Pharmacogenetic research activity in Central America and the Caribbean: a systematic review

Pharmacogenetics research in Brazil: a systematic review

Aim: Pharmacogenomics (PGx) is a rising scientific area in many countries, such as Brazil. Objectives: To identify biomarkers, therapeutic areas, probe drugs and regions/ethnicities most studied in the country in order to guide future studies. Materials & methods: Systematic review of 1060 studies (from 1968 to 2020) comprising 80 genes, six probe drugs and 3,819,233 individuals. Results: MTHFR and HLA-A/B were the most studied genes and metoprolol and dextromethorphan the most studied probe drugs. Oncology was the most studied therapeutic area considering PGx biomarkers. The country’s regions and ethnic groups were studied unevenly, with south/southeast and White people over-represented in respect to their demographic relevance, in detriment of the center-west/northeast/north and Black/mixed individuals. Conclusion: Many of the gaps and possible paths to be covered to reach even PGx data are pointed out by this review.

Relationships between CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 metabolic phenotypes and genotypes in a Nicaraguan Mestizo population

Interethnic variability in the drug-metabolizing capacity of CYP450 enzymes may lead to discrepancies in the relationship between genotypes and phenotypes worldwide. The present study was aimed to analyze for the first time whether there is a relationship between clinically relevant CYP450 genetic polymorphisms and their drug oxidation capacity (metabolic phenotype) in a population of healthy Nicaraguan volunteers. Two hundred and twelve participants were genotyped for CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4, and their actual metabolic phenotype (evaluated by the Metabolic Ratio, MR) was analyzed by using the CEIBA cocktail approach. The results showed the wide interindividual variability in all the studied enzymes and a significant difference (p < 0.004) in the activity of CYP1A2 between male and female subjects. The number of CYP2C19 (p < 0.0001) and CYP2D6 (p < 0.0001) active alleles were shown inversely correlated with their corresponding MR, although there were marked genotype-phenotype discrepancies. There was an actual enzyme capacity overlapping (MR) between genotypically Poor (gPMs) and Extensive Metabolizers (gEMs) of 3.14% subjects for CYP2D6 and 0.94% for CYP2C9. Similarly, there was an overlapping for metabolic phenotypes of 11.48% of genotypically ultrarapid metabolizers (gUMs) for CYP2C19 and 2.09% for CYP2D6 and gEMs. Therefore, the current approach for metabolic phenotype prediction based just on genotype does not predict properly for all individuals within this Nicaraguan Mestizo population, thus representing a potential barrier for the clinical implementation of personalized medicine in this region. However, it is necessary to improve the prediction of phenotype from genotype in order to improve the pharmacogenetic implementation in populations with specific ethnic backgrounds.

The Prevalence of Ultrarapid Metabolizers of Codeine in a Diverse Urban Population

OBJECTIVE

To examine the prevalence of ultrarapid metabolizers of codeine among children in an ethnically diverse urban community.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

A tertiary care academic children's hospital in the Bronx, New York.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

In total, 256 children with nonsyndromic congenital sensorineural hearing loss were analyzed. DNA was assessed for 63 previously described single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and copy number variants (CNVs) known to alter the function and expression of the CYP2D6 gene primarily responsible for codeine metabolism. The rate of CYP2D6 metabolism was predicted based on participants' haplotype.

RESULTS

Ethnic distribution in the study subjects paralleled recent local census data, with the largest portion (115 children, 45.8%) identified as Hispanic or Latino. A total of 154 children (80.6%) had a haplotype that corresponds to extensive codeine metabolism, 18 children (9.42%) were identified as ultrarapid metabolizers (UMs), and 16 children (8.37%) were intermediate metabolizers. Only 3 children in our cohort (1.57%) were poor metabolizers. Patients identifying as Caucasian or Hispanic had an elevated incidence of UMs (11.3% and 11.2%, respectively) with extensive variability within subpopulations.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinically significant rate of ultrarapid metabolizers reinforces safety concerns regarding the use of codeine and related opiates. A patient-targeted approach using pharmacogenomics may mitigate adverse effects by individualizing the selection and dosing of these analgesics.

Impact of CYP2D6 on venlafaxine metabolism in Trinidadian patients with major depressive disorder

AIM

This study aimed to assess the impact of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 variation on venlafaxine (VEN) at steady state in patients from Trinidad and Tobago of Indian and African descent with major depressive disorder.

PATIENTS & METHODS

Patients were phenotyped with dextromethorphan, genotyped for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19, and metabolic ratios for VEN obtained at 2-week intervals.

RESULTS

Of 61 patients, 55 were genotyped and phenotyped and 47 completed 8 weeks of VEN treatment. The majority of patients had metabolic ratios for VEN that were consistent with those for dextromethorphan and genotype-predicted phenotype using activity scores. One subject presented with a novel no-function allele, CYP2D6*99. No correlations were observed with CYP2C19 genotype.

CONCLUSION

CYP2D6 genotype analysis provides valuable information to individualize drug therapy with VEN.

CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotyping in psychiatric patients on psychotropic medication in the former Dutch Antilles

AIM

This study was aimed to asses the prevalence of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 polymorphisms in psychiatric patients and in volunteers from Dutch caribbean origin.

METHODS

In total, 435 individuals were genotyped for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19. Of these, 269 were psychiatric patients on psychotropic medication, living in Curaçao and 166 were volunteers from the Dutch Caribbean population.

RESULTS

No differences in prevalence of alleles were found.

CONCLUSION

Although prevalence of alleles appeared to be very different from African and Caucasian populations, the distribution into predicted phenotypes shows an equal distribution as in Caucasians.