The ENETS/WHO grading system for neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gastroenteropancreatic system: a review of the current state, limitations and proposals for modifications

Neuroendocrine Tumors of Unknown Primary in the Setting of Cytoreductive Hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

Surgical cytoreduction for neuroendocrine tumor liver metastasis (NETLM) consistently shows positive long-term outcomes. Despite reservations in guidelines for surgery when the primary tumor is unidentified (UP-NET), this study compared the surgical and oncologic long-term outcomes between patients with these rare cases undergoing cytoreductive surgery and patients who had liver resection for known primaries.

METHODS

The study identified 32 unknown primary liver metastases (UP-NETLM) in 522 retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent resection of well-differentiated NETLM between January 2000 and December 2020. Tumor and patient characteristics were compared with those in 490 cases of liver metastasis from small intestinal (SI-NETLM) or pancreatic (pNETLM) primaries. Survival analysis was performed to highlight long-term outcome differences. Surgical outcomes were compared between liver resections alone and simultaneous primary resections to assess surgical risk distinctions.

RESULTS

The UP-NET patients had fewer NETLMs (p = 0.004), which on the average were larger than SI-NETLMs or pNETLMs (p = 0.002). Expression of Ki-67 was balanced among the groups. Major hepatectomy was performed more often in the UP-NETLM group (p = 0.017). The 10-year survival rate of 53% for UP-NETLM was comparable with that for SI-NETML (58%; p = 0.463) and pNETLMs (47%; p = 0.497). The median hepatic progression-free survival was 26 months for the UP-NETLM patients and 25 months for the SI-NETLM patients compared to 12 months for the pNETLM patients (p < 0.001). Perioperative mortality was lower than 2%, and severe postoperative morbidity occurred in 21%, similarly distributed among all the groups.

CONCLUSION

The surgical risk and long-term outcomes for the UP-NETLM patients were comparable with those for other NETLM cases, affirming the validity of equally aggressive surgical cytoreduction as a therapeutic option in carefully selected cases.

Gallbladder carcinoid in a cat

Carcinoids are rare tumors that originate from neuroendocrine system cells. There has apparently only been 1 report in the veterinary medical literature of a cat with a gallbladder carcinoid, with no long-term follow-up information available from that case. Furthermore, apparently only 9 dogs with gallbladder carcinoids have been reported, again with no long-term follow-up. This case report describes the clinical presentation, surgical appearance, histopathologic and immunohistochemical findings, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy treatment, and long-term outcome of a domestic longhair cat with a gallbladder carcinoid. The diagnosis of a gallbladder carcinoid in the present case was based on histologic and immunohistochemical findings. Clinical signs of a gallbladder carcinoid are nonspecific and ultrasonographic findings may not be definitive; however, it should be considered as a potential differential diagnosis in cats with lesions of the gallbladder or in the region of the gallbladder. The prognosis is poor, with a potentially high metastatic rate. In the present case, metastasis occurred 7 mo postoperatively despite adjuvant therapy, and the survival time was only 10 mo from the time of diagnosis. Key clinical message: This case report describes the clinical presentation, surgical appearance, histopathologic and immunohistochemical findings, postoperative adjuvant treatment, and long-term outcome of a cat with a gallbladder carcinoid, which should be considered as a potential differential diagnosis in cats with lesions of the gallbladder or in the region of the gallbladder.

Primary Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumor/Carcinoid of the Prostate: Case Report and Review of Literature

Primary well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (WDNT)/carcinoid of the genitourinary tract is rare. Many WDNT reported in the prostate gland have been seen in close association with conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma and/or label for prostate-specific immunohistochemical markers and are best considered prostatic adenocarcinomas with "carcinoid-like" features. We present a case of primary WDNT/carcinoid incidentally detected in a 67-year-old man who underwent radical prostatectomy for Grade group 2 prostatic adenocarcinoma. Morphologically, the neuroendocrine (NE) lesion appeared distinct from the prostatic adenocarcinoma, labeled for NE markers, was negative for prostatic markers (NKX3.1, PSA, and ERG), and showed an overall low Ki-67 proliferation index (<1%). Follow-up was uneventful with no evidence of residual disease or metastasis.

A relook at gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours as per 2019 WHO classification-A tertiary centre experience

INTRODUCTION

Neuroendocrine neoplasm of GIT (gastrointestinal tract) and pancreas is heterogenous with variable clinical features and disease outcomes. Despite multiple attempts of risk stratification by grading and staging, some have unpredictable clinical courses. Well-differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine tumour (G3NET) is a recent subcategory introduced in the 2019 WHO classification based on morphology, molecular profile and prognosis distinguishing it from neuroendocrine carcinoma(NEC). This study aimed at describing the spectrum of NENs encountered in a tertiary centre with focus on reclassifying previously reported G3 tumours into G3 NET and NEC and comparing the survival between them.

METHODOLOGY

This is an 8-year retrospective study of all gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms reclassified according to the 2019 WHO classification based on morphology and Ki-67 index with analysis of the survival rates between the categories. Minimum follow-up period was 20 months.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients with NENs of gastro-entero-pancreas were included, with median age group of 40-60 years (age range 9 to 79 years) and male:female ratio of 1.7:1. The tumour grade correlated with the TNM staging and most of the syndromic NETs were low grade. Eleven percent of the tumours were reclassified as well-differentiated G3NETs. The survival of G3 NETs was higher than NEC.

