1
|
Miki M, Obara RD, Nishimura K, Shishido T, Ikenaka Y, Oka R, Sato K, Nakayama SMM, Kimura T, Kobayashi A, Aoshima K, Saito K, Hiono T, Isoda N, Sakoda Y. FOUR-WEEK ORAL ADMINISTRATION OF BALOXAVIR MARBOXIL AS AN ANTI-INFLUENZA VIRUS DRUG SHOWS NO TOXICITY IN CHICKENS. J Zoo Wildl Med 2024; 55:313-321. [PMID: 38875188 DOI: 10.1638/2023-0103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024] Open
Abstract
High pathogenicity avian influenza is an acute zoonotic disease with high mortality in birds caused by a high pathogenicity avian influenza virus (HPAIV). Recently, HPAIV has rapidly spread worldwide and has killed many wild birds, including endangered species. Baloxavir marboxil (BXM), an anti-influenza agent used for humans, was reported to reduce mortality and virus secretion from HPAIV-infected chickens (Gallus domesticus, order Galliformes) at a dosage of ≥2.5 mg/kg when administered simultaneously with viral challenge. Application of this treatment to endangered birds requires further information on potential avian-specific toxicity caused by repeated exposure to BXM over the long term. To obtain information of potential avian-specific toxicity, a 4-wk oral repeated-dose study of BXM was conducted in chickens (n = 6 or 7 per group), which are commonly used as laboratory avian species. The study was conducted in reference to the human pharmaceutical guidelines for nonclinical repeated-dose drug toxicity studies to evaluate systemic toxicity and exposure. No adverse changes were observed in any organs examined, and dose proportional increases in systemic exposure to active pharmaceutical ingredients were noted from 12.5 to 62.5 mg/kg per day. BXM showed no toxicity to chickens at doses of up to 62.5 mg/kg per day, at which systemic exposure was approximately 71 times higher than systemic exposure at 2.5 mg/kg, the reported efficacious dosage amount, in HPAIV-infected chickens. These results also suggest that BXM could be considered safe for treating HPAIV-infected endangered birds due to its high safety margin compared with the efficacy dose. The data in this study could contribute to the preservation of endangered birds by using BXM as a means of protecting biodiversity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariko Miki
- Shionogi & Co, Ltd, Toyonaka 561-0825, Japan,
| | | | | | | | - Yoshinori Ikenaka
- Laboratory of Toxicology, Department of Environmental Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan
- Translational Research Unit, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan
- One Health Research Center, Hokkaido University, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan
- Water Research Group, Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2531, South Africa
| | - Ryoko Oka
- Shionogi & Co, Ltd, Toyonaka 561-0825, Japan
| | - Kenji Sato
- Shionogi & Co, Ltd, Toyonaka 561-0825, Japan
| | - Shouta M M Nakayama
- Laboratory of Toxicology, Department of Environmental Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan
- Biomedical Sciences Department, School of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Takashi Kimura
- Laboratory of Comparative Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan
| | - Atsushi Kobayashi
- Laboratory of Comparative Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan
| | - Keisuke Aoshima
- Laboratory of Comparative Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan
| | - Keisuke Saito
- Institute for Raptor Biomedicine Japan, Kushiro 084-0922, Japan
| | - Takahiro Hiono
- Laboratory of Microbiology, Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan
- One Health Research Center, Hokkaido University, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan
- International Collaboration Unit, International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Kita-Ku, Sapporo 001-0020, Japan
| | - Norikazu Isoda
- Laboratory of Microbiology, Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan
- One Health Research Center, Hokkaido University, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan
- International Collaboration Unit, International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Kita-Ku, Sapporo 001-0020, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Sakoda
- Laboratory of Microbiology, Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan
- One Health Research Center, Hokkaido University, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan
- International Collaboration Unit, International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Kita-Ku, Sapporo 001-0020, Japan
- Hokkaido University Institute for Vaccine Research and Development, Hokkaido University, Kita-ku, Sapporo 001-0021, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Scott AB, Toribio JA, Singh M, Groves P, Barnes B, Glass K, Moloney B, Black A, Hernandez-Jover M. Low Pathogenic Avian Influenza Exposure Risk Assessment in Australian Commercial Chicken Farms. Front Vet Sci 2018; 5:68. [PMID: 29755987 PMCID: PMC5932326 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2017] [Accepted: 03/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
This study investigated the pathways of exposure to low pathogenic avian influenza (LPAI) virus among Australian commercial chicken farms and estimated the likelihood of this exposure occurring using scenario trees and a stochastic modeling approach following the World Organization for Animal Health methodology for risk assessment. Input values for the models were sourced from scientific literature and an on-farm survey conducted during 2015 and 2016 among Australian commercial chicken farms located in New South Wales and Queensland. Outputs from the models revealed that the probability of a first LPAI virus exposure to a chicken in an Australian commercial chicken farms from one wild bird at any point in time is extremely low. A comparative assessment revealed that across the five farm types (non-free-range meat chicken, free-range meat chicken, cage layer, barn layer, and free range layer farms), free-range layer farms had the highest probability of exposure (7.5 × 10-4; 5% and 95%, 5.7 × 10-4-0.001). The results indicate that the presence of a large number of wild birds on farm is required for exposure to occur across all farm types. The median probability of direct exposure was highest in free-range farm types (5.6 × 10-4 and 1.6 × 10-4 for free-range layer and free-range meat chicken farms, respectively) and indirect exposure was highest in non-free-range farm types (2.7 × 10-4, 2.0 × 10-4, and 1.9 × 10-4 for non-free-range meat chicken, cage layer, and barn layer farms, respectively). The probability of exposure was found to be lowest in summer for all farm types. Sensitivity analysis revealed that the proportion of waterfowl among wild birds on the farm, the presence of waterfowl in the range and feed storage areas, and the prevalence of LPAI in wild birds are the most influential parameters for the probability of Australian commercial chicken farms being exposed to avian influenza (AI) virus. These results highlight the importance of ensuring good biosecurity on farms to minimize the risk of exposure to AI virus and the importance of continuous surveillance of LPAI prevalence including subtypes in wild bird populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Bullanday Scott
- Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jenny-Ann Toribio
- Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mini Singh
- Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Peter Groves
- Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Belinda Barnes
- Quantitative Sciences, Department of Agriculture and Water Resources, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Kathryn Glass
- College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Barbara Moloney
- New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Orange, NSW, Australia
| | - Amanda Black
- New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Orange, NSW, Australia
| | - Marta Hernandez-Jover
- Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University and New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.,School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|