[Diagnostic significance of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in identification and localisation of culprit lesions in patients undergoing elective PTCA]

[Study of efficacy and safety of pharmacological stress tests in nuclear cardiology]

BACKGROUND/AIM

Treadmill test combined with myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) is a commonly used technique in the assessment of coronary artery disease. Many patients who cannot adequately perform exercise stress testing may nevertheless undergo pharmacological tests, most commonly with the vasodilator agents (adenosine and dipyridamole), as well as the positive inotropic agent dobutamine. Patients undergoing vasodilators stress testing with either dipyridamole or adenosine also perform simultaneous low-intensity exercise. The aim of this study was to compare various pharmacological stress tests alone or in combination with low intensity exercise as preparation for MPS in regard to incidence of adverse effects, quality of diagnostic image and the acquisition initial time.

METHODS

A total of 2 205 patients underwent pharmacological stress tests. Pharmacological stress test with adenosine was applied in 493 patients. In 405 of them we performed concomitant low level exercise (50 W) by bicycle ergometar (AdenoEX). In 88 of them we performed adenosine abbreviated protocol (AdenoSCAN). In 1 526 patients we performed pharmacological stress test with dipyridamole. In 871 of them we performed concomitant low level exercise (50 W) by bicycle ergometar (DipyEX), and in 775 we used only dipyridamole protocol (DipySCAN). In 186 patients we used pharmacological stress test with dobutamine. We followed side effects of adenosine, dipyiridamole and dobutamine, compared results between protocols with concomitant low level exercise and vasodilatators only. We also compared image quality, and suggested time of acquisition after stress test.

RESULTS

We found numerous side effects especially with adenosine, but these effects were short-lived and not required active interventions. Benefit with concomitant exercise in booth AdenoEX and DipyEX included decreased side effects (AdenoEX vs AdenoSCAN 620% vs 87%, respectively, and DipyEX vs DipySCAN 37% vs 59%, respectively) improved safety and patients tolerance, improved target-to-background ratios because of less subdiaphragmal activity, and earlier acquisition time. Because of producing a lot of arrhythmias (in 49% of patients) dobutamin was considered a last choice for pharmacological stress testing.

CONCLUSION

Safety and efficacy of vasodilatators (adenosine, dipyridamole) pharmacological stress tests are good, but with concomitant exercise even better. The safety and efficacy of adenosin are better than those of dipyridamole. AdenoEX protocol provides good safety and patients tolerancy. In light of these benefits we recommend AdenoEX whenever possible. Dobutamine is the last pharmacological toll for MPS.