Correlation between central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in various age groups

Comparison of Three Tonometers in Measuring Intraocular Pressure in Eyes That Underwent Myopic Laser in situ Keratomileusis and Photorefractive Keratectomy

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Distribution of IOP measured with an air puff tonometer in a young population

Purpose

To determine the normal range of intraocular pressure (IOP) in the young and its association with certain corneal parameters using a non-contact device.

Methods

Subjects were selected from students of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences through stratified sampling. All participants had visual acuity testing, corneal imaging, a comprehensive slit-lamp examination by an ophthalmologist, and IOP measurement using a non-contact air-puff tonometer.

Results

Of the 1280 invitees, 1073 (83.8%) participated, and 1027 were eligible. Mean IOP was 16.38 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI): 16.22–16.53] in the total sample, 16.14 mmHg (95% CI: 15.84–16.45) in men, and 16.48 mmHg (95% CI: 16.31–16.66) in women. There was a significant IOP difference between myopes and emmetropes (P = 0.031). Based on the multiple linear regression model, IOP associated directly with age and central corneal thickness (CCT), and inversely with corneal diameter, spherical equivalent (SE), and keratoconus. Based on standardized coefficients of the regression model, CCT and SE had the strongest association with IOP.

Conclusions

In the present study, we demonstrated the IOP distribution in a young population using a non-contact method. CCT and SE were strongly associated with IOP.

Intraocular pressure change after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis as measured on the central and peripheral cornea

BACKGROUND

Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) leads to inaccurate measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP). This study aimed to determine the efficacy and reliability of IOP measurement on the peripheral cornea after LASIK.

METHODS

The IOP was measured in 52 eyes of 26 subjects before LASIK and one week and one month after LASIK using non-contact tonometry. The measurements were made on the central and peripheral cornea and the results were subjected to statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The mean measured IOP on the central cornea was decreased by 6.425 ± 2.544 mmHg at one week and 5.752 ± 3.863 mmHg at one month post-operatively. The mean IOP measured on the peripheral cornea was decreased by only 0.921 ± 2.054 mmHg at one week post-operatively. Most notably, the mean IOP measured on the peripheral cornea was increased by only 0.158 ± 2.979 mmHg at one month post-operatively with no statistical significance (p > 0.05). Furthermore, a linear regression of ablation depth versus change in IOP measured on the central cornea was demonstrated, but the peripheral IOP did not display such a statistically significant correlation with the depth of ablation at both one week and one month after operation.

CONCLUSION

The IOP measured on the peripheral cornea is closer to the actual IOP. Therefore, it is more accurate and reliable to measure IOP on the peripheral cornea than on the centre after LASIK.