Low-dose radiotherapy and concurrent FOLFIRI-bevacizumab: a Phase II study

Exploring low-dose radiotherapy to overcome radio-immunotherapy resistance

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the current treatment landscape for cancer, yet the response rates of ICIs remain unmet. Synergistic with immunotherapy, low-dose radiotherapy (LDRT) has been demonstrated to activate anti-tumor immunity - a transition from traditional radiation therapy geared toward local radical treatment to a type of immunological adjuvant. As such, studies utilizing LDRT to enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy have been increasing preclinically and clinically. This paper reviews the recent strategies of using LDRT to overcome the resistance of ICIs, as well as providing potential opportunities in cancer treatment. Despite the potential of LDRT in immunotherapy is recognized, the mechanisms behind this form of treatment remain largely elusive. Thus, we reviewed history, mechanisms and challenges associated with this form of treatment, as well as different modes of its application, to provide relatively accurate practice standards for LDRT as a sensitizing treatment when combined with immunotherapy or radio-immunotherapy.

Low-Dose Radiation Therapy (LDRT) against Cancer and Inflammatory or Degenerative Diseases: Three Parallel Stories with a Common Molecular Mechanism Involving the Nucleoshuttling of the ATM Protein?

Very early after their discovery, X-rays were used in multiple medical applications, such as treatments against cancer, inflammation and pain. Because of technological constraints, such applications involved X-ray doses lower than 1 Gy per session. Progressively, notably in oncology, the dose per session increased. However, the approach of delivering less than 1 Gy per session, now called low-dose radiation therapy (LDRT), was preserved and is still applied in very specific cases. More recently, LDRT has also been applied in some trials to protect against lung inflammation after COVID-19 infection or to treat degenerative syndromes such as Alzheimer's disease. LDRT illustrates well the discontinuity of the dose-response curve and the counterintuitive observation that a low dose may produce a biological effect higher than a certain higher dose. Even if further investigations are needed to document and optimize LDRT, the apparent paradox of some radiobiological effects specific to low dose may be explained by the same mechanistic model based on the radiation-induced nucleoshuttling of the ATM kinase, a protein involved in various stress response pathways.

Cancer combination therapies by angiogenesis inhibitors; a comprehensive review

Abnormal vasculature is one of the most conspicuous traits of tumor tissue, largely contributing to tumor immune evasion. The deregulation mainly arises from the potentiated pro-angiogenic factors secretion and can also target immune cells' biological events, such as migration and activation. Owing to this fact, angiogenesis blockade therapy was established to fight cancer by eliminating the nutrient and oxygen supply to the malignant cells by impairing the vascular network. Given the dominant role of vascular-endothelium growth factor (VEGF) in the angiogenesis process, the well-known anti-angiogenic agents mainly depend on the targeting of its actions. However, cancer cells mainly show resistance to anti-angiogenic agents by several mechanisms, and also potentiated local invasiveness and also distant metastasis have been observed following their administration. Herein, we will focus on clinical developments of angiogenesis blockade therapy, more particular, in combination with other conventional treatments, such as immunotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, targeted therapy, and also cancer vaccines. Video abstract.

Clinical Studies on Ultrafractionated Chemoradiation: A Systematic Review

Aim

The efficacy of low-dose fractionated radiotherapy (LDFRT) and chemotherapy (CHT) combination has large preclinical but little clinical evidence. Therefore, the aim of this review was to collect and analyze the clinical results of LDRT plus concurrent CHT in patients with advanced cancers.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed using the PRISMA methodology. Only studies based on the combination of LDFRT (< 1 Gy/fraction) and CHT were included. Endpoints of the analysis were tumor response, toxicity, and overall survival, with particular focus on any differences between LDFRT-CHT and CHT alone.

Results

Twelve studies (307 patients) fulfilled the selection criteria and were included in this review. Two studies were retrospective, one was a prospective pilot trial, six were phase II studies, two were phase I trials, and one was a phase I/II open label study. No randomized controlled trials were found. Seven out of eight studies comparing clinical response showed higher rates after LDFRT-CHT compared to CHT alone. Three out of four studies comparing survival reported improved results after combined treatment. Three studies compared toxicity of CHT and LDFRT plus CHT, and all of them reported similar adverse events rates. In most cases, toxicity was manageable with only three likely LDFRT-unrelated fatal events (1%), all recorded in the same series on LDFRT plus temozolomide in glioblastoma multiforme patients.

