Novel Technique for Sacral-Alar-Iliac Screw Placement Using Three-Dimensional Patient-Specific Template Guide

Radiation Exposure During Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery Can Be Reduced by Using a Three-Dimensional Patient-Specific Template Guide

BACKGROUND

The use of posterior lumber interbody fusion (PLIF) using cortical bone trajectory (CBT) with a patient-specific 3D template guide is increasingly widespread. To our knowledge, no studies have extensively evaluated the reduction of radiation exposure when using patient-specific drill template guides. The purpose of this study is to compare the intra-operative radiation dose and surgeon's exposure to radiation in CBT-PLIF when using a patient-specific drill guide with that in traditional minimally invasive (MIS)-PLIF.

METHODS

In this observational study, we retrospectively compared data from five patients who were treated with single-level CBT-PLIF using a patient-specific drill guide (G group) and five patients who were treated with single-level traditional MIS-PLIF (M group). We compared the surgical time, surgeon's exposure to radiation, and intra-operative radiation time and dose between the two groups of patients.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 67.0 years in the M group and 74.2 years in the G group. The average surgical time was 242.8 min in the M group and 189.6 min in the G group (p = 0.020). The surgeon's exposure to radiation was 373.7 µSv in the M group and 81.75 µSv in the G group at chest level outside the protector (p = 0.00092); 42.0 µSv (M group) and 3.6 µSv (G group) at chest level inside the protector (p = 0.0000062); and 4.33 µSv (M group) and 1.20 µSv (G group) at the buttocks of the surgeon (p = 0.0013). Radiation time was 269.8 s (M group) and 56.6 s (G group) (p = 0.0097), and radiation dose was 153.7 mGy (M group) and 30.42 mGy (G group) (p = 0.00057).

CONCLUSION

The patient-specific drill template guide is an invaluable tool that facilitates the safe insertion of CBT screws with a low radiation dose from the outset.

Advances in Implant Technologies for Spine Surgery

Spine implants are becoming increasingly diversified. Taking inspiration from other industries, three-dimensional modeling of the spinal column has helped meet the custom needs of individual patients as both en bloc replacements and pedicle screw designs. Intraoperative tailoring of devices, a common need in the operating room, has led to expandable versions of cages and interbody spacers.

Obturator inlet and iliac oblique technique for safe, convenient, and reliable iliac screw placement

Background

There are many described techniques for the placement of posterior iliac screws for extension of lumbar posterior spinal instrumentation to the pelvis. However, each one has its limitations. We describe our technique for fluoroscopic guidance of iliac screw placement utilizing the obturator inlet and iliac oblique views as well as a detailed review of how to obtain and interpret these views for safe iliac screw placement.

Methods

Retrospective chart review of patients undergoing iliac screw placement utilizing the obturator inlet and iliac oblique views as part of spine instrumentation between January 2019 and March 2022. Screw length and bony breaches are reported utilizing this technique.

Results

Twelve patients underwent posterior lumbopelvic fixation with a total of 23 screws placed via either open or percutaneous technique. The mean screw length was 96.5 mm (Range 80-110, standard dev 7.75). There were no recorded breaches or recannulation attempts.

Conclusions

We show how this technique is a much more convenient alternative to the placement of iliac screws under the obturator outlet oblique ("teardrop" view) which necessitates that the C-arm is in line with the instruments being placed. These described views can be used to place screws with either open or percutaneous techniques and with either the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) or S2 alar iliac (S2AI) starting points.

Direct Iliac Screw vs Sacral-2-Alar-Iliac Screws Technique for Sacropelvic Fixation: Technical Nuances and a Review of the Literature

Sacropelvic (SP) fixation is the immobilization of the sacroiliac joint to attain lumbosacral fusion and prevent distal spinal junctional failure. SP fixation is indicated in numerous spinal conditions (eg, scoliosis, multilevel spondylolisthesis, spinal/sacral trauma, tumors, or infections). Many SP fixation techniques have been described in the literature. Currently, the most used surgical techniques for SP fixation are direct iliac screws and sacral-2-alar-iliac screws. There is currently no consensus in the literature on which technique carries more favorable clinical outcomes. In this review, we aim to assess the available data on each technique and discuss their respective advantages and disadvantages. We will also present our experience with a modification of direct iliac screws using a subcrestal approach and outline the future prospects of SP fixation.