CONCLUSION

Grading of NEN is vital for therapeutic decisions and for prognostication. Currently, morphology is the key to recognise the well-differentiated G3 NETs, but can be subject to interobserver variability. Molecular surrogates may play a role in accurately identifying these entities, the validity of which is warranted.

Prognostic differences in grading and metastatic lymph node pattern in patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumors

PURPOSE

Neuroendocrine tumors of the small intestine (si-NET) describe a heterogenous group of neoplasms. Based on the Ki67 proliferation index si-NET are divided into G1 (Ki67 < 2%), G2 (Ki67 3-20%) and rarely G3 (Ki67 > 20%) tumors. However, few studies evaluate the impact of tumor grading on prognosis in si-NET. Moreover, si-NET can form distinct lymphatic spread patterns to the mesenteric root, aortocaval lymph nodes, and distant organs. This study aims to identify prognostic factors within the lymphatic spread patterns and grading.

METHODS

Demographic, pathological, and surgical data of 208 (90 male, 118 female) individuals with si-NETs treated at Charité University Medicine Berlin between 2010 and 2020 were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

A total of 113 (54.5%) specimens were defined as G1 and 93 (44.7%) as G2 tumors. Interestingly, splitting the G2 group in two subgroups: G2 low (Ki67 3-9%) and G2 high (Ki67 10-20%), displayed significant differences in overall survival (OS) (p = 0.008) and progression free survival (PFS) (p = 0.004) between these subgroups. Remission after surgery was less often achieved in patients with higher Ki67 index (> 10%). Lymph node metastases (N +) were present in 174 (83.6%) patients. Patients with isolated locoregional disease showed better PFS and OS in comparison to patients with additional aortocaval and distant lymph node metastases.

CONCLUSION

Lymphatic spread pattern influences patient outcome. In G2 tumors, low and high grading shows heterogenous outcome in OS and PFS. Differentiation within this group might impact follow-up, adjuvant treatment, and surgical strategy.

Transplantation for metastatic liver disease

The liver is a common site of metastases from many cancers, particularly those originating in the gastrointestinal tract. Liver transplantation is an uncommonly used but promising and at times controversial treatment option for neuroendocrine and colorectal liver metastases. Transplantation with meticulous patient selection has been associated with excellent long-term outcomes in individuals with neuroendocrine liver metastases, but questions remain regarding the role of transplantation in those who could also be eligible for hepatectomy, the role of neoadjuvant/adjuvant treatments in minimising recurrence, and the optimal timing of the procedure. A prospective pilot study of liver transplantation for unresectable colorectal liver metastases that reported a 5-year overall survival rate of 60% reinvigorated interest in this area following initially dismal outcomes. This has been followed by larger studies, and prospective trials are ongoing to quantify the potential benefits of liver transplantation over palliative chemotherapy. This review provides a critical summary of currently available knowledge on liver transplantation for neuroendocrine and colorectal liver metastases, and highlights avenues for further study to address gaps in the evidence base.

Digestive MiNENs: Could histological classification and molecular characterization drive clinical outcome and therapeutic approach?

Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) are epithelial neoplasms in which neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine discrete components are combined, each of which constitutes ≥ 30% of the neoplasm. The finding of an additional neuroendocrine component seems to characterize the tumor's biological behavior. Few studies have proved MiNENs histogenetic and molecular characterization, and the development of molecular markers for more accurate classification of MiNENs represents a clinical need. However, a common origin of the neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine components from a pluripotent cancer stem cell could be suggested. The optimal clinical management of MiNENS is largely unknown. Whenever feasible, curative-intent resection should be performed for localized disease; in advanced disease, the treatment should be targeted to the component responsible for the metastatic spreading. This paper provides a revision of the current knowledge on MiNENs, focusing on available evidence about their molecular characterization to suggest a prognostic stratification of these rare forms.

Development and validation of a survival prediction model and risk stratification for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

PURPOSE

We explored risk variables associated with cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs) and created a network dynamic nomogram model to predict patient survival time.

METHODS

A total of 7750 patients with PNENs were included in this analysis, including 134 with functional PNENs and 7616 with nonfunctional PNENs. Clinical feature and prognosis differences between functional and nonfunctional PNENs were compared. Independent prognostic factors affecting CSS were analyzed by univariate and multifactorial Cox regression. Nomogram and web-based prognosis prediction of PNENs were developed and validated by C indices, decision curve analysis, and calibration plots.

RESULTS

Patients with functional PNENs were younger at diagnosis than those with nonfunctional PNENs. Functional PNENs had better prognoses than nonfunctional PNENs (5-year survival rates: 78.55% and 71.10%, respectively). Univariate and multifactorial Cox regression analyses showed that tumor infiltration (T), nodal metastasis (N), metastasis (M), tumor site, differentiation grade, age, marital status, and surgical treatment were independent prognostic risk factors for CSS, which were included in the prognostic nomogram and web-based prognosis calculator. The calibration plots and decision curve analysis showed that the nomogram had excellent prediction and clinical practical ability. The C indices for CSS in the training and validation cohorts were 0.848 (95% CI 0.838-0.8578) and 0.823 (95% CI 0.807-0.839), respectively. We scored all patients according to the nomogram and divided patients into three different risk groups. The prognosis of the low-risk population was significantly better than those of the middle- and high-risk populations based on Kaplan-Meier survival curve.

