Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Anterior and Posterior Approaches

Anterior, Posterior and Anterior-Posterior Approaches for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical and radiological results of the anterior approach versus the posterior approach versus the anterior-posterior approach for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures.

METHODS

The network meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA Statement. Electronic searches of PubMed and Embase were conducted up to June 22, 2023, for relevant randomized controlled trials. STATA13.0 was used to perform network meta-analysis. p < .05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Nine RCTs with a total of 550 patients receiving surgical treatment in at least two of the three approaches, including anterior, posterior and anterior-posterior approaches, were included. The surgical duration and intraoperative bleeding volume in the posterior approach were significantly lower than those in the anterior (SMD, -1.72; 95% CI, -2.82, -0.62) and anterior-posterior approaches (SMD, 3.33; 95% CI, 1.65, 5.00). The surgical duration in the anterior approach was significantly lower than that in the anterior-posterior approach (SMD, 1.61; 95% CI, 0.12, 3.10). The Cobb angle in the anterior-posterior approach was significantly lower than that in the anterior approach (MD, -4.83; 95% CI, -9.60, -0.05). The VAS score in the posterior approach was significantly higher than that in the anterior approach (MD, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.55, 1.16) and anterior-posterior approach (MD, -0.84; 95% CI, -1.12, -0.55). No significant difference was identified among the three surgical approaches in implant failure rate and infection rate.

CONCLUSION

All three approaches were safe approaches with advantages and disadvantages. The selection of surgical approaches for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures may be individualized.

Minimally-invasive lateral thoracic and lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with expandable interbody cages - Considerations, complications & outcomes

Introduction

Reports about lateral lumbar or thoracic interbody fusion (LLIF) using expandable interbody spacers are sparse.

Research question

To report our experience with the use of expandable spacers for LLIF.

Material and methods

We reviewed all consecutive LLIF patients with use of an expandable titanium interbody implant (ELSA® Expandable Integrated LLIF Spacer, Globus Medical Inc, PA (USA)) between September 2018 and January 2024.

Results

We identified 503 patients, in which we performed LLIF at 732 levels. In 63 patients (12.5%) and 70 levels (9.6%) an expandable spacer was used. The mean age was 61.4 years, 57.1% were females. LLIF was performed between T11/12 - L4/5 in the setting of fusion procedures (mono-/bisegmental (20; 28.6%), 3-7 segments (29; 41.4%); >7 segments (21; 30.0%)), of which 21 (33.3%), 20 (31.8%) and 22 (34.9%) were for traumatic, deformity/revision and other diagnoses. Surgery included release of the anterior longitudinal ligament in 30 cases (42.9%). Intraoperative adverse events (AEs) were noted in 2 (3.2%), postoperative AEs in 27 (42.9%) at discharge, 17 (27.0%) at 3 months and 14 (22.2%) at 12 months. Segmental sagittal Cobb angle changed from 1.3° (preoperative) to 13.0° at discharge (p < 0.001), 12.7° at 3 months (p < 0.001) and 13.3° at 12 months (p < 0.001). Functional outcome was excellent/good in 43 (68.3%; 5 missing) at 3 months and in 37 (58.7%; 10 missing) at 12 months.

Discussion and conclusion

The use of LLIF with an expandable spacer was safe, promoted solid fusion and enabled powerful correction of sagittal segmental Cobb angle, which was maintained during follow-up.

Posterior Pedicle Screw Fixation With Indirect Decompression Versus Direct Decompression in Treating Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and efficacy between posterior pedicle screw fixation with direct versus indirect decompression in treating patients with thoracolumbar burst fracture.

METHODS

This study was conducted on the basis of PRISMA statement. We systematically searched the PubMed and Embase databases up to July 3, 2023. Relevant studies comparing indirect decompression and direct decompression were recruited. Weighted mean differences (WMDs), odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were analyzed for continuous and dichotomous data, respectively. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The operation time (WMD: -37.14, 95% CI: [-42.64, 31.64], P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%) and intraoperative blood loss (WMD: -316.82, 95% CI: [-469.80, -163.85], P < 0.0001, I2 = 99%) of indirect decompression group were significantly lower. Percentage of anterior vertebral body height (WMD: 3.98, 95% CI: [2.36, 5.60], P < 0.00001, I2 = 32%) and encroachment rate of the spinal canal (WMD: 1.48, 95% CI: [0.56, 2.40], P = 0.002, I2 = 35%) of indirect decompression group were significantly higher. No statistical difference was identified in grades of neurologic recovery and Cobb angle.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior pedicle screw fixation with indirect decompression was safe and effective for thoracolumbar burst fracture with or without neurologic deficits when posterior longitudinal ligament was intact.

