A MT1-MMP/NF-kappaB signaling axis as a checkpoint controller of COX-2 expression in CD133+ U87 glioblastoma cells

Background

The CD133(+) stem cell population in recurrent gliomas is associated with clinical features such as therapy resistance, blood-brain barrier disruption and, hence, tumor infiltration. Screening of a large panel of glioma samples increasing histological grade demonstrated frequencies of CD133(+) cells which correlated with high expression of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 and of membrane type-1 matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP).

Methods

We used qRT-PCR and immunoblotting to examine the molecular interplay between MT1-MMP and COX-2 gene and protein expression in parental, CD133(+), and neurospheres U87 glioma cell cultures.

Results

We found that CD133, COX-2 and MT1-MMP expression were enhanced when glioma cells were cultured in neurosphere conditions. A CD133(+)-enriched U87 glioma cell population, isolated from parental U87 cells with magnetic cell sorting technology, also grew as neurospheres and showed enhanced COX-2 expression. MT1-MMP gene silencing antagonized COX-2 expression in neurospheres, while overexpression of recombinant MT1-MMP directly triggered COX-2 expression in U87 cells independent from MT1-MMP's catalytic function. COX-2 induction by MT1-MMP was also validated in wild-type and in NF-κB p65^-/- mutant mouse embryonic fibroblasts, but was abrogated in NF-κB1 (p50^-/-) mutant cells.

Conclusion

We provide evidence for enhanced COX-2 expression in CD133(+) glioma cells, and direct cell-based evidence of NF-κB-mediated COX-2 regulation by MT1-MMP. The biological significance of such checkpoint control may account for COX-2-dependent mechanisms of inflammatory balance responsible of therapy resistance phenotype of cancer stem cells.

Cyclooxygenase in the treatment of glioma: its complex role in signal transduction

BACKGROUND

High-grade glioma remains one of the most difficult cancers to treat. Recent studies in oncology have identified a role of the ubiquitous enzyme, cyclooxygenase (Cox), especially cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in cell proliferation, and its inhibition in cancer control, apoptosis, as well as synergy with other forms of therapy. The inhibitors of the Cox enzyme are well known as members of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) class of pharmaceuticals.

METHODS

In vitro and in vivo studies of different cancers expressing COX-2, including glioma studies, along with the few clinical trials that have been reported are reviewed to specifically identify the actions of these agents.

RESULTS

The anticancer effect of the COX-2 inhibitors may occur irrelevant of COX-2 expression, and it appears to be drug-specific, as well as dose-specific in different cancers. In combination with chemotherapeutic agents, the COX-2 inhibitors may have an additive, synergistic, or inhibitory effect on tumor growth.

CONCLUSIONS

As evaluations of this class of drugs begin in glioma, in vitro and in vivo data should be acquired to accurately predict which compounds will have an effect in controlling tumor growth and at which doses these should be used. The actual expression and inhibition of COX-2 may not always be relevant to the effects on tumor growth.

Cyclo-oxygenase-2 and its inhibition in cancer: is there a role?

Despite recent improvements in chemotherapy and radiation therapy in cancer management with the addition of biological agents, novel treatment approaches are needed to further benefit patients. Cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 inhibition represents one such possibility. COX-2 is an enzyme induced in pathological states such as inflammatory disorders and cancer, where it mediates production of prostanoids. The enzyme is commonly expressed in both premalignant lesions and malignant tumours of different types. A growing body of evidence suggests an association of COX-2 with tumour development, aggressive biological tumour behaviour, resistance to standard cancer treatment, and adverse patient outcome. COX-2 may be related to cancer development and propagation through multiple mechanisms, including stimulation of growth, migration, invasiveness, resistance to apoptosis, suppression of the immunosurveillance system, and enhancement of angiogenesis. Epidemiological data suggest that NSAIDs and selective COX-2 inhibitors might prevent the development of cancers, including colorectal, oesophageal and lung cancer. Preclinical investigations have demonstrated that inhibition of this enzyme with selective COX-2 inhibitors enhances tumour response to radiation and chemotherapeutic agents. These preclinical findings have been rapidly advanced to clinical oncology. Clinical trials of the combination of selective COX-2 inhibitors with radiotherapy, chemotherapy or both in patients with a number of cancers have been initiated, and preliminary results are encouraging. This review discusses the role of COX-2, its products (prostaglandins) and its inhibitors in tumour growth and treatment.

