A qualitative examination of apathy and physical activity in Huntington's and Parkinson's disease

Promoting Physical Activity in Huntington's Disease: Co-Design of a Care Partner Resource

Background

Clinical guidelines recommend that people with Huntington's disease (HD) should exercise to maintain/improve fitness and motor function, yet physical activity levels remain low in this group. Promotion of physical activity is often via care partners with little evidence that they are supported in this role.

Objective

The aim was to co-design a resource for care partners of people with HD to support promotion of physical activity.

Methods

A four-step co-design approach was used to develop a care partner resource. Five care partners took part in an online workshop exploring experiences and the knowledge, support and skills needed by care partners to promote physical activity. A co-design team (n = 7) developed a prototype that was user tested by three people who had attended the workshop. Findings from user testing were used to develop the final resource.

Results

An easy to read, image-based prototype was developed that contained tips on planning activity, safety and activity examples. User testing identified the need for grouping of activities suitable for 10, 20, and 30 minutes of available time, information on maintaining and improving activity and re-organization of information to support engagement of activity.

Conclusions

A resource for care partners that has been translated into seven languages was developed to promote physical activity. User testing indicated confidence in using the resource and appreciation of the autonomy provided to the person with HD to plan activities. Further work is needed to evaluate the impact of the resource in promotion of physical activity and the impact on care partner burden.

The Role of Innovation Technology in the Rehabilitation of Patients Affected by Huntington's Disease: A Scoping Review

Huntington's disease is an autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disease caused by the repetition of cytosine, adenine, and guanine trinucleotides on the short arm of chromosome 4p16.3 within the Huntingtin gene. In this study, we aim to examine and map the existing evidence on the use of innovations in the rehabilitation of Huntington's disease. A scoping review was conducted on innovative rehabilitative treatments performed on patients with Huntington's disease. A search was performed on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases to screen references of included studies and review articles for additional citations. Of an initial 1117 articles, only 20 met the search criteria. These findings showed that available evidence is still limited and that studies generally had small sample sizes and a high risk of bias. Regarding cognitive rehabilitation, it has emerged that VR- and PC-based methods as well as NIBS techniques are feasible and may have promising effects in individuals with Huntington's disease. On the other hand, scarce evidence was found for cognitive and motor training that might have a slight impact on overall cognitive function in individuals with Huntington's disease. Data show that further investigation is needed to explore the effects of innovative rehabilitation tools on cognition, especially considering that cognitive and psychiatric symptoms can precede the onset of motor symptoms by many years.

Physical activity and exercise outcomes in Huntington's disease (PACE-HD): results of a 12-month trial-within-cohort feasibility study of a physical activity intervention in people with Huntington's disease

INTRODUCTION

While physical activity (PA) is recognized as important in Huntington's disease (HD) disease management, there has been no long-term evaluation undertaken. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a nested (within cohort) randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a physical therapist-led PA intervention.

METHODS

Participants were recruited from six HD specialist centers participating in the Enroll-HD cohort study in Germany, Spain and U.S. Assessments were completed at baseline and 12 months and linked to Enroll-HD cohort data. Participants at three sites (cohort) received no contact between baseline and 12 month assessments. Participants at three additional sites (RCT) were randomized to PA intervention or control group. The intervention consisted of 18 sessions delivered over 12 months; control group participants received no intervention, however both groups completed monthly exercise/falls diaries and 6-month assessments.

RESULTS

274 participants were screened, 204 met inclusion criteria and 116 were enrolled (59 in cohort; 57 in RCT). Retention rates at 12-months were 84.7% (cohort) and 79.0% (RCT). Data completeness at baseline ranged from 42.3 to 100% and at 12-months 19.2-85.2%. In the RCT, there was 80.5% adherence, high intervention fidelity, and similar adverse events between groups. There were differences in fitness, walking endurance and self-reported PA at 12 months favoring the intervention group, with data completeness >60%. Participants in the cohort had motor and functional decline at rates comparable to previous studies.

CONCLUSION

Predefined progression criteria indicating feasibility were met. PACE-HD lays the groundwork for a future, fully-powered within cohort trial, but approaches to ensure data completeness must be considered.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV: NCT03344601.