Utility and accuracy of perceptual voice and speech distinctions in the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease, PSP and MSA-P

Digital assessment of speech in Huntington disease

Background

Speech changes are an early symptom of Huntington disease (HD) and may occur prior to other motor and cognitive symptoms. Assessment of HD commonly uses clinician-rated outcome measures, which can be limited by observer variability and episodic administration. Speech symptoms are well suited for evaluation by digital measures which can enable sensitive, frequent, passive, and remote administration.

Methods

We collected audio recordings using an external microphone of 36 (18 HD, 7 prodromal HD, and 11 control) participants completing passage reading, counting forward, and counting backwards speech tasks. Motor and cognitive assessments were also administered. Features including pausing, pitch, and accuracy were automatically extracted from recordings using the BioDigit Speech software and compared between the three groups. Speech features were also analyzed by the Unified Huntington Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) dysarthria score. Random forest machine learning models were implemented to predict clinical status and clinical scores from speech features.

Results

Significant differences in pausing, intelligibility, and accuracy features were observed between HD, prodromal HD, and control groups for the passage reading task (e.g., p < 0.001 with Cohen'd = -2 between HD and control groups for pause ratio). A few parameters were significantly different between the HD and control groups for the counting forward and backwards speech tasks. A random forest classifier predicted clinical status from speech tasks with a balanced accuracy of 73% and an AUC of 0.92. Random forest regressors predicted clinical outcomes from speech features with mean absolute error ranging from 2.43-9.64 for UHDRS total functional capacity, motor and dysarthria scores, and explained variance ranging from 14 to 65%. Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores were predicted with mean absolute error of 2.3 and explained variance of 30%.

Conclusion

Speech data have the potential to be a valuable digital measure of HD progression, and can also enable remote, frequent disease assessment in prodromal HD and HD. Clinical status and disease severity were predicted from extracted speech features using random forest machine learning models. Speech measurements could be leveraged as sensitive marker of clinical onset and disease progression in future clinical trials.

Computerized analysis of speech and voice for Parkinson's disease: A systematic review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Speech impairment is an early symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD). This study has summarized the literature related to speech and voice in detecting PD and assessing its severity.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature from 2010 to 2021 to investigate analysis methods and signal features. The keywords "Automatic analysis" in conjunction with "PD speech" or "PD voice" were used, and the PubMed and ScienceDirect databases were searched. A total of 838 papers were found on the first run, of which 189 were selected. One hundred and forty-seven were found to be suitable for the review. The different datasets, recording protocols, signal analysis methods and features that were reported are listed. Values of the features that separate PD patients from healthy controls were tabulated. Finally, the barriers that limit the wide use of computerized speech analysis are discussed.

RESULTS

Speech and voice may be valuable markers for PD. However, large differences between the datasets make it difficult to compare different studies. In addition, speech analytic methods that are not informed by physiological understanding may alienate clinicians.

CONCLUSIONS

The potential usefulness of speech and voice for the detection and assessment of PD is confirmed by evidence from the classification and correlation results.

Speech acoustic indices for differential diagnosis between Parkinson's disease, multiple system atrophy and progressive supranuclear palsy

While speech disorder represents an early and prominent clinical feature of atypical parkinsonian syndromes such as multiple system atrophy (MSA) and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), little is known about the sensitivity of speech assessment as a potential diagnostic tool. Speech samples were acquired from 215 subjects, including 25 MSA, 20 PSP, 20 Parkinson's disease participants, and 150 healthy controls. The accurate differential diagnosis of dysarthria subtypes was based on the quantitative acoustic analysis of 26 speech dimensions related to phonation, articulation, prosody, and timing. A semi-supervised weighting-based approach was then applied to find the best feature combinations for separation between PSP and MSA. Dysarthria was perceptible in all PSP and MSA patients and consisted of a combination of hypokinetic, spastic, and ataxic components. Speech features related to respiratory dysfunction, imprecise consonants, monopitch, slow speaking rate, and subharmonics contributed to worse performance in PSP than MSA, whereas phonatory instability, timing abnormalities, and articulatory decay were more distinctive for MSA compared to PSP. The combination of distinct speech patterns via objective acoustic evaluation was able to discriminate between PSP and MSA with very high accuracy of up to 89% as well as between PSP/MSA and PD with up to 87%. Dysarthria severity in MSA/PSP was related to overall disease severity. Speech disorders reflect the differing underlying pathophysiology of tauopathy in PSP and α-synucleinopathy in MSA. Vocal assessment may provide a low-cost alternative screening method to existing subjective clinical assessment and imaging diagnostic approaches.

Language impairment in progressive supranuclear palsy and corticobasal syndrome

Although commonly known as movement disorders, progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and corticobasal syndrome (CBS) may present with changes in speech and language alongside or even before motor symptoms. The differential diagnosis of these two disorders can be challenging, especially in the early stages. Here we review their impact on speech and language. We discuss the neurobiological and clinical-phenomenological overlap of PSP and CBS with each other, and with other disorders including non-fluent agrammatic primary progressive aphasia and primary progressive apraxia of speech. Because language impairment is often an early and persistent problem in CBS and PSP, there is a need for improved methods for language screening in primary and secondary care, and more detailed language assessments in tertiary healthcare settings. Improved language assessment may aid differential diagnosis as well as inform clinical management decisions.

Speech disorders in Parkinson's disease: pathophysiology, medical management and surgical approaches

The prevalence of speech disorders among individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) has been reported to be as high as 89%. Speech impairment in PD results from a combination of motor and nonmotor deficits. The production of speech depends upon the coordination of various motor activities: respiration, phonation, articulation, resonance and prosody. A speech disorder is defined as impairment in any of its inter-related components. Despite the high prevalence of speech disorders in PD, only 3–4% receive speech treatment. Treatment modalities include pharmacological intervention, speech therapy, surgery, deep brain stimulation and vocal fold augmentation. Although management of Parkinsonian dysarthria is clinically challenging, speech treatment in PD should be part of a multidisciplinary approach to patient care in this disease.