Screen-enrich-combine circulating system to prepare MSC/β-TCP for bone repair in fractures with depressed tibial plateau

Interaction between Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Immune Cells during Bone Injury Repair

Fractures are the most common large organ trauma in humans. The initial inflammatory response promotes bone healing during the initial post-fracture phase, but chronic and persistent inflammation due to infection or other factors does not contribute to the healing process. The precise mechanisms by which immune cells and their cytokines are regulated in bone healing remain unclear. The use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for cellular therapy of bone injuries is a novel clinical treatment approach. Bone progenitor MSCs not only differentiate into bone, but also interact with the immune system to promote the healing process. We review in vitro and in vivo studies on the role of the immune system and bone marrow MSCs in bone healing and their interactions. A deeper understanding of this paradigm may provide clues to potential therapeutic targets in the healing process, thereby improving the reliability and safety of clinical applications of MSCs to promote bone healing.

Intraoperative Creation of Tissue-Engineered Grafts with Minimally Manipulated Cells: New Concept of Bone Tissue Engineering In Situ

Transfer of regenerative approaches into clinical practice is limited by strict legal regulation of in vitro expanded cells and risks associated with substantial manipulations. Isolation of cells for the enrichment of bone grafts directly in the Operating Room appears to be a promising solution for the translation of biomedical technologies into clinical practice. These intraoperative approaches could be generally characterized as a joint concept of tissue engineering in situ. Our review covers techniques of intraoperative cell isolation and seeding for the creation of tissue-engineered grafts in situ, that is, directly in the Operating Room. Up-to-date, the clinical use of tissue-engineered grafts created in vitro remains a highly inaccessible option. Fortunately, intraoperative tissue engineering in situ is already available for patients who need advanced treatment modalities.

Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of Osteoinductive Factors and Cellular Therapies for Long Bone Fractures and Non-Unions: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Background: Long bone fractures display significant non-union rates, but the exact biological mechanisms implicated in this devastating complication remain unclear. The combination of osteogenetic and angiogenetic factors at the fracture site is an essential prerequisite for successful bone regeneration. The aim of this study is to investigate the results of the clinical implantation of growth factors for intraoperative enhancement of osteogenesis for the treatment of long bone fractures and non-unions. Methods: A systematic literature review search was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines in the PubMed and Web of Science databases from the date of inception of each database through to 10 January 2022. Specific inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied in order to identify relevant studies reporting on the treatment of upper and lower limb long bone non-unions treated with osteoinductive or cellular factors. Results: Overall, 18 studies met the inclusion criteria and examined the effectiveness of the application of Bone Morphogenetic Proteins-2 and -7 (BMPs), platelet rich plasma (PRP) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Despite the existence of limitations in the studies analysed (containing mixed groups of open and close fractures, different types of fractures, variability of treatment protocols, different selection criteria and follow-up periods amongst others), their overall effectiveness was found significantly increased in patients who received them compared with the controls (I² = 60%, 95% CI = 1.59 [0.99–2.54], Z =1.93, p = 0.05). Conclusion: Administration of BMP-2 and -7, PRP and MSCs were considered effective and safe methods in fracture treatment, increasing bone consolidation, reducing time to repair and being linked to satisfactory postoperative functional scores.

Light-controlled scaffold- and serum-free hard palatal-derived mesenchymal stem cell aggregates for bone regeneration

