Imaging to optimize liver tumor ablation

Imaging Guidelines during Percutaneous Liver Ablation to Optimize Outcomes and Patient Safety

Image-guided ablation procedures have become a mainstay in cancer therapy. Typically performed from a percutaneous approach, thermal-based ablation procedures rely heavily on imaging guidance both prior to and during the procedure itself. Advances in imaging as they relate to ablation procedures are as important to successful treatments as advancements in the ablation technology itself. Imaging as it relates to procedural planning, targeting and monitoring, and assessment of procedural endpoint is the focus of this article.

Detectability of Target Lesion During CT-Guided Tumor Ablations: Impact on Ablation Outcome

PURPOSE

 Small hepatic malignancies scheduled for CT-guided percutaneous ablation may have been identified in the hepatobiliary phase of liver MRI or in a specific phase of multi-phase CT but may be occult on unenhanced CT used to guide the ablation. We investigated whether the detectability of the target lesion would impact the efficacy of CT-guided hepatic tumor ablations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 We included 69 patients with 99 malignant liver lesions (25 primary, 44 metastases) who underwent IRE (n = 35), RFA (n = 41), or MWA (n = 23) between 01/2015 and 06/2018. All procedures were performed under CT guidance. Lesions not detectable on CT (NDL) were targeted through identification of anatomical landmarks on preinterventional contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. Rates of incomplete ablation, size of ablation zone, local tumor recurrence, intrahepatic progression-free survival (ihPFS), and adverse event rates were compared for detectable lesions (DL) vs. NDL.

RESULTS

 40 lesions were NDL, and 59 lesions were DL on unenhanced CT. The mean follow-up was 16.2 months (14.8 for DL and 18.2 for NDL). The mean diameter of NDL and DL was similar (12.9 mm vs. 14.9 mm). The mean ablation zone size was similar (37.1 mm vs. 38.8 mm). Incomplete ablation did not differ between NDL vs. DL (5.0 % [2/40; 0.6-16.9 %] vs. 3.4 % [2/59; 0.4-11.7 %]), nor did local tumor recurrence (15.4 % [6/39; 5.7 %-30.5 %] vs. 16.9 % [10/59; 8.4-29.0 %]), or median ihPFS (15.5 months vs. 14.3 months).

CONCLUSION

 Target lesion detectability on interventional CT does not have a significant impact on outcome after percutaneous liver ablation when anatomical landmarks are used to guide needle placement.

KEY POINTS

  · Liver tumors can be successfully ablated even if they are not detectable on the navigational CT scan.. · Anatomical landmarks should be used and compared to preinterventional imaging..

CITATION FORMAT

· Barzakova E, Senthilvel N, Bruners P et al. Detectability of Target Lesion During CT-Guided Tumor Ablations: Impact on Ablation Outcome . Fortschr Röntgenstr 2021; DOI: 10.1055/a-1669-9342.

Factors Associated With Local Tumor Control and Complications After Thermal Ablation of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: A 15-year Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors associated with local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS) and complications after colorectal liver metastases (CLM) thermal ablation (TA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 286 patients with 415 CLM undergoing TA (radiofrequency and microwave ablation) in 378 procedures from January 2003 to July 2017. Prior hepatic artery infusion (HAI), bevacizumab, pre-existing biliary dilatation, ablation modality, minimal ablation margin (MM), prior hepatectomy, CLM number, and size were analyzed as factors influencing complications and LTPFS. Statistical analysis included the Kaplan-Meier method, Cox proportional hazards model, competing risk analysis, univariate/multivariate logistic/exact logistic regressions, and the Fisher exact test. Complications were reported according to modified Society of Interventional Radiology guidelines.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 31 months. There was no LTP for MM > 10 mm. Smaller tumor size, increased MM, and prior hepatectomy correlated with longer LTPFS. The major complications occurred following 28 (7%) of 378 procedures. There were no biliary complications in HAI-naive patients, versus 11% in HAI patients (P < .001), of which 7% were major. Biliary complications predictors in HAI patients included biliary dilatation, bevacizumab, and MM > 10 mm. In HAI patients, ablation with 6 to 10 mm and > 10 mm MM resulted in major biliary complication rates of 4% and 21% (P = .0011), with corresponding LTP rates of 24% and 0% (P = .0033). In HAI-naive patients, the LTP rates for 6 to 10 mm and > 10 mm MM were 27% and 0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

No LTP was seen for MM > 10 mm. Biliary complications occurred only in HAI patients, especially in those with biliary dilatation, bevacizumab, and MM > 10 mm. In HAI patients, MM of 6 to 10 mm resulted in 76% local tumor control and 4% major biliary complications incidence.