Osteoporotic Burst Fracture in a Young Male Adult as First Presentation of a Rare PLS3 Mutation: A Case Report

Low-impact spinal fractures in young patients are rare and should raise suspicion of an underlying condition, as these injuries are typically the result of high-energy trauma. We describe a case of a young male patient who sustained a burst fracture of the first lumbar vertebra (L1) following low-energy trauma. The patient underwent percutaneous posterior spinal instrumentation, yet the poor bone quality detected intraoperatively prompted further diagnostic evaluation. Subsequently, low bone mineral density (BMD) was detected, and a rare plastine-3 (PLS3) gene mutation was revealed in the genetic analysis. The patient was initiated on teriparatide therapy after the discovery of osteoporosis postoperatively. It is, therefore, imperative to investigate all young patients with low-energy spinal fractures preoperatively to discover the underlying pathology promptly.

The efficacy of different segments fixation for treatment thoracolumbar fractures: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We did this network meta-analysis to comprehensively compare the efficacy of different segments [intermediate segment (IS), short segment (SS) and long segment (LS)] in the fixation of thoracolumbar fractures.

METHODS

We searched studies from inception until January 20, 2023 through PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. All studies comparing different segments in the fixation of thoracolumbar fractures were included in this meta-analysis. Outcomes were anterior vertebral height ratio (AVHR), sagittal Cobb angle (SCA), visual analogue scale score, and implant failure rate. This network meta-analysis was performed by R software with gemtc package.

RESULTS

Finally, a total of 22 studies were finally included in this network meta-analysis. IS (WMD 2.43, 95% CrI 2.04-2.91) was more effective than SS in terms of the AVHR, and the difference was statistically significant. IS was more effective than LS in reducing SCA (WMD -2.87, 95% CrI -3.79 to -1.96) with statistically significant. Compared with SS, IS significantly reduced the SCA with statistically significant (WMD -2.52, 95% CrI -3.31 to -1.72). IS (WMD -2.87, 95% CrI -3.78 to -1.96) was more effective than LS, and the difference was statistically significant. Moreover, IS (WMD -2.52, 95% CrI -3.31 to -1.72) was more effective than SS, and the difference was statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

IS was associated with a significant reduction in SCA, implant failure rate, and visual analogue scale compared to SS and LS, while having the most favorable impact on AVHR among all the treatments assessed.

Endoscopic Decompression Combined with Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for Treating Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures with Neurological Deficits: Technical Note and Early Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to introduce surgical technique of endoscopic decompression combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) for thoracolumbar burst fractures (TLBFs) with neurological deficits and evaluate its efficacy.

METHODS

A total of 32 patients with TLBFs and neurological deficits who were treated by endoscopic decompression combined with PPSF from June 2018 to August 2019 were included in this study. The effect of decompression was analyzed using canal encroachment ratio, while deformity correction was assessed using the sagittal Cobb angle and the percentage of anterior vertebral height. We also analyzed other clinical outcomes such as visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale dose.

RESULTS

The patients were followed up for an average of 16 months. Our data showed that the patients' mean operation time was 153.75 minutes, the mean intraoperative blood loss was 48.84 mL, and the mean incision length was 7.78 cm. The canal encroachment ratio decreased from 55.91% ± 12.27% to 12.44% ± 3.91% (P < 0.05), sagittal Cobb angle decreased from 17.09° ± 5.46° to 5.72° ± 3.68° (P < 0.05), while the percentage of anterior vertebral height increased from 53.72% ± 8.99% to 83.22% ± 8.21% (P < 0.05). In addition, there was a significant improvement in the visual analog scale score, Oswestry Disability Index, and American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale classification (P < 0.05). Screw fracture occurred only in one patient during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic decompression combined with PPSF in the treatment of TLBFs with neurological deficits is safe and effective, which is a new minimally invasive method for the treatment of such diseases.