Loss of flexion during bronchoscopy: a physical experiment and case study of commercially available systems

Single Use or Disposable Flexible Bronchoscopes: Bench Top and Preclinical Comparison of Currently Available Devices

BACKGROUND

Data regarding the risk of infection related to reusable bronchoscopes, the global drive toward disposable technology and the COVID-19 pandemic have led to an increase in the use and production of single use or disposable bronchoscopes. An in-depth comparison of all available devices has not been published.

METHODS

A benchtop comparison of the Ambu^®aScope^TM, Boston Scientific^® EXALT^TM Model B, the Surgical Company Broncoflex^© Vortex, Pentax^® Medical ONE Pulmo™, and Vathin^® H-Steriscope^TM (all 2.8 mm inner dimension other than the Pentax single-use flexible bronchoscope (3 mm)) was undertaken including measurement of maximal flexion and extension angles, thumb force required and suction with and without biopsy forceps. Thereafter, preclinical assessment was performed with data collected including experience, gender, hand size, and scope preference.

RESULTS

The Vathin single-use flexible bronchoscope had the biggest range of tip movement from flexion to extension with and without forceps. The Boston single-use flexible bronchoscope required the maximal thumb force but had the least reduction of tip movement with forceps. The Boston single-use flexible bronchoscope significantly outperformed all other scopes including the standard Pentax scope and was the only scope capable of suctioning pseudo-mucus around the forceps. Although there was no significant difference in preference in the overall group, females and those with smaller hand size preferred the Pentax and males the Broncoflex single-use flexible bronchoscope.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently available single-use flexible bronchoscopes differ in several factors other than scope sizes and monitor including suction, turning envelope, and handle size. Performance in the clinical setting will be key to their success.

Endovascular steerable and endobronchial precurved guiding sheaths for transbronchial needle delivery under augmented fluoroscopy and cone beam CT image guidance

BACKGROUND

Endobronchial navigation is performed in a variety of ways, none of which are meeting all the clinicians' needs required to reach diagnostic success in every patient. We sought to characterize precurved and steerable guiding sheaths (GS) in endobronchial targeting for lung biopsy using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) based augmented fluoroscopy (AF) image guidance.

METHODS

Four precurved GS (EdgeTM 45, 90, 180, 180EW, Medtronic) and two steerable GS [6.5 F Destino Twist (DT), Oscor; 6 F Morph, BioCardia] were evaluated alone and in combination with an electromagnetic tracking (EM) guide and biopsy needles in three experimental phases: (I) bench model to assess GS deflection and perform biopsy simulations; (II) ex vivo swine lung comparing 2 steerable and 2 precurved GS; and (III) in vivo male swine lung to deliver a needle (n=2 swine) or to deliver a fiducial marker (n=2 swine) using 2 steerable GS. Ex vivo and in vivo image guidance was performed with either commercial or prototype AF image guidance software (Philips) based on either prior CT or procedural CBCT. Primary outcomes were GS delivery angle (θGS) and needle delivery angle (θN) in bench evaluation and needle delivery error (mm) (mean ± se) for ex vivo and in vivo studies.

RESULTS

The steerable DT had the largest range of GS delivery angles (θN: 0-114°) with either the 21 G or 19 G biopsy needle in the bench model. In ex vivo swine lung, needle delivery errors were 8.7±0.9 mm (precurved Edge 90), 5.4±1.9 mm (precurved Edge 180), 4.7±1.2 mm (steerable DT), and 5.6±2.4 mm (steerable Morph). In vivo, the needle delivery errors for the steerable GS were 6.0±1.0 mm (DT) and 15±7.0 mm (Morph). In vivo marker coil delivery was successful for both the steerable DT and morph GS. A case report demonstrated successful needle biopsy with the steerable DT.

CONCLUSIONS

Endobronchial needle delivery with AF guidance is feasible without a bronchoscope with steerable GS providing comparable or improved accuracy compared to precurved GS.