CONCLUSION

We analyzed the clinical features of PNENs and developed a convenient and web dynamic nomogram to predict CSS.

Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Gastrointestinal Tract versus Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Gynaecological Tract-Comparison of the Risk Factors and Non-Surgical Treatment Efficacy

Neuroendocrine tumours of the gastrointestinal tract are rare. The incidence has increased in recent years due to improvements in diagnostic methods for detecting these lesions. These tumours have a poor prognosis, especially when detected at an advanced stage. The basis of the treatment is resection, and non-surgical treatments are also standard in the treatment process. The situation is similar in even rarer neuroendocrine tumours of the reproductive tract, which are associated with an equally poor prognosis. In this article, we focus on learning about the risk factors (including genetic mutations) that increase the risk of the disease and comparing the effectiveness of non-surgical treatments-chemotherapy, radiotherapy, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, somatostatin analogues, and immunotherapy. The efficacy of these treatments varies, and immunotherapy appears to be a promising form of treatment; however, this requires further research.

Surgical Approach to Liver Metastases in GEP-NET in a Tertiary Reference Center

Indications for liver resection in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) vary from liver resection with curative intent to tumor debulking or tissue sampling for histopathological characterization. With increasing expertise, the number of minimally invasive liver surgeries (MILS) in GEP-NET patients has increased. However, the influence on the oncological outcome has hardly been described. The clinicopathological data of patients who underwent liver resection for hepatic metastases of GEP-NET at the Department of Surgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, were analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to compare MILS with open liver surgery (OLS). In total, 22 patients underwent liver surgery with curative intent, and 30 debulking surgeries were analyzed. Disease-free survival (DFS) was longer than progression-free survival (PFS) (10 vs. 24 months), whereas overall survival (OS) did not differ significantly (p = 0.588). Thirty-nine (75%) liver resections were performed as OLS, and thirteen (25%) as MILS. After PSM, a shorter length of hospital stay was found for the MILS group (14 vs. 10 d, p = 0.034), while neither DFS/PFS nor OS differed significantly. Both curative intended and cytoreductive resection of hepatic GEP-NET metastases achieved excellent outcomes. MILS led to a reduced length of hospital, while preserving a good oncological outcome.

What have we learnt from the past - would treatment decisions for GEP-NET patients differ between 2012 to 2016 by the new recommendations in 2022?

BACKGROUND

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors with a broad range of local and systemic treatment options. Still a lack of data regarding treatment sequences exists. The aim of this study was to analyse outcomes in GEP-NETs depending on stage and treatment steps and compare our treatment decisions to the latest treatment recommendations of European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) 2020 for GEP-NETs.

METHODS

Patients were included in this retrospective single-center analysis from 2012-2016. All patients suffering from a GEP-NET, who were screened, treated or evaluated at ENETS Center in Zurich, Switzerland were included in analysis. Patients with any other diagnosis of NET were not included. We used Kaplan Meier estimator as well as Cox regression to compare survival rates between different sites of localization, grades or stages and treatment sequences.

RESULTS

Overall, we identified 256 GEP-NETs, most in advanced stage (62%) and located in small intestine tract or pancreatic gland. Survival depended on stage, grade, primary site and duration of response for the early systemic treatment. On average patients underwent 2.6 different treatment modalities, mostly depending on stage and higher tumor grade. Surgery was performed early but also in advanced stages, usually followed by Somatostatine-Agonist modalities. In distant disease (Stage IV), we investigated a positive effect of PFS after treatment with Somatostatine Analogues (SSA) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21 - 0.97; p = 0.04) and systemic treatment (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.26 - 0.99; p = 0.047) if patients underwent prior surgery or endoscopic resection. Kaplan Meier distributions predict shorter OS in distant disease (Stage IV), (Figure. 1; HR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.46 - 2.89; log-rank test, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This retrospective analysis presents a great overview of all patients', disease and treatment characteristics of GEP-NETs at ENETS Center in Zurich, Switzerland. We illustrated survival (PFS) depending on implemented therapies. According to these findings, we formed a suggested treatment algorithm for advanced GEP-NETs, which does not differ from the latest treatment recommendation by ESMO guidelines for GEP-NETs. The results of this project may define GEP-NET patients' selection for upcoming clinical prospective studies.

Rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms: what the radiologists should know

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the rectum (R-NENs) are rare; however, their incidence has increased almost threefold in the last few decades. Imaging of R-NENs includes two primary categories: anatomic/morphologic imaging comprised of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and functional/molecular imaging comprising of planar scintigraphy, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and positron emission tomography (PET). The management depends on stage, dimension, atypical features, histological grade, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI). Low-risk local R-NENs can be resected endoscopically, and high-risk or locally advanced neoplasms can be treated with radical surgery and lymphadenectomy and/or chemoradiation. The review article focuses on imaging illustrations and discusses applications of different imaging modalities in diagnosing and managing R-NENs.

Clinicopathologic profile of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms in a referral center of South India

BACKGROUND

The neuroendocrine system of the gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) region gives rise to unique, heterogeneous malignancies that need a high index of suspicion to make a diagnosis owing to their indolent course.

AIMS

The present study aimed to find the incidence and the differences in the morphologic and immunohistochemical profile of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEPNET) in a referral center of South India, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.

