Nothing in SARS-CoV-2 makes sense except in the light of RNA modification?

Convergent evolution of allele-specific gene expression that leads to non-small cell lung cancer in different human populations

Phenotypical innovations during evolution are caused by novel mutations, which are usually heterozygous at the beginning. The gene expressions on two alleles of these mutation sites are not necessarily identical, leading to flexible allele-specific regulation in cell systems. We retrieve the transcriptome data of normal and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tissues from 47 African Americans (AA) and 50 European Americans (EA). We analyze the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in NSCLC as well as the tumor-specific mutations. Expression and mutation profiles show convergent evolution in AA and EA populations. The tumor-specific mutations are poorly overlapped, but many of them are located in the same genes, mainly oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. The DEGs in tumors are majorly caused by the mutated alleles rather than normal alleles. The relative expressions of mutated alleles are highly correlated between AA and EA. The differential expression in NSCLC is predominantly mediated by the mutated alleles on heterozygous sites. This molecular mechanism underlying NSCLC oncogenesis is conserved across different human populations, exhibiting convergent evolution. We present this novel angle that differential expression analysis should be performed separately for different alleles. Our ideas should greatly benefit the cancer community.

A-to-I RNA editing shows dramatic up-regulation in osteosarcoma and broadly regulates tumor-related genes by altering microRNA target regions

A-to-I RNA editing is a prevalent type of RNA modification in animals. The dysregulation of RNA editing has led to multiple human cancers. However, the role of RNA editing has never been studied in osteosarcoma, a complex bone cancer with unknown molecular basis. We retrieved the RNA-sequencing data from 24 primary osteosarcoma patients and 3 healthy controls. We systematically profiled the RNA editomes in these samples and quantitatively identified reliable differential editing sites (DES) between osteosarcoma and normal samples. RNA editing efficiency is dramatically increased in osteosarcoma, presumably due to the significant up-regulation of editing enzymes ADAR1 and ADAR2. Up-regulated DES in osteosarcoma are enriched in 3'UTRs. Strikingly, such 3'UTR sites are further enriched in microRNA binding regions of gene EMP2 and other oncogenes, abolishing the microRNA suppression on target genes. Accordingly, the expression of these tumor-promoting genes is elevated in osteosarcoma. There might be an RNA editing-dependent pathway leading to osteosarcoma. We expanded our knowledge on the potential roles of RNA editing in oncogenesis. Based on these molecular features, our work is valuable for future prognosis and diagnosis of osteosarcoma.

Retrospect of the Two-Year Debate: What Fuels the Evolution of SARS-CoV-2: RNA Editing or Replication Error?

Mutation is one of the mechanisms of the evolutionary divergence of an organism. Under this global COVID-19 pandemic, the fast evolution of SARS-CoV-2 became one of the most worrying issues. Some researchers believed that the hosts' RNA deamination systems (APOBECs and ADARs) are the major source of mutations and have driven the evolution of SARS-CoV-2. However, apart from RNA editing, the RDRP (RNA-dependent RNA polymerase)-mediated replication errors may also contribute to the mutation of SARS-CoV-2 (just like the single-nucleotide polymorphisms/variations in eukaryotes caused by DNA replication errors). Unfortunately, it is technically unable to distinguish RNA editing and replication errors (SNPs) in this RNA virus. Here comes a fundamental question: we indeed observed the fast evolution of SARS-CoV-2, but what exactly fuels its evolution: RNA editing or replication errors? This debate lasts for 2 years. In this piece, we will retrospect the 2-year debate on RNA editing versus SNPs.

The efficacy and safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines mRNA1273 and BNT162b2 might be complicated by rampant C-to-U RNA editing

The SARS-CoV-2 RNA vaccines are smartly designed to increase the synonymous codon usage by introducing multiple U-to-C mutations. This design would elevate the translation efficiency of vaccine RNAs. However, we found evidence to reason that the designed cytidines might be converted to uridines again by C-to-U RNA deamination in host cells. This C-to-U mechanism might be a main factor that affects the efficacy and safety of RNA vaccines.

The Sponge Interaction Between Circular RNA and microRNA Serves as a Fast-Evolving Mechanism That Suppresses Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) in Humans

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most lethal cancer types in the world. Currently, the molecular mechanisms and pathways underlying NSCLC oncogenesis are poorly understood. Using multiple Omics data, we systematically explored the differentially expressed circular RNAs (circRNAs) in NSCLC. We also investigated potential microRNA sponges (that absorb circRNAs) in NSCLC and downstream target genes with experimental verifications. hsa_circ_0003497 was down-regulated in NSCLC and played an inhibitory role in tumorigenesis. In contrast, miR-197-3p was up-regulated in NSCLC. hsa_circ_0003497 directly interacts with miR-197-3p and releases a target gene of miR-197-3p termed CTNND1 (a known tumor suppressor gene). Evolutionary analysis reveals fast evolution of this hsa_circ_0003497-miR-197-3p-CTNND1-NSCLC axis in mammals. This work clarified the biological functions and molecular mechanisms of how hsa_circ_0003497 suppresses NSCLC through miR-197-3p and CTNND1. We discovered molecular markers for the prognosis of NSCLC and provided potential intervention targets for its treatment.

uORF-Mediated Translational Regulation of ATF4 Serves as an Evolutionarily Conserved Mechanism Contributing to Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and Stress Response

Diseases and environmental stresses are two distinct challenges for virtually all living organisms. In light of evolution, cellular responses to diseases and stresses might share similar molecular mechanisms, but the detailed regulation pathway is not reported yet.

We obtained the transcriptomes and translatomes from several NSCLC (non-small-cell lung cancer) patients as well as from different species under normal or stress conditions. We found that the translation level of gene ATF4 is remarkably enhanced in NSCLC due to the reduced number of ribosomes binding to its upstream open reading frames (uORFs). We also showed the evolutionary conservation of this uORF-ATF4 regulation in the stress response of other species. Molecular experiments showed that knockdown of ATF4 reduced the cell growth rate while overexpression of ATF4 enhanced cell growth, especially for the ATF4 allele with mutated uORFs. Population genetics analyses in multiple species verified that the mutations that abolish uATGs (start codon of uORFs) are highly deleterious, suggesting the functional importance of uORFs.

Our study proposes an evolutionarily conserved pattern that enhances the ATF4 translation by uORFs upon stress or disease. We generalized the concept of cellular response to diseases and stresses. These two biological processes may share similar molecular mechanisms.