Complications of transcatheter atrial septal defect closure

Complications and Efficacies of Surgical Versus Transcatheter Closure for Pediatric Ostium Secundum Atrial Septal Defect: A Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The optimal approach for pediatric ostium secundum atrial septal defect (ASD) closure remains uncertain. This study aims to assess complications and efficacies of surgical and transcatheter closures.

METHODS

Systematic search in Medline, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases identified cohort studies until July 2023. Complications, length of hospital stay, and efficacy outcomes were evaluated. Subgroup analyses considered ethnicity, ASD size, age, and rim deficiency involvement.

RESULTS

Fourteen cohort studies involving 9695 patients were comprehensively analyzed. Regarding complications, the pediatric patients in the surgery group exhibited higher occurrences of cardiac arrhythmia (odds ratio [OR]: 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22-2.87, p=0.004), pericardial effusion (OR: 14.80, 95% CI: 6.97-31.43, p<0.00001), and pulmonary complications (OR: 2.58, 95% CI: 1.73-3.85, p<0.00001) compared with those in the transcatheter group. However, no significant difference in fever incidence was observed (OR: 2.57, 95% CI: 0.90-7.34, p=0.08). Furthermore, length of hospital stay was notably shorter in the pediatric transcatheter group (mean difference [MD]: 4.00, 95% CI: 1.71-6.29, p=0.0006). Regarding efficacies, both groups demonstrated similar rates of successful closure (OR: 1.97, 95% CI: 0.56-6.92, p=0.29) and residual shunting (OR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.17-1.77, p=0.31) in the pediatric cohort. Subgroup analyses revealed that surgical residual shunting was notably lower in the European pediatric population (OR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.07-0.45, p=0.0002), in cases with ASD size exceeding 15 mm (OR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.08-0.49, p=0.0006), and in pediatric patients younger than 8 years (OR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.12-0.92, p=0.03). Interestingly, residual shunting involving complex ASD with rim deficiency was more pronounced in the surgery group (OR: 2.66, 95% CI: 1.33-5.32, p=0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Both surgical and transcatheter closures are equally effective, with transcatheter closure showing significantly fewer complications.

CLINICAL IMPACT

This meta-analysis offers pivotal insights for clinicians grappling with the optimal approach to pediatric ostium secundum ASD closure. The observed higher incidence of cardiac arrhythmias, pericardial effusions, and pulmonary complications in surgical closures underscores the challenges associated with this modality. In contrast, transcatheter closure, with its comparable efficacy and shorter hospital stays, emerges as an appealing and less invasive alternative. These findings equip clinicians with evidence to make informed decisions, optimizing patient outcomes. Subgroup analyses further refine recommendations, emphasizing tailored considerations for European pediatric patients, larger ASDs, and those under 8 years old, ultimately fostering personalized and improved care strategies.

The feasibility and safety of combining atrial septal defect/patent foramen ovale and left atrial appendage closure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Atrial Septal Defect/Patent Foramen Ovale (ASD/PFO) occlusion is performed to prevent paradoxical embolism and reduce the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke. Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is used as an alternative to medical therapy of non-valvular atrial fibrillation for prevention of stroke. Multiple studies have examined performing LAA and ASD/PFO occlusion. However, the feasibility and safety of combined occlusion of the left atrial appendage and ASD/PFO are not clear, furthermore, these studies are limited by their small sample sizes and retrospective analysis. In this study, we aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze the feasibility and safety of combining left atrial appendage and ASD/PFO closure.

Methods

PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, Cochrane Library, Embase, and WanFang database were searched up to April 2022 to identify peer-reviewed human studies on assessing the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of combining left atrial appendage and ASD/PFO closure. The primary outcome was calculated: procedural feasibility outcome and procedural safety outcome.

Results

A total of 10 articles, including 340 patients from multiple countries, were included in the analysis. The principal findings of our study are: compared with single LAA closure, (i) combining PFO/ASD occlusion and LAA closure had similar procedural success proportion (98.43%, 95% CI: 96.67-100.00%), (ii) similar safety event incidences developed (1.67%, 95% CI: 0.24-3.92%), subgroup analyzed safety event incidences in death was 0.00 (95% CI: 0.00-0.33%), cardiac tamponade was 0.87% (95% CI: 0.00-2.77%), device embolization was 0.00 (95% CI: 0.00-0.60%), major bleeding was 0.00 (95% CI: 0.00-0.33%), stroke was 0.00 (95% CI: 0.00-0.02%).

Conclusion

Although this systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate the technical feasibility and safety of combining closure of PFO/ASD and LAA, further studies of sufficient sample size, long-term follow-up, and rigor endpoint criteria are yet needed to fully evaluate this combination procedure for its role in clinical outcomes.

Association between the Use of Diuretics and Size Reduction in Pediatric Atrial Septal Defect

The effect of diuretics on ASD size reduction remains unclear. In pediatric patients with a large secundum ASD (≥10 mm), diuretic administration seemed to be associated with changes in ASD size. There seemed to be a little possibility of ASD size reduction in case of rim deficiency other than the aortic rim. The patients receiving diuretics may have a lower possibility to undergo surgical closure. The diuretics administration may be associated with the use of smaller ASD devices.

Background and Objectives

While diuretics are sometimes used in atrial septal defect (ASD) treatment, their effect on ASD size reduction remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of diuretics in ASD size reduction in pediatric patients.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with secundum ASD (size ≥10 mm), between 2005 and 2019. Patients were divided into two groups based on the diuretic administration.

Results

Of the 73 enrolled patients, 40 received diuretics. The initial age at ASD diagnosis (2.8±1.7 vs. 2.5±2.0 years, p=0.526) and follow-up duration (22.3±11.4 vs. 18.7±13.2 months, p=0.224) were not significantly different between the groups. The ASD diameter at the initial diagnosis (13.7±2.0 vs. 13.5±3.4 mm, p=0.761) and the indexed ASD diameter (25.5±5.9 vs. 26.9±10.3 mm/m², p=0.493) were also not significantly different between two groups. The ASD diameter significantly increased in the non-diuretic group during follow-up (0.0±2.9 vs. +2.6±2.0 mm, p<0.001). The indexed ASD diameter significantly decreased in the diuretic group during follow-up (−5.7±6.5 vs. +0.2±3.9 mm/m², p<0.001). In the linear mixed model analysis, diuretic use was associated with ASD diameter decrease (p<0.001) and indexed ASD diameter reduction (p<0.001) over time. Device closure was more frequently performed in the diuretic (75.0%) than in the non-diuretic group (39.4%).

Conclusions

Patients receiving diuretics are less likely to undergo surgery. The diuretics administration may be associated with the use of smaller ASD devices for transcatheter treatment through ASD size reduction.

[Vascular access-site infections in percutaneous cardiac interventions: A significant risk?]

Vascular access site infections are infrequent and rarely reported as a potential complication of percutaneous cardiac intervention. A case of access site infection is reported with a literature review. Femoral access is mainly concerned in some circumstances: delayed sheath withdrawal, vascular complications (hematoma, false-aneurysm, arteriovenous fistula), or use of hemostatic closure device. These infectious complications are always serious requiring medical and surgical treatment and potentially associated with life-threatening complications. Preventive measures should be applied in order to reduce the risks: optimisation of femoral punctures with the support of echography guidance, avoid a new puncture in a area with hematoma, femoral angiographic evaluation and strict aseptic precautions with vascular closure devices, and obviously preferential choice of radial access.