An overview of infectious complications in children on new biologic response-modifying agents

The Multifaceted Syndromic Primary Immunodeficiencies in Children

BACKGROUND

Disorders of immunity are poorly recognised in some rare multisystem genetic conditions. We aim to describe syndromic features and immunological defects in children with syndromic primary immunodeficiencies (sPIDs).

METHODS

This is a retrospective descriptive study of children aged 0-18 years with sPIDs under the care of the paediatric immunology service at the Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, United Kingdom, from January 2006 to September 2021.

RESULTS

sPIDs were identified in 36 patients. Genetic diagnoses which are not commonly associated with PIDs and not included in the International Union of Immunological Societies classification were present in 7/36 (19%): Trisomy 22, Arboleda-Tham syndrome, 2p16.3 deletion syndrome, supernumerary ring chromosome 20 syndrome, Myhre syndrome, Noonan syndrome, and trichothiodystrophy/Cockayne syndrome complex. Recurrent and/or severe infections were the most common clinical features (n = 33, 92%). Approximately half had combined immunodeficiency or antibody deficiency. The most common extra-immunological manifestations include dysmorphism (72%), disorders of nervous (78%), musculoskeletal (69%), haematology/lymphatic (58%), and gastrointestinal, hepatic/pancreatic (58%) systems.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with sPIDs often have multiorgan involvement and some are non-immunologically mediated. There should be a low threshold to clinically assess and investigate for disorders of immunity in any patients with syndromic features especially when they present with recurrent/severe/opportunistic infections, features of immune dysregulation, autoinflammation or lymphoproliferation.

Infection-Related Death among Persons with Refractory Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Bacterial sepsis led to multiorgan failure in persons receiving immunosuppressive and antiinflammatory drugs.

Severe infections are emerging as major risk factors for death among children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). In particular, children with refractory JIA treated with long-term, multiple, and often combined immunosuppressive and antiinflammatory agents, including the new biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), are at increased risk for severe infections and death. We investigated 4 persons with JIA who died during 1994–2013, three of overwhelming central venous catheter–related bacterial sepsis caused by coagulase-negative Staphylococus or α-hemolytic Streptococcus infection and 1 of disseminated adenovirus and Epstein-Barr virus infection). All 4 had active JIA refractory to long-term therapy with multiple and combined conventional and biological DMARDs. Two died while receiving high-dose systemic corticosteroids, methotrexate, and after recent exposure to anti–tumor necrosis factor-α biological DMARDs, and 2 during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation procedure. Reporting all cases of severe infections and especially deaths in these children is of paramount importance for accurate surveillance.

Disease-modifying therapies and infectious risks in multiple sclerosis

Immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive treatments for multiple sclerosis (MS) are associated with an increased risk of infection, which makes treatment of this condition challenging in daily clinical practice. Use of the expanding range of available drugs to treat MS requires extensive knowledge of treatment-associated infections, risk-minimizing strategies and approaches to monitoring and treatment of such adverse events. An interdisciplinary approach to evaluate the infectious events associated with available MS treatments has become increasingly relevant. In addition, individual stratification of treatment-related infectious risks is necessary when choosing therapies for patients with MS, as well as during and after therapy. Determination of the individual risk of infection following serial administration of different immunotherapies is also crucial. Here, we review the modes of action of the available MS drugs, and relate this information to the current knowledge of drug-specific infectious risks and risk-minimizing strategies.

[Immunotherapy and infectious issues in multiple sclerosis. Self-injectable and oral drugs for immunotherapy]

Immunotherapy is generally associated with an increased risk for the development of infections. Due to the continuously expanding spectrum of new and potent immunotherapy treatment options for multiple sclerosis (MS), this article describes the currently known risks for treatment-related infections and the current recommendations for prevention of corresponding problems with drugs used in treatment strategies for MS and their mechanisms of action. The new treatment options in particular are linked to specific and severe infections; therefore, intensive and long-lasting monitoring is required before, during and after treatment and multidisciplinary surveillance of patients is needed. This article gives a detailed review of drug-specific red flags and current recommendations for the prophylaxis of infections associated with treatment of relapsing-remitting MS and when using self-injectable and oral disease-modifying immunotherapeutic drugs.

[Medicinal prophylaxis during intensified immunosuppression in children and adolescents : part 2]

The goal of modern antirheumatic therapy is to achieve an optimized disease control. This is individually achieved by an intensified immunosuppression (IS) frequently combining different immunosuppressive agents. Intensified IS should be accompanied by a standardized protocol to monitor immunological changes in the patient. This should include checklists (see Part 1 Screening during intensified IS in children and adolescents). An individual risk stratification according to the planned IS allows a prediction of infectious disease risks for the patient and, thus, individual infection prophylaxis. In addition, standardized management of patients with fever while receiving intensified IS may prevent further complications.

Multiple sclerosis treatment and infectious issues: update 2013

Immunomodulation and immunosuppression are generally linked to an increased risk of infection. In the growing field of new and potent drugs for multiple sclerosis (MS), we review the current data concerning infections and prevention of infectious diseases. This is of importance for recently licensed and future MS treatment options, but also for long-term established therapies for MS. Some of the disease-modifying therapies (DMT) go along with threats of specific severe infections or complications, which require a more intensive long-term monitoring and multi-disciplinary surveillance. We update the existing warning notices and infectious issues which have to be considered using drugs for multiple sclerosis.

Immunogenicity and safety of the bivalent HPV vaccine in female patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a prospective controlled observational cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To compare the immunogenicity and safety of the bivalent human papillomavirus (HPV)16/18 vaccine between female patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and healthy female adolescents.

METHODS

68 patients and 55 healthy girls aged 12-18 years were included in a prospective controlled observational cohort and were vaccinated at 0, 1 and 6 months. Primary outcomes were immunogenicity expressed as seropositivity rate after three vaccine doses at 7 and 12 months and HPV-specific geometric mean antibody concentrations. Secondary outcomes were HPV16/18-specific memory B cell responses in a subset of participants and safety, defined as adverse events and the effect of vaccination on JIA disease activity.

RESULTS

All participants were seropositive for HPV16 and HPV18 at 7 months. One patient turned seronegative at 12 months for HPV16/18. No significant differences were found between patients and controls in HPV-specific antibody concentrations; however, antibody concentrations were consistently lower in patients. No effect of methotrexate on HPV16 antibodies (p=0.79) or HPV18 antibodies (p=0.37) was detected. All patients on anti-TNFα treatment were seropositive after vaccination. The kinetics of HPV16/18 memory B cell responses was comparable between patients and controls, but the magnitude of B cell responses at 7 and 12 months appeared lower in patients. No relevant differences in adverse events were found. HPV vaccination did not aggravate JIA disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The bivalent HPV16/18 vaccine is immunogenic and well tolerated in JIA patients. However, HPV-specific antibodies and B cell responses tended to be lower in patients compared with healthy controls.

CLINICAL TRIAL LISTING

NCT00815282.