Surgical Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture with Neurological Deficit-A Nationwide Multicenter Study in Japan

Posterolateral Instrumented Fusion in Elderly Patients With a Single Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture: Evaluation of Health-Related Quality of Life

Introduction Treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) is a factor that affects the quality of life and should be considered during management. In patients with a single OVF and neurologic deficit, surgical procedures aiming at neural decompression with instrumented fusion should be considered in elderly individuals. Posterolateral instrumented fusion (PLF) constitutes a largely performed fusion surgery for patients featuring indications for fusion surgery. The aim of this study was to determine the safety, effectiveness, and impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of PLF surgery in elderly patients diagnosed with a single OVF. Methods This study was conducted at Interbalkan European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece. Eighty (80) consecutive individuals with OVFs were subjected to PLF and recruited in this prospectively designed non-randomized study. Clinical evaluation was performed preoperatively and postoperatively at particular chronic intervals at one, three, six, and 12 months and two years. The assessment was conducted via the standardized Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Medical Health Survey Questionnaire for pain and HRQoL, respectively. Results No major perioperative complications were observed. All parameters of SF-36 presented significant improvement over the entire follow-up period with VAS scores reaching a plateau at six months. Depicted improvement of these parameters proves the beneficial role of PLF in elderly patients who suffered from a single OVF with or without referable neurological deficit. Conclusion OVFs have a significant impact on the quality of life of elderly patients, and surgical treatment with PLF with or without decompression can lead to functional recovery, pain relief, and HRQoL amelioration. Our results demonstrated that the outcomes of PLF in the surgical treatment of these patients are remarkably favorable, demonstrating the safety and efficacy of the technique.

Efficacy of cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation for osteoporotic mid-thoracic vertebral fractures

Background

Osteoporotic mid-thoracic vertebral fractures (OmTVF), often result in severe pain, and neurological deficits secondary to cord compression. Cement-augmented pedicle screw (CaPS) fixation with posterior spinal decompression (PSD) offers simultaneous decompression with stabilization of these osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Methods

The study involved 32 patients (2022-2023) with T8-T10 osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures resulting in cord compression. All patients underwent CaPS surgery with PSD. Pain reduction was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS), and outcomes with the Oswestry Disability Index, and the American Spinal Injury Association Grades. The local kyphotic angle was also tracked with computed tomography studies performed 1, 3, and 6 months post-operatively.

Results

The average pre-operative VAS score was 8.56 mm; this decreased at 1, 3, and 6 months post-operatively to 2.72 mm, 2.03 mm, and 1.44 mm, respectively. In addition, 31 of 32 patients fully recovered within 6 postoperative months.

Conclusion

For 31 of 32 patients with T8-T10 osteoporotic vertebral fractures, CaPS fixation with PSD successfully alleviated pain and resulted in significant post-operative neurological recovery.

Treatment and Outcome of Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Body Fractures With Deformation of Both Endplates With or Without Posterior Wall Involvement (OF 4): Short-Term Results from the Prospective EOFTT Multicenter Study

STUDY DESIGN

Multicenter prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To analyse therapeutical strategies applied to osteoporotic thoracolumbar OF 4 injuries, to assess related complications and clinical outcome.

METHODS

A multicenter prospective cohort study (EOFTT) including 518 consecutive patients who were treated for an Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF). For the present study, only patients with OF 4 fractures were analysed. Outcome parameters were complications, Visual Analogue Scale, Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, Timed Up & Go test, EQ-5D 5L, and Barthel Index after a minimum follow-up of 6 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 152 (29%) patients presented with OF 4 fractures with a mean age of 76 years (range 41-97). The most common treatment was short-segment posterior stabilization (51%; hybrid stabilization in 36%). Mean follow up was 208 days (±131 days), mean ODI was 30 ± 21. Dorsoventral stabilized patients were younger compared to the other groups (P < .001) and had significant better TuG compared to hybrid stabilization (P = .049). The other clinical outcomes did not differ in the therapy strategies (VAS pain: P = 1.000, ODI: P > .602, Barthel: P > .252, EQ-5D 5L index value: P > .610, VAS-EQ-5D 5L: P = 1.000). The inpatient complication rate was 8% after conservative and 16% after surgical treatment. During follow-up period 14% of conservatively treated patients and 3% of surgical treated patients experienced neurological deficits.

CONCLUSIONS

Conservative therapy of OF 4 injuries seems to be viable option in patients with only moderate symptoms. Hybrid stabilization was the dominant treatment strategy leading to promising clinical short-term results. Stand-alone cement augmentation seems to be a valid alternative in selected cases.

A triple minimally invasive surgery combination for subacute osteoporotic lower lumbar vertebral collapse with neurological compromise: a potential alternative to the vertebral corpectomy/expandable cage strategy

OBJECTIVE

Acute/subacute osteoporotic vertebral collapses (OVCs) in the lower lumbar spine with neurological compromise, although far less well documented than those in the thoracolumbar junction, may often pose greater treatment challenges. The authors clarified the utility of 3 familiar combined techniques of minimally invasive surgery for this condition as an alternative to the corpectomy/expandable cage strategy.

METHODS

This report included the authors' first 5 patients with more than 2 years (range 27-48 months) of follow-up. The patients were between 68 and 91 years of age, and had subacute painful L4 OVC with neurological compromise and preexisting lumbar spinal stenosis. The authors' single-stage minimally invasive surgery combination consisted of the following: step 1, balloon kyphoplasty for the L4 OVC to restore its strength, followed by L4-percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) placement with patients in the prone position; step 2, tubular lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) at the adjacent disc space involved with endplate injury, with patients in the lateral position; and step 3, supplemental PPS-rod fixation with patients in the prone position.

RESULTS

Estimated blood loss ranged from 20 to 72 mL. Neither balloon kyphoplasty-related nor LLIF-related potentially serious complications occurred. With CT measurements at the 9 LLIF levels, the postoperative increases averaged 3.5 mm in disc height and 3.7 mm in bilateral foraminal heights, which decreased by only 0.2 mm and 0 mm at the latest evaluation despite their low bone mineral densities, with a T-score of -3.8 to -2.6 SD. Canal compromise by fracture retropulsion decreased from 33% to 23% on average. As indicated by MRI measurements, the dural sac progressively enlarged and the ligamentum flavum increasingly shrank over time postoperatively, consistent with functional improvements assessed by the physician-based, patient-centered measures.

CONCLUSIONS

The advantages of this method over the corpectomy/expandable cage strategy include the following: 1) better anterior column stability with a segmentally placed cage, which reduces stress concentration at the cage footplate-endplate interface as an important benefit for patients with low bone mineral density; 2) indirect decompression through ligamentotaxis caused by whole-segment spine lengthening with LLIF, pushing back both the retropulsed fragments and the disc bulge anteriorly and unbuckling the ligamentum flavum to diminish its volume posteriorly; and 3) eliminating the need for segmental vessel management and easily bleeding direct decompressions. The authors' recent procedural modification eliminated step 3 by performing loose PPS-rod connections in step 1 and their tight locking after LLIF in step 2, reducing to only once the number of times the patient was repositioned.

Management of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture: Review Update 2022

A vertebral fracture is the most common type of osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) cause a variety of morbidities and deaths. There are currently few "gold standard treatments" outlined for the management of OVFs in terms of quantity and quality. Conservative treatment is the primary treatment option for OVFs. The treatment of pain includes short-term bed rest, analgesic medication, anti-osteoporotic medications, exercise, and a brace. Numerous reports have been made on studies for vertebral augmentation (VA), including vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. There is still debate and controversy about the effectiveness of VA in comparison with conservative treatment. Until more robust data are available, current evidence does not support the routine use of VA for OVF. Despite the fact that the majority of OVFs heal without surgery, 15%-35% of patients with an unstable fracture, persistent intractable back pain, or severely collapsed vertebra that causes a neurologic deficit, kyphosis, or chronic pseudarthrosis frequently require surgery. Because no single approach can guarantee the best surgical outcomes, customized surgical techniques are required. Surgeons must stay current on developments in the osteoporotic spine field and be open to new treatment options. Osteoporosis management and prevention are critical to lowering the risk of future OVFs. Clinical studies on bisphosphonate's effects on fracture healing are lacking. Teriparatide was intermittently administered, which dramatically improved spinal fusion and fracture healing while lowering mortality risk. According to the available literature, there are no standard management methods for OVFs. More multimodal approaches, including conservative and surgical treatment, VA, and medications that treat osteoporosis and promote fracture healing, are required to improve the quality of the majority of guidelines.

Osteoporosis as a Risk Factor for Intraoperative Complications and Long-term Instrumentation Failure in Patients With Scoliotic Spinal Deformity

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective review study.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to determine the effect of osteoporosis on spine instrumentation.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Osteoporosis is a common skeletal pathology that affects systemic cortical bone maintenance and remodeling. This disease accelerates the degeneration of the spine, often necessitating spinal surgery for progressive vertebral deformity, pathologic fracture, bony canal stenosis, and/or neural element decompression. There is a paucity of literature describing the role of osteoporosis as it relates to both perioperative complications and outcomes after spine fusion surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of a prospectively maintained database for patients undergoing spine surgery between January 1, 2006 and October 3, 2017. Inclusion criteria included age 18 years and above and surgery performed for the correction of thoracolumbar scoliosis. Data collected included various demographic, clinical, and operative variables.

RESULTS

A total of 532 patients met inclusion criteria, including 144 (27%) patients with a diagnosis of osteoporosis. Osteoporosis was significantly associated with increased blood volume loss (P=0.003). Postoperatively, osteoporosis was associated with increased rates of instrumentation failure (19% vs. 10%; P=0.008) and the need for revision surgery (33% vs. 16%; P<0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed osteoporosis to be an independent risk factor for increased mean number of spinal segments fused (P<0.05), mean blood volume loss (P<0.05), rate of postoperative deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (P<0.05), rate of instrumentation failure (P<0.05), and need for revision surgery (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Osteoporosis is a significant risk factor for instrumentation failure and need for revision surgery following arthrodesis for scoliosis correction. Furthermore, patients with osteoporosis have a significantly higher risk of intraoperative blood volume loss and postoperative thromboembolic events.

Radiological Evaluation of Combined Anteroposterior Fusion with Vertebral Body Replacement Using a Minimally Invasive Lateral Approach for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: Verification of Optimal Surgical Procedure

The combined anteroposterior fusion with vertebral body replacement (VBR) using a wide footplate expandable cage with a minimally invasive lateral approach has been widely used for pseudoarthrosis after osteoporotic vertebral fractures. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the radiological results of combined anteroposterior surgery using VBR and to recommend the optimal procedure. Thirty-eight elderly patients were included in this study. The mean preoperative local kyphosis angle was 29.3°, and the mean correction loss angle was 6.3°. Cage subsidence was observed in ten patients (26.3%), and UIV or LIV fracture in twelve patients (31.6%). Patients with cage subsidence were compared to those without cage subsidence to determine the causal factors. The mean number of fixed vertebrae was 5.4 vertebrae with cage subsidence and 7.4 vertebrae without cage subsidence. In addition, to precisely clarify the optimal number of fixed vertebrae, those patients with two above–two below fixation were compared to those with less than two above–two below fixation, which revealed that the correction loss angle was significantly less in two above–two below fixation (p = 0.016). Based on these results, we recommend at least two above–two below fixation with VBR to minimize the correction loss angle and prevent cage subsidence.

Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fractures With Neurological Deficit Treated by Balloon Kyphoplasty Augmented with Newly Developed Minimally Invasive Posterior Hook Stabilization

Most osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) are treated conservatively, but surgery is often indicated for residual pain, neuropathy, or severe deformity. OVFs tend to develop in elderly patients, so less invasive surgery is desirable. Surgery is mainly performed to stabilize the fractured vertebral body. Percutaneous cement augmentation, such as via balloon kyphoplasty (BKP), has produced satisfactory results as a surgical method for managing OVFs. Posterior fixation with implants is often performed with or without cement augmentation when stronger fixation is considered necessary for OVFs with local kyphosis and angular instability. Pedicle screws (PSs) are widely used as an implant for posterior fixation, but given the risk of backing out in bones with severe osteoporosis, several measures have been taken to increase the strength such as by adding hooks. In cases of osteoporosis, hooks that can use cortical bone as an anchor are considered more useful than PS but are rarely used in minimally invasive surgery. We developed a minimally invasive posterior hook stabilization approach to directly stabilize the posterior spinal components as a new augmentation method for BKP and applied it to four cases of thoracolumbar OVF with neurological symptoms. The operation time was about 60 minutes, including BKP, and the estimated blood loss was about 10 ml. No postoperative implant problems occurred, and in all cases, neurological symptoms, such as buttocks and leg pain, were alleviated at an early stage after surgery. One patient had a postoperative adjacent vertebral body fracture that was conservatively treatable. Minimally invasive posterior hook stabilization, which we developed as a way of augmenting BKP, was considered useful for managing vertebral body fractures of the thoracolumbar spine with local kyphosis and angular instability.

Direct Lateral Corpectomy and Reconstruction Using an Expandable Cage Improves Local Kyphosis but Not Global Sagittal Alignment

Recently, an expandable cage equipped with rectangular footplates has been used for anterior vertebral replacement in osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF). However, the postoperative changes in global alignment have not been elucidated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate local and global spinal alignment after anterior and posterior spinal fixation (APSF) using an expandable cage in elderly OVF patients. This retrospective multicenter review assessed 54 consecutive patients who underwent APSF for OVF. Clinical outcomes were compared between postoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA) > 95 mm and ≤95 mm groups to investigate the impact of malalignment. SVA improved by only 18.7 mm (from 111.8 mm to 93.1 mm). VAS score of back pain at final follow-up was significantly higher in patients with SVA > 95 mm than SVA ≤ 95 mm (42.4 vs. 22.6, p = 0.007). Adjacent vertebral fracture after surgery was significantly more frequent in the SVA > 95 mm (37% vs. 11%, p = 0.038). Multiple logistic regression showed significantly increased OR for developing adjacent vertebral fracture (OR = 4.76, 95% CI 1.10–20.58). APSF using the newly developed cage improves local kyphotic angle but not SVA. The main cause for the spinal malalignment after surgery was postoperative development of adjacent vertebral fractures.

Clinical and imaging features of surgically treated low lumbar osteoporotic vertebral collapse in patients with Parkinson's disease

Osteoporosis and Parkinson's disease (PD) are age-related diseases, and surgery for osteoporotic vertebral collapse (OVC) in PD patients become more common. OVC commonly affects the thoracolumbar spine, but low lumbar OVC is frequent in patients with lower bone mineral density (BMD). The aim of this study was to identify differences in clinical and imaging features of low lumbar OVC with or without PD and to discuss the appropriate treatment. The subjects were 43 patients with low lumbar OVC below L3 who were treated surgically, including 11 patients with PD. The main clinical symptoms were radicular pain in non-PD cases and a cauda equina sign in PD cases. Rapid progression and destructive changes of OVC were seen in patients with PD. The morphological features of OVC were flat-type in non-PD cases with old compression fracture, and destruction-type in PD cases without old compression fracture. Progression of PD was associated with decreased lumbar lordosis, lower lumbar BMD, and severe sarcopenia. High postoperative complication rates were associated with vertebral fragility and longer fusion surgery. Progression of postural instability as a natural course of PD may lead to mechanical stress and instrumentation failure. Invasive long-fusion surgery should be avoided for single low lumbar OVC.

Differences in surgical outcome after anterior corpectomy and reconstruction with an expandable cage with rectangular footplates between thoracolumbar and lumbar osteoporotic vertebral fracture

Background

Anterior and posterior spinal fixation (APSF) can provide rigid structural anterior column support in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF). A new rectangular footplate designed based on biomechanical studies of endplates provides better resistance to subsidence. However, differences in characteristics exist between the thoracolumbar and lower lumbar spine. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes following APSF using an expandable cage with rectangular footplates in the thoracolumbar/lumbar region.

Methods

Consecutive patients who underwent APSF for OVF at multiple centers were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed by dividing the patients into thoracolumbar (TL, T10–L2) and lumbar (L, L3–L5) groups. Surgical indications were incomplete neurologic deficit or intractable back pain with segmental spinal instability. Surgical outcomes including the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and reoperation rate were compared between TL and L groups.

Results

Sixty-nine patients were followed-up for more than 12 months and analyzed. Operative intervention was required for 35 patients in the TL group and 34 patients in the L group. Mean ages in the TL and L groups were 76.5 years and 75.1 years, respectively. Intra-vertebral instability was more frequent in the TL group (p<0.001). Screw fixation range was significantly longer in the TL group (p=0.012). The rate of cage subsidence did not differ significantly between the TL group (46%) and L group (44%). Reoperation rate tended to be higher in the TL group (p=0.095). Improvement ratio of JOA score was significantly better in the L group (60%) than in the TL group (46.9%, p=0.029).

Conclusion

APSF using an expandable cage was effective to treat OVF at both lumbar and thoracolumbar levels. However, the improvement ratio of the JOA score was better in the L group than in the TL group.

Clinical Observation of Intraosseous Anesthesia in Percutaneous Kyphoplasty

Objective

Percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) is an effective minimally invasive technique in spine surgery in recent years. General anesthesia and local anesthesia are the main ways of anesthesia in PKP, and epidural anesthesia is also applied to PKP to some extent. However, all these three anesthetic methods have their respective advantages and disadvantages. It is essential to compare and evaluate the effects of different anesthesia methods on PKP for treating spinal fractures.

Method

A total of 45 patients (53 vertebral bodies were included) were divided into two groups. Group A included 24 patients (29 vertebral bodies) with an average of 71 years old and Group B included 21 patients (24 vertebral bodies) with an average of 74 years old. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were recorded preoperatively; balloon expansion and bone cement injection were conducted intraoperatively. Then, they were recorded immediately after operation, 6 h postoperatively, to assess the pain level of the patient. Moreover, hospitalization time (days), operation duration (minutes), and bone cement injection amount (mL) had also been recorded.

Results

There was no significant difference in preoperative general information and VAS score. However, the VAS scores were statistically significant at both the moment of balloon expansion and injection of bone cement. At the moment of immediate postoperation, the VAS scores showed no statistically significant difference, while it showed a statistically significant difference 6 h postoperatively.

Conclusion

The anesthesia method by injection of 1% lidocaine hydrochloride (5 ml) into vertebral body can effectively relieve patients' pain in intraoperation and postoperation.

Minimally invasive anteroposterior combined surgery using lateral lumbar interbody fusion without corpectomy for treatment of lumbar spinal canal stenosis associated with osteoporotic vertebral collapse

OBJECTIVE

Various reconstructive surgical procedures have been described for lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS) with osteoporotic vertebral collapse (OVC); however, the optimal surgery remains controversial. In this study, the authors aimed to report the clinical and radiographic outcomes of their novel, less invasive, short-segment anteroposterior combined surgery (APCS) that utilized oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and posterior fusion without corpectomy to achieve decompression and reconstruction of anterior support in patients with LSCS-OVC.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 20 patients with LSCS-OVC (mean age 79.6 years) underwent APCS and received follow-up for a mean of 38.6 months. All patients were unable to walk without support owing to severe low-back and leg pain. Cleft formations in the fractured vertebrae were identified on CT. APCS was performed on the basis of a novel classification of OVC into three types. In type A fractures with a collapsed rostral endplate, combined monosegment OLIF and posterior spinal fusion (PSF) were performed between the collapsed and rostral adjacent vertebrae. In type B fractures with a collapsed caudal endplate, combined monosegment OLIF and PSF were performed between the collapsed and caudal adjacent vertebrae. In type C fractures with severe collapse of both the rostral and caudal endplates, bisegment OLIF and PSF were performed between the rostral and caudal adjacent vertebrae, and pedicle screws were also inserted into the collapsed vertebra. Preoperative and postoperative clinical and radiographical status were reviewed.

RESULTS

The mean number of fusion segments was 1.6. Walking ability improved in all patients, and the mean Japanese Orthopaedic Association score for recovery rate was 65.7%. At 1 year postoperatively, the mean preoperative Oswestry Disability Index of 65.6% had significantly improved to 21.1%. The mean local lordotic angle, which was -5.9° preoperatively, was corrected to 10.5° with surgery and was maintained at 7.7° at the final follow-up. The mean corrective angle was 16.4°, and the mean correction loss was 2.8°.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors have proposed using minimally invasive, short-segment APCS with OLIF, tailored to the morphology of the collapsed vertebra, to treat LSCS-OVC. APCS achieves neural decompression, reconstruction of anterior support, and correction of local alignment.

Current Concepts in the Management of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: A Narrative Review

Vertebral fractures are the most common type of osteoporotic fracture and can increase morbidity and mortality. To date, the guidelines for managing osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) are limited in quantity and quality, and there is no gold standard treatment for these fractures. Conservative treatment is considered the primary treatment option for OVFs and includes pain relief through shortterm bed rest, analgesics, antiosteoporotic drugs, exercise, and braces. Studies on vertebral augmentation (VA) including vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty have been widely reported, but there is still debate and controversy regarding the effectiveness of VA when compared with conservative treatment, and the routine use of VA for OVF is not supported by current evidence. Although most OVFs heal well, approximately 15%-35% of patients with unstable fractures, chronic intractable back pain, severely collapsed vertebra (leading to neurological deficits and kyphosis), or chronic pseudarthrosis frequently require surgery. Given that there is no single technique for optimizing surgical outcomes in OVFs, tailored surgical techniques are needed. Surgeons need to pay attention to advances in osteoporotic spinal surgery and should be open to novel thoughts and techniques. Prevention and management of osteoporosis is the key element in reducing the risk of subsequent OVFs. Bisphosphonates and teriparatide are mainstay drugs for improving fracture healing in OVF. The effects of bisphosphonates on fracture healing have not been clinically evaluated. The intermittent administration of teriparatide significantly enhanced spinal fusion and fracture healing and reduced mortality risk. Based on the current literature, there is still a lack of standard management strategies for OVF. There is a need for greater efforts through multimodal approaches including conservative treatment, surgery, osteoporosis treatment, and drugs that promote fracture healing to improve the quality of the guidelines.

Effect of bisphosphonates or teriparatide on mechanical complications after posterior instrumented fusion for osteoporotic vertebral fracture: a multi-center retrospective study

Background

The optimal treatment of osteoporosis after reconstruction surgery for osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF) remains unclear. In this multicentre retrospective study, we investigated the effects of typically used agents for osteoporosis, namely, bisphosphonates (BP) and teriparatide (TP), on surgical results in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Methods

Retrospectively registered data were collected from 27 universities and affiliated hospitals in Japan. We compared the effects of BP vs TP on postoperative mechanical complication rates, implant-related reoperation rates, and clinical outcomes in patients who underwent posterior instrumented fusion for OVF. Data were analysed according to whether the osteoporosis was primary or glucocorticoid-induced.

Results

A total of 159 patients who underwent posterior instrumented fusion for OVF were included. The overall mechanical complication rate was significantly lower in the TP group than in the BP group (BP vs TP: 73.1% vs 58.2%, p = 0.045). The screw backout rate was significantly lower and the rates of new vertebral fractures and pseudoarthrosis tended to be lower in the TP group than in the BP group. However, there were no significant differences in lumbar functional scores and visual analogue scale pain scores or in implant-related reoperation rates between the two groups. The incidence of pseudoarthrosis was significantly higher in patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) than in those with primary osteoporosis; however, the pseudoarthrosis rate was reduced by using TP. The use of TP also tended to reduce the overall mechanical complication rate in both primary osteoporosis and GIOP.

Conclusions

The overall mechanical complication rate was lower in patients who received TP than in those who received a BP postoperatively, regardless of type of osteoporosis. The incidence of pseudoarthrosis was significantly higher in patients with GIOP, but the use of TP reduced the rate of pseudoarthrosis in GIOP patients. The use of TP was effective to reduce postoperative complications for OVF patients treated with posterior fusion.

The Surgical Outcomes of Spinal Fusion for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures in the Lower Lumbar Spine with a Neurological Deficit

Introduction

Osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) is the most common osteoporotic fracture, and some patients require surgical intervention to improve their impaired activities of daily living with neurological deficits. However, many previous reports have focused on OVF around the thoracolumbar junction, and the surgical outcomes of lumbar OVF have not been thoroughly discussed. We aimed to investigate the surgical outcomes for lumbar OVF with a neurological deficit.

Methods

Patients who underwent fusion surgery for thoracolumbar OVF with a neurological deficit were enrolled at 28 institutions. Clinical information, comorbidities, perioperative complications, Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores, visual analog scale scores, and radiographic parameters were compared between patients with lower lumbar fracture (L3-5) and those with thoracolumbar junction fracture (T10-L2). Each patient with lower lumbar fracture (L group) was matched with to patients with thoracolumbar junction fracture (T group).

Results

A total 403 patients (89 males and 314 females, mean age: 73.8 ± 7.8 years, mean follow-up: 3.9 ± 1.7 years) were included in this study. Lower lumbar OVF was frequently found in patients with lower bone mineral density. After matching, mechanical failure was more frequent in the L group (L group: 64%, T group: 39%; p < 0.001). There was no difference between groups in the clinical and radiographical outcomes, although the rates of complication and revision surgery were still high in both groups.

Conclusions

The surgical intervention for OVF is effective in patients with myelopathy or radiculopathy regardless of the surgical level, although further study is required to improve clinical and radiographical outcomes.

Level of evidence

Level III