Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction due to knee instability

Isokinetic quadriceps physiotherapy after knee surgery: a retrospective study

Introduction

Quadriceps weakness after knee surgery is the most common consequence that can have different consequences not only for the knee itself but also for the locomotor system in general. This study aimed to compare the results of isokinetic and isotonic exercise on torque restoration quadriceps on knee surgery.

Methods

A sample of 180 subjects was analyzed and divided into two subsamples according to the type of rehabilitation protocol that was implemented. The examined group A-isokinetic consisted of 90 male subjects aged 28.54 ± 4.44 years, with a rehabilitation protocol based on the isokinetic exercise of the quadriceps. The examined group B-isotonic also consisted of 90 male subjects aged 27.93 ± 4.27 years, with a rehabilitation protocol for strengthening the quadriceps that applied an exercise program with additional resistance, i.e., isotonic exercise in the gym. Before the start of the rehabilitation treatment, an initial isokinetic test was performed at an angular speed of 60 °/s in all subjects. After 3 and 6 weeks of rehabilitation treatment, the control tests were performed in the same way as in the initial test.

Results

Based on the values of MANOVA analysis and discriminative analysis, significantly better results of isokinetic tests were found in the examined group A-isokinetic compared with those in the examined group B-isotonic. At the final measurement of group A, 83 respondents (92.2%) were placed in the "biggest" class out of the 90 respondents.

Conclusion

Based on the obtained research results, we conclude that isokinetic exercise is more effective in terms of physiotherapy of quadriceps hypotrophy after knee surgery.

Causes of anterior cruciate ligament injuries

In order to prevent anterior cruciate ligament injuries it is necessary to define risk factors and to analyze the most frequent causes of injuries--that being the aim of this study. The study sample consisted of 451 surgically treated patients, including 400 sportsmen (65% of them being active and 35% recreational sportsmen), 29% female and 71% male; of whom 90% were younger than 35. Sports injuries, as the most frequent cause of anterior cruciate ligament injuries, were recorded in 88% of patients (non-contact ones in 78% and contact ones in 22%), injuries occurring in everyday activities in 11% and in traffic in 1%. Among sportsmen, reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament was most frequently performed in football players (48%), then in handball players (22%), basketball players (13%), volleyball players (8%), martial arts fighters (4%). However, the injury incidence was the highest among the active basketball players (1 injured among 91 active players). Type of footwear, warming up before the activity, genetic predisposition and everyday therapy did not have a significant influence on getting injured. Anterior cruciate ligament injuries happened three times more often during matches, in the middle and at the end of a match and training session (79%), at landing after the jump or when changing direction of movement (75%) without a contact with other competitors, on dry surfaces (79%), among not so well prepared sportsmen.

[Reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament by using two different techniques]

INTRODUCTION

Modern literature concerning reconstructions of Anterior Cruciate Ligament is mostly focused on the choice of graft (hamstring or bone-tendon-bone), its placing, tensioning and fixation. The bone-hamstring-bone graft consists of compressed cancellous bone on its ends and it has been developed to achieve a more rigid fixation of the graft. The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative results in surgically treated patients two years after the reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 55 patients divided into two groups according to the implanted graft: bone-tendon-bone and bone-hamstring-bone graft. The results were assessed by Tegner and Lysholm scoring systems, arthrometric measurements, functional tests and International Knee Documentation Committee standard.

RESULTS

The average postoperative results did not show a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between the two groups (94 in the bone-tendon-bone group versus 93 in the bone-hamstring-bone group) according to Lysholm scoring system, nor in the arthrometric measurements obtained by Lachman test (2.0:2.1). According to the International Knee Documentation Committee standard, the bone-hamstring-bone group had more excellent results, but also three unsatisfactory ones; so, the bone-tendon-bone group was found to have uniform and better results (100% of excellent and good results vs. 91% in the bone-hamstring-bone group). Better results were also recorded by Tegner scoring system in the bone-tendon-bone group (8.6 vs. 7.1) due to the fact that there were more active athletes and greater preoperative level of activities in this group (3.1 vs. 7.1 in the bone-hamstring group).

CONCLUSIONS

The choice of graft is a less important factor in the reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament than its placing, tensioning and fixation, because a significant difference between groups was recorded only by the International Knee Documentation Committee standard.