Subcutaneous immunoglobulin use in immunoglobulin-naive patients with primary immunodeficiency: a systematic review

Population pharmacokinetics of immunoglobulin G after intravenous, subcutaneous, or hyaluronidase-facilitated subcutaneous administration in immunoglobulin-naive patients with primary immunodeficiencies

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) replacement therapy is the standard of care for patients with primary immunodeficiencies with antibody deficiencies. Intravenous (IVIG), subcutaneous (SCIG), and hyaluronidase-facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin (fSCIG) therapies differ in their pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles, administration routes, and dosing regimens. Information on use of subcutaneous therapy in IgG treatment-naive patients is limited. This study used population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model-based simulations to characterize IgG PKs in IgG-naive patients with varying disease severity across several IVIG, SCIG, and fSCIG dosing regimens. An integrated popPK model, developed and validated using data from eight clinical trials, was utilized to simulate scenarios that varied by therapy, loading regimen, maintenance dose (equivalent to 400, 600, or 800 mg/kg every 4 weeks [Q4W]), and baseline endogenous total IgG concentration (1.5 or 4.0 g/L). Simulations were performed for age groups of 2-<6, 6-<12, 12-<18, and ≥18 years. Steady-state serum trough IgG concentrations (Cmin,ss), proportion of patients achieving Cmin,ss ≥ 7 g/L, and days taken to reach this threshold were summarized. SCIG provided greater mean Cmin,ss values than IVIG and fSCIG for any scenario. Across all therapies, Cmin,ss tended to increase with age, dose, and endogenous concentration. Although the findings are model-based and not a summarization of real-world observations, doses ≥ 800 mg/kg Q4W with corresponding loading regimens are likely to be clinically appropriate for achieving target IgG concentrations in treatment-naive patients in a timely manner, especially at low endogenous starting concentrations. Therapy-specific dose adjustment based on baseline endogenous IgG concentration, clinical status, and patient characteristics may be warranted.

Clinical outcomes of immunoglobulin treatment for patients with secondary antibody deficiency: Data from the Ontario immunoglobulin treatment case registry

BACKGROUND

Despite the increasing number of cases of secondary antibody deficiency (SAD) and immunoglobulin (Ig) utilization, there is a paucity of data in the literature on clinical and patient-reported outcomes in this population.

OBJECTIVE

To describe immunoglobulin utilization patterns, clinical and patient-reported outcomes in patients with SAD on immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study of patients with secondary antibody deficiency enrolled in the Ontario Immunoglobulin Treatment (ONIT) Case Registry from June 2020 to September 2022 was completed. Demographics, comorbidities, indications for immunoglobulin treatment, clinical infections at baseline and post IgRT, and patient-reported outcomes were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 140 patients (58 males; 82 females; median age 68) with SAD during the study period; 131 were on subcutaneous Ig (SCIG) and 9 were on intravenous Ig (IVIG). The most common indication was chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) (N = 52). IgRT reduced the average annual number of infections by 82.6%, emergency room (ER) visits by 84.6%, and hospitalizations by 83.3%. Overall, 84.6% of patients reported their health as better compared to before IgRT. Among those patients who switched from IVIG to SCIG (N = 35), 33.3% reported their health as the same, and 62.9% reported their health as better.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that IgRT significantly improved clinical outcomes and patient-reported general health state in patients with SAD. This study also further supports the use of SCIG in patients with SAD.

Improving Access to Therapy for Patients With Inborn Errors of Immunity: A Call to Action

Breakthroughs in sequencing technology, targeted immunotherapy, and immune reconstituting treatment have increased the pool of patients with inborn errors of immunity, requiring expertise from clinical immunologists. A growing category of immunodeficiency, presenting as primary immune regulatory disorder and secondary immunodeficiency due to targeted immune therapy for cancer and autoimmunity, has added to the growing burden of patients needing access to immune-supportive therapy. The confluence of a growing population of patients needing a clinical immunologist, complex payer structures, and inadequate health care representation will exacerbate current problems with access to therapy. Patients, health care providers, researchers, public and private payers, and industry must come together to find solutions to improve access to therapy. In this article, we reviewed the major topics regarding access to therapy for patients with immunodeficiency.

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin 16.5% for the treatment of pediatric patients with primary antibody immunodeficiency

INTRODUCTION

Human immunoglobulin (IG) administered intravenously (IVIG) or subcutaneously (SCIG) is used to prevent infections in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDDs) such as primary antibody immunodeficiencies.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides an overview of PIDD with a focus on SCIG treatment, including the properties and clinical trial results of a new SCIG 16.5% (Cutaquig, Octapharma) in pediatric patients. We also discuss the various benefits of SCIG including stable serum immunoglobulin G levels, high tolerability with fewer systemic side effects, and the flexibility of self-administration.

EXPERT OPINION

Individualized treatment for PIDD in children is necessary given the different factors that affect administration of SCIG. Variables such as the dose, dosing interval, administration sites, and ancillary equipment can be adjusted to impact the long-term satisfaction with SCIG administration in pediatric patients. The successful work that has been conducted by both professional and patient organizations to increase awareness of PIDD, especially in pediatric patients, is substantial and ongoing. The importance of early diagnosis and treatment in the pediatric patient population cannot be overstated. The safety, efficacy, and tolerability of SCIG 16.5% have been demonstrated in pediatric patients with PIDDs providing an additional therapeutic option in this vulnerable population.

A clinician's guide for administration of high-concentration and facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases

Immunoglobulin replacement therapy is the standard-of-care treatment for patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases who have impaired antibody production and function. Clinicians and patients may consider intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) or subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) options, and each route may offer different benefits for the individual. IVIG requires fewer infusion sites and less frequent infusions than some formulations of SCIG. However, SCIG does not require venous access, is associated with fewer systemic adverse infusion reactions than IVIG, and can independently be self-administered at home. Importantly, tailoring treatment experiences to the needs of the individual may improve treatment adherence and quality of life for patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases who often rely on long-term or lifelong treatment. This review aims to educate United States (US) healthcare providers on the administration process of SCIG, with a focus on more concentrated formulations of SCIG and facilitated SCIG. It provides practical guidance on initiating, optimizing, and monitoring SCIG therapy. The advantages and disadvantages of the different treatment options are also presented for discussion between the patient and clinician.