Percutaneous Microwave versus Radiofrequency Ablation of Colorectal Liver Metastases: Ablation with Clear Margins (A0) Provides the Best Local Tumor Control

PURPOSE

To identify and compare predictors of local tumor progression (LTP)-free survival (LTPFS) after radiofrequency (RF) ablation and microwave (MW) ablation of colorectal liver metastases (CLMs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective review of CLMs ablated from November 2009 to April 2015 (110 patients). Margins were measured on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) 6 weeks after ablation. Clinical and technical predictors of LTPFS were assessed using a competing risk model adjusted for clustering.

RESULTS

Technique effectiveness (complete ablation) was 93% (79/85) for RF ablation and 97% (58/60) for MW ablation (P = .47). The median follow-up period was significantly longer for RF ablation than for MW ablation (56 months vs. 29 months) (P < .001). There was no difference in the local tumor progression (LTP) rates between RF ablation and MW ablation (P = 0.84). Significant predictors of shorter LTPFS for RF ablation on univariate analysis were ablation margins 5 mm or smaller (P < .001) (hazard ratio [HR]: 14.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.2-40.9) and perivascular tumors (P = .021) (HR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.1-4.3); both retained significance on multivariate analysis. Significant predictors of shorter LTPFS on univariate analysis for MW ablation were ablation margins 5 mm or smaller (P < .001) (subhazard ratio: 11.6; 95% CI: 3.1-42.7) and no history of prior liver resection (P < .013) (HR: 3.2; 95%: 1.3-7.8); both retained significance on multivariate analysis. There was no LTP for tumors ablated with margins over 10 mm (median LTPFS: not reached). Perivascular tumors were not predictive for MW ablation (P = .43).

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of the thermal ablation modality used, margins larger than 5 mm are critical for local tumor control, with no LTP noted for margins over 10 mm. Unlike RF ablation, the efficiency of MW ablation was not affected for perivascular tumors.

Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Factors Affecting Outcomes--A 10-year Experience at a Single Center

PURPOSE

To identify predictors of oncologic outcomes after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CLMs) and to describe and evaluate a modified clinical risk score (CRS) adapted for ablation as a patient stratification and prognostic tool.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study consisted of a HIPAA-compliant institutional review board-approved retrospective review of data in 162 patients with 233 CLMs treated with percutaneous RFA between December 2002 and December 2012. Contrast material-enhanced CT was used to assess technique effectiveness 4-8 weeks after RFA. Patients were followed up with contrast-enhanced CT every 2-4 months. Overall survival (OS) and local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS) were calculated from the time of RFA by using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank tests and Cox regression models were used for univariate and multivariate analysis to identify predictors of outcomes.

RESULTS

Technique effectiveness was 94% (218 of 233). Median LTPFS was 26 months. At univariate analysis, predictors of shorter LTPFS were tumor size greater than 3 cm (P < .001), ablation margin size of 5 mm or less (P < .001), high modified CRS (P = .009), male sex (P = .03), and no history of prior hepatectomy (P = .04) or hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (P = .01). At multivariate analysis, only tumor size greater than 3 cm (P = .01) and margin size of 5 mm or less (P < .001) were independent predictors of shorter LTPFS. Median and 5-year OS were 36 months and 31%. At univariate analysis, predictors of shorter OS were tumor size larger than 3 cm (P = .005), carcinoembryonic antigen level greater than 30 ng/mL (P = .003), high modified CRS (P = .02), and extrahepatic disease (EHD) (P < .001). At multivariate analysis, tumor size greater than 3 cm (P = .006) and more than one site of EHD (P < .001) were independent predictors of shorter OS.

CONCLUSION

Tumor size of less than 3 cm and ablation margins greater than 5 mm are essential for satisfactory local tumor control. Tumor size of more than 3 cm and the presence of more than one site of EHD are associated with shorter OS.

"How we do it" - a practical approach to hepatic metastases ablation techniques

Secondary liver malignancies are associated with significant mortality and morbidity if left untreated. Colorectal cancer is the most frequent origin of hepatic metastases. A multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of hepatic metastases includes medical, surgical, radiation and interventional oncology. The role of interventional oncology in the management of hepatic malignancies continues to evolve and applies to a large and continuous spectrum of metastatic disease, from the relatively small solitary metastasis to larger tumors and multifocal liver disease. Within the past 10 years, several publications of percutaneous image-guided ablation indicated the effectiveness and safety of this minimally invasive therapy for selected patients with limited number (arguably up to 4 metastases) of relatively small (less than 5cm) hepatic metastases. Different image-guided procedures such radiofrequency, microwave, and laser cause thermal ablation and coagulation necrosis or cell death of the target tumor. Cryoablation, causing cell death via cellular freezing, has also been used. Recently, irreversible electroporation, a nonthermal modality, has also been used for liver tumor ablation. In the following section, we review the different liver ablation techniques, as well as indications for ablation, specific patient preparations, and different "tricks of the trade" that we use to achieve safe and effective liver tumor ablation. We also discuss appropriate imaging and clinical patient follow-up and potential complications of liver tumor ablation.

