Population and community ecology: past progress and future directions

Population and community ecology as a science are about 100 years old, and we discuss here our opinion of what approaches have progressed well and which point to possible future directions. The three major threads within population and community ecology are theoretical ecology, statistical tests and models, and experimental ecology. We suggest that our major objective is to understand what factors determine the distribution and abundance of organisms within populations and communities, and we evaluate these threads against this major objective. Theoretical ecology is elegant and compelling and has laid the groundwork for achieving our overall objectives with useful simple models. Statistics and statistical models have contributed informative methods to analyze quantitatively our understanding of distribution and abundance for future research. Population ecology is difficult to carry out in the field, even though we may have all the statistical methods and models needed to achieve results. Community ecology is growing rapidly with much description but less understanding of why changes occur. Biodiversity science cuts across all these subdivisions but rarely digs into the necessary population and community science that might solve conservation problems. Climate change affects all aspects of ecology but to assume that everything in population and community ecology is driven by climate change is oversimplified. We make recommendations on how to advance the field with advice for present and future generations of population and community ecologists.

Food supplementation experiments revisited: verifying that supplemental food is used by its intended recipients

Field-based food supplementation experiments can determine whether populations are limited by natural food availability. However, they may yield spurious results if added food is hoarded by dominants, exploited by immigrants, or delivered ineffectively. Surprisingly, population-level approaches accounting for these potential sources of bias have not been established. We explored responses of free-ranging snowshoe hares ( Lepus americanus Erxleben, 1777) to food supplementation by contrasting per capita browsing rates on three study sites with added food with those on three control sites during two winters. Food augmentation reduced foraging pressure by hares; this reduction was significant when browse species of high dietary importance were considered. By implication, hares on manipulated sites switched from favored natural foods to supplemental food, meaning that the extra food found its mark and was not heavily exploited by immigrants or hoarded by dominants. Demographic responses to food addition were not detected on the manipulated sites, indicating that the study population was not food limited. Given the success with which we detected the signal of supplementation and eliminated potential confounding factors, we suggest that future studies using food addition in the context of herbivore population dynamics would benefit from a more mechanistic approach; this may involve measurement of browsing rates on manipulated and control sites.