METHODS

There were 55 gastroenteropancreatic region neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) assessed for demographic, clinical and radiological features. Gross morphological features, histopathological features, mitotic index, Ki67 proliferation index, and immunohistochemical positivity for synaptophysin, chromogranin-A, CD-56, NSE (Neuron Specific Enolase) and pan-cytokeratin (Pan-CK) were also assessed.

RESULTS

The majority were nonfunctional tumors presenting with abdominal pain, gastrointestinal bleed, vomiting, jaundice, and loss of weight and appetite. The sites of involvement according to the order of frequency were duodenum, stomach, rectum, pancreas, ileum, appendix and jejunum. The endoscopic appearance of duodenal and jejunal tumors showed polypoidal, nodular and ulceroproliferative growth. These tumors were diagnosed by preoperative biopsy; 54% of them were grade-1 neuroendocrine tumors exhibiting nesting, trabecular, cord, and solid sheet patterns. All 55 cases were synaptophysin-positive with variable positivity for chromogranin, neuron-specific enolase, CD56, and Pan-CK. Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas (MANECs) involving the duodenum and stomach comprised 7.3% of all GEPNETs. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors constituted 9% of all tumors; one was multifocal. Lymph node metastasis was seen in 12/55 tumors; 6/12 showed liver metastasis also. All metastasizing tumors measured less than 4 cm in size. Statistical correlation of the tumor grade, mitotic count and Ki67 index as analysed by Spearman's correlation between the paired data denoted by r^s in 55 tumors showed a strong correlation between mitotic count and Ki67 index; a moderate correlation was noted between the tumor grade and Ki67 index.

CONCLUSION

The clinicopathologic profile of 55 GEPNET revealed a majority to be sporadic Grade 1 tumor. Tumors that showed lymph node and liver metastasis were less than 4 cm in size. MANECs were found in the duodenum and stomach.

Treatment of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms with Radiolabeled Peptides-Where Are We Now

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has been one of the most successful and exciting examples of theranostics in nuclear medicine in recent decades and is now firmly embedded in many treatment algorithms for unresectable or metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) worldwide. It is widely considered to be an effective treatment for well- or moderately differentiated neoplasms, which express high levels of somatostatin receptors that can be selectively targeted. This review article outlines the scientific basis of PRRT in treatment of NENs and describes its discovery dating back to the early 1990s. Early treatments utilizing Indium-111, a γ-emitter, showed promise in reduction in tumor size and improvement in biochemistry, but were also met with high radiation doses and myelotoxic and nephrotoxic effects. Subsequently, stable conjugation of DOTA-peptides with β-emitting radionuclides, such as Yttrium-90 and Lutetium-177, served as a breakthrough for PRRT and studies highlighted their potential in eliciting progression-free survival and quality of life benefits. This article will also elaborate on the key trials which paved the way for its approval and will discuss therapeutic considerations, such as patient selection and administration technique, to optimize its use.

Progress in the Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are a heterogeneous and orphan group of neoplasms that vary in their histology, clinical features, prognosis, and management. The treatment of PNETs is highly dependent on the stage at presentation, tumor grade and differentiation, presence of symptoms from hormonal overproduction or from local growth, tumor burden, and rate of progression. The US Food and Drug Administration has recently approved many novel treatments, which have altered decision making and positively impacted the care and prognosis of these patients. In this review, we focus on the significant progress made in the management of PNETs over the past decade, as well as the active areas of research. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Medicine, Volume 73 is January 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

Chronotype: what role in the context of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors?

BACKGROUND

Chronotype is defined as a trait determining the subject circadian preference in behavioral and biological rhythms relative to external light-dark cycle. Although individual differences in chronotype have been associated with an increased risk of developing some types of cancer, no studies have been carried out in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET).

MATERIALS

We investigate the differences in chronotype between 109 GEP-NET and 109 healthy subjects, gender-, age-, and BMI-matched; and its correlation with tumor aggressiveness.

RESULTS

GEP-NET patients have a lower chronotype score (p = 0.035) and a higher percentage of evening chronotype (p = 0.003) than controls. GEP-NET patients with morning chronotype had lower BMI, waist circumference, and higher percentage of MetS (p < 0.001) than evening type. Interestingly, considering the clinical pathological characteristics, patients with the presence of metastasis, grading G2, and in progressive disease presented the lower chronotype score (p = 0.004, p < 0.001, and p = 0.002; respectively) compared to other categories. Chronotype score was negatively associated with anthropometric measurements, metabolic profile, percentage of MetS, and Ki67 index (p < 0.001 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

GEP-NET patients have an unhealthy metabolic profile and present more commonly an evening chronotype. These results support the importance of including the assessment of chronotype in an adjunctive tool for the prevention of metabolic alterations and tumor aggressiveness of GEP-NET.