Radiosensitizing potential of the selective cyclooygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor meloxicam on human glioma cells

The COX-2 protein is frequently overexpressed in human malignant gliomas. This expression has been associated with their aggressive growth characteristics and poor prognosis for patients. Targeting the COX-2 pathway might improve glioma therapy. In this study, the effects of the selective COX-2 inhibitor meloxicam alone and in combination with irradiation were investigated on human glioma cells in vitro. A panel of three glioma cell lines (D384, U87 and U251) was used in the experiments from which U87 cells expressed constitutive COX-2. The response to meloxicam and irradiation (dose-range of 0-6 Gy) was determined by the clonogenic assay, cell proliferation was evaluated by growth analysis and cell cycle distribution by FACS. 24-72 h exposure to 250-750 microM meloxicam resulted in a time and dose dependent growth inhibition with an almost complete inhibition after 24 h for all cell lines. Exposure to 750 microM meloxicam for 24 h increased the fraction of cells in the radiosensitive G(2)/M cell cycle phase in D384 (18-27%) and U251 (17-41%) cells. 750 microM meloxicam resulted in radiosensitization of D384 (DMF:2.19) and U87 (DMF:1.25) cells, but not U251 cells (DMF:1.08). The selective COX-2 inhibitor meloxicam exerted COX-2 independent growth inhibition and radiosensitization of human glioma cells.

Radiosensitivity enhancement by celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 selective inhibitor, via COX-2-dependent cell cycle regulation on human cancer cells expressing differential COX-2 levels

To characterize the radiation-enhancing effects on human cancer cells and underlying mechanisms of celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 selective inhibitor, and to ascertain whether its effects are COX-2 dependent. Clonogenic cytotoxicity assays and radiation survival assays after treatment with celecoxib +/- radiation were done on four human cancer cell lines that expressed differential COX-2 levels. Stably COX-2 knocked down or overexpressed cell lines were developed, and clonogenic assays, apoptosis assays, or cell cycle change measurements were conducted after treatment with celecoxib +/- radiation. Prostaglandin E(2) (PGE2) was applied to medium after treatment with celecoxib +/- radiation to determine whether the radiation-enhancing effect associated with celecoxib results from reduced generation of prostaglandin. Celecoxib's radiation-enhancing effect was observed in COX-2-expressing A549 and NCI-H460 cells but was not observed in the COX-2 nonexpressing MCF-7 and HCT-116 cells. Celecoxib's radiation-enhancing effects in A549 cells were shown to disappear after the administration of COX-2 knocked down. In contrast, the HCT-116 cells were radiosensitized by celecoxib after being transfected with COX-2 expression vector. The addition of PGE2 after treatment with celecoxib +/- radiation had no significant effects on celecoxib's radiation-enhancing effects in A549 and COX-2 transfected HCT-116 cells. Radiation-induced G2-M arrest was enhanced and sustained in the COX-2-overexpressing cells compared with that seen in COX-2 low-expressing cells. Celecoxib or NS-398 effected no changes or attenuated radiation-induced G(2)-M arrest in the COX-2-overexpressing cells but further enhanced the radiation-induced G(2)-M arrest in the COX-2 low-expressing cells. Celecoxib's radiation-enhancing effects seem to occur in a COX-2 expression-dependent manner in the cancer cells. This effect does not seem to be the result of reduced PGE2 generation. Celecoxib may exert an inhibitory effect on enhanced radiation-induced G2-M arrest in the COX-2-overexpressing cells, which may allow the arrested cells to enter mitosis and die after radiation, but may also further enhance radiation-induced G2-M arrest in the COX-2 low-expressing cells, by virtue of another mechanism.

Synergy between celecoxib and radiotherapy results from inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2-derived prostaglandin E2, a survival factor for tumor and associated vasculature

Previous work has demonstrated that selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors can act synergistically with radiotherapy to improve tumor debulking and control in preclinical models. The underlying mechanism of this remarkable activity has not yet been determined. Here, we report that radiation can elevate intratumoral levels of COX-2 protein and its products, particularly prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)). Furthermore, inhibition of COX-2 activity or neutralization of PGE(2) activity enhances radiotherapy even in tumors where COX-2 expression is restricted to the tumor neovasculature. Direct assessment of vascular function by direct contrast enhancement-magnetic resonance imaging showed that the combination of radiation and celecoxib lead to enhanced vascular permeability. These observations suggest that an important mechanism of celecoxib-induced radiosensitization involves inhibition of COX-2-derived PGE(2), thus removing a survival factor for the tumor and its vasculature.

