-resistant cells, and they regulated lung cancer occurrence and development through the phosphorylating PI3K/AKT signaling pathway.

Schedule-dependent cytotoxicity of sunitinib and TRAIL in human non-small cell lung cancer cells with or without EGFR and KRAS mutations

ABSTACT

BACKGROUND

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who do initially respond to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) may eventually develop resistance, which may at least partly be due to the acquisition of a secondary EGFR mutation (T790M). Additionally, it has been found that KRAS mutations may serve as poor prognostic biomarkers. Here, we aimed at establishing a suitable treatment regimen for the multi-target TKI sunitinib and the tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) in NSCLC-derived cells with or without EGFR and KRAS mutations.

METHODS

Four NSCLC-derived cell lines with or without EGFR and KRAS mutations were exposed to different sunitinib and TRAIL treatment regimens. Alterations in cell viability, cell cycle distribution, apoptosis, phosphorylation of AKT and expression of the death receptors DR4 and DR5 were evaluated using CCK8, flow cytometry and Western blotting assays, respectively.

RESULTS

A synergistic cytotoxic effect was observed in all four cell lines treated with sunitinib (1 nM) followed by TRAIL (100 ng/ml), as well as after simultaneous treatment with both agents. We found that sunitinib enhances TRAIL-induced G0/G1-phase cell cycle arrest and blocks TRAIL-triggered activation of AKT as the underlying mechanism. In contrast, we observed antagonistic effects when sunitinib was administered after TRAIL to the cell lines tested. A decreased DR4 and DR5 expression was found to be correlated with this antagonism.

CONCLUSION

From our data we conclude that administration of sunitinib followed by TRAIL, as well as a simultaneous administration of both agents, serve as favorable treatment regimens for NSCLC-derived cells, irrespective of their EGFR and/or KRAS mutation status.

Inhibition of mTOR enhances radiosensitivity of lung cancer cells and protects normal lung cells against radiation

Radiotherapy has been used for a long time as a standard therapy for cancer; however, there have been no recent research breakthroughs. Radioresistance and various side-effects lead to the unexpected outcomes of radiation therapy. Specific and accurate targeting as well as reduction of radioresistance have been major challenges for irradiation therapy. Recent studies have shown that rapamycin shows promise for inhibiting tumorigenesis by suppressing mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). We found that the combination of rapamycin with irradiation significantly diminished cell viability and colony formation, and increased cell apoptosis, as compared with irradiation alone in lung cancer cell line A549, suggesting that rapamycin can enhance the effectiveness of radiation therapy by sensitizing cancer cells to irradiation. Importantly, we observed that the adverse effects of irradiation on a healthy lung cell line (WI-38) were also offset. No enhanced protein expression of mTOR signaling was observed in WI-38 cells, which is normally elevated in lung cancer cells. Moreover, DNA damage was significantly less with the combination therapy than with irradiation therapy alone. Our data suggest that the incorporation of rapamycin during radiation therapy could be a potent way to improve the sensitivity and effectiveness of radiation therapy as well as to protect normal cells from being damaged by irradiation.

The antitumor activity of PNA modified vinblastine cationic liposomes on Lewis lung tumor cells: In vitro and in vivo evaluation

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the frequently-occurring disease in the world, and the treatment effects are usually unsatisfactory. Vinblastine is an anti-microtubule drug in clinic. In this study, a nanostructured liposome was designed and prepared for treating NSCLC. In the liposomes, peanut agglutinin (PNA) was modified on the liposomal surface, 3-(N-(N',N'-dimethylaminoethane)carbamoyl) cholesterol was used as cationic materials, and vinblastine was encapsulated in the aqueous core of liposomes, respectively. The PNA modified vinblastine cationic liposomes were approximately 100 nm in size with a positive potential. In vitro results showed that the targeting liposomes could significantly enhance cellular uptake, selectively accumulate in LLT cells, and dramatically initiate apoptosis via activating pro-apoptotic proteins and apoptotic enzymes, thus leading to the strongest antitumor efficacy to LLT cells. In vivo results demonstrated that the targeting liposomes could display a prolonged circulation time in the blood, accumulate more drug in tumor location, and induce most of tumor cells apoptosis. As a result, a robust overall antitumor efficacy in tumor-bearing mice was observed subsequently. In conclusion, the chemotherapy using the PNA modified vinblastine cationic liposomes could provide a potential strategy for treating non-small cell lung cancer.