1
|
Wehler CJ, Panchal NH, Cotchery DL, Farooqi OA, Ferguson DK, Foran D, Hakki OW, Silva R, Smith GM, Gibson G. Alternatives to opioids for acute pain management after dental procedures: A Department of Veterans Affairs consensus paper. J Am Dent Assoc 2021; 152:641-652. [PMID: 34325780 DOI: 10.1016/j.adaj.2021.03.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Revised: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioid misuse is a widespread public health problem, and opioids are often prescribed in the dental environment. These recommendations provide alternatives to opioids to reduce or eliminate dental procedure-related acute pain. METHODS A multidisciplinary working group developed these clinical recommendations to specifically address procedure-related acute pain. These recommendations, which are based on published peer-reviewed research and guidelines, include therapies used before, during, and after dental procedures. When evidence is not definitive, the best practices, which are based on experts' consensus, are included. The recommendations are not intended to be exhaustive. RESULTS These recommendations are a summary of the evidence and best practices for opioid alternatives to treat acute pain related to dental procedures. CONCLUSIONS Dental providers should prioritize opioid stewardship when managing procedure-related pain with strategies such as thorough preprocedure pain assessment, minimally invasive techniques, preemptive analgesia, intraprocedure pain management, and appropriately selected postprocedure pharmacologic therapy. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS These recommendations are a concise resource for clinical providers. It is important to address patients' procedure-related pain, using nonopioids whenever possible. Alternatives are outlined, allowing providers to make informed decisions.
Collapse
|
2
|
Lawson McLean A, Kalff R, Reichart R. Spinal Cord Stimulation for Acute Pain Following Surgery for Cervical Myelopathy: A Novel Treatment Strategy. Pain Pract 2018; 19:310-315. [PMID: 30369016 DOI: 10.1111/papr.12742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2018] [Revised: 09/28/2018] [Accepted: 10/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic pain syndromes caused by degenerative and postinfectious changes in the cervical spine continue to pose significant management challenges to neurosurgeons and pain practitioners. The identification of an individualized treatment plan, astute surgical technique, comprehensive and multimodal analgesia, and adequate rehabilitation processes do not necessarily result in diminished pain. CASE SUMMARY We present the case of a patient with chronic pain treated surgically for degenerative cervical myelopathy secondary to cervical spinal stenosis. Following this surgery, the patient experienced an intractable postoperative pain syndrome that had anatomical borders, and an intensity and character that were different from the background chronic pain from which he suffered. We successfully implanted a cervical spinal cord stimulation (SCS) lead in the period following his stenosis surgery, which had good therapeutic effect on the postoperative-onset pain. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first description of SCS having a strong positive effect on an acute exacerbation of neuropathic pain. At follow-up 12 months later, assessment of the patient's pain diary revealed a modal pain intensity of 3/10 on the numeric rating scale over the preceding 3 months. The Brief Pain Inventory (Short Form) scores at this time were 10/40 in the pain severity domain and 18/70 in the interference with function domain, demonstrating the long-term effectiveness of this SCS strategy. CONCLUSION While SCS has hitherto been untested as a therapy for acute-onset pain, this report demonstrates its utility as a salvage treatment in select cases of uncontrollable postoperative pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron Lawson McLean
- Division of Functional and Restorative Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Rolf Kalff
- Division of Functional and Restorative Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Rupert Reichart
- Division of Functional and Restorative Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rogal S, Mankaney G, Udawatta V, Good CB, Chinman M, Zickmund S, Bielefeldt K, Jonassaint N, Jazwinski A, Shaikh O, Hughes C, Humar A, DiMartini A, Fine MJ. Association between opioid use and readmission following liver transplantation. Clin Transplant 2016; 30:1222-1229. [PMID: 27409580 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the independent association between pre-transplant prescription opioid use and readmission following liver transplantation. We reviewed the medical records of all patients at a single medical center undergoing primary, single-organ, liver transplantation from 2004 to 2014. We assessed factors associated with hospital readmission 30 days and 1 year after hospital discharge using multivariable competing risk regression models. Among 1056 transplant recipients, 49 (4.6%) were prescribed pre-transplant prescription opioids. Readmission occurred in 421 (40%) patients within 30 days and 689 (65%) within 1 year. Patients with pre-transplant opioid use had a significantly higher risk of readmission at 30 days (HR 1.7; 95% CI 1.1-2.5) and a non-significantly elevated risk at 1 year (HR 1.4; 95% CI 1.0-1.9) when controlling for other potential confounders. Although pain was the major reason for readmission in only 12 (3%) patients at 30 days and 33 (6%) patients at 1 year, pre-transplant opioid use was significantly associated with pain-related readmission at both time points. In conclusion, prescription opioid use pre-transplantation was significantly associated with all-cause 30-day readmissions and pain-related readmissions at 30 days and 1 year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shari Rogal
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. .,Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. .,Division of Gastroenterology, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. .,Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Gautham Mankaney
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Viyan Udawatta
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Chester B Good
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Matthew Chinman
- VISN 4 Mental Illness Research and Clinical Center, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Susan Zickmund
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Klaus Bielefeldt
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Naudia Jonassaint
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Alison Jazwinski
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Obaid Shaikh
- Division of Gastroenterology, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Christopher Hughes
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Abhinav Humar
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Andrea DiMartini
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Michael J Fine
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|