COX-2 inhibitors as radiosensitizing agents for cancer therapy

Prostaglandins have long been known to impact the radiosensitivity of cells and tissues, and many studies have centered on exploiting nonspecific prostaglandin inhibitors such as NSAIDs for therapeutic gain. These studies have ultimately been unsuccessful due to the lack of targeted specificity against the tumor. The discovery of the inducible cyclooxygenase enzyme (COX-2) and development of some highly selective inhibitors (which spare the constitutive COX-1 activity) has renewed excitement for modulating tumor prostaglandins as a method of specific radiosensitization of tumors, while sparing normal tissues. This review discusses these new data and generates a rationale for use of COX-2 inhibitors as radiosensitizing agents in cancer therapy.

Role of Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors in Combination with Radiation Therapy in Lung Cancer

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is an enzyme involved in prostaglandin production in pathologic states such as inflammatory disorders and cancer. The enzyme is often overexpressed in premalignant lesions and cancer of the lung. Overexpression of COX-2 in lung cancer is associated with more aggressive biological tumor behavior and adverse patient outcome. In preclinical studies, inhibition of this enzyme with selective COX-2 inhibitors enhances tumor response to radiation and chemotherapeutic agents. These findings have been rapidly advanced to clinical oncology. Clinical trials of the combination of selective COX-2 inhibitors with radiation therapy, chemotherapy, or both in patients with lung cancer have been initiated and some preliminary results are available. In this review, we describe the relationship between overexpression of COX-2 and lung cancer, the antitumor effect of selective COX-2 inhibitors, discuss the rationale for using selective COX-2 inhibitors combined with radiation therapy and chemotherapy, and summarize current clinical protocols and initial findings.

Correction of radioresistant DNA synthesis in ataxia telangiectasia fibroblasts by prostaglandin E2 treatment

Cultured cells from patients inheriting the rare cancer-prone and radiotherapy-sensitive disorder ataxia telangiectasia (AT) exhibit defects in the activation of cell-cycle checkpoints after exposure to ionizing radiation. In particular, the failure of AT cells to arrest transiently the DNA de novo replication machinery immediately after irradiation--so-called radioresistant DNA synthesis (RDS)--is often taken as a molecular hallmark of the disease. Recently we reported that: (i) the radiation-responsive S-phase checkpoint operating in normal human cells is mediated by a signal transduction pathway involving Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII); and (ii) the RDS phenotype of AT cells is associated with failure to mobilize Ca2+ from intracellular stores, which is required for activation of the CaMKII-dependent S-phase arrest. In the present study, we demonstrate that the RDS phenotype of AT dermal fibroblasts can be rectified in the absence of ectopic expression of functional ATM, the 350-kDa protein kinase encoded by the gene mutated in AT. Correction of RDS was observed when AT fibroblasts were coincubated with normal fibroblasts under conditions in which the 2 different cell cultures shared the same medium but were completely separated physically. The RDS trait was also rectified when AT fibroblasts were briefly incubated with prostaglandin E2 in the absence of normal feeder cells, signifying that this ubiquitous eicosanoid can serve as the diffusible "RDS-correction factor" for AT cells in the aforementioned cocultivation studies. It would therefore appear that prostaglandin E2 can assume the role of an extracellular signaling modulator of the S-phase checkpoint in AT cells exposed to ionizing radiation, inducing DNA synthesis shutdown via an alternative, ATM-independent signal transduction pathway.

Efficacy and toxicity of radiation in preparative regimens for pediatric stem cell transplantation. I: Clinical applications and therapeutic effects

Here, we review the role of total body irradiation in the treatment of children with bone marrow transplantation, as well as alternative sources of stem cells. We were unable to demonstrate any clear superiority of TBI-containing preparative regimens, but we were able to find a few definitive reports of significantly enhanced toxicity or important variations in control of the underlying primary diseases, in comparing TBI-based regimens, with those containing only chemotherapy.