[Diagnosis and therapy of sepsis. Guidelines of the German Sepsis Society Inc. and the German Interdisciplinary Society for Intensive and Emergency Medicine]

A recent survey conducted by the publicly funded Competence Network Sepsis (SepNet) reveals that severe sepsis and/or septic shock occurs in 75,000 inhabitants (110 out of 100,000) and sepsis in 79,000 inhabitants (116 out of 100,000) in Germany annually. This illness is responsible for approximately 60,000 deaths and ranges as the third most frequent cause of death after acute myocardial infarction. Direct costs for the intensive care of patients with severe sepsis alone amount to approximately 1.77 billion euros, which means that about 30% of the budget in intensive care is used to treat severe sepsis. However, until now German guidelines for the diagnosis and therapy of severe sepsis did not exist. Therefore, the German Sepsis Society initiated the development of guidelines which are based on international recommendations by the International Sepsis Forum (ISF) and the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) and take into account the structure and organization of the German health care system. Priority was given to the following guideline topics: a) diagnosis, b) prevention, c) causative therapy, d) supportive therapy, e) adjunctive therapy. The guidelines development process was carefully planned and strictly adhered to the requirements of the Working Group of Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF).

Diagnosis of infection in sepsis: An evidence-based review

OBJECTIVE

In 2003, critical care and infectious disease experts representing 11 international organizations developed management guidelines for the diagnosis of infection in sepsis that would be of practical use for the bedside clinician, under the auspices of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign, an international effort to increase awareness and improve outcome in severe sepsis.

DESIGN

The process included a modified Delphi method, a consensus conference, several subsequent smaller meetings of subgroups and key individuals, teleconferences, and electronic-based discussion among subgroups and among the entire committee.

METHODS

The modified Delphi methodology used for grading recommendations built on a 2001 publication sponsored by the International Sepsis Forum. We undertook a systematic review of the literature graded along five levels to create recommendation grades from A to E, with A being the highest grade. Pediatric considerations to contrast adult and pediatric management are in the article by Parker et al. on p. S591.

CONCLUSIONS

Obtaining a precise bacteriological diagnosis before starting antibiotic therapy is, when possible, of paramount importance for the success of therapeutic strategy during sepsis. Two to three blood cultures should be performed, preferably from a peripheral vein, without interval between samples to avoid delaying therapy. A quantitative approach is preferred in most cases when possible, in particular for catheter-related infections and ventilator-associated pneumonia. Diagnosing community-acquired pneumonia is complex, and a diagnostic algorithm is proposed. Appropriate samples are indicated during soft tissue and intraabdominal infections, but cultures obtained through the drains are discouraged.

Performance of a hybrid central venous catheter utilized for both peripheral blood stem cell harvest and transplant support of patients undergoing autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

Patients undergoing autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSC) frequently require the sequential insertion of two central venous catheters, one for leukapheresis and one for transplant support. Hybrid catheters suitable for leukapheresis and long-term use have been increasingly used, but there is limited information regarding their performance and complication rate. The purpose of this study was to determine the performance of the Pheres-Flow hybrid catheter when utilized for both leukapheresis and transplant support, with particular emphasis on the incidence of infectious and occlusive complications. We prospectively analyzed the performance of 92 catheters in 82 consecutive patients who underwent autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation. Occlusion was the most frequent complication of this catheter with 29% of the patients experiencing difficulty drawing blood or infusing fluids. Infection was another frequent complication. Twenty-two percent of patients developed catheter-related bloodstream infections and 15 catheters had to be removed because of proven or suspected infection that did not respond to antibiotic therapy. Nevertheless, 77% of patients were able to complete leukapheresis and transplant support with only one catheter. We conclude that the utilization of the Pheres-Flow catheter for both leukapheresis and transplant support is feasible, but that new strategies need to be developed to decrease the incidence of occlusive and infectious complications of hybrid catheters.

Catheter manipulations and the risk of catheter-associated bloodstream infection in neonatal intensive care unit patients

A prospective cohort study was performed to evaluate the influence of catheter manipulations on catheter associated bloodstream infection (CABSI) in neonates. Neonates admitted between 1 November 1993 and 31 October 1994 at the neonatal intensive care unit of a university hospital were included in the study. Seventeen episodes of CABSI occurred in 357 central catheters over a period of 3470 catheter-days, with a cumulative incidence of 4.7/100 catheters and an incidence density of 4.9/1000 catheter-days. Patient and catheter-related risk factors independently associated with CABSI were: catheter hub colonization (odds ratio [OR] = 32.6, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 4.3-249), extremely low weight (</= 1000 gram) at time of catheter insertion (OR = 9.1, 95% CI = 1.9-42.2). Catheter manipulations independently associated with CABSI were disinfection of the catheter hub (OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.1-1.3), blood sampling (OR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.1-1.8), heparinization (OR = 0.9, 95% CI = 0.8-1.0) and antisepsis of exit site (OR = 0.9, 95% CI = 0.8-1.0). This study indicates that certain manipulations (e.g. blood sampling through the central line) and disconnection of the central venous catheter, which necessitates disinfection of the catheter hub, increase the risk of CABSI, while other procedures (e.g. heparinization and exit site antisepsis), protect against CABSI in neonates.