Conclusion

None of the analyzed studies provided level I evidence on the clinical impact of LDFRT plus CHT. However, it should be noted that, apart from two small series of breast cancers, all studies reported improved therapeutic outcomes and similar tolerability compared to CHT alone.

Systematic Review Registration

www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42020206639.

High-dose irradiation in combination with non-ablative low-dose radiation to treat metastatic disease after progression on immunotherapy: Results of a phase II trial

AIM

To report early findings from a phase II trial of high-dose radiotherapy (HD-RT) with or without low-dose RT (LD-RT) for metastatic cancer.

METHODS

Eligible patients had metastatic disease that progressed on immunotherapy within 6 months. Patients were given either HD-RT (20-70 Gy total; 3-12.5 Gy/f), or HD-RT + LD-RT (0.5-2 Gy/f up to 1-10 Gy total) to separate lesions, with continued immunotherapy. Radiographic response was assessed per RECIST 1.1 and Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC). Primary endpoints: (1) 4-month disease control (DCR, complete/partial response [CR/PR] or stable disease [SD]) or an overall response (ORR, CR/PR) at any point in ≥10% of patients, per RECIST 1.1; (2) dose-limiting toxicity within 3 months not exceeding 30%. Secondary endpoint was lesion-specific response.

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients (NSCLC, n = 38; melanoma n = 21) were analyzed (39 HD-RT and 35 HD-RT + LD-RT). The median follow-up time was 13.6 months. The primary endpoint was met for 72 evaluable patients, with a 4-month DCR of 42% (47% [16/34] vs. 37% [14/38] in HD-RT + LD-RT vs. HD-RT, P = 0.38), and 19% ORR at any time (26% [9/34] vs. 13% [5/38] in HD-RT + LD-RT vs. HD-RT, P = 0.27). Three patients had toxicity ≥grade 3. LD-RT lesion response (53%) was improved compared to nonirradiated lesions in HD-RT + LD-RT (23%, P = 0.002) and HD-RT (11%, P < 0.001). T- and NK cell infiltration was enhanced in lesions treated with LD-RT.

CONCLUSIONS

HD-RT plus LD-RT safely improved lesion-specific response in patients with immune resistant solid tumors by promoting infiltration of effector immune cells into the tumor microenvironment.

Chemopotentiating effects of low-dose fractionated radiation on cisplatin and paclitaxel in cervix cancer cell lines and normal fibroblasts from patients with cervix cancer

The aim of the present study was to compare the effects (assessed by clonogenic survival and γH2AX foci assays) of low-dose fractionated radiation LDFR (4 × 0.125 Gy, 4 × 0.25 Gy and 4 × 0.5 Gy) versus single radiation doses (0.5 Gy, 1 Gy and 2 Gy) on cisplatin and paclitaxel in HRS-negative cervix cancer cell lines SiHa and CaSki to see if the effects of LDFR can emerge in cells that not present low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity (HRS) phenomenon. Additionally, we report the effects in normal fibroblasts (HRS-negative and HRS-positive) from two patients with cervix cancer to see if the chemopotentiating effects of LDFR also apply to normal cells. LDFR (4 × 0.125 Gy, 4 × 0.25 Gy and 4 × 0.5 Gy) as well as single doses (0.5 Gy, 1 Gy and 2 Gy) enhanced cytotoxicity of cisplatin and paclitaxel in all the cell lines. Cisplatin-potentiating effects were maximum with LDFR 4 × 0.5 Gy, and were two-fold greater than those with a single dose of 2 Gy in SiHa, CaSki and HFIB2 cells. Paclitaxel-enhancing effects were also maximum with LDFR 4 × 0.5 Gy, however only in HRS-positive HFIB2 fibroblasts were significantly greater than those with a single dose of 2 Gy. The results demonstrate that LDFR may enhance the effects of cisplatin and paclitaxel in SiHa and CaSki cells, although they lack HRS phenomenon, and show that the magnitude of the potentiating effects of LDFR depends on cytostatic type and the size of low doses. In normal fibroblasts the chemopotentiating effects of LDFR seem to depend on HRS status. In conclusion, the unique enhancing effects of LDFR on cisplatin in cervical cancer cell lines, even when HRS negative, suggest that all patients with cervical cancer may benefit from the addition of LDFR to adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy.