Association between Spinopelvic Alignment and Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration Quantified with Magnetic Resonance Imaging T2 Mapping in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain

Automatic measurement of anatomical parameters of the lumbar vertebral body and the intervertebral disc on radiographs by deep learning

Background

Lumbar spine disorders are one of the common causes of low back pain (LBP). Objective and reliable measurement of anatomical parameters of the lumbar spine is essential in the clinical diagnosis and evaluation of lumbar disorders. However, manual measurements are time-consuming and laborious, with poor consistency and repeatability. Here, we aim to develop and evaluate an automatic measurement model for measuring the anatomical parameters of the vertebral body and intervertebral disc based on lateral lumbar radiographs and deep learning (DL).

Methods

A model based on DL was developed with a dataset consisting of 1,318 lateral lumbar radiographs for the prediction of anatomical parameters, including vertebral body heights (VBH), intervertebral disc heights (IDH), and intervertebral disc angles (IDA). The mean of the values obtained by 3 radiologists was used as a reference standard. Statistical analysis was performed in terms of standard deviation (SD), mean absolute error (MAE), Percentage of correct keypoints (PCK), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), regression analysis, and Bland-Altman plot to evaluate the performance of the model compared with the reference standard.

Results

The percentage of intra-observer landmark distance within the 3 mm threshold was 96%. The percentage of inter-observer landmark distance within the 3 mm threshold was 94% (R1 and R2), 92% (R1 and R3), and 93% (R2 and R3), respectively. The PCK of the model within the 3 mm distance threshold was 94-99%. The model-predicted values were 30.22±3.01 mm, 10.40±3.91 mm, and 10.63°±4.74° for VBH, IDH, and IDA, respectively. There were good correlation and consistency in anatomical parameters of the lumbar vertebral body and disc between the model and the reference standard in most cases (R2=0.89-0.95, ICC =0.93-0.98, MAE =0.61-1.15, and SD =0.89-1.64).

Conclusions

The newly proposed model based on a DL algorithm can accurately measure various anatomical parameters on lateral lumbar radiographs. This could provide an accurate and efficient measurement tool for the quantitative evaluation of spinal disorders.

Sagittal Alignment in the Degenerative Lumbar Spine: Surgical Planning

➤ Sagittal alignment of the spine has gained attention in the field of spinal deformity surgery for decades. However, emerging data support the importance of restoring segmental lumbar lordosis and lumbar spinal shape according to the pelvic morphology when surgically addressing degenerative lumbar pathologies such as degenerative disc disease and spondylolisthesis.➤ The distribution of caudal lordosis (L4-S1) and cranial lordosis (L1-L4) as a percentage of global lordosis varies by pelvic incidence (PI), with cephalad lordosis increasing its contribution to total lordosis as PI increases.➤ Spinal fusion may lead to iatrogenic deformity if performed without attention to lordosis magnitude and location in the lumbar spine.➤ A solid foundation of knowledge with regard to optimal spinal sagittal alignment is beneficial when performing lumbar spinal surgery, and thoughtful planning and execution of lumbar fusions with a focus on alignment may improve patient outcomes.

How to make a more optimal surgical plan for Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients: a comparative study based on the changes of the sagittal alignment and selection of the lowest instrumented vertebra

BACKGROUND

The treatment of patients with Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is closely related to the pelvic because the spine-pelvis is an interacting whole. Besides, the choice of fusion segment is a significant issue; with the optimal choice, there will be fewer complications and restoring the pelvic morphology to some extent. This study aims to analyze the impact of changes in sagittal parameters and selection of the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) on spine and pelvic morphology for better surgical strategy.

METHOD

Ninety-four patients with Lenke 5 AIS who underwent selective posterior thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curve fusion were included in the study and grouped according to pelvic morphology and position of LIV. Spinopelvic parameters were measured preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the latest follow-up. The patient's preoperative and last follow-up quality of life was assessed with the MOS item short-form health survey (SF-36) and scoliosis research society 22-item (SRS-22).

RESULT

Patients being posterior pelvic tilt had the oldest mean age (P = 0.010), the smallest lumbar lordosis (LL) (P = 0.036), the smallest thoracic kyphosis (TK) (P = 0.399) as well as the smallest proximal junctional angle (PJA) while those being anterior pelvic tilt had the largest PJA. The follow-up TK significantly increased in both groups of anterior and normal pelvic tilt (P < 0.039, P < 0.006) while no significant changes were observed in the posterior pelvic tilt group. When LIV is above L4, the follow-up PJA was larger than other groups (P = 0.049, P = 0.006). When LIV is below L4, the follow-up TK and PT were larger and LL was smaller than other groups(P < 0.05). The SF-36 and SRS-22 scores were better in the LIV = L4 group than in other groups at the last follow-up (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The correction of TK and LL after surgery can improve pelvic morphology. Besides, LIV is best set at L4, which will facilitate the recovery of TK, the improvement of symptoms, and the prevention of complications and pelvic deformities. Level of evidence Level III.

Patient-Reported Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Disc Disease: A Prospective Comparative Cohort Study

Background

Comparative outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) and traditional open TLIF (O-TLIF) for degenerative lumbar disc disease have been poorly studied. The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare the outcomes between MI-TLIF and O-TLIF for patients with a degenerative disc disease, focusing on the functional capacity of patients in daily life.

Methods

A prospective cohort study was performed, comparing 54 patients who underwent O-TLIF and 55 patients who underwent MI-TLIF with a follow-up of 4 years. Clinical evaluation was performed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 36-item short form survey (SF-36), and a visual analog scale for pain (VAS pain). Radiological evaluation was also performed.

Results

At the final follow-up, compared with O-TLIF, MI-TLIF was associated with significantly better intraoperative results, including similar operative time (p = 0.246), lower estimated blood loss (p = 0.001), and shorter hospital stay (p = 0.001). The final ODI score was significantly better in the MI-TLIF group (p = 0.031). The SF-36-physical (p = 0.023) and VAS pain (p = 0.024) scores were significantly better in the MI-TLIF group. There was no significant difference in the fusion rate (p = 0.747).

Conclusions

The MI-TLIF technique is an effective and safe procedure for degenerative lumbar disc disease. Compared to traditional O-TLIF, MI-TLIF was associated with less disability and higher quality of life, with a low rate of intraoperative and postoperative complications.

Associations between visceral fat chronic low back pain and central sensitization in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis

BACKGROUND

Pain sensitization may be one of the mechanisms contributing to chronic low back pain (CLBP).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between visceral fat, CLBP, and central sensitization (CS); describe the relationship between low back pain (LBP) intensity and CS; and identify possible correlation between visceral fat and LBP intensity.

METHODS

Patients with CLBP were divided using their CS inventory (CSI) scores into low- (CSI < 40) and high-CSI (CSI ⩾ 40) subgroups. We compared computed tomography (CT) measurements and scores for association with pain according to the visual analogue scale (VAS) between the two groups.

RESULTS

The low-CSI and the high-CSI groups had 47 patients (67.1%; 21 men, 26 women) and 23 patients (32.9%; 11 men and 12 women), respectively. The high-CSI group had a significantly higher mean VAS score (p< 0.01) and estimated mean visceral fat area (p< 0.05) than the low-CSI group. There was a moderate positive correlation between VAS score and visceral fat (standardised partial regression coefficient: 0.659, p< 0.01) in the high-CSI group according to multiple linear regression analysis adjusted for age and sex.

CONCLUSIONS

Visceral fat is associated with CLBP, regardless of sex or age, and may be a potential therapeutic target for CLBP with CS.

Factors associated with low back pain in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Low back pain (LBP) is a major symptom of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (SLSS). It is important to assess LBP in patients with SLSS to develop better treatment. This study aimed to analyse the factors associated with LBP in patients with SLSS.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included consecutive patients with SLSS aged between 51 and 79 years who had symptoms in one or both the legs, with and without LBP. The participants were classified into two groups: the high group (LBP visual analogue scale [VAS] score ≥ 30 mm) and the low group (LBP VAS score < 30 mm). We performed multiple logistic regression analysis with the high and low groups as dependent variables, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 80 patients with LSS were included (35 men and 45 women; mean age 64.5 years), with 47 and 30 patients in the high and low groups, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the sagittal vertical axis (SVA; + 10 mm; odds ratio, 1.331; 95% confidence interval, 1.051 - 1.660) and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL; + 1°; odds ratio, 1.065; 95% confidence interval, 1.019-1.168) were significantly associated with LBP. A receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed cut-off values of 47.0 mm of SVA and 30.5° of PI-LL, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicated that SVA and PI-LL were significant predictors for LBP in SLSS. It is suggested that these parameters should be taken into consideration when assessing LBP in patients with SLSS.

Clinical characteristics of geriatric patients with non-specific chronic low back pain

A comprehensive analysis of clinical information in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) was performed to clarify the clinical characteristics of geriatric LBP from the perspective of body composition, spinal alignment, and blood findings related to senescence. We enrolled 203 patients with an average age of 79.0 years (77 men and 126 women), with non-specific CLBP as a single-center prospective cohort study, the patients were compared with age- and sex-matched controls without CLBP using a propensity score-matching. We performed laboratory analysis, radiographic evaluations for global spinal parameter and lumbar degeneration, and body composition analysis using whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. We observed a higher red blood cell distribution width (RDW) (p < 0.001), which is an index of aging, as well as a lower vitamin D level (p = 0.002), skeletal muscle mass index (p = 0.045) and a higher fat mass (p = 0.007) in patients with CLBP. Moreover, patients with geriatric CLBP had significantly lower lumbar lordosis (p = 0.024), and higher sagittal vertical axis (p = 0.006) was correlated with lower extremity and trunk muscle mass (p < 0.001), independent of lumbar degeneration. Geriatric patients with CLBP have sarcopenic fat accumulation and spinal sagittal malalignment with senescent status, such as elevated RDW and hypovitaminosis D.