Ki67 does not predict recurrence for low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms with peritoneal dissemination after cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC

Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMN) can disseminate to become low-grade mucinous carcinoma peritonei (LGMCP), which is optimally treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC). Approximately half of the patients with LGMCP recur despite complete cytoreduction, and risk factors for recurrence are poorly understood. We sought to evaluate if Ki67 predicts progression of LGMCP after CRS/HIPEC. A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed to identify patients treated with complete CRS/HIPEC for LGMCP from 2008 to 2019 with Ki67 assessed. Patient characteristics, histologic data, average and focally high "hotspot") Ki67 index, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Ki-67 immunostain was performed on the histologic section with the highest cellularity and architectural complexity. Forty-four patients with LGMCP (55% male, median age 61) were identified. The median Ki67 score and hotspot Ki67 score was 15% (1-70) and 50% (1-90), respectively. On univariate analysis, average Ki67 and hotspot Ki67 were not predictive of PFS when analyzed as continuous normalized values (HR 1.0, p = 0.79 and HR 1.1, p = 0.38, respectively) or as categorical values when stratified by the median (HR 0.9, p = 0.67 and HR 1.0, p = 0.93). This remained true on multivariate analysis when stratified for peritoneal cancer index, CEA, and completeness of cytoreduction score for both normalized Ki67 and hotspot Ki67 (HR 0.9 [95% CI 0.8-1.3], p = 0.94 and HR 1.04 [95% CI 0.8-1.3], p = 0.73, respectively). Ki67 failed to predict disease recurrence for patients with LGMCP in this cohort.

Update on Histological Reporting Changes in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Classification and nomenclature of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) have frequently changed over the last years. These changes reflect both increasing knowledge and international standardisation.

RECENT FINDINGS

The most recent changes in the Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic system induced the concept of well-differentiated NET with high proliferation rate (NET G3), explaining partially the heterogeneity of G3 NEN. Even if the nomenclature in pulmonary NEN is still different, the terms 'carcinoid' and 'atypical carcinoid' are widely overlapping with NET G1 and NET G2. Molecular data shows an additional heterogeneity both in well-differentiated NET and poorly differentiated NEC. However, no studies are available demonstrating clinical usefulness yet. The heterogeneity of NEN regarding the organ of origin, differentiation and molecular subtypes make development of personalised therapy a challenge needing more international and interdisciplinary collaborations and clinical trials allowing stratification according to biological subgroups.

Ki-67 Proliferation Index Assessment in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors by Digital Image Analysis With Stringent Case and Hotspot Level Concordance Requirements

OBJECTIVES

The Ki-67 proliferation index is integral to gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (GEP-NET) assessment. Automated Ki-67 measurement would aid clinical workflows, but adoption has lagged owing to concerns of nonequivalency. We sought to address this concern by comparing 2 digital image analysis (DIA) platforms to manual counting with same-case/different-hotspot and same-hotspot/different-methodology concordance assessment.

METHODS

We assembled a cohort of GEP-NETs (n = 20) from 16 patients. Two sets of Ki-67 hotspots were manually counted by three observers and by two DIA platforms, QuantCenter and HALO. Concordance between methods and observers was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) measures. For each comparison pair, the number of cases within ±0.2xKi-67 of its comparator was assessed.

RESULTS

DIA Ki-67 showed excellent correlation with manual counting, and ICC was excellent in both within-hotspot and case-level assessments. In expert-vs-DIA, DIA-vs-DIA, or expert-vs-expert comparisons, the best-performing was DIA Ki-67 by QuantCenter, which showed 65% cases within ±0.2xKi-67 of manual counting.

CONCLUSIONS

Ki-67 measurement by DIA is highly correlated with expert-assessed values. However, close concordance by strict criteria (>80% within ±0.2xKi-67) is not seen with DIA-vs-expert or expert-vs-expert comparisons. The results show analytic noninferiority and support widespread adoption of carefully optimized and validated DIA Ki-67.

Alterations in Ki67 Labeling Following Treatment of Poorly Differentiated Neuroendocrine Carcinomas: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall

Assessment of the Ki67 index is critical for grading well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (WD-NETs), which can show a broad range of labeling that defines the WHO grade (G1-G3). Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (PD-NECs) have a relatively high Ki67 index, >20% in all cases and commonly exceeding 50%. After anecdotally observing PD-NECs with an unexpectedly low and heterogeneous Ki67 index following chemotherapy in 5 cases, we identified 15 additional cases of treated high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (HG-NENs). The study cohort comprised 20 cases; 11 PD-NECs, 8 mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas, and 1 WD-NET, G3 from various anatomic sites (gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, larynx, lung, and breast). The Ki67 index was evaluated on pretreatment (when available) and posttreatment samples. Topographic heterogeneity in the Ki67 index was expressed using a semi-quantitative score of 0 (no heterogeneity) to 5 (>80% difference between maximal Ki67 and minimal Ki67 indices). Relative to the pretreatment group (n=9, mean Ki67 of 86.3%, range 80% to 100%), the neoplasms in the posttreatment group (n=20, mean Ki67 of 47.7%, range 1% to 90%) showed a significantly lower Ki67 index (18/20 cases). Of the 18 cases with a relatively low Ki67 index, 15 showed heterogeneous labeling (mean heterogeneity score of 2.3, range 1 to 5) and in 3 cases it was a homogeneously low. This phenomenon was observed in all subtypes of HG-NENs. In 6 cases, the alterations in Ki67 index following treatment were sufficient to place these HG-NENs in the WHO G1 or G2 grade, erroneously suggesting a diagnosis of WD-NET, and in 9 cases there was sufficient heterogeneity in the Ki67 index to suggest that a limited biopsy may sample an area of low Ki67, even though hotspot regions with a Ki67 index of >20% persisted. In 7 cases, the alterations in the Ki67 index were accompanied by morphologic features resembling a WD-NET. These observations suggest that there is a potential for misinterpretation of previously treated PD-NECs as WD-NETs, or for assigning a lower grade in G3 WD-NETs. While the prognostic significance of treatment-associated alterations in Ki67 index is unknown, awareness of this phenomenon is important to avoid this diagnostic pitfall when evaluating treated NENs.