Cell aggregates that mimic in vivo cell-cell interactions are promising and powerful tools for tissue engineering. This study isolated a new, easily obtained, population of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from rat hard palates named hard palatal-derived mesenchymal stem cells (PMSCs). The PMSCs were positive for CD90, CD44, and CD29 and negative for CD34, CD45, and CD146. They exhibited clonogenicity, self-renewal, migration, and multipotent differentiation capacities. Furthermore, this study fabricated scaffold-free 3D aggregates using light-controlled cell sheet technology and a serum-free method. PMSC aggregates were successfully constructed with good viability. Transplantation of the PMSC aggregates and the PMSC aggregate-implant complexes significantly enhanced bone formation and implant osseointegration in vivo, respectively. This new cell resource is easy to obtain and provides an alternative strategy for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Preclinical and Clinical Amelioration of Bone Fractures with Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Even though reunion of bone fracture confronts clinicians, mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are investigated to be curative in bone fracture. This study aimed to explore the application potential of MSCs for healing bone fractures. By inputting search terms and retrieving studies published up to March 2021, multiple databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, were searched to identify eligible studies. The mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated to analyze the main results in the meta-analysis. Data analysis was performed using Engauge Digitizer 10.8 and R Software. Of the 31 articles, 26 were preclinical studies (n = 913), and 5 were clinical trials (n = 335). Preclinically, MSCs therapy significantly augmented the progress of bone regeneration [(bone volume over tissue volume (MD7.35, p < 0.01)], despite some non-significant effects (on the callus index, bone strength, work to failure, and stiffness). Clinically, the MSC group had a significantly reduced incidence of poor recovery (odds ratio (OR) 0.30, p < 0.01); however, a significant decrease in healing time was not observed in the MSC group (MD 2.47, p = 0.26). In summary, our data suggest that patients with bone fractures benefited from MSC administration and that MSCs are a potentially useful agent for bone regeneration. Despite these satisfactory outcomes, larger randomised clinical trials (RCTs) are necessary to confirm these findings.

Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Bioactive Factors, and Scaffolds in Bone Repair: From Research Perspectives to Clinical Practice

Mesenchymal stem cell-based therapies are promising tools for bone tissue regeneration. However, tracking cells and maintaining them in the site of injury is difficult. A potential solution is to seed the cells onto a biocompatible scaffold. Construct development in bone tissue engineering is a complex step-by-step process with many variables to be optimized, such as stem cell source, osteogenic molecular factors, scaffold design, and an appropriate in vivo animal model. In this review, an MSC-based tissue engineering approach for bone repair is reported. Firstly, MSC role in bone formation and regeneration is detailed. Secondly, MSC-based bone tissue biomaterial design is analyzed from a research perspective. Finally, examples of animal preclinical and human clinical trials involving MSCs and scaffolds in bone repair are presented.

Use of Osteobiologics for Fracture Management: The When, What, and How

Osteobiologics are defined as a group of natural and synthetic materials used to augment bone healing. The selection of the most appropriate osteobiologic from the growing list of available options can be a challenging task. In selecting a material, surgeons should weigh a variety of considerations, including the indication for their use (the when), the most suitable substance (the what), and the correct mode of application (the how). This summary reviews these considerations and seeks to provide the surgeon with a basis for informed clinical evidence-based decision-making in their choice of a successful option.

Use of a novel Screen-Enrich-Combine(-biomaterials) Circulating System to fill a 3D-printed open Ti6Al4V frame with mesenchymal stem cells/β-tricalcium phosphate to repair complex anatomical bone defects in load-bearing areas

Background

Repairing complex anatomical load-bearing bone defects is difficult because it requires the restoration of the load-bearing function, reconstructing the anatomical shape, and repair by regenerated bone. We previously developed a Screen–Enrich–Combine(-biomaterials) Circulating System (SECCS) for rapid intraoperative enrichment of autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to enhance the osteogenic ability of porous bone substitutes. In this study, we prepared a 3D-printed Ti6A14V macroporous frame matching the defect shape to provide early load-bearing support and evaluated the efficacy of filling the frame with SECCS-processed MSCs/beta tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) for long-term bone growth.

Methods

Fifteen 2-year-old goats were involved in this study, and the lateral part of their distal femur was removed by an electric saw and was fitted by a matching electron beam melting technology-prepared (EBM) Ti6Al4V frame. Three types of frames, filled with nothing, pure porous β-TCP, or SECCS-processed MSCs/β-TCP, were fixed onto the defect site. Repair efficacy was evaluated by X-ray radiography, computed tomography (CT), histology, and histomorphometry.

