Update on the Diagnosis and Management of Popliteal Aneurysm and Literature Review

Ruptured popliteal artery aneurysms

Background

Rupture is a recognised complication of ruptured popliteal artery aneurysms that requires emergency intervention. There is little evidence collating the presentation, intervention and outcomes of ruptured popliteal artery aneurysms.

Objective

The primary aim of this study was to deduce the sequelae following different management modalities of ruptured popliteal artery aneurysm.

Methods

We performed a systematic review of all available cases reports of ruptured popliteal artery aneurysms in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocol.

Results

We identified 48 cases taken from 35 case reports and series. Men were more commonly affected ( n = 96%), and mean age was 71 years. Acute limb ischemia was the commonest presentation (32%) whilst incidental deep vein thrombosis was found in 43% of patients. The mean aneurysm size was 8.2 cm (range, 2.7 to 13.3 cm). Management consisted of open surgery (58%), endovascular treatment (25%) and ‘other’ treatment (evacuation of haematoma, ligation of aneurysm, amputation or palliation) (17%). The perioperative mortality rate in the whole cohort was 13%. Perioperative mortality was similar between comparing the open and endovascular surgery groups. Re-intervention rate amongst endovascular patients was 25% over an average follow-up period of 14 months. There was one re-intervention in the re-constructive group (3%) over a follow-up period of 17 months and none in the ‘other’ group.

Conclusion

Popliteal artery aneurysm rupture is a serious complication associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Open surgical reconstruction and endovascular repair are both feasible for the treatment of ruptured popliteal artery aneurysms; however, open surgery is less likely to require further re-intervention.

Tratamento endovascular versus tratamento aberto de aneurisma de artéria poplítea: artigo de revisão

Resumo O tratamento convencional do aneurisma da artéria poplítea é a cirurgia aberta de exclusão do aneurisma e revascularização do membro acometido. Nos últimos anos, o tratamento endovascular vem ganhando popularidade e interesse. O tratamento endovascular é menos invasivo e de menor morbidade; porém, é de alto custo e sua perviedade é incerta. O objetivo desta revisão é comparar os dois tratamentos através da análise de desfechos abordados em estudos primários e secundários. Realizou-se uma revisão narrativa da literatura publicada nos últimos 5 anos. Foram selecionados seis estudos retrospectivos, duas metanálises, um ensaio clínico e uma revisão sistemática Cochrane. Número limitado de pacientes e curto período de seguimento não nos permitem extrair conclusões consistentes. Não há evidência clara que sugere melhores resultados entre um ou outro tratamento eletivo. Novos ensaios randomizados devem ser realizados para determinar o papel do tratamento endovascular desse aneurisma.

Endovascular Treatment of Chronic Occluded Popliteal Artery Aneurysm

Critical limb ischemia may be the consequence of chronic occlusion of an aneurysm of popliteal artery. Endovascular repairs have the potential to be less invasive than open surgery and to allow the treatment, during the same procedure, of occlusive infrapopliteal diseases achieving a better distal outflow. Eleven patients with occluded popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA) underwent an endovascular repair of PAA using a new technique, by positioning of a Viabahn graft inside a bare nitinol stent, deployed at the level of aneurysm with the intent to avoid distal embolization and to assure an external scaffold for the Viabahn graft. Immediate success rate was 100%. A peroneal artery embolization occurred in 1 patient (9%) and was successfully treated by stent implantation. Four (36.4%) patients needed a below-the-knee revascularization to achieve at least 1 vessel line to the foot. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 2.6 days. At 24-month follow-up, primary patency, target lesion revascularization, and major amputation rates were 82%, 9%, and 0%, respectively. All patients are still alive at last follow-up visit. The endovascular repair with the combined use of a bare metal stent and Viabahn graft resulted in a low incidence of distal embolization and major amputation rate, with an excellent 24-month patency rate, and may offer a safe alternative to open surgery for the treatment of occluded PAAs.