Capecitabine-Temozolomide in Advanced Grade 2 and Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Benefits of Chemotherapy in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms with Significant 18FDG Uptake

INTRODUCTION

Capecitabine-temozolomide (CAPTEM) chemotherapy, alone or with concurrent peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), has activity in advanced WHO grade 2 and grade 3 neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). The objective of this study was to evaluate the activity of the CAPTEM in patients with grade 2 and grade 3 NENs and identify prognostic factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic grade 2 and grade 3 NENs, who were having baseline significant dual uptake on 68Ga-DOTATATE/18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET-CT scan and treated with CAPTEM chemotherapy between January 2014 and December 2019 at Tata Memorial Hospital, was conducted. The clinical variables and survival data were collected. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 68 patients received the CAPTEM regimen, of whom 29 patients (43%) received CAPTEM alone and 39 patients (57%) received concurrent PRRT. The primary sites were pancreas in 32 (47%) and small intestine in 12 (18%) patients. Mean Ki-67 index was 12.6% (range: 3-50). Forty-five patients (65%) were treatment naïve. There were no significant differences in baseline clinical variables between patients treated with CAPTEM alone or with CAPTEM-PRRT. Both regimens were well tolerated. With a median follow-up of 22.1 months, the median PFS for the entire cohort was 27.5 months. There was no statistical difference in the median PFS between patients receiving CAPTEM alone or CAPTEM-PRRT (33.7 vs. 22 months; p = 0.199). A Ki-67 index of >5% predicted for inferior PFS on multivariate analysis (24 versus 73.8 months; p = 0.04; hazard ratio -3.77; 95% confidence interval: 1.07-13.26).

CONCLUSION

CAPTEM, alone or concurrent with PRRT, has a significant activity in grade 2 and grade 3 NENs with dual SSTR and 18FDG expression. A Ki-67 index >5% predicts strongly for inferior outcomes and should be further explored as a prognostic cutoff in grade 2 NENs. Early initiation of CAPTEM should be considered in this group of tumors with significant baseline 18FDG expression.

Development and Validation of a Score for Screening Suicide of Patients With Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Background: If the diagnosis of neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) increases the risk of patients to commit suicide has not been investigated so far. Identifying NEN patients at risk to commit suicide is important to increase their life quality and life expectancy. Methods and findings: Cancer cases were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program and were divided into the NEN and the non-NEN cohorts. Subsequently, the NEN patients were randomly split into a training data set and a validation data set. Analyzing the training data set, we developed a score for assessing the risk to commit suicide for patients with NEN. In addition, we validated the score using the validation data set and evaluated, if this score could also be applied to other cancer entities by using the test data set, a non-NEN cohort. The odds ratio (OR) of suicide between NEN and non-NEN patients was determined. Moreover, the performance of a score was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic curve and the area under the curve (AUC). Compared to non-NEN, NEN significantly increased the risk of suicide to 1.8-fold (NEN vs. non-NEN; OR, 1.832; P < 0.001). In addition, we observed that age, gender, race, marital status, tumor stage, histologic grade, surgery, and chemotherapy were associated with suicide among NEN patients; and a synthesized score based on these factors could significantly distinguish suicide individuals from non-suicide individuals in the training data set (AUC, 0.829; P < 0.001) and in the validation data set (AUC, 0.735; P < 0.001). This score also had a good performance when it was assessed by the test data set (AUC, 0.690; P < 0.001). This demonstrates that the score might also be applicable to other cancer entities. Conclusions: This population-based study suggests that NEN patients have a higher risk of suicide than non-NEN patients. In addition, this study provided a score, which can identify NEN patients at high-risk of committing suicide. Thus, this score in combination with current screening and prevention strategies for suicide may improve life quality and life expectancy of NEN patients.

Patient reported experience of the burden of neuroendocrine tumors and impact of eSHINE Patient Support Program on patient quality of life

AIM

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are an uncommon cancer and difficult to diagnose and treat. Treatment is complicated by debilitating side effects, impacting quality of life. This Australia-wide survey aimed to increase our understanding of the impact and burden of NETs on patient quality of life (QoL) and to assess the benefit of a patient support program (eSHINE).

METHOD

Consented patients from the eSHINE mailing list (n = 267) were invited to participate in an electronic self-reported survey comprising 29 questions on clinical characteristics, diagnosis, sociodemographics, impact of living with NETs and benefits of a patient support program. No formal sample size was calculated. All analyses were descriptive.

RESULTS

A total of 144 participants (54%) responded. A total of 129 (48%) completed all questions. Approximately half of respondents were female, from metropolitan and rural areas, aged over 65 years and had a primary diagnosis of gastrointestinal NETs. Fifty-eight percent had been diagnosed over 5 years ago. Twenty-seven percent reported seeing four or more healthcare professionals prior to being diagnosed. Living with NETs had a large impact on patients' QoL. 83.5% reported fatigue, 76% felt their emotional health was impacted by NETs and 75% reported reduced ability to participate in leisure activities. Access to a supportive network to manage and treat NETs was extremely important to participants. Eighty-five percent of respondents reported the eSHINE program had a positive impact on their QoL.