Risk factors for central vascular catheter-associated bloodstream infections among patients in a neonatal intensive care unit

The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for catheter-associated bloodstream infection (CABSI) in neonates. We undertook a prospective investigation of the potential risk factors for CABSI (patient-related, treatment-related and catheter-related) in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) using univariate and multivariate techniques. We also investigated the relationship between catheter hub and catheter exit site colonization with CABSI.Thirty-five episodes of CABSI occurred in 862 central catheters over a period of 8028 catheter-days, with a cumulative incidence of 4.1/100 catheters and an incidence density of 4.4/1000 catheter days. Factors independently associated with CABSI were: catheter hub colonization (odds ratio [OR] = 44.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 14.5 to 134.4), exit site colonization (OR = 14.4, CI = 4.8 to 42.6), extremely low weight (< 1000 g) at time of catheter insertion (OR = 5.13, CI = 2.1 to 12.5), duration of parenteral nutrition (OR=1.04, CI=1.0 to 1.08) and catheter insertion after first week of life (OR = 2.7, CI = 1.1 to 6.7). In 15 (43%) out of the 35 CABSI episodes the catheter hub was colonized, in nine (26%) cases the catheter exit site was colonized and in three (9%) cases colonization was found at both sites. This prospective cohort study on CABSI in a NICU identified five risk factors of which two can be used for risk-stratified incidence density description (birthweight and time of catheter insertion). It also emphasized the importance of catheter exit site, hub colonization and exposure to parenteral nutrition in the pathogenesis of CABSI.

Nonrespiratory Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection at a children's hospital

To describe Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection in children, we reviewed the medical records of patients with isolates from nonrespiratory sites and identified 85 episodes, 51 (60%) of which represented true infection. Forty-two episodes (82.4%) were hospital acquired. Commonly associated with S. maltophilia infection were underlying illness (in 90.2% of cases), previous hospitalizations (in 78.7%), previous antibiotic exposure (in 78.4%), and the presence of a central venous catheter (in 76.5%). Polymicrobial isolates were obtained in 70.6% of episodes; Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species were the most common coisolates. Bloodstream infection was the most frequent clinical syndrome (32 [63%] of 51 episodes). Fever or sepsis occurred in 22 (69%) and shock in 10 (31%) of 32 episodes. Infection at other sites was less severe. The most active antibiotics in vitro were trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and ticarcillin-clavulanate. The overall and attributable mortality rates were 12.5% and 6.3%, respectively. S. maltophilia appears to be an important cause of nosocomially acquired bacteremia in children. The significance in children of isolation from other sites is less clear.

Epidemiology of bloodstream infections at a cancer center

CONTEXT

Cancer patients are at unusually high risk for developing bloodstream infections (BSI), which are a major cause of in-hospital morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the epidemiological characteristics and the etiology of BSI in cancer patients.

DESIGN

Descriptive study.

SETTING

Terciary Oncology Care Center.

PARTICIPANTS

During a 24-month period all hospitalized patients with clinically significant BSI were evaluated in relation to several clinical and demographic factors.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 435 episodes of BSI (349 patients). The majority of the episodes occurred among non-neutropenic patients (58.6%) and in those younger than 40 years (58.2%). There was a higher occurrence of unimicrobial infections (74.9%), nosocomial episodes (68.3%) and of those of undetermined origin (52.8%). Central venous catheters (CVC) were present in 63.2% of the episodes. Overall, the commonest isolates from blood in patients with hematology diseases and solid tumors were staphylococci (32% and 34.7%, respectively). There were 70 episodes of fungemia with a predominance of Candida albicans organisms (50.6%). Fungi were identified in 52.5% of persistent BSI and in 91.4% of patients with CVC. Gram-negative bacilli prompted the CVC removal in 45.5% of the episodes. Oxacillin resistance was detected in 26.3% of Staphylococcus aureus isolates and in 61.8% of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci were not observed. Initial empirical antimicrobial therapy was considered appropriate in 60.5% of the cases.

CONCLUSION

The identification of the microbiology profile of BSI and the recognition of possible risk factors in high-risk cancer patients may help in planning and conducting more effective infection control and preventive measures, and may also allow further analytical studies for reducing severe infectious complications in such groups of patients.