Results

In the basic regular hexagon printing unit, the combined side width (w) and the inscribed circle diameter (d) determines the printing frame’s mechanical strength. The compressive load was significantly higher for w=1.9 mm, d=4.4 mm than for w=1.7 mm, d=4.0 mm or w=2.0 mm, d=5.0 mm (P<0.05). The EBM-prepared Ti6Al4V defect-matched frame was well maintained 9 months after implantation. The MSCs successfully adhered to the wall of the porous β-TCP in the SECCS-processed group and had spread fully in the test samples. Each goat in the MSCs/β-TCP–the filled group, had approximately 31,321.7±22,554.7 of MSCs and a larger area of new bone growth inside the frame than the control and blank areas groups.

Conclusions

Filling the 3D-printed Ti6Al4V large-aperture frame with osteogenic materials achieved biological reconstruction over a larger area of regenerated bone to repair complex anatomical weight-bearing bone defects under the condition of early frame-supported load bearing. MSCs/β-TCP prepared by SECCS can be used as a filling material for this type of bone defect to obtain more efficacious bone repair.

Systematic review assessing the evidence for the use of stem cells in fracture healing

AIMS

Bone demonstrates good healing capacity, with a variety of strategies being utilized to enhance this healing. One potential strategy that has been suggested is the use of stem cells to accelerate healing.

METHODS

The following databases were searched: MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, WHO-ICTRP, ClinicalTrials.gov, as well as reference checking of included studies. The inclusion criteria for the study were: population (any adults who have sustained a fracture, not including those with pre-existing bone defects); intervention (use of stem cells from any source in the fracture site by any mechanism); and control (fracture healing without the use of stem cells). Studies without a comparator were also included. The outcome was any reported outcomes. The study design was randomized controlled trials, non-randomized or observational studies, and case series.

RESULTS

In all, 94 eligible studies were identified. The clinical and methodological aspects of the studies were too heterogeneous for a meta-analysis to be undertaken. A narrative synthesis examined study characteristics, stem cell methods (source, aspiration, concentration, and application) and outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Insufficient high-quality evidence is available to determine the efficacy of stem cells for fracture healing. The studies were heterogeneous in population, methods, and outcomes. Work to address these issues and establish standards for future research should be undertaken.Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-10:628-638.

Comparison and characterization of enriched mesenchymal stem cells obtained by the repeated filtration of autologous bone marrow through porous biomaterials

Background

When bone marrow is repeatedly filtered through porous material, the mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in the bone marrow can adhere to the outer and inner walls of the carrier material to become enriched locally, and this is a promising method for MSC enrichment. In this process, the enrichment efficiency of MSCs involved in the regulation of the cell ecology of postfiltration composites containing other bone marrow components is affected by many factors. This study compared the enrichment efficiency and characterized the phenotypes of enriched MSCs obtained by the filtration of autologous bone marrow through different porous bone substitutes.

Methods

Human bone marrow was filtered through representative porous materials, and different factors affecting MSC enrichment efficiency were evaluated. The soluble proteins and MSC phenotypes in the bone marrow before and after filtration were also compared.

Results

The enrichment efficiency of the MSCs found in gelatin sponges was 96.1% ± 3.4%, which was higher than that of MSCs found in allogeneic bone (72.5% ± 7.6%) and porous β-TCP particles (61.4% ± 5.4%). A filtration frequency of 5–6 and a bone marrow/material volume ratio of 2 achieved the best enrichment efficiency for MSCs. A high-throughput antibody microarray indicated that the soluble proteins were mostly filtered out and remained in the flow through fluid, whereas a small number of proteins were abundantly (> 50%) enriched in the biomaterial. In terms of the phenotypic characteristics of the MSCs, including the cell aspect ratio, osteogenetic fate, specific antigens, gene expression profile, cell cycle stage, and apoptosis rate, no significant changes were found before or after filtration.

Conclusion

When autologous bone marrow is rapidly filtered through porous bone substitutes, the optimal enrichment efficiency of MSCs can be attained by the rational selection of the type of carrier material, the bone marrow/carrier material volume ratio, and the filtration frequency. The enrichment of bone marrow MSCs occurs during filtration, during which the soluble proteins in the bone marrow are also absorbed to a certain extent. This filtration enrichment technique does not affect the phenotype of the MSCs and thus may provide a safe alternative method for MSC enrichment.