CONCLUSION

Patients value support from healthcare professionals and patient support programs such as eSHINE in managing NETs. The eSHINE Patient Support Program has a positive impact on patient QoL.

Clinical Features and Long-Term Survival of Metastatic Hepatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Secondary to Gastroenteropancreatic Site: An Analysis by Applying the Grading Classification

Method

Data of patients who were surgically treated and clinicopathologically diagnosed as (MH)-NENs secondary to (GEP)-NENs at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2006 to December 2018 were retrospectively collected and analyzed by the grading classification for (GEP)-NENs.

Results

We identified 150 patients with (MH)-NENs secondary to (GEP)-NENs, including 10 patients with G1 NETs, 26 with G2 NETs, 33 with G3 NETs, and 81 with G3 NECs. There were significant differences between patients with G1/G2/G3 NETs and those with G3 NECs, such as age at diagnosis (P=0.041), synchronous liver lesion (P=0.032), incidental diagnosis (P=0.014), tumor largest diameter (P=0.047), vascular invasion (P=0.017), and extrahepatic metastatic disease (P=0.029). The estimated 3-year overall survival for patients with G1 NETs, G2 NETs, G3 NETs, and G3 NECs was 100%, 79.4%, 49.5%, and 20.7%, respectively (P < 0.001). The survival of G1 NETs or G2 NETs was significantly better than that of G3 NETs (P=0.013, P=0.037, respectively) and G3 NECs (P=0.001, P < 0.001; respectively). Patients with G3 NECs present notably worse survival than those with G3 NETs (P=0.012), while survival comparison between G1 NETs and G2 NETs was not statistically different (P=0.131). The grading classification for (GEP)-NENs was an effective independent predictor of survival for (MH)-NENs secondary to (GEP)-NENs (hazard ratio: 4.234; 95% confidence intervals: 1.984–6.763; P=0.003).

Conclusion

Our demonstration revealed that the grading classification for (GEP)-NENs could well stratify (MH)-NENs secondary to (GEP)-NENs into prognostic groups and supported its wide use in clinical practice.

World Health Organization grading classification for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: a comprehensive analysis from a large Chinese institution

Background

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (p-NENs) are a group of highly heterogeneous tumors with distinct clinicopathological features and long-term prognosis. In 2017, in order to better stratify patients into prognostic groups and predicting their outcomes, World Health Organization (WHO) officially updated its grading system for p-NENs which distinguished these neoplasms among Grading 1 (G1) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (p-NETs), G2 p-NETs, G3 p-NETs and G3 pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (p-NECs). However, this new grading classification for p-NENs has not yet been rigorously validated.

Methods

Data of patients who were surgically treated and histopathologically diagnosed as p-NENs at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2002 to December 2018 were retrospectively collected and analyzed according the novel WHO 2017 grading classification.

Results

We eventually enrolled 480 eligible patients with p-NENs in our present study, in which 150 patients with WHO 2017 G1 p-NETs, 158 with G2 p-NETs, 64 with G3 p-NETs and 108 with G3 p-NECs were identified. The estimated 5-year overall survival for patients with G1 p-NETs, G2 p-NETs, G3 p-NETs and G3 p-NECs was 75.8, 58.4, 35.1 and 11.1%, with a median survival time of 85.3mons, 67.4mons, 51.3mons and 26.8mons, respectively. Patients with G2 p-NETs present notably worse survival than those with G1 p-NETs (P = 0.03). Survival of G3 p-NETs were significantly worse than that of G1 p-NETs or G2 p-NETs (P < 0.001, P = 0.023, respectively), as well as that when comparing G3 p-NECs with G1 p-NETs or G2 p-NETs (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively). Patients with G3 p-NECs showed statistically shorter survival than those with G3 p-NETs (P < 0.001). Both WHO 2017 and 2010 grading criteria could be independent predictor for the OS of p-NENs (P = 0.016, P = 0.022; respectively). The 95% confidence intervals of WHO 2017 grading classification (0.983–9.454) was slightly smaller than that of WHO 2010 criteria (0.201–13.374), indicating a relatively more accurate predicting ability for the prognosis of p-NENs.

Conclusion

The WHO 2017 grading classification for p-NENs could successfully allocate patients into four groups with distinct clinical features and significant survival differences, which might be superior to the WHO 2010 criteria for its better prognostic stratification and more accurate predicting ability.

Comparison of different anti-Ki67 antibody clones and hot-spot sizes for assessing proliferative index and grading in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours using manual and image analysis

AIMS

Ki67 proliferative index (PI) is essential for grading gastroenteric and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP NETs). Analytical and preanalytical variables can affect Ki67 PI. In contrast to counting methodology, until now little attention has focused on the question of clone equivalence and the effect of hot-spot size on Ki67 PI in GEP NETs. Using manual counting and image analysis, this study compared the Ki67 PI achieved using MM1, K2 and 30-9 to MIB1, a clone which has been validated for, and is referenced in, guidelines relating to assessment of Ki67 PI in GEP NETs.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Forty-two pancreatic NETs were each immunohistochemically stained for the anti-Ki67 clones MIB1, MM1, K2 and 30-9. Ki67 PI was calculated manually and by image analysis, the latter using three different hot-spot sizes. In manual comparisons using single hot-spot high-power fields, non-MIB1 clones overestimated Ki67 PI compared to MIB1, resulting in grading discordances. Image analysis shows good agreement with manual Ki67 PI but a tendency to overestimate absolute Ki67 PI. Increasing the size of tumour hot-spot from 500 to 2000 cells resulted in a decrease in Ki67 PI.