Split-dose technique for FDG PET/CT-guided percutaneous ablation: a method to facilitate lesion targeting and to provide immediate assessment of treatment effectiveness

PURPOSE

To describe a split-dose technique for fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)-guided ablation that permits both target localization and evaluation of treatment effectiveness.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Institutional review board approved the study with a waiver of consent. From July to December 2011, 23 patients (13 women, 10 men; mean age, 59 years; range, 35-87 years) with 29 FDG-avid tumors (median size, 1.4 cm; range, 0.6-4.4 cm) were targeted for ablation. The location of the lesion was the liver (n = 23), lung (n = 4), adrenal gland (n = 1), and thigh (n = 1). Radiofrequency ablation was performed in 17 lesions; microwave ablation, in six; irreversible electroporation, in five; and cryoablation, in one. The pathologic condition of the tumor was metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma in 18 lesions, primary hepatocellular carcinoma in one lesion, and a variety of metastatic tumors in the remaining 10 lesions. A total of 4 mCi (148 MBq) of FDG was administered before the procedure for localization and imaging guidance. At completion of the ablation, an additional 8 mCi (296 MBq) of FDG was administered to assess ablation adequacy. Results of subsequent imaging follow-up were used to determine if postablation imaging after the second dose of FDG reliably helped predict complete tumor ablation. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the results.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight of 29 (97%) ablated lesions showed no residual FDG activity after the second intraprocedural FDG dose. One patient with residual activity underwent immediate biopsy that revealed residual viable tumor and was immediately re-treated. Follow-up imaging at a median of 155 days (range, 92-257 days) after ablation showed local recurrences in two (7%) lesions that were originally negative at postablation PET.

CONCLUSION

Split-dose FDG PET/CT may be a useful tool to provide both guidance and endpoint evaluation, allowing an opportunity for repeat intervention if necessary. Further work is necessary to validate these concepts.

Margin size is an independent predictor of local tumor progression after ablation of colon cancer liver metastases

PURPOSE

This study was designed to evaluate the relationship between the minimal margin size and local tumor progression (LTP) following CT-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CLM).

METHODS

An institutional review board-approved, HIPPA-compliant review identified 73 patients with 94 previously untreated CLM that underwent RFA between March 2003 and May 2010, resulting in an ablation zone completely covering the tumor 4-8 weeks after RFA dynamic CT. Comparing the pre- with the post-RFA CT, the minimal margin size was categorized to 0, 1-5, 6-10, and 11-15 mm. Follow-up included CT every 2-4 months. Kaplan-Meier methodology and Cox regression analysis were used to evaluate the effect of the minimal margin size, tumor location, size, and proximity to a vessel on LTP.

RESULTS

Forty-five of 94 (47.9 %) CLM progressed locally. Median LTP-free survival (LPFS) was 16 months. Two-year LPFS rates for ablated CLM with minimal margin of 0, 1-5 mm, 6-10 mm, 11-15 mm were 26, 46, 74, and 80 % (p < 0.011). Minimal margin (p = 0.002) and tumor size (p = 0.028) were independent risk factors for LTP. The risk for LTP decreased by 46 % for each 5-mm increase in minimal margin size, whereas each additional 5-mm increase in tumor size increased the risk of LTP by 22 %.

CONCLUSIONS

An ablation zone with a minimal margin uniformly larger than 5 mm 4-8 weeks postablation CT is associated with the best local tumor control.

CT-guided radiofrequency ablation as a salvage treatment of colorectal cancer hepatic metastases developing after hepatectomy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) ablation of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CLMs) that recur after hepatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From December 2002 to December 2008, 71 CLMs that developed after hepatectomy were ablated in 56 patients. Medical records and imaging were reviewed to determine technique effectiveness/complete ablation (ie, ablation defect covering the entire tumor on 4-6-week postablation computed tomography [CT]), complications, and local tumor progression (LTP) at the site of ablation. LTP-free and overall survival were calculated by using Kaplan-Meier methodology. A modified clinical risk score (CRS) including nodal status of the primary tumor, time interval between diagnoses of the primary tumor and liver metastases, number of tumors, and size of the largest tumor was assessed for its effect on overall survival and LTP.

RESULTS

Tumor size ranged between 0.5 and 5.7 cm. Complete ablation was documented in 67 of 71 cases (94%). Complications included liver abscess (n = 1) and pleural effusion (n = 1). Median overall survival time was 31 months. One-, 2- and 3-year overall survival rates were 91%, 66%, and 41%, respectively. CRS was an independent factor for overall survival (74% for CRS of 0-2 vs 42% for CRS of 3-4 at 2 y; P = .03) and for LTP-free survival (66% for CRS of 0-2 vs 22% for CRS of 3-4 at 1 y after a single ablation; P <.01).

CONCLUSIONS

CT-guided RF ablation can be used to treat recurrent CLM after hepatectomy. A low CRS is associated with better clinical outcomes.