CONCLUSION

Different anti-Ki67 clones do not produce equivalent PIs in GEP NETs, and clone selection may therefore affect patient care. Increasing the hot-spot size decreases the Ki67 PI. Greater standardisation in terms of antibody clone selection and hot-spot size is required for grading GEP NETs. Image analysis is an effective tool for assisting Ki67 assessment and allows easier standardisation of the size of the tumour hot-spot.

Colorectal neuroendocrine tumors: A case series

INTRODUCTION

Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) of the colon and sigmoid colon are uncommon compared to colorectal adenocarcinoma. Few reports have been made of NET of the colon and sigmoid colon that presents with peritonitis and large bowel obstruction.

CASE PRESENTATION

Here, we report two cases of NET of the colon and sigmoid colon, which were diagnosed and treated at our institution. In our first case, a 66-year-old man with a history of abdominal distension was diagnosed with NET via histopathology of the sigmoid colon. The second case involved a 45-year-old woman with the chief complaints of abdominal distention and inability to defecate; specimen histopathology of the descending colon showed neuroendocrine carcinoma features. Clinical outcome was very poor in our patients: eight months after the resection, the second patient demonstrated a sign of metastasis on the liver.

CONCLUSION

An uncommon case of colon and sigmoid colon carcinoma with neuroendocrine and diagnostic difficulties precludes an exact description of the initial diagnostic criteria and management. Thus, our case series offers an overview of initial symptoms, radiological and histopathological features for early diagnosis, and proper management of NET.

The Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Digestive Tract: Diagnosis, Treatment and Nutrition

Nuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a group of rare neoplasms originating from dispersed neuroendocrine cells, mainly of the digestive and respiratory tract, showing characteristic histology and immunoprofile contributing to classification of NENs. Some NENs have the ability to produce biogenic amines and peptide hormones, which may be associated with clinical syndromes like, e.g., the carcinoid syndrome caused by unmetabolized overproduced serotonin, hypoglycemic syndrome in case of insulinoma, or Zollinger-Ellison syndrome accompanying gastrinoma. Diagnostics for these include ultrasound with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). Different nuclear medicine procedures can also be used, like somatostatin analogues scintigraphy (SRS) and 68Ga-Dota-Peptide PET/CT, as well as biochemical methods to determine the level of general neuroendocrine markers, such as chromogranin A (CgA), 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid (5-HIAA), synaptopfysin and cell type-specific peptide hormones, and neurotransmitters like gastrin, insulin, serotonin, and histamine. NENs influence the whole organism by modulating metabolism. The treatment options for neuroendocrine neoplasms include surgery, somatostatin analogue therapy, radionuclide therapy, chemotherapy, molecular targeted therapies, alpha-interferon therapy, and inhibitors of serotonin production. In the case of hypersensitivity to biogenic amines, a diet that limits the main sources of amines should be used. The symptoms are usually connected with histamine, tyramine and putrescine. Exogenic sources of histamine are products that take a long time to mature and ferment. Patients with a genetic insufficiency of the diamine oxidase enzyme (DAO), and those that take medicine belonging to the group of monoamine oxidases (MAO), are particularly susceptible to the negative effects of amines. Diet plays an important role in the initiation, promotion, and progression of cancers. As a result of the illness, the consumption of some nutrients can be reduced, leading to nutritional deficiencies and resulting in malnutrition. Changes in metabolism may lead to cachexia in some patients suffering from NENs. The aim of this narrative review was to advance the knowledge in this area, and to determine possibilities related to dietary support. The authors also paid attention to role of biogenic amines in the treatment of patients with NENs. We can use this information to better understand nutritional issues faced by patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs), and to help inform the development of screening tools and clinical practice guidelines.

Rectal neuroendocrine carcinoma: case report of a rare entity and perspective review of promising agents

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) comprise a heterogeneous group of tumours, which can be classified into neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) and mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs). To date, there is no consensus regarding the optimal therapy, which usually depends on the primary location and classification, according to morphological features of differentiation and proliferation rates. Nevertheless, multidisciplinary strategies combining medical treatments and locoregional strategies have yielded better efficacy results. Here, we report the case of a patient diagnosed with a nonfunctional rectal NECs with metastatic widespread to pelvic lymph nodes and bilateral lung metastases. The patient received three cycles of platinum-etoposide, concomitantly with palliative radiotherapy. Although CT scan after three cycles showed a significant partial response, there was an early fatal progression only 3 months after having stopped systemic therapy. As formerly described in the literature, this case highlights the aggressive behaviour of NECs, rare tumours that often present in advanced stages at diagnosis. Lately, new insights into the molecular biology of NECs have unveiled the possibility of using novel drugs, such as targeted agents or immunotherapy, in molecularly selected subgroups of patients. In this review, we discuss the current management of this rare entity and provide an overview of the most relevant molecular findings, whilst illustrating the potential value that prescreening panels can offer, searching for actionable targets (MSI/dMMR, PD-L1, BRAF^v600E) to guide therapy with promising agents that could fill a void in this disease.